Message ID | 20120912174706.GE9269@linux.vnet.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted, archived |
Commit | be812195d8ac536a62cb1eb5c29b5f2fefefb621 |
Delegated to: | Benjamin Herrenschmidt |
Headers | show |
Hi, On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:47:07 -0700 Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > Anticipating growth in coming years, we should ensure we are getting a > good lead on testing. Most changes to pseries_defconfig are copied into ppc64_defconfig. Should this one be as well?
Hi Stephen, On 13.09.2012 [22:37:39 +1000], Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:47:07 -0700 Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > Anticipating growth in coming years, we should ensure we are getting > > a good lead on testing. > > Most changes to pseries_defconfig are copied into ppc64_defconfig. > Should this one be as well? Ah, I didn't realize that was the case, sorry. Yes, it probably does make sense to do this change. Should I just send a follow-on patch? Thanks, Nish
On 13.09.2012 [11:00:11 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > On 13.09.2012 [22:37:39 +1000], Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:47:07 -0700 Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > > > Anticipating growth in coming years, we should ensure we are getting > > > a good lead on testing. > > > > Most changes to pseries_defconfig are copied into ppc64_defconfig. > > Should this one be as well? > > Ah, I didn't realize that was the case, sorry. Yes, it probably does > make sense to do this change. Should I just send a follow-on patch? Actually, ppc64_defconfig doesn't currently define CONFIG_NR_CPUS. NR_CPUS' powerpc Kconfig allows 2-8192 already, so given the current state, I'm not sure any further patch is necessary? Thanks, Nish
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/configs/pseries_defconfig b/arch/powerpc/configs/pseries_defconfig index 1f65b3c..a0e0e53 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/configs/pseries_defconfig +++ b/arch/powerpc/configs/pseries_defconfig @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ CONFIG_PPC64=y CONFIG_ALTIVEC=y CONFIG_VSX=y CONFIG_SMP=y -CONFIG_NR_CPUS=1024 +CONFIG_NR_CPUS=2048 CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL=y CONFIG_SYSVIPC=y CONFIG_POSIX_MQUEUE=y
Anticipating growth in coming years, we should ensure we are getting a good lead on testing. Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>