Message ID | 1329314253-4596-4-git-send-email-aneesh@ti.com |
---|---|
State | Deferred |
Delegated to: | Tom Rini |
Headers | show |
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/config.mk b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/config.mk index 83ddf10..b66fb6f 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/config.mk +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/config.mk @@ -22,8 +22,9 @@ # PLATFORM_RELFLAGS += -fno-common -ffixed-r8 -msoft-float -# Make ARMv5 to allow more compilers to work, even though its v7a. -PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS += -march=armv5 +# If armv7-a is not supported by GCC fall-back to armv5, which is +# supported by more tool-chains +PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -march=armv7-a, -march=armv5) # ========================================================================= # # Supply options according to compiler version
Enable -march=armv7-a for armv7 platforms if the tool-chain supports it. This in turn results in Thumb-2 code generated for these platforms if CONFIG_SYS_THUMB_BUILD is enabled. Signed-off-by: Aneesh V <aneesh@ti.com> --- I believe armv7-a is fine for all the SoCs except Tegra2 and I see that Tegra2 is already making the necessary exception in .../armv7/tegra2/config.mk Let me know if any other SoC has a problem with armv7-a Changes from RFC to V1: - Enabled armv7-a from armv7/config.mk instead of from omap config.mk files --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/config.mk | 5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)