Message ID | 20200316160724.37596-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | Peter Rosin |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2,1/4] i2c: mux: pca954x: Refactor pca954x_irq_handler() | expand |
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 06:07:21PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Refactor pca954x_irq_handler() to: > - use for_each_set_bit() macro > - use IRQ_RETVAL() macro > > Above change makes code easy to read and understand. Peter, does this series good in your opinion? > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> > --- > v2: masked pending to prevent handling of spurious IRQs (Peter) > drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c | 17 +++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c > index a0d926ae3f86..b764c7c746e9 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c > @@ -327,21 +327,18 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(idle_state); > static irqreturn_t pca954x_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) > { > struct pca954x *data = dev_id; > - unsigned int child_irq; > - int ret, i, handled = 0; > + unsigned long pending; > + int ret, i; > > ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte(data->client); > if (ret < 0) > return IRQ_NONE; > > - for (i = 0; i < data->chip->nchans; i++) { > - if (ret & BIT(PCA954X_IRQ_OFFSET + i)) { > - child_irq = irq_linear_revmap(data->irq, i); > - handle_nested_irq(child_irq); > - handled++; > - } > - } > - return handled ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE; > + pending = (ret >> PCA954X_IRQ_OFFSET) & (BIT(data->chip->nchans) - 1); > + for_each_set_bit(i, &pending, data->chip->nchans) > + handle_nested_irq(irq_linear_revmap(data->irq, i)); > + > + return IRQ_RETVAL(pending); > } > > static int pca954x_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *idata, unsigned int type) > -- > 2.25.1 >
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 11:43:16PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 06:07:21PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > Refactor pca954x_irq_handler() to: > > - use for_each_set_bit() macro > > - use IRQ_RETVAL() macro > > > > Above change makes code easy to read and understand. > > Peter, does this series good in your opinion? Peter, Wolfram, this missed previous cycle, any work needs to be done? > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> > > --- > > v2: masked pending to prevent handling of spurious IRQs (Peter) > > drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c | 17 +++++++---------- > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c > > index a0d926ae3f86..b764c7c746e9 100644 > > --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c > > +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c > > @@ -327,21 +327,18 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(idle_state); > > static irqreturn_t pca954x_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) > > { > > struct pca954x *data = dev_id; > > - unsigned int child_irq; > > - int ret, i, handled = 0; > > + unsigned long pending; > > + int ret, i; > > > > ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte(data->client); > > if (ret < 0) > > return IRQ_NONE; > > > > - for (i = 0; i < data->chip->nchans; i++) { > > - if (ret & BIT(PCA954X_IRQ_OFFSET + i)) { > > - child_irq = irq_linear_revmap(data->irq, i); > > - handle_nested_irq(child_irq); > > - handled++; > > - } > > - } > > - return handled ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE; > > + pending = (ret >> PCA954X_IRQ_OFFSET) & (BIT(data->chip->nchans) - 1); > > + for_each_set_bit(i, &pending, data->chip->nchans) > > + handle_nested_irq(irq_linear_revmap(data->irq, i)); > > + > > + return IRQ_RETVAL(pending); > > } > > > > static int pca954x_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *idata, unsigned int type) > > -- > > 2.25.1 > > > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko > >
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c index a0d926ae3f86..b764c7c746e9 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c @@ -327,21 +327,18 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(idle_state); static irqreturn_t pca954x_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) { struct pca954x *data = dev_id; - unsigned int child_irq; - int ret, i, handled = 0; + unsigned long pending; + int ret, i; ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte(data->client); if (ret < 0) return IRQ_NONE; - for (i = 0; i < data->chip->nchans; i++) { - if (ret & BIT(PCA954X_IRQ_OFFSET + i)) { - child_irq = irq_linear_revmap(data->irq, i); - handle_nested_irq(child_irq); - handled++; - } - } - return handled ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE; + pending = (ret >> PCA954X_IRQ_OFFSET) & (BIT(data->chip->nchans) - 1); + for_each_set_bit(i, &pending, data->chip->nchans) + handle_nested_irq(irq_linear_revmap(data->irq, i)); + + return IRQ_RETVAL(pending); } static int pca954x_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *idata, unsigned int type)
Refactor pca954x_irq_handler() to: - use for_each_set_bit() macro - use IRQ_RETVAL() macro Above change makes code easy to read and understand. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> --- v2: masked pending to prevent handling of spurious IRQs (Peter) drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c | 17 +++++++---------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)