diff mbox series

[U-Boot,v2,1/5] efi_loader: bootmgr: support BootNext and BootCurrent variable behavior

Message ID 20190115025437.11966-2-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org
State Superseded, archived
Delegated to: Heinrich Schuchardt
Headers show
Series efi_loader: run a specific efi application more easily | expand

Commit Message

AKASHI Takahiro Jan. 15, 2019, 2:54 a.m. UTC
See UEFI v2.7, section 3.1.2 for details of the specification.

With my efitool command, you can try as the following:
  => efi boot add 1 SHELL ...
  => efi boot add 2 HELLO ...
  => efi boot order 1 2
  => efi bootmgr
     (starting SHELL ...)
  => efi boot next 2
  => efi bootmgr
     (starting HELLO ...)
  => efi dumpvar
  <snip ...>
  BootCurrent: {boot,run}(blob)
  00000000:  02 00                    ..
  BootOrder: {boot,run}(blob)
  00000000:  01 00 02 00              ....

Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
---
 lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Heinrich Schuchardt Feb. 26, 2019, 6:57 p.m. UTC | #1
On 1/15/19 3:54 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> See UEFI v2.7, section 3.1.2 for details of the specification.
> 
> With my efitool command, you can try as the following:
>   => efi boot add 1 SHELL ...
>   => efi boot add 2 HELLO ...
>   => efi boot order 1 2
>   => efi bootmgr
>      (starting SHELL ...)
>   => efi boot next 2
>   => efi bootmgr
>      (starting HELLO ...)
>   => efi dumpvar
>   <snip ...>
>   BootCurrent: {boot,run}(blob)
>   00000000:  02 00                    ..
>   BootOrder: {boot,run}(blob)
>   00000000:  01 00 02 00              ....
> 
> Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
> ---
>  lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c
> index a095df3f540b..6c5303736dc6 100644
> --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c
> +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c
> @@ -145,11 +145,21 @@ static void *try_load_entry(uint16_t n, struct efi_device_path **device_path,
>  	efi_deserialize_load_option(&lo, load_option);
>  
>  	if (lo.attributes & LOAD_OPTION_ACTIVE) {
> +		u32 attributes;
>  		efi_status_t ret;
>  
>  		debug("%s: trying to load \"%ls\" from %pD\n",
>  		      __func__, lo.label, lo.file_path);
>  
> +		attributes = EFI_VARIABLE_BOOTSERVICE_ACCESS |
> +			     EFI_VARIABLE_RUNTIME_ACCESS;
> +		size = sizeof(n);
> +		ret = rs->set_variable(L"BootCurrent",
> +				       (efi_guid_t *)&efi_global_variable_guid,

Use EFI_CALL(). Instead of dereferencing you could directly call
efi_set_variable().

> +				       attributes, size, &n);
> +		if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
> +			goto error;
> +
>  		ret = efi_load_image_from_path(lo.file_path, &image);
>  
>  		if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
> @@ -173,16 +183,38 @@ error:
>  void *efi_bootmgr_load(struct efi_device_path **device_path,
>  		       struct efi_device_path **file_path)
>  {
> -	uint16_t *bootorder;
> +	u16 bootnext, *bootorder;
>  	efi_uintn_t size;
>  	void *image = NULL;
>  	int i, num;
> +	efi_status_t ret;
>  
>  	__efi_entry_check();
>  
>  	bs = systab.boottime;
>  	rs = systab.runtime;
>  
> +	/* get BootNext */
> +	size = sizeof(bootnext);
> +	ret = rs->get_variable(L"BootNext",
> +			       (efi_guid_t *)&efi_global_variable_guid,
> +			       NULL, &size, &bootnext);

You could call efi_get_variable() directly instead of dereferencing rs.
But anyway you have to use EFI_CALL().

> +	if (!bootnext)
> +		goto run_list;

Goto is acceptable for error handling. But otherwise I would rather
avoid it.

> +
> +	/* delete BootNext */
> +	ret = rs->set_variable(L"BootNext",
> +			       (efi_guid_t *)&efi_global_variable_guid,
> +			       0, 0, &bootnext);

EFI_CALL().

Best regards

Heinrich

> +	if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
> +		goto error;
> +
> +	image = try_load_entry(bootnext, device_path, file_path);
> +	if (image)
> +		goto error;
> +
> +run_list:
> +	/* BootOrder */
>  	bootorder = get_var(L"BootOrder", &efi_global_variable_guid, &size);
>  	if (!bootorder)
>  		goto error;
>
AKASHI Takahiro Feb. 27, 2019, 5:47 a.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 07:57:26PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 1/15/19 3:54 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > See UEFI v2.7, section 3.1.2 for details of the specification.
> > 
> > With my efitool command, you can try as the following:
> >   => efi boot add 1 SHELL ...
> >   => efi boot add 2 HELLO ...
> >   => efi boot order 1 2
> >   => efi bootmgr
> >      (starting SHELL ...)
> >   => efi boot next 2
> >   => efi bootmgr
> >      (starting HELLO ...)
> >   => efi dumpvar
> >   <snip ...>
> >   BootCurrent: {boot,run}(blob)
> >   00000000:  02 00                    ..
> >   BootOrder: {boot,run}(blob)
> >   00000000:  01 00 02 00              ....
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c
> > index a095df3f540b..6c5303736dc6 100644
> > --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c
> > +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c
> > @@ -145,11 +145,21 @@ static void *try_load_entry(uint16_t n, struct efi_device_path **device_path,
> >  	efi_deserialize_load_option(&lo, load_option);
> >  
> >  	if (lo.attributes & LOAD_OPTION_ACTIVE) {
> > +		u32 attributes;
> >  		efi_status_t ret;
> >  
> >  		debug("%s: trying to load \"%ls\" from %pD\n",
> >  		      __func__, lo.label, lo.file_path);
> >  
> > +		attributes = EFI_VARIABLE_BOOTSERVICE_ACCESS |
> > +			     EFI_VARIABLE_RUNTIME_ACCESS;
> > +		size = sizeof(n);
> > +		ret = rs->set_variable(L"BootCurrent",
> > +				       (efi_guid_t *)&efi_global_variable_guid,
> 
> Use EFI_CALL().

Okay
But as I said somewhere else, it's quite annoying to me that
some efi_xxx requires EFI_CALL(), and others not.
There should have been consistent naming rules.

> Instead of dereferencing you could directly call
> efi_set_variable().

Yeah, given that this code is under lib/efi_loader, it may be natural
to use efi_set_variable(). But existing get_var() uses the same style of coding.

Do you want to change all of the call sites including get_var()?

> > +				       attributes, size, &n);
> > +		if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
> > +			goto error;
> > +
> >  		ret = efi_load_image_from_path(lo.file_path, &image);
> >  
> >  		if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
> > @@ -173,16 +183,38 @@ error:
> >  void *efi_bootmgr_load(struct efi_device_path **device_path,
> >  		       struct efi_device_path **file_path)
> >  {
> > -	uint16_t *bootorder;
> > +	u16 bootnext, *bootorder;
> >  	efi_uintn_t size;
> >  	void *image = NULL;
> >  	int i, num;
> > +	efi_status_t ret;
> >  
> >  	__efi_entry_check();
> >  
> >  	bs = systab.boottime;
> >  	rs = systab.runtime;
> >  
> > +	/* get BootNext */
> > +	size = sizeof(bootnext);
> > +	ret = rs->get_variable(L"BootNext",
> > +			       (efi_guid_t *)&efi_global_variable_guid,
> > +			       NULL, &size, &bootnext);
> 
> You could call efi_get_variable() directly instead of dereferencing rs.
> But anyway you have to use EFI_CALL().

Ditto

> > +	if (!bootnext)
> > +		goto run_list;
> 
> Goto is acceptable for error handling. But otherwise I would rather
> avoid it.

Okay with another indentation.

> > +
> > +	/* delete BootNext */
> > +	ret = rs->set_variable(L"BootNext",
> > +			       (efi_guid_t *)&efi_global_variable_guid,
> > +			       0, 0, &bootnext);
> 
> EFI_CALL().

Thanks,
-Takahiro Akashi

> Best regards
> 
> Heinrich
> 
> > +	if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
> > +		goto error;
> > +
> > +	image = try_load_entry(bootnext, device_path, file_path);
> > +	if (image)
> > +		goto error;
> > +
> > +run_list:
> > +	/* BootOrder */
> >  	bootorder = get_var(L"BootOrder", &efi_global_variable_guid, &size);
> >  	if (!bootorder)
> >  		goto error;
> > 
>
Heinrich Schuchardt Feb. 27, 2019, 6:14 a.m. UTC | #3
On 2/27/19 6:47 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 07:57:26PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>> On 1/15/19 3:54 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>>> See UEFI v2.7, section 3.1.2 for details of the specification.
>>>
>>> With my efitool command, you can try as the following:
>>>   => efi boot add 1 SHELL ...
>>>   => efi boot add 2 HELLO ...
>>>   => efi boot order 1 2
>>>   => efi bootmgr
>>>      (starting SHELL ...)
>>>   => efi boot next 2
>>>   => efi bootmgr
>>>      (starting HELLO ...)
>>>   => efi dumpvar
>>>   <snip ...>
>>>   BootCurrent: {boot,run}(blob)
>>>   00000000:  02 00                    ..
>>>   BootOrder: {boot,run}(blob)
>>>   00000000:  01 00 02 00              ....
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>>  lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c
>>> index a095df3f540b..6c5303736dc6 100644
>>> --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c
>>> +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c
>>> @@ -145,11 +145,21 @@ static void *try_load_entry(uint16_t n, struct efi_device_path **device_path,
>>>  	efi_deserialize_load_option(&lo, load_option);
>>>  
>>>  	if (lo.attributes & LOAD_OPTION_ACTIVE) {
>>> +		u32 attributes;
>>>  		efi_status_t ret;
>>>  
>>>  		debug("%s: trying to load \"%ls\" from %pD\n",
>>>  		      __func__, lo.label, lo.file_path);
>>>  
>>> +		attributes = EFI_VARIABLE_BOOTSERVICE_ACCESS |
>>> +			     EFI_VARIABLE_RUNTIME_ACCESS;
>>> +		size = sizeof(n);
>>> +		ret = rs->set_variable(L"BootCurrent",
>>> +				       (efi_guid_t *)&efi_global_variable_guid,
>>
>> Use EFI_CALL().
> 
> Okay
> But as I said somewhere else, it's quite annoying to me that
> some efi_xxx requires EFI_CALL(), and others not.
> There should have been consistent naming rules.

We started with having separate functions like efi_allocate_pages_ext()
and efi_allocate_pages(). Then Rob Clark came along and introduced
EFI_CALL() in a095aadffa96 and I stopped creating _ext() functions.

When running with DEBUG 1 it sometimes is helpful to see which function
is calling which other and where errors are originally reported.

But I am open to changes in this area.

> 
>> Instead of dereferencing you could directly call
>> efi_set_variable().
> 
> Yeah, given that this code is under lib/efi_loader, it may be natural
> to use efi_set_variable(). But existing get_var() uses the same style of coding.
> 
> Do you want to change all of the call sites including get_var()?

Calling efi_set_variable() directly uses less bytes of code than
rs->get_variable() which makes it preferable.

I have seen that iPXE modifies system->boottime to intercept system
calls. The same could be done by an EFI driver to the runtime vectors.

In the light of your work on secure boot I think we should not allow an
EFI driver to intercept the reading and changing of variables here.

We should also rethink it for efidebug.c

Best regards

Heinrich

> 
>>> +				       attributes, size, &n);
>>> +		if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
>>> +			goto error;
>>> +
>>>  		ret = efi_load_image_from_path(lo.file_path, &image);
>>>  
>>>  		if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
>>> @@ -173,16 +183,38 @@ error:
>>>  void *efi_bootmgr_load(struct efi_device_path **device_path,
>>>  		       struct efi_device_path **file_path)
>>>  {
>>> -	uint16_t *bootorder;
>>> +	u16 bootnext, *bootorder;
>>>  	efi_uintn_t size;
>>>  	void *image = NULL;
>>>  	int i, num;
>>> +	efi_status_t ret;
>>>  
>>>  	__efi_entry_check();
>>>  
>>>  	bs = systab.boottime;
>>>  	rs = systab.runtime;
>>>  
>>> +	/* get BootNext */
>>> +	size = sizeof(bootnext);
>>> +	ret = rs->get_variable(L"BootNext",
>>> +			       (efi_guid_t *)&efi_global_variable_guid,
>>> +			       NULL, &size, &bootnext);
>>
>> You could call efi_get_variable() directly instead of dereferencing rs.
>> But anyway you have to use EFI_CALL().
> 
> Ditto
> 
>>> +	if (!bootnext)
>>> +		goto run_list;
>>
>> Goto is acceptable for error handling. But otherwise I would rather
>> avoid it.
> 
> Okay with another indentation.
> 
>>> +
>>> +	/* delete BootNext */
>>> +	ret = rs->set_variable(L"BootNext",
>>> +			       (efi_guid_t *)&efi_global_variable_guid,
>>> +			       0, 0, &bootnext);
>>
>> EFI_CALL().
> 
> Thanks,
> -Takahiro Akashi
> 
>> Best regards
>>
>> Heinrich
>>
>>> +	if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
>>> +		goto error;
>>> +
>>> +	image = try_load_entry(bootnext, device_path, file_path);
>>> +	if (image)
>>> +		goto error;
>>> +
>>> +run_list:
>>> +	/* BootOrder */
>>>  	bootorder = get_var(L"BootOrder", &efi_global_variable_guid, &size);
>>>  	if (!bootorder)
>>>  		goto error;
>>>
>>
>
AKASHI Takahiro Feb. 27, 2019, 6:27 a.m. UTC | #4
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 07:14:10AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 2/27/19 6:47 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 07:57:26PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >> On 1/15/19 3:54 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> >>> See UEFI v2.7, section 3.1.2 for details of the specification.
> >>>
> >>> With my efitool command, you can try as the following:
> >>>   => efi boot add 1 SHELL ...
> >>>   => efi boot add 2 HELLO ...
> >>>   => efi boot order 1 2
> >>>   => efi bootmgr
> >>>      (starting SHELL ...)
> >>>   => efi boot next 2
> >>>   => efi bootmgr
> >>>      (starting HELLO ...)
> >>>   => efi dumpvar
> >>>   <snip ...>
> >>>   BootCurrent: {boot,run}(blob)
> >>>   00000000:  02 00                    ..
> >>>   BootOrder: {boot,run}(blob)
> >>>   00000000:  01 00 02 00              ....
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
> >>> ---
> >>>  lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c
> >>> index a095df3f540b..6c5303736dc6 100644
> >>> --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c
> >>> +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c
> >>> @@ -145,11 +145,21 @@ static void *try_load_entry(uint16_t n, struct efi_device_path **device_path,
> >>>  	efi_deserialize_load_option(&lo, load_option);
> >>>  
> >>>  	if (lo.attributes & LOAD_OPTION_ACTIVE) {
> >>> +		u32 attributes;
> >>>  		efi_status_t ret;
> >>>  
> >>>  		debug("%s: trying to load \"%ls\" from %pD\n",
> >>>  		      __func__, lo.label, lo.file_path);
> >>>  
> >>> +		attributes = EFI_VARIABLE_BOOTSERVICE_ACCESS |
> >>> +			     EFI_VARIABLE_RUNTIME_ACCESS;
> >>> +		size = sizeof(n);
> >>> +		ret = rs->set_variable(L"BootCurrent",
> >>> +				       (efi_guid_t *)&efi_global_variable_guid,
> >>
> >> Use EFI_CALL().
> > 
> > Okay
> > But as I said somewhere else, it's quite annoying to me that
> > some efi_xxx requires EFI_CALL(), and others not.
> > There should have been consistent naming rules.
> 
> We started with having separate functions like efi_allocate_pages_ext()
> and efi_allocate_pages(). Then Rob Clark came along and introduced
> EFI_CALL() in a095aadffa96 and I stopped creating _ext() functions.
> 
> When running with DEBUG 1 it sometimes is helpful to see which function
> is calling which other and where errors are originally reported.
> 
> But I am open to changes in this area.
> 
> > 
> >> Instead of dereferencing you could directly call
> >> efi_set_variable().
> > 
> > Yeah, given that this code is under lib/efi_loader, it may be natural
> > to use efi_set_variable(). But existing get_var() uses the same style of coding.
> > 
> > Do you want to change all of the call sites including get_var()?
> 
> Calling efi_set_variable() directly uses less bytes of code than
> rs->get_variable() which makes it preferable.

So is your answer yes, or no?

> I have seen that iPXE modifies system->boottime to intercept system
> calls. The same could be done by an EFI driver to the runtime vectors.
> 
> In the light of your work on secure boot I think we should not allow an
> EFI driver to intercept the reading and changing of variables here.
> 
> We should also rethink it for efidebug.c

I'm not sure about your concern here, but no doubt efidebug should
be disabled on production system with secure boot.

Thanks,
-Takahiro Akashi

> Best regards
> 
> Heinrich
> 
> > 
> >>> +				       attributes, size, &n);
> >>> +		if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
> >>> +			goto error;
> >>> +
> >>>  		ret = efi_load_image_from_path(lo.file_path, &image);
> >>>  
> >>>  		if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
> >>> @@ -173,16 +183,38 @@ error:
> >>>  void *efi_bootmgr_load(struct efi_device_path **device_path,
> >>>  		       struct efi_device_path **file_path)
> >>>  {
> >>> -	uint16_t *bootorder;
> >>> +	u16 bootnext, *bootorder;
> >>>  	efi_uintn_t size;
> >>>  	void *image = NULL;
> >>>  	int i, num;
> >>> +	efi_status_t ret;
> >>>  
> >>>  	__efi_entry_check();
> >>>  
> >>>  	bs = systab.boottime;
> >>>  	rs = systab.runtime;
> >>>  
> >>> +	/* get BootNext */
> >>> +	size = sizeof(bootnext);
> >>> +	ret = rs->get_variable(L"BootNext",
> >>> +			       (efi_guid_t *)&efi_global_variable_guid,
> >>> +			       NULL, &size, &bootnext);
> >>
> >> You could call efi_get_variable() directly instead of dereferencing rs.
> >> But anyway you have to use EFI_CALL().
> > 
> > Ditto
> > 
> >>> +	if (!bootnext)
> >>> +		goto run_list;
> >>
> >> Goto is acceptable for error handling. But otherwise I would rather
> >> avoid it.
> > 
> > Okay with another indentation.
> > 
> >>> +
> >>> +	/* delete BootNext */
> >>> +	ret = rs->set_variable(L"BootNext",
> >>> +			       (efi_guid_t *)&efi_global_variable_guid,
> >>> +			       0, 0, &bootnext);
> >>
> >> EFI_CALL().
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > -Takahiro Akashi
> > 
> >> Best regards
> >>
> >> Heinrich
> >>
> >>> +	if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
> >>> +		goto error;
> >>> +
> >>> +	image = try_load_entry(bootnext, device_path, file_path);
> >>> +	if (image)
> >>> +		goto error;
> >>> +
> >>> +run_list:
> >>> +	/* BootOrder */
> >>>  	bootorder = get_var(L"BootOrder", &efi_global_variable_guid, &size);
> >>>  	if (!bootorder)
> >>>  		goto error;
> >>>
> >>
> > 
>
Heinrich Schuchardt Feb. 27, 2019, 6:39 a.m. UTC | #5
On 2/27/19 7:27 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 07:14:10AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>> On 2/27/19 6:47 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 07:57:26PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>>> On 1/15/19 3:54 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>>>>> See UEFI v2.7, section 3.1.2 for details of the specification.
>>>>>
>>>>> With my efitool command, you can try as the following:
>>>>>   => efi boot add 1 SHELL ...
>>>>>   => efi boot add 2 HELLO ...
>>>>>   => efi boot order 1 2
>>>>>   => efi bootmgr
>>>>>      (starting SHELL ...)
>>>>>   => efi boot next 2
>>>>>   => efi bootmgr
>>>>>      (starting HELLO ...)
>>>>>   => efi dumpvar
>>>>>   <snip ...>
>>>>>   BootCurrent: {boot,run}(blob)
>>>>>   00000000:  02 00                    ..
>>>>>   BootOrder: {boot,run}(blob)
>>>>>   00000000:  01 00 02 00              ....
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c
>>>>> index a095df3f540b..6c5303736dc6 100644
>>>>> --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c
>>>>> +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c
>>>>> @@ -145,11 +145,21 @@ static void *try_load_entry(uint16_t n, struct efi_device_path **device_path,
>>>>>  	efi_deserialize_load_option(&lo, load_option);
>>>>>  
>>>>>  	if (lo.attributes & LOAD_OPTION_ACTIVE) {
>>>>> +		u32 attributes;
>>>>>  		efi_status_t ret;
>>>>>  
>>>>>  		debug("%s: trying to load \"%ls\" from %pD\n",
>>>>>  		      __func__, lo.label, lo.file_path);
>>>>>  
>>>>> +		attributes = EFI_VARIABLE_BOOTSERVICE_ACCESS |
>>>>> +			     EFI_VARIABLE_RUNTIME_ACCESS;
>>>>> +		size = sizeof(n);
>>>>> +		ret = rs->set_variable(L"BootCurrent",
>>>>> +				       (efi_guid_t *)&efi_global_variable_guid,
>>>>
>>>> Use EFI_CALL().
>>>
>>> Okay
>>> But as I said somewhere else, it's quite annoying to me that
>>> some efi_xxx requires EFI_CALL(), and others not.
>>> There should have been consistent naming rules.
>>
>> We started with having separate functions like efi_allocate_pages_ext()
>> and efi_allocate_pages(). Then Rob Clark came along and introduced
>> EFI_CALL() in a095aadffa96 and I stopped creating _ext() functions.
>>
>> When running with DEBUG 1 it sometimes is helpful to see which function
>> is calling which other and where errors are originally reported.
>>
>> But I am open to changes in this area.
>>
>>>
>>>> Instead of dereferencing you could directly call
>>>> efi_set_variable().
>>>
>>> Yeah, given that this code is under lib/efi_loader, it may be natural
>>> to use efi_set_variable(). But existing get_var() uses the same style of coding.
>>>
>>> Do you want to change all of the call sites including get_var()?
>>
>> Calling efi_set_variable() directly uses less bytes of code than
>> rs->get_variable() which makes it preferable.
> 
> So is your answer yes, or no?

I would prefer calling efi_get_variable() directly and not to use
rs->get_variable().

> 
>> I have seen that iPXE modifies system->boottime to intercept system
>> calls. The same could be done by an EFI driver to the runtime vectors.
>>
>> In the light of your work on secure boot I think we should not allow an
>> EFI driver to intercept the reading and changing of variables here.
>>
>> We should also rethink it for efidebug.c
> 
> I'm not sure about your concern here, but no doubt efidebug should
> be disabled on production system with secure boot.

Also in efidebug we are creating more runtime code bytes than needed by
using system->runtime->efi_something() or system->boottime->efi_something().

Best regards

Heinrich

> 
> Thanks,
> -Takahiro Akashi
> 
>> Best regards
>>
>> Heinrich
>>
>>>
>>>>> +				       attributes, size, &n);
>>>>> +		if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
>>>>> +			goto error;
>>>>> +
>>>>>  		ret = efi_load_image_from_path(lo.file_path, &image);
>>>>>  
>>>>>  		if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
>>>>> @@ -173,16 +183,38 @@ error:
>>>>>  void *efi_bootmgr_load(struct efi_device_path **device_path,
>>>>>  		       struct efi_device_path **file_path)
>>>>>  {
>>>>> -	uint16_t *bootorder;
>>>>> +	u16 bootnext, *bootorder;
>>>>>  	efi_uintn_t size;
>>>>>  	void *image = NULL;
>>>>>  	int i, num;
>>>>> +	efi_status_t ret;
>>>>>  
>>>>>  	__efi_entry_check();
>>>>>  
>>>>>  	bs = systab.boottime;
>>>>>  	rs = systab.runtime;
>>>>>  
>>>>> +	/* get BootNext */
>>>>> +	size = sizeof(bootnext);
>>>>> +	ret = rs->get_variable(L"BootNext",
>>>>> +			       (efi_guid_t *)&efi_global_variable_guid,
>>>>> +			       NULL, &size, &bootnext);
>>>>
>>>> You could call efi_get_variable() directly instead of dereferencing rs.
>>>> But anyway you have to use EFI_CALL().
>>>
>>> Ditto
>>>
>>>>> +	if (!bootnext)
>>>>> +		goto run_list;
>>>>
>>>> Goto is acceptable for error handling. But otherwise I would rather
>>>> avoid it.
>>>
>>> Okay with another indentation.
>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	/* delete BootNext */
>>>>> +	ret = rs->set_variable(L"BootNext",
>>>>> +			       (efi_guid_t *)&efi_global_variable_guid,
>>>>> +			       0, 0, &bootnext);
>>>>
>>>> EFI_CALL().
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Takahiro Akashi
>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>>
>>>> Heinrich
>>>>
>>>>> +	if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
>>>>> +		goto error;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	image = try_load_entry(bootnext, device_path, file_path);
>>>>> +	if (image)
>>>>> +		goto error;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +run_list:
>>>>> +	/* BootOrder */
>>>>>  	bootorder = get_var(L"BootOrder", &efi_global_variable_guid, &size);
>>>>>  	if (!bootorder)
>>>>>  		goto error;
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
AKASHI Takahiro Feb. 27, 2019, 6:55 a.m. UTC | #6
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 07:39:50AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 2/27/19 7:27 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 07:14:10AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >> On 2/27/19 6:47 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 07:57:26PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >>>> On 1/15/19 3:54 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> >>>>> See UEFI v2.7, section 3.1.2 for details of the specification.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> With my efitool command, you can try as the following:
> >>>>>   => efi boot add 1 SHELL ...
> >>>>>   => efi boot add 2 HELLO ...
> >>>>>   => efi boot order 1 2
> >>>>>   => efi bootmgr
> >>>>>      (starting SHELL ...)
> >>>>>   => efi boot next 2
> >>>>>   => efi bootmgr
> >>>>>      (starting HELLO ...)
> >>>>>   => efi dumpvar
> >>>>>   <snip ...>
> >>>>>   BootCurrent: {boot,run}(blob)
> >>>>>   00000000:  02 00                    ..
> >>>>>   BootOrder: {boot,run}(blob)
> >>>>>   00000000:  01 00 02 00              ....
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>>  lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>>>>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c
> >>>>> index a095df3f540b..6c5303736dc6 100644
> >>>>> --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c
> >>>>> +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c
> >>>>> @@ -145,11 +145,21 @@ static void *try_load_entry(uint16_t n, struct efi_device_path **device_path,
> >>>>>  	efi_deserialize_load_option(&lo, load_option);
> >>>>>  
> >>>>>  	if (lo.attributes & LOAD_OPTION_ACTIVE) {
> >>>>> +		u32 attributes;
> >>>>>  		efi_status_t ret;
> >>>>>  
> >>>>>  		debug("%s: trying to load \"%ls\" from %pD\n",
> >>>>>  		      __func__, lo.label, lo.file_path);
> >>>>>  
> >>>>> +		attributes = EFI_VARIABLE_BOOTSERVICE_ACCESS |
> >>>>> +			     EFI_VARIABLE_RUNTIME_ACCESS;
> >>>>> +		size = sizeof(n);
> >>>>> +		ret = rs->set_variable(L"BootCurrent",
> >>>>> +				       (efi_guid_t *)&efi_global_variable_guid,
> >>>>
> >>>> Use EFI_CALL().
> >>>
> >>> Okay
> >>> But as I said somewhere else, it's quite annoying to me that
> >>> some efi_xxx requires EFI_CALL(), and others not.
> >>> There should have been consistent naming rules.
> >>
> >> We started with having separate functions like efi_allocate_pages_ext()
> >> and efi_allocate_pages(). Then Rob Clark came along and introduced
> >> EFI_CALL() in a095aadffa96 and I stopped creating _ext() functions.
> >>
> >> When running with DEBUG 1 it sometimes is helpful to see which function
> >> is calling which other and where errors are originally reported.
> >>
> >> But I am open to changes in this area.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>> Instead of dereferencing you could directly call
> >>>> efi_set_variable().
> >>>
> >>> Yeah, given that this code is under lib/efi_loader, it may be natural
> >>> to use efi_set_variable(). But existing get_var() uses the same style of coding.
> >>>
> >>> Do you want to change all of the call sites including get_var()?
> >>
> >> Calling efi_set_variable() directly uses less bytes of code than
> >> rs->get_variable() which makes it preferable.
> > 
> > So is your answer yes, or no?
> 
> I would prefer calling efi_get_variable() directly and not to use
> rs->get_variable().

My point is "including get_var()" or not.
I have never touched that function in my patch.

> > 
> >> I have seen that iPXE modifies system->boottime to intercept system
> >> calls. The same could be done by an EFI driver to the runtime vectors.
> >>
> >> In the light of your work on secure boot I think we should not allow an
> >> EFI driver to intercept the reading and changing of variables here.
> >>
> >> We should also rethink it for efidebug.c
> > 
> > I'm not sure about your concern here, but no doubt efidebug should
> > be disabled on production system with secure boot.
> 
> Also in efidebug we are creating more runtime code bytes than needed by
> using system->runtime->efi_something() or system->boottime->efi_something().

I think we discussed in the past.
I prefer to calling boot time/run time services via system table
as this command is expected to be implemented as an (embedded) EFI application
sometime in the future.

Thanks,
-Takahiro Akashi

> Best regards
> 
> Heinrich
> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > -Takahiro Akashi
> > 
> >> Best regards
> >>
> >> Heinrich
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>> +				       attributes, size, &n);
> >>>>> +		if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
> >>>>> +			goto error;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>>  		ret = efi_load_image_from_path(lo.file_path, &image);
> >>>>>  
> >>>>>  		if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
> >>>>> @@ -173,16 +183,38 @@ error:
> >>>>>  void *efi_bootmgr_load(struct efi_device_path **device_path,
> >>>>>  		       struct efi_device_path **file_path)
> >>>>>  {
> >>>>> -	uint16_t *bootorder;
> >>>>> +	u16 bootnext, *bootorder;
> >>>>>  	efi_uintn_t size;
> >>>>>  	void *image = NULL;
> >>>>>  	int i, num;
> >>>>> +	efi_status_t ret;
> >>>>>  
> >>>>>  	__efi_entry_check();
> >>>>>  
> >>>>>  	bs = systab.boottime;
> >>>>>  	rs = systab.runtime;
> >>>>>  
> >>>>> +	/* get BootNext */
> >>>>> +	size = sizeof(bootnext);
> >>>>> +	ret = rs->get_variable(L"BootNext",
> >>>>> +			       (efi_guid_t *)&efi_global_variable_guid,
> >>>>> +			       NULL, &size, &bootnext);
> >>>>
> >>>> You could call efi_get_variable() directly instead of dereferencing rs.
> >>>> But anyway you have to use EFI_CALL().
> >>>
> >>> Ditto
> >>>
> >>>>> +	if (!bootnext)
> >>>>> +		goto run_list;
> >>>>
> >>>> Goto is acceptable for error handling. But otherwise I would rather
> >>>> avoid it.
> >>>
> >>> Okay with another indentation.
> >>>
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +	/* delete BootNext */
> >>>>> +	ret = rs->set_variable(L"BootNext",
> >>>>> +			       (efi_guid_t *)&efi_global_variable_guid,
> >>>>> +			       0, 0, &bootnext);
> >>>>
> >>>> EFI_CALL().
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> -Takahiro Akashi
> >>>
> >>>> Best regards
> >>>>
> >>>> Heinrich
> >>>>
> >>>>> +	if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
> >>>>> +		goto error;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +	image = try_load_entry(bootnext, device_path, file_path);
> >>>>> +	if (image)
> >>>>> +		goto error;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +run_list:
> >>>>> +	/* BootOrder */
> >>>>>  	bootorder = get_var(L"BootOrder", &efi_global_variable_guid, &size);
> >>>>>  	if (!bootorder)
> >>>>>  		goto error;
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> > 
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c
index a095df3f540b..6c5303736dc6 100644
--- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c
+++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c
@@ -145,11 +145,21 @@  static void *try_load_entry(uint16_t n, struct efi_device_path **device_path,
 	efi_deserialize_load_option(&lo, load_option);
 
 	if (lo.attributes & LOAD_OPTION_ACTIVE) {
+		u32 attributes;
 		efi_status_t ret;
 
 		debug("%s: trying to load \"%ls\" from %pD\n",
 		      __func__, lo.label, lo.file_path);
 
+		attributes = EFI_VARIABLE_BOOTSERVICE_ACCESS |
+			     EFI_VARIABLE_RUNTIME_ACCESS;
+		size = sizeof(n);
+		ret = rs->set_variable(L"BootCurrent",
+				       (efi_guid_t *)&efi_global_variable_guid,
+				       attributes, size, &n);
+		if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
+			goto error;
+
 		ret = efi_load_image_from_path(lo.file_path, &image);
 
 		if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
@@ -173,16 +183,38 @@  error:
 void *efi_bootmgr_load(struct efi_device_path **device_path,
 		       struct efi_device_path **file_path)
 {
-	uint16_t *bootorder;
+	u16 bootnext, *bootorder;
 	efi_uintn_t size;
 	void *image = NULL;
 	int i, num;
+	efi_status_t ret;
 
 	__efi_entry_check();
 
 	bs = systab.boottime;
 	rs = systab.runtime;
 
+	/* get BootNext */
+	size = sizeof(bootnext);
+	ret = rs->get_variable(L"BootNext",
+			       (efi_guid_t *)&efi_global_variable_guid,
+			       NULL, &size, &bootnext);
+	if (!bootnext)
+		goto run_list;
+
+	/* delete BootNext */
+	ret = rs->set_variable(L"BootNext",
+			       (efi_guid_t *)&efi_global_variable_guid,
+			       0, 0, &bootnext);
+	if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
+		goto error;
+
+	image = try_load_entry(bootnext, device_path, file_path);
+	if (image)
+		goto error;
+
+run_list:
+	/* BootOrder */
 	bootorder = get_var(L"BootOrder", &efi_global_variable_guid, &size);
 	if (!bootorder)
 		goto error;