| Message ID | 4ACC749E.4060806@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted, archived |
| Delegated to: | David Miller |
| Headers | show |
From: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:59:42 +0200 > Looking at commit ebc3f64b864f it appears that this was intended > and not the original, equivalent to `if (facilities.reverse & ~0x81)'. > > In x25_parse_facilities() that patch changed how facilities->reverse > was set. No other bits were set than 0x80 and/or 0x01. > > Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com> Looks good to me, applied to net-next-2.6 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/net/x25/af_x25.c b/net/x25/af_x25.c index 7fa9c7a..ca4dc28 100644 --- a/net/x25/af_x25.c +++ b/net/x25/af_x25.c @@ -1363,7 +1363,7 @@ static int x25_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) facilities.throughput > 0xDD) break; if (facilities.reverse && - (facilities.reverse | 0x81)!= 0x81) + (facilities.reverse & 0x81) != 0x81) break; x25->facilities = facilities; rc = 0;
Looking at commit ebc3f64b864f it appears that this was intended and not the original, equivalent to `if (facilities.reverse & ~0x81)'. In x25_parse_facilities() that patch changed how facilities->reverse was set. No other bits were set than 0x80 and/or 0x01. Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com> --- This is correct isn't it? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html