mbox

[Pull,Request] Various ARM platform code fixes

Message ID CAK9yfHw=zecLHWHVZWvf3PzphYG3CDyTwMRXicUUFM4kkhT9Mw@mail.gmail.com
State New
Headers show

Pull-request

git://git.linaro.org/people/sachin.kamat/linux-common-kernel.git arm-soc

Message

Sachin Kamat June 2, 2014, 9:23 a.m. UTC
Hi Arnd,

As suggested by you I am sending a pull request for the below 8 patches.
These are based on for-next branch of arm-soc tree [1].

[1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc.git



The following changes since commit f8175c74fd39ccc336391a9491fc0353d6f92b90:

  Merge branch 'next/soc' into for-next (2014-05-31 10:20:56 -0700)

are available in the git repository at:


  git://git.linaro.org/people/sachin.kamat/linux-common-kernel.git arm-soc

for you to fetch changes up to 545ce3a27284b231fca8ea09cc3e37d66793b56f:

  ARM: spear: Staticize local symbols in spear1340.c (2014-06-02 13:56:58 +0530)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Sachin Kamat (8):
      ARM: sti: Staticize local variables
      ARM: mvebu: Staticize armada_375_smp_cpu1_enable_wa
      ARM: mvebu: Staticize armada_370_xp_cpu_pm_init
      ARM: mvebu: Staticize mvebu_cpu_reset_init
      ARM: vt8500: Staticize local symbols
      ARM: spear: Staticize spear13xx_io_desc
      ARM: spear: Staticize spear1310_io_desc in spear1310.c
      ARM: spear: Staticize local symbols in spear1340.c

 arch/arm/mach-mvebu/cpu-reset.c  |    2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-mvebu/platsmp-a9.c |    2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pmsu.c       |    2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-spear/spear1310.c  |    2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-spear/spear1340.c  |    6 +++---
 arch/arm/mach-spear/spear13xx.c  |    2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-sti/platsmp.c      |    6 +++---
 arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c    |    6 +++---
 8 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

Comments

Olof Johansson June 2, 2014, 4:42 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org> wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> As suggested by you I am sending a pull request for the below 8 patches.
> These are based on for-next branch of arm-soc tree [1].
>
> [1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc.git

Please, don't send random pull requests to us. Some of these patches
are for platforms that have quite active maintainers and you're
messing up everyone's workflow by randomly sending them to us.

I have no idea what you talked to Arnd about, and you give no
reference to it in your pull request.

Besides, the merge window is open, we're not taking anything new until
after -rc1.


-Olof
Arnd Bergmann June 2, 2014, 7:02 p.m. UTC | #2
On Monday 02 June 2014 09:42:48 Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org> wrote:
> > Hi Arnd,
> >
> > As suggested by you I am sending a pull request for the below 8 patches.
> > These are based on for-next branch of arm-soc tree [1].
> >
> > [1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc.git
> 
> Please, don't send random pull requests to us. Some of these patches
> are for platforms that have quite active maintainers and you're
> messing up everyone's workflow by randomly sending them to us.
> 
> I have no idea what you talked to Arnd about, and you give no
> reference to it in your pull request.

FYI, these are all trivial cleanups that no subarch maintainer has
picked up since they were posted, and I offered to take them
from a pull request
 
> Besides, the merge window is open, we're not taking anything new until
> after -rc1.

Agreed, I didn't expect the merge window to open already, and since there
is no urgency here, let's apply this into next/cleanups after the merge
window.

	Arnd
Sachin Kamat June 24, 2014, 9:44 a.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:32 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Monday 02 June 2014 09:42:48 Olof Johansson wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org> wrote:
>> > Hi Arnd,
>> >
>> > As suggested by you I am sending a pull request for the below 8 patches.
>> > These are based on for-next branch of arm-soc tree [1].
>> >
>> > [1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc.git
>>
>> Please, don't send random pull requests to us. Some of these patches
>> are for platforms that have quite active maintainers and you're
>> messing up everyone's workflow by randomly sending them to us.
>>
>> I have no idea what you talked to Arnd about, and you give no
>> reference to it in your pull request.
>
> FYI, these are all trivial cleanups that no subarch maintainer has
> picked up since they were posted, and I offered to take them
> from a pull request
>
>> Besides, the merge window is open, we're not taking anything new until
>> after -rc1.
>
> Agreed, I didn't expect the merge window to open already, and since there
> is no urgency here, let's apply this into next/cleanups after the merge
> window.

Arnd, I no longer have access to my Linaro git repo. Shall I re-send
the individual
patches?
Arnd Bergmann June 24, 2014, 11:12 a.m. UTC | #4
On Tuesday 24 June 2014 15:14:07 Sachin Kamat wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:32 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > On Monday 02 June 2014 09:42:48 Olof Johansson wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org> wrote:
> >> > Hi Arnd,
> >> >
> >> > As suggested by you I am sending a pull request for the below 8 patches.
> >> > These are based on for-next branch of arm-soc tree [1].
> >> >
> >> > [1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc.git
> >>
> >> Please, don't send random pull requests to us. Some of these patches
> >> are for platforms that have quite active maintainers and you're
> >> messing up everyone's workflow by randomly sending them to us.
> >>
> >> I have no idea what you talked to Arnd about, and you give no
> >> reference to it in your pull request.
> >
> > FYI, these are all trivial cleanups that no subarch maintainer has
> > picked up since they were posted, and I offered to take them
> > from a pull request
> >
> >> Besides, the merge window is open, we're not taking anything new until
> >> after -rc1.
> >
> > Agreed, I didn't expect the merge window to open already, and since there
> > is no urgency here, let's apply this into next/cleanups after the merge
> > window.
> 
> Arnd, I no longer have access to my Linaro git repo. Shall I re-send
> the individual
> patches?

Yes, please do, and send them with Cc to both linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
and arm@kernel.org.

	Arnd
Sachin Kamat June 24, 2014, 11:49 a.m. UTC | #5
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 June 2014 15:14:07 Sachin Kamat wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:32 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>> > On Monday 02 June 2014 09:42:48 Olof Johansson wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org> wrote:
>> >> > Hi Arnd,
>> >> >
>> >> > As suggested by you I am sending a pull request for the below 8 patches.
>> >> > These are based on for-next branch of arm-soc tree [1].
>> >> >
>> >> > [1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc.git
>> >>
>> >> Please, don't send random pull requests to us. Some of these patches
>> >> are for platforms that have quite active maintainers and you're
>> >> messing up everyone's workflow by randomly sending them to us.
>> >>
>> >> I have no idea what you talked to Arnd about, and you give no
>> >> reference to it in your pull request.
>> >
>> > FYI, these are all trivial cleanups that no subarch maintainer has
>> > picked up since they were posted, and I offered to take them
>> > from a pull request
>> >
>> >> Besides, the merge window is open, we're not taking anything new until
>> >> after -rc1.
>> >
>> > Agreed, I didn't expect the merge window to open already, and since there
>> > is no urgency here, let's apply this into next/cleanups after the merge
>> > window.
>>
>> Arnd, I no longer have access to my Linaro git repo. Shall I re-send
>> the individual
>> patches?
>
> Yes, please do, and send them with Cc to both linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> and arm@kernel.org.

Thanks Arnd. Sent them just now.
Forgot to mention "Resend" in the subject on patches 3-8 :(