Message ID | b06d478e1008aa14c12fa1ea9f8da941@localhost |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 02:58:12PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Arnd, Olof, > > Please find below a pull request for a couple of fixes concerning > the VGIC implementation in KVM. No real hurry, these can probably > be applied after the merge window. > > The branch is on top of mainline as of this morning, but I'm happy > to rebase it on something else if that's more convenient. Now, why is this being thrown at arm-soc? Is it not core ARM stuff, or is KVM being counted as yet another platform?
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:41:36 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 02:58:12PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> Arnd, Olof, >> >> Please find below a pull request for a couple of fixes concerning >> the VGIC implementation in KVM. No real hurry, these can probably >> be applied after the merge window. >> >> The branch is on top of mainline as of this morning, but I'm happy >> to rebase it on something else if that's more convenient. > > Now, why is this being thrown at arm-soc? Is it not core ARM stuff, > or is KVM being counted as yet another platform? You're right. Arm-soc took care of the initial merge of the VGIC code because of other dependencies, but now that it has been merged, I should have sent the pull request to you. Sincere apologies. Shall I send you another pull request, or would you prefer these patches in the patch system? Thanks, M.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 06:28:41PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:41:36 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux > <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 02:58:12PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > >> Arnd, Olof, > >> > >> Please find below a pull request for a couple of fixes concerning > >> the VGIC implementation in KVM. No real hurry, these can probably > >> be applied after the merge window. > >> > >> The branch is on top of mainline as of this morning, but I'm happy > >> to rebase it on something else if that's more convenient. > > > > Now, why is this being thrown at arm-soc? Is it not core ARM stuff, > > or is KVM being counted as yet another platform? > > You're right. Arm-soc took care of the initial merge of the VGIC code > because of other dependencies, but now that it has been merged, I should > have sent the pull request to you. Sincere apologies. > > Shall I send you another pull request, or would you prefer these patches > in the patch system? Does it need another pull request or is your original sufficient for me to pull?
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 19:18:25 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 06:28:41PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:41:36 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux >> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: >> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 02:58:12PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> >> Arnd, Olof, >> >> >> >> Please find below a pull request for a couple of fixes concerning >> >> the VGIC implementation in KVM. No real hurry, these can probably >> >> be applied after the merge window. >> >> >> >> The branch is on top of mainline as of this morning, but I'm happy >> >> to rebase it on something else if that's more convenient. >> > >> > Now, why is this being thrown at arm-soc? Is it not core ARM stuff, >> > or is KVM being counted as yet another platform? >> >> You're right. Arm-soc took care of the initial merge of the VGIC code >> because of other dependencies, but now that it has been merged, I should >> have sent the pull request to you. Sincere apologies. >> >> Shall I send you another pull request, or would you prefer these patches >> in the patch system? > > Does it need another pull request or is your original sufficient for me > to pull? It is directly based on mainline as of this morning, so it should be good for you to pull it. Thanks, M.
On 22/02/13 19:30, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 19:18:25 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux > <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 06:28:41PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>> On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:41:36 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux >>> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: >>>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 02:58:12PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>>>> Arnd, Olof, >>>>> >>>>> Please find below a pull request for a couple of fixes concerning >>>>> the VGIC implementation in KVM. No real hurry, these can probably >>>>> be applied after the merge window. >>>>> >>>>> The branch is on top of mainline as of this morning, but I'm happy >>>>> to rebase it on something else if that's more convenient. >>>> >>>> Now, why is this being thrown at arm-soc? Is it not core ARM stuff, >>>> or is KVM being counted as yet another platform? >>> >>> You're right. Arm-soc took care of the initial merge of the VGIC code >>> because of other dependencies, but now that it has been merged, I > should >>> have sent the pull request to you. Sincere apologies. >>> >>> Shall I send you another pull request, or would you prefer these > patches >>> in the patch system? >> >> Does it need another pull request or is your original sufficient for me >> to pull? > > It is directly based on mainline as of this morning, so it should be good > for you to pull it. Hi Russell, Any chance this two patches can make it into the next -rc? They do fix a couple of important issues (loss of guest interrupts). I'm happy to either resend a pull request if you want one, or put them in the patch system if that's more convenient. Thanks, M.
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 04:29:41PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Hi Russell, > > Any chance this two patches can make it into the next -rc? They do fix a > couple of important issues (loss of guest interrupts). > > I'm happy to either resend a pull request if you want one, or put them > in the patch system if that's more convenient. Gah. Welcome to the problems of email getting buried... these lists are currently running at 300 messages per day - this was completely off my radar. It's the same old problem - unless I process the email as soon as I see it, it _will_ get buried and forgotten. If people can send pull requests for _me_ to linux+pull@arm.linux.org.uk, I can direct them into a separate mailbox (and know for certain that they're intending _me_ to pull them) and that will remove the problem of stuff being buried like this.