Message ID | 512CDE04.2010401@free-electrons.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 05:08:36PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Arnd, Olof, > > Here is the second pull request for DT additions for 3.9, containing > the commits that were reverted, plus the missing commit that makes > everything build. > > It depends on patches that were merged by LinusT and went through > LinusW pinctrl tree, during this merge window. Ok. I think in hindsight this might just as well have waited for 3.10, but given that we've gone back and forth on it a bit, I've pulled it into the fixes branch for 3.9. -Olof
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 05:08:36PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: >> Arnd, Olof, >> >> Here is the second pull request for DT additions for 3.9, containing >> the commits that were reverted, plus the missing commit that makes >> everything build. >> >> It depends on patches that were merged by LinusT and went through >> LinusW pinctrl tree, during this merge window. > > Ok. I think in hindsight this might just as well have waited for 3.10, but > given that we've gone back and forth on it a bit, I've pulled it into the > fixes branch for 3.9. So, I wasn't able to get the fixes pull request that I was going to bundle this with sent out in time for -rc1. I can either stage this for 3.10 as it is, or if you prefer to sit on it a bit and add more stuff and send it in with another branch later. Let me know what you prefer and I'll stage it accordingly. -Olof
Hi Olof, Le 05/03/2013 02:17, Olof Johansson a écrit : > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 05:08:36PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: >>> Arnd, Olof, >>> >>> Here is the second pull request for DT additions for 3.9, containing >>> the commits that were reverted, plus the missing commit that makes >>> everything build. >>> >>> It depends on patches that were merged by LinusT and went through >>> LinusW pinctrl tree, during this merge window. >> >> Ok. I think in hindsight this might just as well have waited for 3.10, but >> given that we've gone back and forth on it a bit, I've pulled it into the >> fixes branch for 3.9. > > So, I wasn't able to get the fixes pull request that I was going to > bundle this with sent out in time for -rc1. > > I can either stage this for 3.10 as it is, or if you prefer to sit on > it a bit and add more stuff and send it in with another branch later. > Let me know what you prefer and I'll stage it accordingly. I guess you can drop them then, I'll submit them as part as a new pull request for 3.10. Thanks, Maxime