| Message ID | 1357527374-31055-1-git-send-email-josephl@nvidia.com |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted, archived |
| Headers | show |
On 01/06/2013 07:56 PM, Joseph Lo wrote: > It would rather to use the API of time_to_jiffies than a constant number > of jiffies for the wait time of CPU power up. > > Based on the work by: > Sang-Hun Lee <sanlee@nvidia.com> Applied to Tegra's for-3.9/soc branch. > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c > - timeout = jiffies + 5*HZ; > + timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(50); I did just want to confirm though; I think that changes the timeout from 5 seconds to 50mS and similarly for the other change. I assume that was intended? The code certainly seemed to work just fine with this change when I tested it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 01:41 +0800, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 01/06/2013 07:56 PM, Joseph Lo wrote: > > It would rather to use the API of time_to_jiffies than a constant number > > of jiffies for the wait time of CPU power up. > > > > Based on the work by: > > Sang-Hun Lee <sanlee@nvidia.com> > > Applied to Tegra's for-3.9/soc branch. > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c > > > - timeout = jiffies + 5*HZ; > > + timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(50); > > I did just want to confirm though; I think that changes the timeout from > 5 seconds to 50mS and similarly for the other change. I assume that was > intended? The code certainly seemed to work just fine with this change > when I tested it. Yes, I also tested this patch with CPU hotplug stress test. The result was good. Thanks for confirming. Joseph -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c index 60daf9f..6867030 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static int tegra30_power_up_cpu(unsigned int cpu) * next time around. */ if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &tegra_cpu_init_mask)) { - timeout = jiffies + 5*HZ; + timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(50); do { if (!tegra_powergate_is_powered(pwrgateid)) goto remove_clamps; @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static int tegra30_power_up_cpu(unsigned int cpu) return ret; /* Wait for the power to come up. */ - timeout = jiffies + 10*HZ; + timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(100); while (tegra_powergate_is_powered(pwrgateid)) { if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) return -ETIMEDOUT;
It would rather to use the API of time_to_jiffies than a constant number of jiffies for the wait time of CPU power up. Based on the work by: Sang-Hun Lee <sanlee@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Joseph Lo <josephl@nvidia.com> --- arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)