| Message ID | 50CC5A5B.8030603@netcologne.de |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
Hi Thomas, wrong patch attached? It contains a hunk in frontend-passes.c, which seems totally unrelated ... Cheers, Janus 2012/12/15 Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de>: > Hello world, > > the attached patch fixes the regression and regtests cleanly. > No test case because I could not find anything portable > to create a FIFO in the testsuite. > > OK for trunk and 4.7? > > Thomas > > 2012-12-15 Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org> > > PR libfortran/30162 > * io/unix.c (raw_tell): If the lseek is done on a > non-seekable file, return 0. >
Index: frontend-passes.c =================================================================== --- frontend-passes.c (Revision 193793) +++ frontend-passes.c (Arbeitskopie) @@ -1277,8 +1277,12 @@ doloop_code (gfc_code **c, int *walk_subtrees ATTR break; case EXEC_CALL: - f = co->symtree->n.sym->formal; + if (co->resolved_sym == NULL) + break; + + f = co->resolved_sym->formal; + /* Withot a formal arglist, there is only unknown INTENT, which we don't check for. */ if (f == NULL)
Hello world, the attached patch fixes the regression and regtests cleanly. No test case because I could not find anything portable to create a FIFO in the testsuite. OK for trunk and 4.7? Thomas 2012-12-15 Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org> PR libfortran/30162 * io/unix.c (raw_tell): If the lseek is done on a non-seekable file, return 0.