Message ID | 1353400211-5182-8-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable, archived |
Delegated to: | David Miller |
Headers | show |
Hi Tejun, On 20.11.2012 09:30, Tejun Heo wrote: > Inherit netprio configuration from ->css_online(), allow nesting and > remove .broken_hierarchy marking. This makes netprio_cgroup's > behavior match netcls_cgroup's. > > Note that this patch changes userland-visible behavior. Nesting is > allowed and the first level cgroups below the root cgroup behave > differently - they inherit priorities from the root cgroup on creation > instead of starting with 0. This is unfortunate but not doing so is > much crazier. > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Tested and Acked-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de> > --- > Documentation/cgroups/net_prio.txt | 2 ++ > net/core/netprio_cgroup.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/cgroups/net_prio.txt b/Documentation/cgroups/net_prio.txt > index 01b3226..a82cbd2 100644 > --- a/Documentation/cgroups/net_prio.txt > +++ b/Documentation/cgroups/net_prio.txt > @@ -51,3 +51,5 @@ One usage for the net_prio cgroup is with mqprio qdisc allowing application > traffic to be steered to hardware/driver based traffic classes. These mappings > can then be managed by administrators or other networking protocols such as > DCBX. > + > +A new net_prio cgroup inherits the parent's configuration. > diff --git a/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c b/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c > index b2af0d0..bde53da 100644 > --- a/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c > +++ b/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c > @@ -136,9 +136,6 @@ static struct cgroup_subsys_state *cgrp_css_alloc(struct cgroup *cgrp) > { > struct cgroup_netprio_state *cs; > > - if (cgrp->parent && cgrp->parent->id) > - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > - > cs = kzalloc(sizeof(*cs), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!cs) > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > @@ -146,16 +143,34 @@ static struct cgroup_subsys_state *cgrp_css_alloc(struct cgroup *cgrp) > return &cs->css; > } > > -static void cgrp_css_free(struct cgroup *cgrp) > +static int cgrp_css_online(struct cgroup *cgrp) > { > - struct cgroup_netprio_state *cs = cgrp_netprio_state(cgrp); > + struct cgroup *parent = cgrp->parent; > struct net_device *dev; > + int ret = 0; > + > + if (!parent) > + return 0; BTW, parent is always != NULL, because the root cgroup will be attached to the dummytop cgroup. This is the reason why there are this check in netprio_prio() static u32 netprio_prio(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct net_device *dev) { struct netprio_map *map = rcu_dereference_rtnl(dev->priomap); if (map && cgrp->id < map->priomap_len) return map->priomap[cgrp->id]; is necessary. cheer, daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hello, Daniel. On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 09:57:14AM +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote: > >-static void cgrp_css_free(struct cgroup *cgrp) > >+static int cgrp_css_online(struct cgroup *cgrp) > > { > >- struct cgroup_netprio_state *cs = cgrp_netprio_state(cgrp); > >+ struct cgroup *parent = cgrp->parent; > > struct net_device *dev; > >+ int ret = 0; > >+ > >+ if (!parent) > >+ return 0; > > BTW, parent is always != NULL, because the root cgroup will be > attached to the dummytop cgroup. Hmmm? I'm confused. When ->css_online() is called for dummytop in cgroup_init_subsys(), its parent is NULL. What am I missing? Thanks.
Hi Tejun, On 20.11.2012 15:40, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Daniel. > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 09:57:14AM +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote: >>> -static void cgrp_css_free(struct cgroup *cgrp) >>> +static int cgrp_css_online(struct cgroup *cgrp) >>> { >>> - struct cgroup_netprio_state *cs = cgrp_netprio_state(cgrp); >>> + struct cgroup *parent = cgrp->parent; >>> struct net_device *dev; >>> + int ret = 0; >>> + >>> + if (!parent) >>> + return 0; >> >> BTW, parent is always != NULL, because the root cgroup will be >> attached to the dummytop cgroup. > > Hmmm? I'm confused. When ->css_online() is called for dummytop in > cgroup_init_subsys(), its parent is NULL. What am I missing? Forget my comment, I was really confused when writing this. I was looking only at cgroups which were created after bootup. cheers, daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/Documentation/cgroups/net_prio.txt b/Documentation/cgroups/net_prio.txt index 01b3226..a82cbd2 100644 --- a/Documentation/cgroups/net_prio.txt +++ b/Documentation/cgroups/net_prio.txt @@ -51,3 +51,5 @@ One usage for the net_prio cgroup is with mqprio qdisc allowing application traffic to be steered to hardware/driver based traffic classes. These mappings can then be managed by administrators or other networking protocols such as DCBX. + +A new net_prio cgroup inherits the parent's configuration. diff --git a/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c b/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c index b2af0d0..bde53da 100644 --- a/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c +++ b/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c @@ -136,9 +136,6 @@ static struct cgroup_subsys_state *cgrp_css_alloc(struct cgroup *cgrp) { struct cgroup_netprio_state *cs; - if (cgrp->parent && cgrp->parent->id) - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); - cs = kzalloc(sizeof(*cs), GFP_KERNEL); if (!cs) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); @@ -146,16 +143,34 @@ static struct cgroup_subsys_state *cgrp_css_alloc(struct cgroup *cgrp) return &cs->css; } -static void cgrp_css_free(struct cgroup *cgrp) +static int cgrp_css_online(struct cgroup *cgrp) { - struct cgroup_netprio_state *cs = cgrp_netprio_state(cgrp); + struct cgroup *parent = cgrp->parent; struct net_device *dev; + int ret = 0; + + if (!parent) + return 0; rtnl_lock(); - for_each_netdev(&init_net, dev) - WARN_ON_ONCE(netprio_set_prio(cgrp, dev, 0)); + /* + * Inherit prios from the parent. As all prios are set during + * onlining, there is no need to clear them on offline. + */ + for_each_netdev(&init_net, dev) { + u32 prio = netprio_prio(parent, dev); + + ret = netprio_set_prio(cgrp, dev, prio); + if (ret) + break; + } rtnl_unlock(); - kfree(cs); + return ret; +} + +static void cgrp_css_free(struct cgroup *cgrp) +{ + kfree(cgrp_netprio_state(cgrp)); } static u64 read_prioidx(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft) @@ -237,21 +252,12 @@ static struct cftype ss_files[] = { struct cgroup_subsys net_prio_subsys = { .name = "net_prio", .css_alloc = cgrp_css_alloc, + .css_online = cgrp_css_online, .css_free = cgrp_css_free, .attach = net_prio_attach, .subsys_id = net_prio_subsys_id, .base_cftypes = ss_files, .module = THIS_MODULE, - - /* - * net_prio has artificial limit on the number of cgroups and - * disallows nesting making it impossible to co-mount it with other - * hierarchical subsystems. Remove the artificially low PRIOIDX_SZ - * limit and properly nest configuration such that children follow - * their parents' configurations by default and are allowed to - * override and remove the following. - */ - .broken_hierarchy = true, }; static int netprio_device_event(struct notifier_block *unused,
Inherit netprio configuration from ->css_online(), allow nesting and remove .broken_hierarchy marking. This makes netprio_cgroup's behavior match netcls_cgroup's. Note that this patch changes userland-visible behavior. Nesting is allowed and the first level cgroups below the root cgroup behave differently - they inherit priorities from the root cgroup on creation instead of starting with 0. This is unfortunate but not doing so is much crazier. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> --- Documentation/cgroups/net_prio.txt | 2 ++ net/core/netprio_cgroup.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)