mtd: sh_flctl: Switch from tick-based to time-based timeout

Instead of counting down a compile-time value, we use a value based on
jiffies.

Signed-off-by: Bastian Hecht <hechtb@gmail.com>
---
Artem mentioned the idea a while ago - here is the simple implementation now.

 drivers/mtd/nand/sh_flctl.c  |   14 +++++++++-----
 include/linux/mtd/sh_flctl.h |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 16:05 +0200, Bastian Hecht wrote:
> Instead of counting down a compile-time value, we use a value based on
> jiffies.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bastian Hecht <hechtb@gmail.com>

Pushed to l2-mtd.git, thanks!

Hello Artem!

Could you please pull out this patch of your tree? While reworking the
driver for IRQ-driven use, I've realized that this conversion makes no
sense as all loops use a udelay(1) in them. So the timeout is already
time based.

Sorry for the inconvenience,

Bastian Hecht


2012/7/4 Bastian Hecht <hechtb@googlemail.com>:
> Instead of counting down a compile-time value, we use a value based on
> jiffies.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bastian Hecht <hechtb@gmail.com>
> ---
> Artem mentioned the idea a while ago - here is the simple implementation now.
>
>  drivers/mtd/nand/sh_flctl.c  |   14 +++++++++-----
>  include/linux/mtd/sh_flctl.h |    2 +-
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/sh_flctl.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/sh_flctl.c
> index ed03ed2..0d9cce7 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/sh_flctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/sh_flctl.c
> @@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ static struct nand_bbt_descr flctl_4secc_largepage = {
>         .pattern = scan_ff_pattern,
>  };
>
> +static int loop_timeout_max;
> +
>  static void empty_fifo(struct sh_flctl *flctl)
>  {
>         writel(flctl->flintdmacr_base | AC1CLR | AC0CLR, FLINTDMACR(flctl));
> @@ -91,7 +93,7 @@ static void timeout_error(struct sh_flctl *flctl, const char *str)
>
>  static void wait_completion(struct sh_flctl *flctl)
>  {
> -       uint32_t timeout = LOOP_TIMEOUT_MAX;
> +       uint32_t timeout = loop_timeout_max;
>
>         while (timeout--) {
>                 if (readb(FLTRCR(flctl)) & TREND) {
> @@ -138,7 +140,7 @@ static void set_addr(struct mtd_info *mtd, int column, int page_addr)
>
>  static void wait_rfifo_ready(struct sh_flctl *flctl)
>  {
> -       uint32_t timeout = LOOP_TIMEOUT_MAX;
> +       uint32_t timeout = loop_timeout_max;
>
>         while (timeout--) {
>                 uint32_t val;
> @@ -153,7 +155,7 @@ static void wait_rfifo_ready(struct sh_flctl *flctl)
>
>  static void wait_wfifo_ready(struct sh_flctl *flctl)
>  {
> -       uint32_t len, timeout = LOOP_TIMEOUT_MAX;
> +       uint32_t len, timeout = loop_timeout_max;
>
>         while (timeout--) {
>                 /* check FIFO */
> @@ -168,7 +170,7 @@ static void wait_wfifo_ready(struct sh_flctl *flctl)
>  static enum flctl_ecc_res_t wait_recfifo_ready
>                 (struct sh_flctl *flctl, int sector_number)
>  {
> -       uint32_t timeout = LOOP_TIMEOUT_MAX;
> +       uint32_t timeout = loop_timeout_max;
>         void __iomem *ecc_reg[4];
>         int i;
>         int state = FL_SUCCESS;
> @@ -247,7 +249,7 @@ static enum flctl_ecc_res_t wait_recfifo_ready
>
>  static void wait_wecfifo_ready(struct sh_flctl *flctl)
>  {
> -       uint32_t timeout = LOOP_TIMEOUT_MAX;
> +       uint32_t timeout = loop_timeout_max;
>         uint32_t len;
>
>         while (timeout--) {
> @@ -939,6 +941,8 @@ static int __devinit flctl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
>         pm_runtime_resume(&pdev->dev);
>
> +       loop_timeout_max = loops_per_jiffy * msecs_to_jiffies(LOOP_TIMEOUT_MS);
> +
>         ret = nand_scan_ident(flctl_mtd, 1, NULL);
>         if (ret)
>                 goto err_chip;
> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/sh_flctl.h b/include/linux/mtd/sh_flctl.h
> index 01e4b15..ade44c1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mtd/sh_flctl.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/sh_flctl.h
> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@
>  #define        _4ECCEND        (0x1 << 1)      /* 4 symbols end */
>  #define        _4ECCEXST       (0x1 << 0)      /* 4 symbols exist */
>
> -#define LOOP_TIMEOUT_MAX       0x00010000
> +#define LOOP_TIMEOUT_MS        100
>
>  enum flctl_ecc_res_t {
>         FL_SUCCESS,
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>

On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 17:21 +0200, Bastian Hecht wrote:
> Hello Artem!
> 
> Could you please pull out this patch of your tree? While reworking the
> driver for IRQ-driven use, I've realized that this conversion makes no
> sense as all loops use a udelay(1) in them. So the timeout is already
> time based.

Dropped, thanks!

Hi Artem,

commit 19f5f7364a1cc770b14692f609bb9b802fc334d5
is still in l2-mtd. Please drop it, so it doesn't get merged and I can
base my new patches on the clean code.

Thanks!

Bastian


2012/8/20 Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>:
> On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 17:21 +0200, Bastian Hecht wrote:
>> Hello Artem!
>>
>> Could you please pull out this patch of your tree? While reworking the
>> driver for IRQ-driven use, I've realized that this conversion makes no
>> sense as all loops use a udelay(1) in them. So the timeout is already
>> time based.
>
> Dropped, thanks!
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Artem Bityutskiy

On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 12:49 +0200, Bastian Hecht wrote:
> Hi Artem,
> 
> commit 19f5f7364a1cc770b14692f609bb9b802fc334d5
> is still in l2-mtd. Please drop it, so it doesn't get merged and I can
> base my new patches on the clean code.

I've dropped your patch now for real.