Message ID | 20240913121110.1611340-4-Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | Introduce initial AMD ASF Controller driver support | expand |
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 05:41:05PM +0530, Shyam Sundar S K wrote: > Export the following i2c_piix4 driver functions as a library so that the > AMD ASF driver can utilize these core functionalities from the i2c_piix4 > driver: > > - piix4_sb800_region_request(): Request access to a specific SMBus region > on the SB800 chipset. > > - piix4_sb800_region_release(): Release the previously requested SMBus > region on the SB800 chipset. > > - piix4_transaction(): Handle SMBus transactions between the SMBus > controller and connected devices. > > - piix4_sb800_port_sel(): Select the appropriate SMBus port on the SB800 > chipset. > > By making these functions available as a library, enable the AMD ASF > driver to leverage the established mechanisms in the i2c_piix4 driver, > promoting code reuse and consistency across different drivers. > Note that the git diff view is presented in two separate lines in order to > suppress the checkpatch.pl "CHECKS". This paragraph should be in comment block rather than commit message body... > Co-developed-by: Sanket Goswami <Sanket.Goswami@amd.com> > Signed-off-by: Sanket Goswami <Sanket.Goswami@amd.com> > Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com> > --- ...somewhere here. ... > +int piix4_sb800_region_request(struct device *dev, > + struct sb800_mmio_cfg *mmio_cfg) One line? ... > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(piix4_sb800_region_request); Use namespaced exports (with _NS) from day 1. ... > +void piix4_sb800_region_release(struct device *dev, > + struct sb800_mmio_cfg *mmio_cfg) > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(piix4_sb800_region_release); Same comments as per above. ... > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(piix4_transaction); > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(piix4_sb800_port_sel); _NS
On 9/14/2024 00:24, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 05:41:05PM +0530, Shyam Sundar S K wrote: >> Export the following i2c_piix4 driver functions as a library so that the >> AMD ASF driver can utilize these core functionalities from the i2c_piix4 >> driver: >> >> - piix4_sb800_region_request(): Request access to a specific SMBus region >> on the SB800 chipset. >> >> - piix4_sb800_region_release(): Release the previously requested SMBus >> region on the SB800 chipset. >> >> - piix4_transaction(): Handle SMBus transactions between the SMBus >> controller and connected devices. >> >> - piix4_sb800_port_sel(): Select the appropriate SMBus port on the SB800 >> chipset. >> >> By making these functions available as a library, enable the AMD ASF >> driver to leverage the established mechanisms in the i2c_piix4 driver, >> promoting code reuse and consistency across different drivers. > >> Note that the git diff view is presented in two separate lines in order to >> suppress the checkpatch.pl "CHECKS". > > This paragraph should be in comment block rather than commit message body... > I can move it to comment block but in the last version Andi mentioned that I have to leave a note about the function within one line. >> Co-developed-by: Sanket Goswami <Sanket.Goswami@amd.com> >> Signed-off-by: Sanket Goswami <Sanket.Goswami@amd.com> >> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com> >> --- > > ...somewhere here. > > ... > >> +int piix4_sb800_region_request(struct device *dev, >> + struct sb800_mmio_cfg *mmio_cfg) > > One line? > I am OK to do it, but Andi has a preference to stay within 80 character wide length. Andi, what are you thoughts? Thanks, Shyam > ... > >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(piix4_sb800_region_request); > > Use namespaced exports (with _NS) from day 1. > > ... > >> +void piix4_sb800_region_release(struct device *dev, >> + struct sb800_mmio_cfg *mmio_cfg) > >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(piix4_sb800_region_release); > > Same comments as per above. > > ... > >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(piix4_transaction); >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(piix4_sb800_port_sel); > > _NS >
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 11:44:04PM +0530, Shyam Sundar S K wrote: > On 9/14/2024 00:24, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 05:41:05PM +0530, Shyam Sundar S K wrote: ... > >> Note that the git diff view is presented in two separate lines in order to > >> suppress the checkpatch.pl "CHECKS". (1) ^^^ > > This paragraph should be in comment block rather than commit message body... > > I can move it to comment block but in the last version Andi mentioned > that I have to leave a note about the function within one line. What function? I'm talking about (1) which refers to Git and checkpatch.
On 9/18/2024 15:26, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 11:44:04PM +0530, Shyam Sundar S K wrote: >> On 9/14/2024 00:24, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 05:41:05PM +0530, Shyam Sundar S K wrote: > > ... > >>>> Note that the git diff view is presented in two separate lines in order to >>>> suppress the checkpatch.pl "CHECKS". > > (1) ^^^ > >>> This paragraph should be in comment block rather than commit message body... >> >> I can move it to comment block but in the last version Andi mentioned >> that I have to leave a note about the function within one line. > > What function? I'm talking about (1) which refers to Git and checkpatch. > There was a remark on this function to make it into a single line. +int piix4_sb800_region_request(struct device *dev, + struct sb800_mmio_cfg *mmio_cfg) Anyways, let me not confuse more. I will put the paragraph what you pointed in the comment block. Thanks, Shyam
Hi Shyam, ... > >> Note that the git diff view is presented in two separate lines in order to > >> suppress the checkpatch.pl "CHECKS". > > > > This paragraph should be in comment block rather than commit message body... > > > > I can move it to comment block but in the last version Andi mentioned > that I have to leave a note about the function within one line. > > >> Co-developed-by: Sanket Goswami <Sanket.Goswami@amd.com> > >> Signed-off-by: Sanket Goswami <Sanket.Goswami@amd.com> > >> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com> > >> --- > > > > ...somewhere here. > > > > ... > > > >> +int piix4_sb800_region_request(struct device *dev, > >> + struct sb800_mmio_cfg *mmio_cfg) > > > > One line? > > > > I am OK to do it, but Andi has a preference to stay within 80 > character wide length. > > Andi, what are you thoughts? I apologize for my earlier review of v4. I failed to notice that you had removed the "static" (which you had properly described). I mistakenly thought you had made an unrelated line adjustment. I'm sorry for requesting a new version. Please feel free to use the format you prefer. Andi PS: I still prefer 80 characters per line, but this is just a personal, non-binding preference.
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.c index 2c2a466e2f85..7e0fb51ce532 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.c @@ -153,8 +153,8 @@ struct i2c_piix4_adapdata { struct sb800_mmio_cfg mmio_cfg; }; -static int piix4_sb800_region_request(struct device *dev, - struct sb800_mmio_cfg *mmio_cfg) +int piix4_sb800_region_request(struct device *dev, + struct sb800_mmio_cfg *mmio_cfg) { if (mmio_cfg->use_mmio) { void __iomem *addr; @@ -192,9 +192,10 @@ static int piix4_sb800_region_request(struct device *dev, return 0; } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(piix4_sb800_region_request); -static void piix4_sb800_region_release(struct device *dev, - struct sb800_mmio_cfg *mmio_cfg) +void piix4_sb800_region_release(struct device *dev, + struct sb800_mmio_cfg *mmio_cfg) { if (mmio_cfg->use_mmio) { iounmap(mmio_cfg->addr); @@ -205,6 +206,7 @@ static void piix4_sb800_region_release(struct device *dev, release_region(SB800_PIIX4_SMB_IDX, SB800_PIIX4_SMB_MAP_SIZE); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(piix4_sb800_region_release); static bool piix4_sb800_use_mmio(struct pci_dev *PIIX4_dev) { @@ -514,7 +516,7 @@ static int piix4_setup_aux(struct pci_dev *PIIX4_dev, return piix4_smba; } -static int piix4_transaction(struct i2c_adapter *piix4_adapter, unsigned short piix4_smba) +int piix4_transaction(struct i2c_adapter *piix4_adapter, unsigned short piix4_smba) { int temp; int result = 0; @@ -587,6 +589,7 @@ static int piix4_transaction(struct i2c_adapter *piix4_adapter, unsigned short p inb_p(SMBHSTDAT1)); return result; } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(piix4_transaction); /* Return negative errno on error. */ static s32 piix4_access(struct i2c_adapter * adap, u16 addr, @@ -740,7 +743,7 @@ static void piix4_imc_wakeup(void) release_region(KERNCZ_IMC_IDX, 2); } -static int piix4_sb800_port_sel(u8 port, struct sb800_mmio_cfg *mmio_cfg) +int piix4_sb800_port_sel(u8 port, struct sb800_mmio_cfg *mmio_cfg) { u8 smba_en_lo, val; @@ -762,6 +765,7 @@ static int piix4_sb800_port_sel(u8 port, struct sb800_mmio_cfg *mmio_cfg) return (smba_en_lo & piix4_port_mask_sb800); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(piix4_sb800_port_sel); /* * Handles access to multiple SMBus ports on the SB800. diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.h b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.h index c4c20edacb00..9a5faac3eedd 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.h +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.h @@ -37,4 +37,9 @@ struct sb800_mmio_cfg { bool use_mmio; }; +int piix4_sb800_port_sel(u8 port, struct sb800_mmio_cfg *mmio_cfg); +int piix4_transaction(struct i2c_adapter *piix4_adapter, unsigned short piix4_smba); +int piix4_sb800_region_request(struct device *dev, struct sb800_mmio_cfg *mmio_cfg); +void piix4_sb800_region_release(struct device *dev, struct sb800_mmio_cfg *mmio_cfg); + #endif /* I2C_PIIX4_H */