[v2,3/4] uq/master: Add CPU eject handling for acpi_piix4

Add stub functions for CPU eject callback. Define cpu_acpi_eject property and
enable eject callback only for pc-1.1 machine model.

Signed-off-by: Vasilis Liaskovitis <vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com>
---
 hw/acpi_piix4.c |   20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 hw/pc_piix.c    |    8 ++++++++
 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

On 2012-01-24 11:10, Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
> Add stub functions for CPU eject callback. Define cpu_acpi_eject property and
> enable eject callback only for pc-1.1 machine model.

Just to get the idea: What is the plan and advantage of introducing a
stub first? How much more is required to have some usable feature, even
if its just a friction of the full support?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Vasilis Liaskovitis <vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com>
> ---
>  hw/acpi_piix4.c |   20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  hw/pc_piix.c    |    8 ++++++++
>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/acpi_piix4.c b/hw/acpi_piix4.c
> index 96e1ce8..8475aa6 100644
> --- a/hw/acpi_piix4.c
> +++ b/hw/acpi_piix4.c
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
>  
>  #define GPE_BASE 0xafe0
>  #define PROC_BASE 0xaf00
> +#define PROC_EJ_BASE 0xaf20
>  #define GPE_LEN 4
>  #define PCI_BASE 0xae00
>  #define PCI_EJ_BASE 0xae08
> @@ -80,6 +81,8 @@ typedef struct PIIX4PMState {
>      struct gpe_regs gpe_cpu;
>      struct pci_status pci0_status;
>      uint32_t pci0_hotplug_enable;
> +    /* for cpu hotplug */
> +    uint32_t cpu_acpi_eject;
>  } PIIX4PMState;
>  
>  static void piix4_acpi_system_hot_add_init(PCIBus *bus, PIIX4PMState *s);
> @@ -424,6 +427,7 @@ static PCIDeviceInfo piix4_pm_info = {
>      .class_id           = PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_OTHER,
>      .qdev.props         = (Property[]) {
>          DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("smb_io_base", PIIX4PMState, smb_io_base, 0),
> +        DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("cpu_acpi_eject", PIIX4PMState, cpu_acpi_eject, 0),
>          DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
>      }
>  };
> @@ -497,6 +501,17 @@ static void pcihotplug_write(void *opaque, uint32_t addr, uint32_t val)
>      PIIX4_DPRINTF("pcihotplug write %x <== %d\n", addr, val);
>  }
>  
> +static uint32_t cpuej_read(void *opaque, uint32_t addr)
> +{
> +    PIIX4_DPRINTF("cpuej read %x\n", addr);
> +    return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void cpuej_write(void *opaque, uint32_t addr, uint32_t val)
> +{
> +    PIIX4_DPRINTF("cpuej write %x <== %d\n", addr, val);
> +}
> +
>  static uint32_t pciej_read(void *opaque, uint32_t addr)
>  {
>      PIIX4_DPRINTF("pciej read %x\n", addr);
> @@ -555,6 +570,11 @@ static void piix4_acpi_system_hot_add_init(PCIBus *bus, PIIX4PMState *s)
>      register_ioport_write(PROC_BASE, 32, 1, gpe_writeb, s);
>      register_ioport_read(PROC_BASE, 32, 1,  gpe_readb, s);
>  
> +    if (s->cpu_acpi_eject) {
> +        register_ioport_write(PROC_EJ_BASE, 32, 1, cpuej_write, s);
> +        register_ioport_read(PROC_EJ_BASE, 32, 1,  cpuej_read, s);
> +    }
> +
>      register_ioport_write(PCI_BASE, 8, 4, pcihotplug_write, pci0_status);
>      register_ioport_read(PCI_BASE, 8, 4,  pcihotplug_read, pci0_status);
>  
> diff --git a/hw/pc_piix.c b/hw/pc_piix.c
> index ac251c6..6d61567 100644
> --- a/hw/pc_piix.c
> +++ b/hw/pc_piix.c
> @@ -380,6 +380,14 @@ static QEMUMachine pc_machine_v1_1 = {
>      .desc = "Standard PC",
>      .init = pc_init_pci,
>      .max_cpus = 255,
> +    .compat_props = (GlobalProperty[]) {
> +        {
> +            .driver   = "PIIX4_PM",
> +            .property = "cpu_acpi_eject",
> +            .value    = stringify(1),

Such things are usually handled the other way around: define
no_cpu_acpi_eject and set it in all legacy machines.

> +        },
> +        { /* end of list */ }
> +    },
>  };
>  
>  static QEMUMachine pc_machine_v1_0 = {

Jan

Am 24.01.2012 11:28, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
> On 2012-01-24 11:10, Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
>> diff --git a/hw/pc_piix.c b/hw/pc_piix.c
>> index ac251c6..6d61567 100644
>> --- a/hw/pc_piix.c
>> +++ b/hw/pc_piix.c
>> @@ -380,6 +380,14 @@ static QEMUMachine pc_machine_v1_1 = {
>>      .desc = "Standard PC",
>>      .init = pc_init_pci,
>>      .max_cpus = 255,
>> +    .compat_props = (GlobalProperty[]) {
>> +        {
>> +            .driver   = "PIIX4_PM",
>> +            .property = "cpu_acpi_eject",
>> +            .value    = stringify(1),
> 
> Such things are usually handled the other way around: define
> no_cpu_acpi_eject and set it in all legacy machines.

Either way reminds me that qdev bool support never got merged. I'll dig
it out and rebase.

Andreas

On 2012-01-24 13:52, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 24.01.2012 11:28, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
>> On 2012-01-24 11:10, Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
>>> diff --git a/hw/pc_piix.c b/hw/pc_piix.c
>>> index ac251c6..6d61567 100644
>>> --- a/hw/pc_piix.c
>>> +++ b/hw/pc_piix.c
>>> @@ -380,6 +380,14 @@ static QEMUMachine pc_machine_v1_1 = {
>>>      .desc = "Standard PC",
>>>      .init = pc_init_pci,
>>>      .max_cpus = 255,
>>> +    .compat_props = (GlobalProperty[]) {
>>> +        {
>>> +            .driver   = "PIIX4_PM",
>>> +            .property = "cpu_acpi_eject",
>>> +            .value    = stringify(1),
>>
>> Such things are usually handled the other way around: define
>> no_cpu_acpi_eject and set it in all legacy machines.
> 
> Either way reminds me that qdev bool support never got merged. I'll dig
> it out and rebase.

Perfect! I really hate to model bool via bit.

Jan