Message ID | 49346212.3050102@rtr.ca |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable, archived |
Headers | show |
On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:15:46 -0500 Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca> wrote: > Yeah.. bit of a nuisance that. > I regularly apply this patch to my own kernels: While it will certainly work, maybe it's time to switch to /sys/class/rtc/rtcX/wakealarm .
Alessandro Zummo wrote: > On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:15:46 -0500 > Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca> wrote: > >> Yeah.. bit of a nuisance that. >> I regularly apply this patch to my own kernels: > > While it will certainly work, maybe it's time to switch > to /sys/class/rtc/rtcX/wakealarm . .. Perhaps, but doing so would still leave the but in /proc/acpi/alarm, so we need to fix it regardless. Cheers --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux". Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux . Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist before submitting a driver. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
--- old/drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c 2008-01-06 16:39:45.000000000 -0500 +++ linux/drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c 2008-01-06 17:35:35.000000000 -0500 @@ -78,11 +78,11 @@ } #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS */ -#if defined(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_CMOS) || defined(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_CMOS_MODULE) || !defined(CONFIG_X86) +//#if defined(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_CMOS) || defined(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_CMOS_MODULE) || !defined(CONFIG_X86) /* use /sys/class/rtc/rtcX/wakealarm instead; it's not ACPI-specific */ -#else +//#else #define HAVE_ACPI_LEGACY_ALARM -#endif +//#endif #ifdef HAVE_ACPI_LEGACY_ALARM