| Message ID | 20210222130735.1313443-1-djrscally@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Introduce intel_skl_int3472 module | expand |
+cc Andy, who's email address I managed to screw up - sorry. On 22/02/2021 13:07, Daniel Scally wrote: > v1 for this series was originally 14-18 of this series: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20201130133129.1024662-1-djrscally@gmail.com/T/#m91934e12e3d033da2e768e952ea3b4a125ee3e67 > > v2 was here: > https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/20210118003428.568892-1-djrscally@gmail.com/ > > Series level changelog: > > - Dropped the patch moving acpi_lpss_dep() to utils since it's not used > in acpi_dev_get_dependent_dev() anymore. > - Replaced it with a patch extending acpi_walk_dep_device_list() to be > able to apply a given callback against each device in acpi_dep_list > - Dropped the patch creating acpi_i2c_dev_name() and simply open coded > that functionality. > > This has been tested on a number of devices, but currently **not** on a device > designed for ChromeOS, which we ideally need to do to ensure no regression > caused by replacing the tps68470 MFD driver. Sakari / Tomasz, is there any way > you could help with that? Unfortunately, I don't have a device to test it on > myself. > > Original cover letter: > > At the moment in the kernel the ACPI _HID INT3472 is taken by the tps68470 > MFD driver, but that driver can only handle some of the cases of that _HID > that we see. There are at least these three possibilities: > > 1. INT3472 devices that provide GPIOs through the usual framework and run > power and clocks through an operation region; this is the situation that > the current module handles and is seen on ChromeOS devices > 2. INT3472 devices that provide GPIOs, plus clocks and regulators that are > meant to be driven through the usual frameworks, usually seen on devices > designed to run Windows > 3. INT3472 devices that don't actually represent a physical tps68470, but > are being used as a convenient way of grouping a bunch of system GPIO > lines that are intended to enable power and clocks for sensors which > are called out as dependent on them. Also seen on devices designed to > run Windows. > > This series introduces a new module which registers: > > 1. An i2c driver that determines which scenario (#1 or #2) applies to the > machine and registers platform devices to be bound to GPIO, OpRegion, > clock and regulator drivers as appropriate. > 2. A platform driver that binds to the dummy INT3472 devices described in > #3 > > The platform driver for the dummy device registers the GPIO lines that > enable the clocks and regulators to the sensors via those frameworks so > that sensor drivers can consume them in the usual fashion. The existing > GPIO and OpRegion tps68470 drivers will work with the i2c driver that's > registered. Clock and regulator drivers are available but have not so far been > tested, so aren't part of this series. > > The existing mfd/tps68470.c driver being thus superseded, it is removed. > > Thanks > Dan > > Daniel Scally (6): > ACPI: scan: Extend acpi_walk_dep_device_list() > ACPI: scan: Add function to fetch dependent of acpi device > i2c: core: Add a format macro for I2C device names > gpiolib: acpi: Export acpi_get_gpiod() > platform/x86: Add intel_skl_int3472 driver > mfd: tps68470: Remove tps68470 MFD driver > > MAINTAINERS | 5 + > drivers/acpi/ec.c | 2 +- > drivers/acpi/pmic/Kconfig | 2 +- > drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c | 2 +- > drivers/acpi/scan.c | 92 ++- > drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 2 +- > drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 38 +- > drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c | 2 +- > drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 4 +- > drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 18 - > drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 - > drivers/mfd/tps68470.c | 97 --- > drivers/platform/surface/surface3_power.c | 2 +- > drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig | 2 + > drivers/platform/x86/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/Kconfig | 31 + > drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/Makefile | 4 + > .../intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_common.c | 106 ++++ > .../intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_common.h | 110 ++++ > .../intel_skl_int3472_discrete.c | 592 ++++++++++++++++++ > .../intel_skl_int3472_tps68470.c | 113 ++++ > include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 8 + > include/linux/acpi.h | 4 +- > include/linux/gpio/consumer.h | 7 + > include/linux/i2c.h | 3 + > 25 files changed, 1100 insertions(+), 148 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 drivers/mfd/tps68470.c > create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/Kconfig > create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/Makefile > create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_common.c > create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_common.h > create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_discrete.c > create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_tps68470.c >
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 3:11 PM Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com> wrote: > > v1 for this series was originally 14-18 of this series: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20201130133129.1024662-1-djrscally@gmail.com/T/#m91934e12e3d033da2e768e952ea3b4a125ee3e67 > > v2 was here: > https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/20210118003428.568892-1-djrscally@gmail.com/ > > Series level changelog: > > - Dropped the patch moving acpi_lpss_dep() to utils since it's not used > in acpi_dev_get_dependent_dev() anymore. > - Replaced it with a patch extending acpi_walk_dep_device_list() to be > able to apply a given callback against each device in acpi_dep_list > - Dropped the patch creating acpi_i2c_dev_name() and simply open coded > that functionality. > > This has been tested on a number of devices, but currently **not** on a device > designed for ChromeOS, which we ideally need to do to ensure no regression > caused by replacing the tps68470 MFD driver. Sakari / Tomasz, is there any way > you could help with that? Unfortunately, I don't have a device to test it on > myself. +Cc: Dmitry and Guenter. Guys, do you know by a chance who can help with the above request from Daniel? > Original cover letter: > > At the moment in the kernel the ACPI _HID INT3472 is taken by the tps68470 > MFD driver, but that driver can only handle some of the cases of that _HID > that we see. There are at least these three possibilities: > > 1. INT3472 devices that provide GPIOs through the usual framework and run > power and clocks through an operation region; this is the situation that > the current module handles and is seen on ChromeOS devices > 2. INT3472 devices that provide GPIOs, plus clocks and regulators that are > meant to be driven through the usual frameworks, usually seen on devices > designed to run Windows > 3. INT3472 devices that don't actually represent a physical tps68470, but > are being used as a convenient way of grouping a bunch of system GPIO > lines that are intended to enable power and clocks for sensors which > are called out as dependent on them. Also seen on devices designed to > run Windows. > > This series introduces a new module which registers: > > 1. An i2c driver that determines which scenario (#1 or #2) applies to the > machine and registers platform devices to be bound to GPIO, OpRegion, > clock and regulator drivers as appropriate. > 2. A platform driver that binds to the dummy INT3472 devices described in > #3 > > The platform driver for the dummy device registers the GPIO lines that > enable the clocks and regulators to the sensors via those frameworks so > that sensor drivers can consume them in the usual fashion. The existing > GPIO and OpRegion tps68470 drivers will work with the i2c driver that's > registered. Clock and regulator drivers are available but have not so far been > tested, so aren't part of this series. > > The existing mfd/tps68470.c driver being thus superseded, it is removed. > > Thanks > Dan > > Daniel Scally (6): > ACPI: scan: Extend acpi_walk_dep_device_list() > ACPI: scan: Add function to fetch dependent of acpi device > i2c: core: Add a format macro for I2C device names > gpiolib: acpi: Export acpi_get_gpiod() > platform/x86: Add intel_skl_int3472 driver > mfd: tps68470: Remove tps68470 MFD driver > > MAINTAINERS | 5 + > drivers/acpi/ec.c | 2 +- > drivers/acpi/pmic/Kconfig | 2 +- > drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c | 2 +- > drivers/acpi/scan.c | 92 ++- > drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 2 +- > drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 38 +- > drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c | 2 +- > drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 4 +- > drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 18 - > drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 - > drivers/mfd/tps68470.c | 97 --- > drivers/platform/surface/surface3_power.c | 2 +- > drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig | 2 + > drivers/platform/x86/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/Kconfig | 31 + > drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/Makefile | 4 + > .../intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_common.c | 106 ++++ > .../intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_common.h | 110 ++++ > .../intel_skl_int3472_discrete.c | 592 ++++++++++++++++++ > .../intel_skl_int3472_tps68470.c | 113 ++++ > include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 8 + > include/linux/acpi.h | 4 +- > include/linux/gpio/consumer.h | 7 + > include/linux/i2c.h | 3 + > 25 files changed, 1100 insertions(+), 148 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 drivers/mfd/tps68470.c > create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/Kconfig > create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/Makefile > create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_common.c > create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_common.h > create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_discrete.c > create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_tps68470.c > > -- > 2.25.1 >
Hi, On 2/22/21 2:07 PM, Daniel Scally wrote: > v1 for this series was originally 14-18 of this series: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20201130133129.1024662-1-djrscally@gmail.com/T/#m91934e12e3d033da2e768e952ea3b4a125ee3e67 > > v2 was here: > https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/20210118003428.568892-1-djrscally@gmail.com/ > > Series level changelog: > > - Dropped the patch moving acpi_lpss_dep() to utils since it's not used > in acpi_dev_get_dependent_dev() anymore. > - Replaced it with a patch extending acpi_walk_dep_device_list() to be > able to apply a given callback against each device in acpi_dep_list > - Dropped the patch creating acpi_i2c_dev_name() and simply open coded > that functionality. > > This has been tested on a number of devices, but currently **not** on a device > designed for ChromeOS, which we ideally need to do to ensure no regression > caused by replacing the tps68470 MFD driver. Sakari / Tomasz, is there any way > you could help with that? Unfortunately, I don't have a device to test it on > myself. > > Original cover letter: > > At the moment in the kernel the ACPI _HID INT3472 is taken by the tps68470 > MFD driver, but that driver can only handle some of the cases of that _HID > that we see. There are at least these three possibilities: > > 1. INT3472 devices that provide GPIOs through the usual framework and run > power and clocks through an operation region; this is the situation that > the current module handles and is seen on ChromeOS devices > 2. INT3472 devices that provide GPIOs, plus clocks and regulators that are > meant to be driven through the usual frameworks, usually seen on devices > designed to run Windows > 3. INT3472 devices that don't actually represent a physical tps68470, but > are being used as a convenient way of grouping a bunch of system GPIO > lines that are intended to enable power and clocks for sensors which > are called out as dependent on them. Also seen on devices designed to > run Windows. > > This series introduces a new module which registers: > > 1. An i2c driver that determines which scenario (#1 or #2) applies to the > machine and registers platform devices to be bound to GPIO, OpRegion, > clock and regulator drivers as appropriate. > 2. A platform driver that binds to the dummy INT3472 devices described in > #3 > > The platform driver for the dummy device registers the GPIO lines that > enable the clocks and regulators to the sensors via those frameworks so > that sensor drivers can consume them in the usual fashion. The existing > GPIO and OpRegion tps68470 drivers will work with the i2c driver that's > registered. Clock and regulator drivers are available but have not so far been > tested, so aren't part of this series. > > The existing mfd/tps68470.c driver being thus superseded, it is removed. Thank you for this patch series. Since there have already been a whole bunch of review-comments, I've not taken a detailed look at this yet. I do wonder if you have thought about how this series should be merged? This series is spread over quite a few subsytems and since there are various interdependencies in the patches it is probably best if it gets merged in its entirety through a single tree. I guess that merging though either Rafael's (drivers/acpi) tree or Lee's (drivers/mfd) tree makes the most sense. As drivers/platform/x86 maintainer I'm happy with whatever solution works for the other subsystem maintainers. Regards, Hans > > Thanks > Dan > > Daniel Scally (6): > ACPI: scan: Extend acpi_walk_dep_device_list() > ACPI: scan: Add function to fetch dependent of acpi device > i2c: core: Add a format macro for I2C device names > gpiolib: acpi: Export acpi_get_gpiod() > platform/x86: Add intel_skl_int3472 driver > mfd: tps68470: Remove tps68470 MFD driver > > MAINTAINERS | 5 + > drivers/acpi/ec.c | 2 +- > drivers/acpi/pmic/Kconfig | 2 +- > drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c | 2 +- > drivers/acpi/scan.c | 92 ++- > drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 2 +- > drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 38 +- > drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c | 2 +- > drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 4 +- > drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 18 - > drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 - > drivers/mfd/tps68470.c | 97 --- > drivers/platform/surface/surface3_power.c | 2 +- > drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig | 2 + > drivers/platform/x86/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/Kconfig | 31 + > drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/Makefile | 4 + > .../intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_common.c | 106 ++++ > .../intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_common.h | 110 ++++ > .../intel_skl_int3472_discrete.c | 592 ++++++++++++++++++ > .../intel_skl_int3472_tps68470.c | 113 ++++ > include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 8 + > include/linux/acpi.h | 4 +- > include/linux/gpio/consumer.h | 7 + > include/linux/i2c.h | 3 + > 25 files changed, 1100 insertions(+), 148 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 drivers/mfd/tps68470.c > create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/Kconfig > create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/Makefile > create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_common.c > create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_common.h > create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_discrete.c > create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_tps68470.c >
Hi Hans On 04/03/2021 13:37, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 2/22/21 2:07 PM, Daniel Scally wrote: >> v1 for this series was originally 14-18 of this series: >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20201130133129.1024662-1-djrscally@gmail.com/T/#m91934e12e3d033da2e768e952ea3b4a125ee3e67 >> >> v2 was here: >> https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/20210118003428.568892-1-djrscally@gmail.com/ >> >> Series level changelog: >> >> - Dropped the patch moving acpi_lpss_dep() to utils since it's not used >> in acpi_dev_get_dependent_dev() anymore. >> - Replaced it with a patch extending acpi_walk_dep_device_list() to be >> able to apply a given callback against each device in acpi_dep_list >> - Dropped the patch creating acpi_i2c_dev_name() and simply open coded >> that functionality. >> >> This has been tested on a number of devices, but currently **not** on a device >> designed for ChromeOS, which we ideally need to do to ensure no regression >> caused by replacing the tps68470 MFD driver. Sakari / Tomasz, is there any way >> you could help with that? Unfortunately, I don't have a device to test it on >> myself. >> >> Original cover letter: >> >> At the moment in the kernel the ACPI _HID INT3472 is taken by the tps68470 >> MFD driver, but that driver can only handle some of the cases of that _HID >> that we see. There are at least these three possibilities: >> >> 1. INT3472 devices that provide GPIOs through the usual framework and run >> power and clocks through an operation region; this is the situation that >> the current module handles and is seen on ChromeOS devices >> 2. INT3472 devices that provide GPIOs, plus clocks and regulators that are >> meant to be driven through the usual frameworks, usually seen on devices >> designed to run Windows >> 3. INT3472 devices that don't actually represent a physical tps68470, but >> are being used as a convenient way of grouping a bunch of system GPIO >> lines that are intended to enable power and clocks for sensors which >> are called out as dependent on them. Also seen on devices designed to >> run Windows. >> >> This series introduces a new module which registers: >> >> 1. An i2c driver that determines which scenario (#1 or #2) applies to the >> machine and registers platform devices to be bound to GPIO, OpRegion, >> clock and regulator drivers as appropriate. >> 2. A platform driver that binds to the dummy INT3472 devices described in >> #3 >> >> The platform driver for the dummy device registers the GPIO lines that >> enable the clocks and regulators to the sensors via those frameworks so >> that sensor drivers can consume them in the usual fashion. The existing >> GPIO and OpRegion tps68470 drivers will work with the i2c driver that's >> registered. Clock and regulator drivers are available but have not so far been >> tested, so aren't part of this series. >> >> The existing mfd/tps68470.c driver being thus superseded, it is removed. > Thank you for this patch series. Since there have already been a whole > bunch of review-comments, I've not taken a detailed look at this yet. No problem, I'm hoping to do a v3 over the weekend anyway. > I do wonder if you have thought about how this series should be merged? > This series is spread over quite a few subsytems and since there are > various interdependencies in the patches it is probably best if it gets > merged in its entirety through a single tree. > > I guess that merging though either Rafael's (drivers/acpi) tree or > Lee's (drivers/mfd) tree makes the most sense. > > As drivers/platform/x86 maintainer I'm happy with whatever solution > works for the other subsystem maintainers. I also think it's a good idea to go through a single tree, and my plan was to raise that probably after the next review round or so, but I hadn't gotten as far as thinking about whos tree it should be or anything yet. To be honest I'm not sure what factors dictate which choice is best in that regard; handling complex git merges is a bit outside my experience. > > Regards, > > Hans > > > > >> Thanks >> Dan >> >> Daniel Scally (6): >> ACPI: scan: Extend acpi_walk_dep_device_list() >> ACPI: scan: Add function to fetch dependent of acpi device >> i2c: core: Add a format macro for I2C device names >> gpiolib: acpi: Export acpi_get_gpiod() >> platform/x86: Add intel_skl_int3472 driver >> mfd: tps68470: Remove tps68470 MFD driver >> >> MAINTAINERS | 5 + >> drivers/acpi/ec.c | 2 +- >> drivers/acpi/pmic/Kconfig | 2 +- >> drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_chtdc_ti.c | 2 +- >> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 92 ++- >> drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 2 +- >> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 38 +- >> drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c | 2 +- >> drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 4 +- >> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 18 - >> drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 - >> drivers/mfd/tps68470.c | 97 --- >> drivers/platform/surface/surface3_power.c | 2 +- >> drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig | 2 + >> drivers/platform/x86/Makefile | 1 + >> drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/Kconfig | 31 + >> drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/Makefile | 4 + >> .../intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_common.c | 106 ++++ >> .../intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_common.h | 110 ++++ >> .../intel_skl_int3472_discrete.c | 592 ++++++++++++++++++ >> .../intel_skl_int3472_tps68470.c | 113 ++++ >> include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 8 + >> include/linux/acpi.h | 4 +- >> include/linux/gpio/consumer.h | 7 + >> include/linux/i2c.h | 3 + >> 25 files changed, 1100 insertions(+), 148 deletions(-) >> delete mode 100644 drivers/mfd/tps68470.c >> create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/Kconfig >> create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/Makefile >> create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_common.c >> create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_common.h >> create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_discrete.c >> create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel-int3472/intel_skl_int3472_tps68470.c >>
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 01:49:14PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote: > On 04/03/2021 13:37, Hans de Goede wrote: > > On 2/22/21 2:07 PM, Daniel Scally wrote: ... > >> The existing mfd/tps68470.c driver being thus superseded, it is removed. > > Thank you for this patch series. Since there have already been a whole > > bunch of review-comments, I've not taken a detailed look at this yet. > > No problem, I'm hoping to do a v3 over the weekend anyway. Do you mean v4? I'm just wondering if you need any help.
Hi Andy On 29/03/2021 16:03, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 01:49:14PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote: >> On 04/03/2021 13:37, Hans de Goede wrote: >>> On 2/22/21 2:07 PM, Daniel Scally wrote: > ... > >>>> The existing mfd/tps68470.c driver being thus superseded, it is removed. >>> Thank you for this patch series. Since there have already been a whole >>> bunch of review-comments, I've not taken a detailed look at this yet. >> No problem, I'm hoping to do a v3 over the weekend anyway. > Do you mean v4? Oops, I do indeed. > I'm just wondering if you need any help. Thanks - I don't think so; I've just not been working on it very much lately. I got sidetracked with a sensor driver [1] that was pretty fun, so I've been focused on that instead. I'm just finishing up a v2 for that, and then I'll come back to this. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20210312103239.279523-2-djrscally@gmail.com/