Message ID | 20110906192229.GK28816@pengutronix.de |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Tuesday 06 September 2011, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > if I remember correctly you don't mind non-fast-forward updates?! If I'm > wrong just tell me. Right, I can take a limited number of those at least. I want a reasonable git history, not a stainless one ;-) > Compared to Sascha's pull request this mail is a reply to, the following > changed: > > - squash a patch by Jason Liu <jason.hui@linaro.org> into > d27536c6619221528114746317def345467a3e80 fixing a build failure for > mx25 (1314623624-9999-1-git-send-email-jason.hui@linaro.org) > - squash a patch by Arnaud Patard (Rtp) <arnaud.patard@rtp-net.org> > into 236c4e8be436380b5354fe0d7facf94688e024ec fixing the resource > size for pata_imx devices (20110827131911.571434313@rtp-net.org) > - two new patches: > "ARM: mx51/efika: Configure esdhc cd/wp on efika mx/sb" and "ARM: mx5: fix clock > usage for suspend" both by Arnaud Patard. > > I choosed to squash the two fixes to ease bisection. > Though the 2nd patch by Arnaud fixes suspend, I think it's not necessary > to go in before v3.1. There were a few other pull requests that I haven't taken yet since master.kernel.org is down. If the general feeling is that I should take at least the bug fixes, I can start a branch on the linaro server for that. Arnd
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > There were a few other pull requests that I haven't taken yet since > master.kernel.org is down. If the general feeling is that I should take > at least the bug fixes, I can start a branch on the linaro server for that. My feeling is that you should take them all on git.linaro.org (or anywhere for that matter) just as if master.kernel.org was alive. The nice property of Git is that the actual location of a repository shouldn't matter. Bringing it back to master.kernel.org later on would be a no brainer. I do have write access to that repository on master.kernel.org, but I practically never exercised that privilege so far, hence this doesn't have to be transferred as well. Nicolas
On Thursday 08 September 2011, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Thu, 8 Sep 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > There were a few other pull requests that I haven't taken yet since > > master.kernel.org is down. If the general feeling is that I should take > > at least the bug fixes, I can start a branch on the linaro server for that. > > My feeling is that you should take them all on git.linaro.org (or > anywhere for that matter) just as if master.kernel.org was alive. The > nice property of Git is that the actual location of a repository > shouldn't matter. Bringing it back to master.kernel.org later on would > be a no brainer. I do have write access to that repository on > master.kernel.org, but I practically never exercised that privilege so > far, hence this doesn't have to be transferred as well. Ok, pulled into imx/devel and next/devel now. Please check that everything still works. Arnd