mbox

[GIT,PULL] orion5x and footbridge compile fixes for 3.1

Message ID 4E565AC4.7060504@gmail.com
State New
Headers show

Pull-request

git://git.jdl.com/software/linux-3.0.git fixes

Message

Rob Herring Aug. 25, 2011, 2:23 p.m. UTC
Arnd,

Please pull for 3.1-rc. Footbridge and orion5x builds are currently
broken in 3.1 mainly due to my changes in this commit:

commit cc22b4c18540e5e8bf55c7d124044f9317527d3c
Author: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Date:   Tue Jun 28 21:22:40 2011 -0500

    ARM: set vga memory base at run-time


The following changes since commit fcb8ce5cfe30ca9ca5c9a79cdfe26d1993e65e0c:

  Linux 3.1-rc3 (2011-08-22 11:42:53 -0700)

are available in the git repository at:
  git://git.jdl.com/software/linux-3.0.git fixes

Bryan Wu (2):
      ARM: mach-orion5x: add missing header file <linux/vga.h>
      ARM: mach-footbridge: add missing header file <video/vga.h>

Paul Gortmaker (1):
      arm: fix compile failure in orion5x/dns323-setup.c

 arch/arm/mach-footbridge/dc21285.c   |    1 +
 arch/arm/mach-orion5x/dns323-setup.c |    2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-orion5x/pci.c          |    1 +
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Rob

Comments

Paul Gortmaker Aug. 25, 2011, 3:37 p.m. UTC | #1
On 11-08-25 10:23 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> Arnd,
> 
> Please pull for 3.1-rc. Footbridge and orion5x builds are currently
> broken in 3.1 mainly due to my changes in this commit:
> 
> commit cc22b4c18540e5e8bf55c7d124044f9317527d3c
> Author: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
> Date:   Tue Jun 28 21:22:40 2011 -0500
> 
>     ARM: set vga memory base at run-time
> 
> 
> The following changes since commit fcb8ce5cfe30ca9ca5c9a79cdfe26d1993e65e0c:
> 
>   Linux 3.1-rc3 (2011-08-22 11:42:53 -0700)
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
>   git://git.jdl.com/software/linux-3.0.git fixes
> 
> Bryan Wu (2):
>       ARM: mach-orion5x: add missing header file <linux/vga.h>
>       ARM: mach-footbridge: add missing header file <video/vga.h>

I had similar commits to the two above in the module.h tree
(in linux-next) since I thought the missing vga.h was fallout
from the implicit presence of module.h everywhere.

I'll drop all three from linux-next now that they are scheduled
for pulling into 3.1-rcN.

Thanks,
Paul.

> 
> Paul Gortmaker (1):
>       arm: fix compile failure in orion5x/dns323-setup.c
> 
>  arch/arm/mach-footbridge/dc21285.c   |    1 +
>  arch/arm/mach-orion5x/dns323-setup.c |    2 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-orion5x/pci.c          |    1 +
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> Rob
Arnd Bergmann Aug. 26, 2011, 3:53 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thursday 25 August 2011, Rob Herring wrote:
> Please pull for 3.1-rc. Footbridge and orion5x builds are currently
> broken in 3.1 mainly due to my changes in this commit:
> 
> commit cc22b4c18540e5e8bf55c7d124044f9317527d3c
> Author: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
> Date:   Tue Jun 28 21:22:40 2011 -0500
> 
>     ARM: set vga memory base at run-time
> 
> 
> The following changes since commit fcb8ce5cfe30ca9ca5c9a79cdfe26d1993e65e0c:
> 

Pulled, thanks!

BTW, are you planning to get your own git tree in the future or do you keep using
Jon's git.jdl.com server?

It should be no problem for you to get hosting on git.kernel.org, there is
a FAQ somewhere. With the current situation, it's now clear from the changelog
why I am pulling patches from Jon's server with your Signed-off-by.

	Arnd
Rob Herring Aug. 26, 2011, 4:05 p.m. UTC | #3
Arnd,

On 08/26/2011 10:53 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 25 August 2011, Rob Herring wrote:
>> Please pull for 3.1-rc. Footbridge and orion5x builds are currently
>> broken in 3.1 mainly due to my changes in this commit:
>>
>> commit cc22b4c18540e5e8bf55c7d124044f9317527d3c
>> Author: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>> Date:   Tue Jun 28 21:22:40 2011 -0500
>>
>>     ARM: set vga memory base at run-time
>>
>>
>> The following changes since commit fcb8ce5cfe30ca9ca5c9a79cdfe26d1993e65e0c:
>>
> 
> Pulled, thanks!
> 
> BTW, are you planning to get your own git tree in the future or do you keep using
> Jon's git.jdl.com server?

It is mine basically, just on Jon's domain. But yes, it's on the IT guys
todo list... Jon was just the quickest path.

> 
> It should be no problem for you to get hosting on git.kernel.org, there is
> a FAQ somewhere. With the current situation, it's now clear from the changelog
> why I am pulling patches from Jon's server with your Signed-off-by.
> 
Why would 3 Marvell patches from me be strange... :)
It wasn't really clear to me whether you were going to pick them off the
list and were aware of all 3 patches, so I just decided to make it easy
for you.

Rob
Arnd Bergmann Aug. 26, 2011, 4:18 p.m. UTC | #4
On Friday 26 August 2011, Rob Herring wrote:
> > It should be no problem for you to get hosting on git.kernel.org, there is
> > a FAQ somewhere. With the current situation, it's now clear from the changelog
> > why I am pulling patches from Jon's server with your Signed-off-by.
> > 
> Why would 3 Marvell patches from me be strange... :)
> It wasn't really clear to me whether you were going to pick them off the
> list and were aware of all 3 patches, so I just decided to make it easy
> for you.

It's all good and for three patches there is no worry at all. I was mainly
wondering about the long-term plans the larger series that you are
submitting.

	Arnd