mbox series

[v5,0/5] Add PCIe support for SM8250 SoC

Message ID 20201027170033.8475-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org
Headers show
Series Add PCIe support for SM8250 SoC | expand

Message

Manivannan Sadhasivam Oct. 27, 2020, 5 p.m. UTC
Hello,

This series adds PCIe support for Qualcomm SM8250 SoC with relevant PHYs.
There are 3 PCIe instances on this SoC each with different PHYs. The PCIe
controller and PHYs are mostly comaptible with the ones found on SDM845
SoC, hence the old drivers are modified to add the support.

This series has been tested on RB5 board with QCA6391 chipset connected
onboard.

Thanks,
Mani

Changes in v5:

* Added Review tags from Rob
* Cleaned up the bdf to sid patch after discussing with Tony

Changes in v4:

* Fixed an issue with tx_tbl_sec in PHY driver

Changes in v3:

* Rebased on top of phy/next
* Renamed ops_sm8250 to ops_1_9_0 to maintain uniformity

Changes in v2:

* Fixed the PHY and PCIe bindings
* Introduced secondary table in PHY driver to abstract out the common configs.
* Used a more generic way of configuring BDF to SID mapping
* Dropped ATU change in favor of a patch spotted by Rob

Manivannan Sadhasivam (5):
  dt-bindings: phy: qcom,qmp: Add SM8250 PCIe PHY bindings
  phy: qcom-qmp: Add SM8250 PCIe QMP PHYs
  dt-bindings: pci: qcom: Document PCIe bindings for SM8250 SoC
  PCI: qcom: Add SM8250 SoC support
  PCI: qcom: Add support for configuring BDF to SID mapping for SM8250

 .../devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.txt     |   6 +-
 .../devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,qmp-phy.yaml |   6 +
 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig            |   1 +
 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c        |  92 ++++++
 drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c           | 281 +++++++++++++++++-
 drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.h           |  18 ++
 6 files changed, 398 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Lorenzo Pieralisi Dec. 8, 2020, 9:47 a.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:30:28PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> This series adds PCIe support for Qualcomm SM8250 SoC with relevant PHYs.
> There are 3 PCIe instances on this SoC each with different PHYs. The PCIe
> controller and PHYs are mostly comaptible with the ones found on SDM845
> SoC, hence the old drivers are modified to add the support.
> 
> This series has been tested on RB5 board with QCA6391 chipset connected
> onboard.

Hi,

I would be merging this series, I understand patch {2) was already
taken by Vinod - should I take {1,3,4,5} via the pci tree ?

Thanks,
Lorenzo

> Thanks,
> Mani
> 
> Changes in v5:
> 
> * Added Review tags from Rob
> * Cleaned up the bdf to sid patch after discussing with Tony
> 
> Changes in v4:
> 
> * Fixed an issue with tx_tbl_sec in PHY driver
> 
> Changes in v3:
> 
> * Rebased on top of phy/next
> * Renamed ops_sm8250 to ops_1_9_0 to maintain uniformity
> 
> Changes in v2:
> 
> * Fixed the PHY and PCIe bindings
> * Introduced secondary table in PHY driver to abstract out the common configs.
> * Used a more generic way of configuring BDF to SID mapping
> * Dropped ATU change in favor of a patch spotted by Rob
> 
> Manivannan Sadhasivam (5):
>   dt-bindings: phy: qcom,qmp: Add SM8250 PCIe PHY bindings
>   phy: qcom-qmp: Add SM8250 PCIe QMP PHYs
>   dt-bindings: pci: qcom: Document PCIe bindings for SM8250 SoC
>   PCI: qcom: Add SM8250 SoC support
>   PCI: qcom: Add support for configuring BDF to SID mapping for SM8250
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.txt     |   6 +-
>  .../devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,qmp-phy.yaml |   6 +
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig            |   1 +
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c        |  92 ++++++
>  drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c           | 281 +++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.h           |  18 ++
>  6 files changed, 398 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.17.1
>
Manivannan Sadhasivam Dec. 8, 2020, 10:45 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Lorenzo,

On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:47:12AM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:30:28PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > This series adds PCIe support for Qualcomm SM8250 SoC with relevant PHYs.
> > There are 3 PCIe instances on this SoC each with different PHYs. The PCIe
> > controller and PHYs are mostly comaptible with the ones found on SDM845
> > SoC, hence the old drivers are modified to add the support.
> > 
> > This series has been tested on RB5 board with QCA6391 chipset connected
> > onboard.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I would be merging this series, I understand patch {2) was already
> taken by Vinod - should I take {1,3,4,5} via the pci tree ?
> 

Vinod merged patches 1/5 and 2/5 as they belong to phy subsystem. You
can take the rest of the patches via pci tree.

Thanks,
Mani

> Thanks,
> Lorenzo
> 
> > Thanks,
> > Mani
> > 
> > Changes in v5:
> > 
> > * Added Review tags from Rob
> > * Cleaned up the bdf to sid patch after discussing with Tony
> > 
> > Changes in v4:
> > 
> > * Fixed an issue with tx_tbl_sec in PHY driver
> > 
> > Changes in v3:
> > 
> > * Rebased on top of phy/next
> > * Renamed ops_sm8250 to ops_1_9_0 to maintain uniformity
> > 
> > Changes in v2:
> > 
> > * Fixed the PHY and PCIe bindings
> > * Introduced secondary table in PHY driver to abstract out the common configs.
> > * Used a more generic way of configuring BDF to SID mapping
> > * Dropped ATU change in favor of a patch spotted by Rob
> > 
> > Manivannan Sadhasivam (5):
> >   dt-bindings: phy: qcom,qmp: Add SM8250 PCIe PHY bindings
> >   phy: qcom-qmp: Add SM8250 PCIe QMP PHYs
> >   dt-bindings: pci: qcom: Document PCIe bindings for SM8250 SoC
> >   PCI: qcom: Add SM8250 SoC support
> >   PCI: qcom: Add support for configuring BDF to SID mapping for SM8250
> > 
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.txt     |   6 +-
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,qmp-phy.yaml |   6 +
> >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig            |   1 +
> >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c        |  92 ++++++
> >  drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c           | 281 +++++++++++++++++-
> >  drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.h           |  18 ++
> >  6 files changed, 398 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > -- 
> > 2.17.1
> >
Lorenzo Pieralisi Dec. 8, 2020, 11:40 a.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 04:15:57PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Hi Lorenzo,
> 
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:47:12AM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:30:28PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > This series adds PCIe support for Qualcomm SM8250 SoC with relevant PHYs.
> > > There are 3 PCIe instances on this SoC each with different PHYs. The PCIe
> > > controller and PHYs are mostly comaptible with the ones found on SDM845
> > > SoC, hence the old drivers are modified to add the support.
> > > 
> > > This series has been tested on RB5 board with QCA6391 chipset connected
> > > onboard.
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I would be merging this series, I understand patch {2) was already
> > taken by Vinod - should I take {1,3,4,5} via the pci tree ?
> > 
> 
> Vinod merged patches 1/5 and 2/5 as they belong to phy subsystem. You
> can take the rest of the patches via pci tree.

Would you mind rebasing them on top of my pci/dwc branch (with Bjorn's
tags) and resend them, I will apply them then.

Thanks,
Lorenzo
Manivannan Sadhasivam Dec. 8, 2020, 12:01 p.m. UTC | #4
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 11:40:23AM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 04:15:57PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > Hi Lorenzo,
> > 
> > On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:47:12AM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:30:28PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > > 
> > > > This series adds PCIe support for Qualcomm SM8250 SoC with relevant PHYs.
> > > > There are 3 PCIe instances on this SoC each with different PHYs. The PCIe
> > > > controller and PHYs are mostly comaptible with the ones found on SDM845
> > > > SoC, hence the old drivers are modified to add the support.
> > > > 
> > > > This series has been tested on RB5 board with QCA6391 chipset connected
> > > > onboard.
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I would be merging this series, I understand patch {2) was already
> > > taken by Vinod - should I take {1,3,4,5} via the pci tree ?
> > > 
> > 
> > Vinod merged patches 1/5 and 2/5 as they belong to phy subsystem. You
> > can take the rest of the patches via pci tree.
> 
> Would you mind rebasing them on top of my pci/dwc branch (with Bjorn's
> tags) and resend them, I will apply them then.
> 

Sure, will send now.

Thanks,
Mani

> Thanks,
> Lorenzo