diff mbox series

i40e: Check if transceiver implements DDM before access

Message ID 20190718175202.14909-1-maurosr@linux.vnet.ibm.com
State Accepted
Delegated to: Jeff Kirsher
Headers show
Series i40e: Check if transceiver implements DDM before access | expand

Commit Message

Mauro S. M. Rodrigues July 18, 2019, 5:52 p.m. UTC
Similar to the ixgbe issue fixed in:
655c91414579 ("ixgbe: Check DDM existence in transceiver before access)

i40e has the same issue when reading eeprom from SFP's module that comply
with SFF-8472 but not implement the Digital Diagnostic Monitoring (DDM)
interface described in it. The existence of such area is specified by bit
6 of byte 92, set to 1 if implemented.

Without this patch, due to not checking this bit i40e fails to read SFP
module's eeprom with the follow message:

ethtool -m enP51p1s0f0
Cannot get Module EEPROM data: Input/output error

Because it fails to read the additional 256 bytes in which it was assumed
to exist the DDM data.

Signed-off-by: "Mauro S. M. Rodrigues" <maurosr@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c | 6 ++++++
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_type.h    | 1 +
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)

Comments

Bowers, AndrewX July 22, 2019, 7:18 p.m. UTC | #1
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org] On
> Behalf Of Mauro S. M. Rodrigues
> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2019 10:52 AM
> To: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org; Kirsher, Jeffrey T
> <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
> Cc: wangyugui@e16-tech.com
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] i40e: Check if transceiver implements
> DDM before access
> 
> Similar to the ixgbe issue fixed in:
> 655c91414579 ("ixgbe: Check DDM existence in transceiver before access)
> 
> i40e has the same issue when reading eeprom from SFP's module that
> comply with SFF-8472 but not implement the Digital Diagnostic Monitoring
> (DDM) interface described in it. The existence of such area is specified by bit
> 6 of byte 92, set to 1 if implemented.
> 
> Without this patch, due to not checking this bit i40e fails to read SFP module's
> eeprom with the follow message:
> 
> ethtool -m enP51p1s0f0
> Cannot get Module EEPROM data: Input/output error
> 
> Because it fails to read the additional 256 bytes in which it was assumed to
> exist the DDM data.
> 
> Signed-off-by: "Mauro S. M. Rodrigues" <maurosr@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c | 6 ++++++
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_type.h    | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)

Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@intel.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c
index 527eb52c5401..e456e2122fea 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c
@@ -5123,6 +5123,12 @@  static int i40e_get_module_info(struct net_device *netdev,
 			/* Module is not SFF-8472 compliant */
 			modinfo->type = ETH_MODULE_SFF_8079;
 			modinfo->eeprom_len = ETH_MODULE_SFF_8079_LEN;
+		} else if (!(sff8472_swap & I40E_MODULE_SFF_DDM_IMPLEMENTED)) {
+			/* Module is SFF-8472 compliant but doesn't implemend Digital Diagnostic
+			 * Monitoring (DDM).
+			 */
+			modinfo->type = ETH_MODULE_SFF_8079;
+			modinfo->eeprom_len = ETH_MODULE_SFF_8079_LEN;
 		} else {
 			modinfo->type = ETH_MODULE_SFF_8472;
 			modinfo->eeprom_len = ETH_MODULE_SFF_8472_LEN;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_type.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_type.h
index 8f43aa47c263..2a6219d66771 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_type.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_type.h
@@ -443,6 +443,7 @@  struct i40e_nvm_access {
 #define I40E_MODULE_SFF_8472_COMP	0x5E
 #define I40E_MODULE_SFF_8472_SWAP	0x5C
 #define I40E_MODULE_SFF_ADDR_MODE	0x04
+#define I40E_MODULE_SFF_DDM_IMPLEMENTED 0x40
 #define I40E_MODULE_TYPE_QSFP_PLUS	0x0D
 #define I40E_MODULE_TYPE_QSFP28		0x11
 #define I40E_MODULE_QSFP_MAX_LEN	640