diff mbox series

[1/4] gpio: stp-xway: simplify error handling in xway_stp_probe()

Message ID 20190702223248.31934-2-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com
State New
Headers show
Series gpio: stp-xway: small cleanups and improvements | expand

Commit Message

Martin Blumenstingl July 2, 2019, 10:32 p.m. UTC 
Return early if devm_gpiochip_add_data() returns an error instead of
having two consecutive "if (!ret) ..." statements.

Also make xway_stp_hw_init() return void because it unconditionally
returns 0. While here also update the kerneldoc comment for
xway_stp_hw_init().

These changes makes the error handling within the driver consistent.
No functional changes intended.

Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-stp-xway.c | 19 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Comments

Linus Walleij July 4, 2019, 7:39 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 12:33 AM Martin Blumenstingl
<martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Return early if devm_gpiochip_add_data() returns an error instead of
> having two consecutive "if (!ret) ..." statements.
>
> Also make xway_stp_hw_init() return void because it unconditionally
> returns 0. While here also update the kerneldoc comment for
> xway_stp_hw_init().
>
> These changes makes the error handling within the driver consistent.
> No functional changes intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>

Patch applied.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-stp-xway.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-stp-xway.c
index 24c478392394..a3326255ce3c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-stp-xway.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-stp-xway.c
@@ -156,9 +156,9 @@  static int xway_stp_request(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned gpio)
 
 /**
  * xway_stp_hw_init() - Configure the STP unit and enable the clock gate
- * @virt: pointer to the remapped register range
+ * @chip: Pointer to the xway_stp chip structure
  */
-static int xway_stp_hw_init(struct xway_stp *chip)
+static void xway_stp_hw_init(struct xway_stp *chip)
 {
 	/* sane defaults */
 	xway_stp_w32(chip->virt, 0, XWAY_STP_AR);
@@ -201,8 +201,6 @@  static int xway_stp_hw_init(struct xway_stp *chip)
 	if (chip->reserved)
 		xway_stp_w32_mask(chip->virt, XWAY_STP_UPD_MASK,
 			XWAY_STP_UPD_FPI, XWAY_STP_CON1);
-
-	return 0;
 }
 
 static int xway_stp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -265,14 +263,15 @@  static int xway_stp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 	clk_enable(clk);
 
-	ret = xway_stp_hw_init(chip);
-	if (!ret)
-		ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &chip->gc, chip);
+	xway_stp_hw_init(chip);
 
-	if (!ret)
-		dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Init done\n");
+	ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &chip->gc, chip);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 
-	return ret;
+	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Init done\n");
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static const struct of_device_id xway_stp_match[] = {