diff mbox series

[net-next,v2,4/5] ipv6: sr: Add seg6local action End.BPF

Message ID 223e33f96b2cb9868a55a686c5d9321162a67ddb.1524591163.git.m.xhonneux@gmail.com
State Changes Requested, archived
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show
Series ipv6: sr: introduce seg6local End.BPF action | expand

Commit Message

Mathieu Xhonneux April 24, 2018, 5:44 p.m. UTC
This patch adds the End.BPF action to the LWT seg6local infrastructure.
This action works like any other seg6local End action, meaning that an IPv6
header with SRH is needed, whose DA has to be equal to the SID of the
action. It will also advance the SRH to the next segment, the BPF program
does not have to take care of this.

Since the BPF program may not be a source of instability in the kernel, it
is important to ensure that the integrity of the packet is maintained
before yielding it back to the IPv6 layer. The hook hence keeps track if
the SRH has been altered through the helpers, and re-validates its
content if needed with seg6_validate_srh. The state kept for validation is
stored in a per-CPU buffer. The BPF program is not allowed to directly
write into the packet, and only some fields of the SRH can be altered
through the helper bpf_lwt_seg6_store_bytes.

Performances profiling has shown that the SRH re-validation does not induce
a significant overhead. If the altered SRH is deemed as invalid, the packet
is dropped.

This validation is also done before executing any action through
bpf_lwt_seg6_action, and will not be performed again if the SRH is not
modified after calling the action.

The BPF program may return 3 types of return codes:
    - BPF_OK: the End.BPF action will look up the next destination through
             seg6_lookup_nexthop.
    - BPF_REDIRECT: if an action has been executed through the
          bpf_lwt_seg6_action helper, the BPF program should return this
          value, as the skb's destination is already set and the default
          lookup should not be performed.
    - BPF_DROP : the packet will be dropped.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Xhonneux <m.xhonneux@gmail.com>
Acked-by: David Lebrun <dlebrun@google.com>
---
 include/linux/bpf_types.h       |   1 +
 include/uapi/linux/bpf.h        |   1 +
 include/uapi/linux/seg6_local.h |   3 +
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c           |   1 +
 net/core/filter.c               |  25 +++++++
 net/ipv6/seg6_local.c           | 156 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 6 files changed, 184 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

David Miller April 27, 2018, 2:59 p.m. UTC | #1
From: Mathieu Xhonneux <m.xhonneux@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 18:44:15 +0100

> This patch adds the End.BPF action to the LWT seg6local infrastructure.
> This action works like any other seg6local End action, meaning that an IPv6
> header with SRH is needed, whose DA has to be equal to the SID of the
> action. It will also advance the SRH to the next segment, the BPF program
> does not have to take care of this.

I'd like to see some BPF developers review this change.

But on my side I wonder if, instead of validating the whole thing afterwards,
we should make the helpers accessible by the eBPF program validate the changes
as they are made.
Alexei Starovoitov April 28, 2018, 12:01 a.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:59:19AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Mathieu Xhonneux <m.xhonneux@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 18:44:15 +0100
> 
> > This patch adds the End.BPF action to the LWT seg6local infrastructure.
> > This action works like any other seg6local End action, meaning that an IPv6
> > header with SRH is needed, whose DA has to be equal to the SID of the
> > action. It will also advance the SRH to the next segment, the BPF program
> > does not have to take care of this.
> 
> I'd like to see some BPF developers review this change.
> 
> But on my side I wonder if, instead of validating the whole thing afterwards,
> we should make the helpers accessible by the eBPF program validate the changes
> as they are made.

Looking at the code I don't think it's possible to keep it valid all the time
while building, so seg6_validate_srh() after the program run seems necessary.

I think the whole set should be targeting bpf-next tree.
Please fix kbuild errors, rebase and document new helper in man-page style.
Things like:
+	test_btf_haskv.o test_btf_nokv.o test_lwt_seg6local.o
+>>>>>>> selftests/bpf: test for seg6local End.BPF action
should be fixed properly.
Mathieu Xhonneux April 30, 2018, 8:06 p.m. UTC | #3
2018-04-28 2:01 GMT+02:00 Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>:
>
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:59:19AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Mathieu Xhonneux <m.xhonneux@gmail.com>
> > Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 18:44:15 +0100
> >
> > > This patch adds the End.BPF action to the LWT seg6local infrastructure.
> > > This action works like any other seg6local End action, meaning that an IPv6
> > > header with SRH is needed, whose DA has to be equal to the SID of the
> > > action. It will also advance the SRH to the next segment, the BPF program
> > > does not have to take care of this.
> >
> > I'd like to see some BPF developers review this change.
> >
> > But on my side I wonder if, instead of validating the whole thing afterwards,
> > we should make the helpers accessible by the eBPF program validate the changes
> > as they are made.
>
> Looking at the code I don't think it's possible to keep it valid all the time
> while building, so seg6_validate_srh() after the program run seems necessary.


Indeed, e.g. to add a TLV in the SRH one needs to call
bpf_lwt_seg6_adjust_srh (to add some room for the TLV), then
bpf_lwt_seg6_store_bytes() (to fill the space with the TLV). Between
those two calls, the SRH is in an invalid state.

>
>
> I think the whole set should be targeting bpf-next tree.
> Please fix kbuild errors, rebase and document new helper in man-page style.
> Things like:
> +       test_btf_haskv.o test_btf_nokv.o test_lwt_seg6local.o
> +>>>>>>> selftests/bpf: test for seg6local End.BPF action
> should be fixed properly.


Oops, I didn't catch this one, thanks. I'll send a v3 towards bpf-next.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_types.h b/include/linux/bpf_types.h
index 799c8bb6416f..f8f1deeac1d2 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_types.h
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@  BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK, cg_sock)
 BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR, cg_sock_addr)
 BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN, lwt_in)
 BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT, lwt_xmit)
+BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_SEG6LOCAL, lwt_seg6local)
 BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS, sock_ops)
 BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, sk_skb)
 BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG, sk_msg)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 23421dbc29a7..ff3e403d0927 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -138,6 +138,7 @@  enum bpf_prog_type {
 	BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
 	BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT,
 	BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR,
+	BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_SEG6LOCAL,
 };
 
 enum bpf_attach_type {
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/seg6_local.h b/include/uapi/linux/seg6_local.h
index ef2d8c3e76c1..aadcc11fb918 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/seg6_local.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/seg6_local.h
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@  enum {
 	SEG6_LOCAL_NH6,
 	SEG6_LOCAL_IIF,
 	SEG6_LOCAL_OIF,
+	SEG6_LOCAL_BPF,
 	__SEG6_LOCAL_MAX,
 };
 #define SEG6_LOCAL_MAX (__SEG6_LOCAL_MAX - 1)
@@ -59,6 +60,8 @@  enum {
 	SEG6_LOCAL_ACTION_END_AS	= 13,
 	/* forward to SR-unaware VNF with masquerading */
 	SEG6_LOCAL_ACTION_END_AM	= 14,
+	/* custom BPF action */
+	SEG6_LOCAL_ACTION_END_BPF	= 15,
 
 	__SEG6_LOCAL_ACTION_MAX,
 };
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 5dd1dcb902bf..d925f94d1697 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -1251,6 +1251,7 @@  static bool may_access_direct_pkt_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 	switch (env->prog->type) {
 	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN:
 	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_OUT:
+	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_SEG6LOCAL:
 		/* dst_input() and dst_output() can't write for now */
 		if (t == BPF_WRITE)
 			return false;
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 8a2331c47881..8a19df818750 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -4268,6 +4268,21 @@  lwt_xmit_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
 	}
 }
 
+static const struct bpf_func_proto *
+lwt_seg6local_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+	switch (func_id) {
+	case BPF_FUNC_lwt_seg6_store_bytes:
+		return &bpf_lwt_seg6_store_bytes_proto;
+	case BPF_FUNC_lwt_seg6_action:
+		return &bpf_lwt_seg6_action_proto;
+	case BPF_FUNC_lwt_seg6_adjust_srh:
+		return &bpf_lwt_seg6_adjust_srh_proto;
+	default:
+		return lwt_out_func_proto(func_id, prog);
+	}
+}
+
 static bool bpf_skb_is_valid_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
 				    const struct bpf_prog *prog,
 				    struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info)
@@ -5824,6 +5839,16 @@  const struct bpf_prog_ops lwt_xmit_prog_ops = {
 	.test_run		= bpf_prog_test_run_skb,
 };
 
+const struct bpf_verifier_ops lwt_seg6local_verifier_ops = {
+	.get_func_proto		= lwt_seg6local_func_proto,
+	.is_valid_access	= lwt_is_valid_access,
+	.convert_ctx_access	= bpf_convert_ctx_access,
+};
+
+const struct bpf_prog_ops lwt_seg6local_prog_ops = {
+	.test_run		= bpf_prog_test_run_skb,
+};
+
 const struct bpf_verifier_ops cg_sock_verifier_ops = {
 	.get_func_proto		= sock_filter_func_proto,
 	.is_valid_access	= sock_filter_is_valid_access,
diff --git a/net/ipv6/seg6_local.c b/net/ipv6/seg6_local.c
index e9b23fb924ad..f44c10250e14 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/seg6_local.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/seg6_local.c
@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@ 
 /*
  *  SR-IPv6 implementation
  *
- *  Author:
+ *  Authors:
  *  David Lebrun <david.lebrun@uclouvain.be>
+ *  eBPF support: Mathieu Xhonneux <m.xhonneux@gmail.com>
  *
  *
  *  This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
@@ -32,6 +33,7 @@ 
 #endif
 #include <net/seg6_local.h>
 #include <linux/etherdevice.h>
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
 
 struct seg6_local_lwt;
 
@@ -42,6 +44,11 @@  struct seg6_action_desc {
 	int static_headroom;
 };
 
+struct bpf_lwt_prog {
+	struct bpf_prog *prog;
+	char *name;
+};
+
 struct seg6_local_lwt {
 	int action;
 	struct ipv6_sr_hdr *srh;
@@ -50,6 +57,7 @@  struct seg6_local_lwt {
 	struct in6_addr nh6;
 	int iif;
 	int oif;
+	struct bpf_lwt_prog bpf;
 
 	int headroom;
 	struct seg6_action_desc *desc;
@@ -449,6 +457,67 @@  static int input_action_end_b6_encap(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	return err;
 }
 
+static int input_action_end_bpf(struct sk_buff *skb,
+				struct seg6_local_lwt *slwt)
+{
+	struct seg6_bpf_srh_state *srh_state =
+		this_cpu_ptr(&seg6_bpf_srh_states);
+	struct ipv6_sr_hdr *srh;
+	int srhoff = 0;
+	int ret;
+
+	srh = get_and_validate_srh(skb);
+	if (!srh)
+		goto drop;
+	advance_nextseg(srh, &ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr);
+
+	/* preempt_disable is needed to protect the per-CPU buffer srh_state,
+	 * which is also accessed by the bpf_lwt_seg6_* helpers
+	 */
+	preempt_disable();
+	srh_state->hdrlen = srh->hdrlen << 3;
+	srh_state->valid = 1;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	bpf_compute_data_pointers(skb);
+	ret = bpf_prog_run_save_cb(slwt->bpf.prog, skb);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	switch (ret) {
+	case BPF_OK:
+	case BPF_REDIRECT:
+		break;
+	case BPF_DROP:
+		goto drop;
+	default:
+		pr_warn_once("bpf-seg6local: Illegal return value %u\n", ret);
+		goto drop;
+	}
+
+	if (unlikely((srh_state->hdrlen & 7) != 0))
+		goto drop;
+
+	if (ipv6_find_hdr(skb, &srhoff, IPPROTO_ROUTING, NULL, NULL) < 0)
+		goto drop;
+	srh = (struct ipv6_sr_hdr *)(skb->data + srhoff);
+	srh->hdrlen = (u8)(srh_state->hdrlen >> 3);
+
+	if (!srh_state->valid &&
+	    unlikely(!seg6_validate_srh(srh, (srh->hdrlen + 1) << 3)))
+		goto drop;
+
+	preempt_enable();
+
+	if (ret != BPF_REDIRECT)
+		seg6_lookup_nexthop(skb, NULL, 0);
+
+	return dst_input(skb);
+
+drop:
+	kfree_skb(skb);
+	return -EINVAL;
+}
+
 static struct seg6_action_desc seg6_action_table[] = {
 	{
 		.action		= SEG6_LOCAL_ACTION_END,
@@ -495,7 +564,13 @@  static struct seg6_action_desc seg6_action_table[] = {
 		.attrs		= (1 << SEG6_LOCAL_SRH),
 		.input		= input_action_end_b6_encap,
 		.static_headroom	= sizeof(struct ipv6hdr),
-	}
+	},
+	{
+		.action		= SEG6_LOCAL_ACTION_END_BPF,
+		.attrs		= (1 << SEG6_LOCAL_BPF),
+		.input		= input_action_end_bpf,
+	},
+
 };
 
 static struct seg6_action_desc *__get_action_desc(int action)
@@ -540,6 +615,7 @@  static const struct nla_policy seg6_local_policy[SEG6_LOCAL_MAX + 1] = {
 				    .len = sizeof(struct in6_addr) },
 	[SEG6_LOCAL_IIF]	= { .type = NLA_U32 },
 	[SEG6_LOCAL_OIF]	= { .type = NLA_U32 },
+	[SEG6_LOCAL_BPF]	= { .type = NLA_NESTED },
 };
 
 static int parse_nla_srh(struct nlattr **attrs, struct seg6_local_lwt *slwt)
@@ -717,6 +793,71 @@  static int cmp_nla_oif(struct seg6_local_lwt *a, struct seg6_local_lwt *b)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+#define MAX_PROG_NAME 256
+static const struct nla_policy bpf_prog_policy[LWT_BPF_PROG_MAX + 1] = {
+	[LWT_BPF_PROG_FD]   = { .type = NLA_U32, },
+	[LWT_BPF_PROG_NAME] = { .type = NLA_NUL_STRING,
+				.len = MAX_PROG_NAME },
+};
+
+static int parse_nla_bpf(struct nlattr **attrs, struct seg6_local_lwt *slwt)
+{
+	struct nlattr *tb[LWT_BPF_PROG_MAX + 1];
+	struct bpf_prog *p;
+	int ret;
+	u32 fd;
+
+	ret = nla_parse_nested(tb, LWT_BPF_PROG_MAX, attrs[SEG6_LOCAL_BPF],
+			       bpf_prog_policy, NULL);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (!tb[LWT_BPF_PROG_FD] || !tb[LWT_BPF_PROG_NAME])
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	slwt->bpf.name = nla_memdup(tb[LWT_BPF_PROG_NAME], GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!slwt->bpf.name)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	fd = nla_get_u32(tb[LWT_BPF_PROG_FD]);
+	p = bpf_prog_get_type(fd, BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_SEG6LOCAL);
+	if (IS_ERR(p))
+		return PTR_ERR(p);
+
+	slwt->bpf.prog = p;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int put_nla_bpf(struct sk_buff *skb, struct seg6_local_lwt *slwt)
+{
+	struct nlattr *nest;
+
+	if (!slwt->bpf.prog)
+		return 0;
+
+	nest = nla_nest_start(skb, SEG6_LOCAL_BPF);
+	if (!nest)
+		return -EMSGSIZE;
+
+	if (slwt->bpf.name &&
+	    nla_put_string(skb, LWT_BPF_PROG_NAME, slwt->bpf.name))
+		return -EMSGSIZE;
+
+	return nla_nest_end(skb, nest);
+}
+
+static int cmp_nla_bpf(struct seg6_local_lwt *a, struct seg6_local_lwt *b)
+{
+	if (!a->bpf.name && !b->bpf.name)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (!a->bpf.name || !b->bpf.name)
+		return 1;
+
+	return strcmp(a->bpf.name, b->bpf.name);
+}
+
 struct seg6_action_param {
 	int (*parse)(struct nlattr **attrs, struct seg6_local_lwt *slwt);
 	int (*put)(struct sk_buff *skb, struct seg6_local_lwt *slwt);
@@ -747,6 +888,11 @@  static struct seg6_action_param seg6_action_params[SEG6_LOCAL_MAX + 1] = {
 	[SEG6_LOCAL_OIF]	= { .parse = parse_nla_oif,
 				    .put = put_nla_oif,
 				    .cmp = cmp_nla_oif },
+
+	[SEG6_LOCAL_BPF]	= { .parse = parse_nla_bpf,
+				    .put = put_nla_bpf,
+				    .cmp = cmp_nla_bpf },
+
 };
 
 static int parse_nla_action(struct nlattr **attrs, struct seg6_local_lwt *slwt)
@@ -795,7 +941,6 @@  static int seg6_local_build_state(struct nlattr *nla, unsigned int family,
 
 	err = nla_parse_nested(tb, SEG6_LOCAL_MAX, nla, seg6_local_policy,
 			       extack);
-
 	if (err < 0)
 		return err;
 
@@ -884,6 +1029,11 @@  static int seg6_local_get_encap_size(struct lwtunnel_state *lwt)
 	if (attrs & (1 << SEG6_LOCAL_OIF))
 		nlsize += nla_total_size(4);
 
+	if (attrs & (1 << SEG6_LOCAL_BPF))
+		nlsize += nla_total_size(sizeof(struct nlattr)) +
+		       nla_total_size(MAX_PROG_NAME) +
+		       nla_total_size(4);
+
 	return nlsize;
 }