Patch Detail
get:
Show a patch.
patch:
Update a patch.
put:
Update a patch.
GET /api/patches/2225635/?format=api
{ "id": 2225635, "url": "http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/patches/2225635/?format=api", "web_url": "http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/gcc/patch/aedL4pUAHZEKfiVo@tucnak/", "project": { "id": 17, "url": "http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/projects/17/?format=api", "name": "GNU Compiler Collection", "link_name": "gcc", "list_id": "gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org", "list_email": "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org", "web_url": null, "scm_url": null, "webscm_url": null, "list_archive_url": "", "list_archive_url_format": "", "commit_url_format": "" }, "msgid": "<aedL4pUAHZEKfiVo@tucnak>", "list_archive_url": null, "date": "2026-04-21T10:05:22", "name": "testsuite: Fix up builtin-math-6.c for mpc 1.4.* [PR124682]", "commit_ref": null, "pull_url": null, "state": "new", "archived": false, "hash": "55599964cc415cee69e645eb9adf2663b8bc0391", "submitter": { "id": 671, "url": "http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/people/671/?format=api", "name": "Jakub Jelinek", "email": "jakub@redhat.com" }, "delegate": null, "mbox": "http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/gcc/patch/aedL4pUAHZEKfiVo@tucnak/mbox/", "series": [ { "id": 500773, "url": "http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/series/500773/?format=api", "web_url": "http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/gcc/list/?series=500773", "date": "2026-04-21T10:05:22", "name": "testsuite: Fix up builtin-math-6.c for mpc 1.4.* [PR124682]", "version": 1, "mbox": "http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/series/500773/mbox/" } ], "comments": "http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/patches/2225635/comments/", "check": "pending", "checks": "http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/patches/2225635/checks/", "tags": {}, "related": [], "headers": { "Return-Path": "<gcc-patches-bounces~incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org>", "X-Original-To": [ "incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org", "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" ], "Delivered-To": [ "patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org", "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" ], "Authentication-Results": [ "legolas.ozlabs.org;\n\tdkim=pass (1024-bit key;\n unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256\n header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=RVw/xT/g;\n\tdkim-atps=neutral", "legolas.ozlabs.org;\n spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gcc.gnu.org\n (client-ip=2620:52:6:3111::32; helo=vm01.sourceware.org;\n envelope-from=gcc-patches-bounces~incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org;\n receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org)", "sourceware.org;\n\tdkim=pass (1024-bit key,\n unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256\n header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=RVw/xT/g", "sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none)\n header.from=redhat.com", "sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com", "server2.sourceware.org;\n arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.129.124" ], "Received": [ "from vm01.sourceware.org (vm01.sourceware.org\n [IPv6:2620:52:6:3111::32])\n\t(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)\n\t key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384)\n\t(No client certificate requested)\n\tby legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4g0J0N4jWsz1yCv\n\tfor <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Tue, 21 Apr 2026 20:06:10 +1000 (AEST)", "from vm01.sourceware.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])\n\tby sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1984BA23F4\n\tfor <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:06:08 +0000 (GMT)", "from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com\n (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124])\n by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620574BA23F4\n for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:05:31 +0000 (GMT)", "from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com\n (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by\n relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3,\n cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-669-Hlg3IiHZPAyhY75wqHDX-A-1; Tue,\n 21 Apr 2026 06:05:27 -0400", "from mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com\n (mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.12])\n (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)\n key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest\n SHA256)\n (No client certificate requested)\n by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS\n id 75A3D1956048; Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:05:26 +0000 (UTC)", "from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.44.48.12])\n by mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with\n ESMTPS\n id D8F8719560AB; Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:05:25 +0000 (UTC)", "from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])\n by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTPS id 63LA5M8k917308\n (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT);\n Tue, 21 Apr 2026 12:05:23 +0200", "(from jakub@localhost)\n by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.18.1/8.18.1/Submit) id 63LA5MEs917307;\n Tue, 21 Apr 2026 12:05:22 +0200" ], "DKIM-Filter": [ "OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9A1984BA23F4", "OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 620574BA23F4" ], "DMARC-Filter": "OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 620574BA23F4", "ARC-Filter": "OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 620574BA23F4", "ARC-Seal": "i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1776765931; cv=none;\n b=Yrxiu55kh95Se6mTjtTKCEOp5L9W2NBBA4ETR0Nlrq3V5PzErHVKEwTslNWAN+xRH85AsOvkwkzFzUqWNNFtr+D4xLOxCpjbO4ufDSQVaD8nw5nN5uFnZv5Oy0N2eo3fGY0c447VuEzGdKQsu1wFUYR/jJyHrKRfZglIwUJ2HLU=", "ARC-Message-Signature": "i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;\n t=1776765931; c=relaxed/simple;\n bh=OuWC0PjT9rS/hdmDpzofOCyU+xx3pSFp76GPRBXC9lc=;\n h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version;\n b=nNUzRyrE+qv3/n3va+UzcETfw7NXKBqWP0QEoVNtFXwWaeJzkzvdLjWQjUTNQvj7NsaEnLBFc93Bfoa7+F2Y/tlplLjZpfuDJyRpZjRbVTwU6xsAhgaD2ECVDzRWTv7MrZiGD60gQIdqquzzEjdKWud8ha3t5ms/QA4br2GEzc4=", "ARC-Authentication-Results": "i=1; server2.sourceware.org", "DKIM-Signature": "v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;\n s=mimecast20190719; t=1776765931;\n h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:\n message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:\n content-type:content-type; bh=7QagA6yqZ0khAWQxV0LDiOS7SQm8nrFNmokXnmw5ufk=;\n b=RVw/xT/gWquuSafqlkRxjUHZEUr8NMmFbh0RQQzgqHL3fqq2gergGk596DlJ8J4RUpg3X4\n VPhaqXYa55PWnvJciYpz2bS8WiRpSzWBxb/+iWFph7HW2RzwpakSkFVDHUseVdYePdHY0J\n OmTt2Te3E9M90O4+PJKgi5GK5z8FGac=", "X-MC-Unique": "Hlg3IiHZPAyhY75wqHDX-A-1", "X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID": "Hlg3IiHZPAyhY75wqHDX-A_1776765926", "Date": "Tue, 21 Apr 2026 12:05:22 +0200", "From": "Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>", "To": "\"Joseph S. Myers\" <josmyers@redhat.com>,\n Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>", "Cc": "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org", "Subject": "[PATCH] testsuite: Fix up builtin-math-6.c for mpc 1.4.* [PR124682]", "Message-ID": "<aedL4pUAHZEKfiVo@tucnak>", "MIME-Version": "1.0", "X-Scanned-By": "MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.12", "X-Mimecast-Spam-Score": "0", "X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID": "fJ70xj3XrUL6wUhdJ24R0WF4LsIGixecAr3E_QEBGl0_1776765926", "X-Mimecast-Originator": "redhat.com", "Content-Type": "text/plain; charset=us-ascii", "Content-Disposition": "inline", "X-BeenThere": "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org", "X-Mailman-Version": "2.1.30", "Precedence": "list", "List-Id": "Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>", "List-Unsubscribe": "<https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>,\n <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>", "List-Archive": "<https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/>", "List-Post": "<mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>", "List-Help": "<mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>", "List-Subscribe": "<https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>,\n <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>", "Reply-To": "Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>", "Errors-To": "gcc-patches-bounces~incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org" }, "content": "Hi!\n\nMPC 1.4.0 changed the handling of signed zeros in cpow results.\nThese changes broke the builtin-math-6.c test.\nLooking at the differences, MPC 1.3.1 to 1.4.0 changes folding of\nthe following calls in the test (it is always about the sign of\nthe imag zero part, +-0.0 means below that MPC 1.3.1 returned\npositive 0.0 and MPC 1.4.0 returns -0.0 instead, and -+0.0 means\nconversely that MPC 1.3.1 returned -0.0 and MPC 1.4.0 returns positive\n0.0.\n__builtin_cpow (__complex__ (-1.5e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (3.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (-3.375e+0, +-0.0);\n__builtin_cpow (__complex__ (-1.5e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (-3.0e+0, -0.0)) = __complex__ (-2.96296296296296279848547783331014215946197509765625e-1, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpow (__complex__ (1.5e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (3.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (3.375e+0, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpow (__complex__ (-2.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (3.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (-8.0e+0, +-0.0);\n__builtin_cpow (__complex__ (-2.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (-3.0e+0, -0.0)) = __complex__ (-1.25e-1, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpow (__complex__ (2.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (3.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (8.0e+0, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpow (__complex__ (-3.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (-4.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (1.2345679012345678327022824305458925664424896240234375e-2, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpow (__complex__ (-3.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (4.0e+0, -0.0)) = __complex__ (8.1e+1, +-0.0);\n__builtin_cpow (__complex__ (3.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (4.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (8.1e+1, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpow (__complex__ (-3.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (5.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (-2.43e+2, +-0.0);\n__builtin_cpow (__complex__ (-3.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (-5.0e+0, -0.0)) = __complex__ (-4.11522633744856002058210009408867335878312587738037109375e-3, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpow (__complex__ (3.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (5.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (2.43e+2, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpow (__complex__ (-4.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (-2.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (6.25e-2, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpow (__complex__ (-4.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (2.0e+0, -0.0)) = __complex__ (1.6e+1, +-0.0);\n__builtin_cpow (__complex__ (4.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (2.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (1.6e+1, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpow (__complex__ (1.5e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (-3.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (2.96296296296296279848547783331014215946197509765625e-1, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpow (__complex__ (-1.5e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (-3.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (-2.96296296296296279848547783331014215946197509765625e-1, +-0.0);\n__builtin_cpow (__complex__ (-1.5e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (3.0e+0, -0.0)) = __complex__ (-3.375e+0, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpow (__complex__ (2.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (-3.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (1.25e-1, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpow (__complex__ (-2.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (-3.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (-1.25e-1, +-0.0);\n__builtin_cpow (__complex__ (-2.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (3.0e+0, -0.0)) = __complex__ (-8.0e+0, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpow (__complex__ (3.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (-4.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (1.2345679012345678327022824305458925664424896240234375e-2, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpow (__complex__ (3.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (-5.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (4.11522633744856002058210009408867335878312587738037109375e-3, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpow (__complex__ (-3.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (-5.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (-4.11522633744856002058210009408867335878312587738037109375e-3, +-0.0);\n__builtin_cpow (__complex__ (-3.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (5.0e+0, -0.0)) = __complex__ (-2.43e+2, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpow (__complex__ (-3.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (4.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (8.1e+1, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpow (__complex__ (-3.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (-4.0e+0, -0.0)) = __complex__ (1.2345679012345678327022824305458925664424896240234375e-2, +-0.0);\n__builtin_cpow (__complex__ (4.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (-2.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (6.25e-2, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpow (__complex__ (-4.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (2.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (1.6e+1, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpow (__complex__ (-4.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (-2.0e+0, -0.0)) = __complex__ (6.25e-2, +-0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-1.5e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (3.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (-3.375e+0, +-0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-1.5e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (-3.0e+0, -0.0)) = __complex__ (-2.96296298503875732421875e-1, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (1.5e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (3.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (3.375e+0, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-2.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (3.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (-8.0e+0, +-0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-2.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (-3.0e+0, -0.0)) = __complex__ (-1.25e-1, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (2.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (3.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (8.0e+0, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-3.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (-4.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (1.2345679104328155517578125e-2, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-3.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (4.0e+0, -0.0)) = __complex__ (8.1e+1, +-0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (3.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (4.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (8.1e+1, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-3.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (5.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (-2.43e+2, +-0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-3.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (-5.0e+0, -0.0)) = __complex__ (-4.1152262128889560699462890625e-3, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (3.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (5.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (2.43e+2, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-4.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (-2.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (6.25e-2, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-4.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (2.0e+0, -0.0)) = __complex__ (1.6e+1, +-0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (4.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (2.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (1.6e+1, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (1.5e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (-3.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (2.96296298503875732421875e-1, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-1.5e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (-3.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (-2.96296298503875732421875e-1, +-0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-1.5e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (3.0e+0, -0.0)) = __complex__ (-3.375e+0, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (2.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (-3.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (1.25e-1, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-2.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (-3.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (-1.25e-1, +-0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-2.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (3.0e+0, -0.0)) = __complex__ (-8.0e+0, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (3.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (-4.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (1.2345679104328155517578125e-2, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (3.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (-5.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (4.1152262128889560699462890625e-3, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-3.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (-5.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (-4.1152262128889560699462890625e-3, +-0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-3.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (5.0e+0, -0.0)) = __complex__ (-2.43e+2, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-3.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (4.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (8.1e+1, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-3.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (-4.0e+0, -0.0)) = __complex__ (1.2345679104328155517578125e-2, +-0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (4.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (-2.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (6.25e-2, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-4.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (2.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (1.6e+1, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-4.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (-2.0e+0, -0.0)) = __complex__ (6.25e-2, +-0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-1.5e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (3.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (-3.375e+0, +-0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-1.5e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (-3.0e+0, -0.0)) = __complex__ (-2.96296296296296296301315750798544002009293762966990470886e-1, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (1.5e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (3.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (3.375e+0, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-2.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (3.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (-8.0e+0, +-0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-2.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (-3.0e+0, -0.0)) = __complex__ (-1.25e-1, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (2.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (3.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (8.0e+0, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-3.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (-4.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (1.23456790123456790122724786341878999706977992900647222996e-2, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-3.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (4.0e+0, -0.0)) = __complex__ (8.1e+1, +-0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (3.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (4.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (8.1e+1, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-3.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (5.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (-2.43e+2, +-0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-3.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (-5.0e+0, -0.0)) = __complex__ (-4.11522633744855967075749287806263332356593309668824076653e-3, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (3.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (5.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (2.43e+2, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-4.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (-2.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (6.25e-2, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-4.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (2.0e+0, -0.0)) = __complex__ (1.6e+1, +-0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (4.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (2.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (1.6e+1, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (1.5e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (-3.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (2.96296296296296296301315750798544002009293762966990470886e-1, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-1.5e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (-3.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (-2.96296296296296296301315750798544002009293762966990470886e-1, +-0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-1.5e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (3.0e+0, -0.0)) = __complex__ (-3.375e+0, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (2.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (-3.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (1.25e-1, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-2.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (-3.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (-1.25e-1, +-0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-2.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (3.0e+0, -0.0)) = __complex__ (-8.0e+0, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (3.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (-4.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (1.23456790123456790122724786341878999706977992900647222996e-2, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (3.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (-5.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (4.11522633744855967075749287806263332356593309668824076653e-3, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-3.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (-5.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (-4.11522633744855967075749287806263332356593309668824076653e-3, +-0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-3.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (5.0e+0, -0.0)) = __complex__ (-2.43e+2, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-3.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (4.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (8.1e+1, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-3.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (-4.0e+0, -0.0)) = __complex__ (1.23456790123456790122724786341878999706977992900647222996e-2, +-0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (4.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (-2.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (6.25e-2, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-4.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (2.0e+0, 0.0)) = __complex__ (1.6e+1, -+0.0);\n__builtin_cpowf (__complex__ (-4.0e+0, -0.0), __complex__ (-2.0e+0, -0.0)) = __complex__ (6.25e-2, +-0.0);\n\nThe following patch adjusts the testcase, so that it ignores the sign of\nzero imag part.\n\nTested on x86_64-linux, both with GCC built against MPC 1.3.1 and against\nMPC 1.4.1. Ok for trunk?\n\n2026-04-21 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>\n\n\tPR testsuite/124682\n\t* gcc.dg/torture/builtin-math-6.c (TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2_ISZ): Define.\n\t(TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2_ALLNEG): Use TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2_ISZ instead of\n\tTESTIT_COMPLEX_R2.\n\n\n\tJakub", "diff": "--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/builtin-math-6.c.jj\t2026-04-20 10:29:33.216057701 +0200\n+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/builtin-math-6.c\t2026-04-21 11:42:54.068643817 +0200\n@@ -158,26 +158,47 @@ void link_error(int x, int y)\n link_error(__LINE__, VAL_NUM); \\\n } while (0)\n \n-/* For complex numbers, call the TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2 macro for all\n+/* Similar to TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2, but doesn't check sign of imag part\n+ if imag part is zero. MPC between 1.3.1 and 1.4.0 changed the\n+ handling of it. */\n+#define TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2_ISZ(VAL_NUM, FUNC, ARG0, ARG1, RES) do { \\\n+ if (COMPLEX_DIFF1PCT_F (__builtin_##FUNC##f(ARG0, ARG1), (RES)) \\\n+ || CKSGN_F (__real__ (__builtin_##FUNC##f(ARG0, ARG1)), __real__ (RES)) \\\n+ || (__imag__ (RES) != 0 \\\n+\t && CKSGN_F (__imag__ (__builtin_##FUNC##f(ARG0, ARG1)), __imag__ (RES)))) \\\n+ link_error(__LINE__, VAL_NUM); \\\n+ if (COMPLEX_DIFF1PCT (__builtin_##FUNC(ARG0, ARG1), (RES)) \\\n+ || CKSGN (__real__ (__builtin_##FUNC(ARG0, ARG1)), __real__ (RES)) \\\n+ || (__imag__ (RES) != 0 \\\n+\t && CKSGN (__imag__ (__builtin_##FUNC(ARG0, ARG1)), __imag__ (RES)))) \\\n+ link_error(__LINE__, VAL_NUM); \\\n+ if (COMPLEX_DIFF1PCT_L (__builtin_##FUNC##l(ARG0, ARG1), (RES)) \\\n+ || CKSGN_L (__real__ (__builtin_##FUNC##l(ARG0, ARG1)), __real__ (RES)) \\\n+ || (__imag__ (RES) != 0 \\\n+\t && CKSGN_L (__imag__ (__builtin_##FUNC##l(ARG0, ARG1)), __imag__ (RES)))) \\\n+ link_error(__LINE__, VAL_NUM); \\\n+ } while (0)\n+\n+/* For complex numbers, call the TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2_ISZ macro for all\n combinations of neg and conj. */\n #define TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2_ALLNEG(FUNC, ARG0, ARG1, RES1, RES2, RES3, RES4, RES5,\\\n RES6, RES7, RES8, RES9, RES10, RES11, RES12, RES13, RES14, RES15, RES16) do{ \\\n- TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2(1, FUNC, (_Complex float)(ARG0),(_Complex float)(ARG1), RES1);\\\n- TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2(2, FUNC, (_Complex float)(ARG0),CONJ(ARG1), RES2); \\\n- TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2(3, FUNC, (_Complex float)(ARG0),-(_Complex float)(ARG1), RES3); \\\n- TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2(4, FUNC, (_Complex float)(ARG0),-CONJ(ARG1), RES4); \\\n- TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2(5, FUNC, -(_Complex float)(ARG0),(_Complex float)(ARG1), RES5); \\\n- TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2(6, FUNC, -(_Complex float)(ARG0),CONJ(ARG1), RES6); \\\n- TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2(7, FUNC, -(_Complex float)(ARG0),-(_Complex float)(ARG1), RES7); \\\n- TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2(8, FUNC, -(_Complex float)(ARG0),-CONJ(ARG1), RES8); \\\n- TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2(9, FUNC, CONJ(ARG0),(_Complex float)(ARG1), RES9); \\\n- TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2(10, FUNC, CONJ(ARG0),CONJ(ARG1), RES10); \\\n- TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2(11, FUNC, CONJ(ARG0),-(_Complex float)(ARG1), RES11); \\\n- TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2(12, FUNC, CONJ(ARG0),-CONJ(ARG1), RES12); \\\n- TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2(13, FUNC, -CONJ(ARG0),(_Complex float)(ARG1), RES13); \\\n- TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2(14, FUNC, -CONJ(ARG0),CONJ(ARG1), RES14); \\\n- TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2(15, FUNC, -CONJ(ARG0),-(_Complex float)(ARG1), RES15); \\\n- TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2(16, FUNC, -CONJ(ARG0),-CONJ(ARG1), RES16); \\\n+ TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2_ISZ(1, FUNC, (_Complex float)(ARG0),(_Complex float)(ARG1), RES1);\\\n+ TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2_ISZ(2, FUNC, (_Complex float)(ARG0),CONJ(ARG1), RES2); \\\n+ TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2_ISZ(3, FUNC, (_Complex float)(ARG0),-(_Complex float)(ARG1), RES3); \\\n+ TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2_ISZ(4, FUNC, (_Complex float)(ARG0),-CONJ(ARG1), RES4); \\\n+ TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2_ISZ(5, FUNC, -(_Complex float)(ARG0),(_Complex float)(ARG1), RES5); \\\n+ TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2_ISZ(6, FUNC, -(_Complex float)(ARG0),CONJ(ARG1), RES6); \\\n+ TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2_ISZ(7, FUNC, -(_Complex float)(ARG0),-(_Complex float)(ARG1), RES7); \\\n+ TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2_ISZ(8, FUNC, -(_Complex float)(ARG0),-CONJ(ARG1), RES8); \\\n+ TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2_ISZ(9, FUNC, CONJ(ARG0),(_Complex float)(ARG1), RES9); \\\n+ TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2_ISZ(10, FUNC, CONJ(ARG0),CONJ(ARG1), RES10); \\\n+ TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2_ISZ(11, FUNC, CONJ(ARG0),-(_Complex float)(ARG1), RES11); \\\n+ TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2_ISZ(12, FUNC, CONJ(ARG0),-CONJ(ARG1), RES12); \\\n+ TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2_ISZ(13, FUNC, -CONJ(ARG0),(_Complex float)(ARG1), RES13); \\\n+ TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2_ISZ(14, FUNC, -CONJ(ARG0),CONJ(ARG1), RES14); \\\n+ TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2_ISZ(15, FUNC, -CONJ(ARG0),-(_Complex float)(ARG1), RES15); \\\n+ TESTIT_COMPLEX_R2_ISZ(16, FUNC, -CONJ(ARG0),-CONJ(ARG1), RES16); \\\n } while (0)\n \n int main (void)\n", "prefixes": [] }