From patchwork Thu Feb 14 23:56:27 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Segher Boessenkool X-Patchwork-Id: 1042517 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=gcc.gnu.org (client-ip=209.132.180.131; helo=sourceware.org; envelope-from=gcc-patches-return-496200-incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.crashing.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gcc.gnu.org header.i=@gcc.gnu.org header.b="UZ3UQI3T"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 440tby5Tr1z9s7T for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 10:57:08 +1100 (AEDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=rRQ0mcK1aql06phMFQzjSzeHXi8ZCzIggKztL4qnno5ahb4AEp i7qEILPtyougLvBiwb1G/XDw79AqsKcBg+BbNtv8HgJPPBx99oY8mt/BlV6tpc14 YaQs5iq2aIbSBxA76snKZJpHic9vRJ94AGrFg/JHlX3EkS5tROuoGQBTU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= default; bh=2NI/qQpbEVJMH7ncl76ikhtafuU=; b=UZ3UQI3TyZudofXRlhKl gA991Hf0wtxaBIl2heHkAnXPEK/c+ICsblZ60wnIe1vtqpkaeusqKFhIM4Zi24KQ PaNSNkL6V0p2tjpoC5Tg2O6WVeQRIewre8JQAEAh2i/Yrmj9n1RUR7kGPT8RXxuD tDkCdjXaZO0WF/CZAckG8uc= Received: (qmail 16354 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2019 23:57:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16345 invoked by uid 89); 14 Feb 2019 23:56:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-11.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, GIT_PATCH_2, GIT_PATCH_3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=RCS, family X-HELO: gate.crashing.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (HELO gate.crashing.org) (63.228.1.57) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 23:56:58 +0000 Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id x1ENujdf015714; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 17:56:47 -0600 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id x1ENuRJ4015710; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 17:56:27 -0600 Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 17:56:27 -0600 From: Segher Boessenkool To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gerald@pfeifer.com, jakub@redhat.com Subject: [PATCH wwwdocs] changes.html for "asm inline" Message-ID: <20190214235616.GC14180@gate.crashing.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-IsSubscribed: yes Hi! I did the following patch for the GCC 8 changes.html (in the 8.3 section): Is that okay? Also okay for GCC 7.5? And for GCC 9? Segher Index: htdocs/gcc-8/changes.html =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-8/changes.html,v retrieving revision 1.98 diff -u -r1.98 changes.html --- htdocs/gcc-8/changes.html 29 Dec 2018 21:09:09 -0000 1.98 +++ htdocs/gcc-8/changes.html 14 Feb 2019 23:39:34 -0000 @@ -1354,6 +1354,14 @@ GCC 8.3 is not yet released. +

C family

+ +
    +
  • Support has been added for asm inline. An asm + that is inline is counted as minimum length for inlining + decisions, irrespective of how big it looks otherwise. +
+

Windows