From patchwork Tue Jan 31 18:48:04 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kajol Jain X-Patchwork-Id: 1735035 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=DKIDarkq; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4P5vGH0c4tz23gY for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 05:48:55 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4P5vGG6mxyz3cfH for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 05:48:54 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=DKIDarkq; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=kjain@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=DKIDarkq; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4P5vFt01j0z3bbD for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 05:48:33 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 30VI2WV8031380; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 18:48:28 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=GeWP34mTOXN3zf0ZrvwpDKUljS9SDKBP6sh56wOQKnM=; b=DKIDarkqujXb/LAxQ3yIFRELlPqryXbC7FYQfPsbA6Vps+MKEuAFmde8AfNqA6BUe019 qyq59bPy29RNolUdfSaP7BM/zOj7TJLIA/sNKmn95I+oia/2sXcH2sZdyDnHoPKtFhji 20UvgMjwItPur06TJV5Rq8woX6F0RmmB+/A4gWXBFR+YiR6SU+pA0DYXiSH9uSkNJjhw zGLpRF8FzIAo1jbEgdYXhMSvV2c8oMeVHR0f5c/83UNvWMqLW+a8pYUBoc/oAmquKKlj 1DIbSREys6QLVFFV1jvsIbMuNDDXSjdCdk6lPvcuFNvTHZKzGIYQONl9kiFF8OzEB+9X 5A== Received: from ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (48.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.72]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3nf5x6cyg2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 31 Jan 2023 18:48:28 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 30UMGCh0022335; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 18:48:26 GMT Received: from smtprelay01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.227]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3ncvugjrs2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 31 Jan 2023 18:48:26 +0000 Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.105]) by smtprelay01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 30VImMaR44892426 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 31 Jan 2023 18:48:22 GMT Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6853E20043; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 18:48:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6254820040; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 18:48:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-e8dccbcc-2adc-11b2-a85c-bc1f33b9b810.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.106.14]) by smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 18:48:20 +0000 (GMT) From: Kajol Jain To: mpe@ellerman.id.au Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/hv-24x7: Fix pvr check when setting interface version Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 00:18:04 +0530 Message-Id: <20230131184804.220756-1-kjain@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: k4pewHZpWgyfurUGXnw3574Ez-1Mz9YF X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: k4pewHZpWgyfurUGXnw3574Ez-1Mz9YF X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.219,Aquarius:18.0.930,Hydra:6.0.562,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2023-01-31_08,2023-01-31_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxlogscore=954 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2212070000 definitions=main-2301310162 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kjain@linux.ibm.com, maddy@linux.ibm.com, Sachin Sant , disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Commit ec3eb9d941a9 ("powerpc/perf: Use PVR rather than oprofile field to determine CPU version") added usage of pvr value instead of oprofile field to determine the platform. In hv-24x7 pmu driver code, pvr check uses PVR_POWER8 when assigning the interface version for power8 platform. But power8 can also have other pvr values like PVR_POWER8E and PVR_POWER8NVL. Hence the interface version won't be set properly incase of PVR_POWER8E and PVR_POWER8NVL. Fix this issue by adding the checks for PVR_POWER8E and PVR_POWER8NVL as well. Fixes: ec3eb9d941a9 ("powerpc/perf: Use PVR rather than oprofile field to determine CPU version") Reported-by: Sachin Sant Signed-off-by: Kajol Jain Tested-by: Sachin Sant --- arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c index 33c23225fd54..8c3253df133d 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c @@ -1727,7 +1727,8 @@ static int hv_24x7_init(void) } /* POWER8 only supports v1, while POWER9 only supports v2. */ - if (PVR_VER(pvr) == PVR_POWER8) + if (PVR_VER(pvr) == PVR_POWER8 || PVR_VER(pvr) == PVR_POWER8E || + PVR_VER(pvr) == PVR_POWER8NVL) interface_version = 1; else { interface_version = 2;