From patchwork Fri Jun 10 15:55:48 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hari Bathini X-Patchwork-Id: 1642018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=oypKb4cz; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4LKQZk0lxCz9s5V for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 01:57:18 +1000 (AEST) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4LKQZk091Zz3cds for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 01:57:18 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=oypKb4cz; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=hbathini@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=oypKb4cz; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4LKQYm0jYCz2xKf for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 01:56:27 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 25AECxEt016964; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:06 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=j46PyfkMy/zK0Yabz4R6McXUoyKqQj/vVMmL324KBo8=; b=oypKb4czVCFxzO6M6s//SxBJ9xYS+qdHKqoLXnGj5Q62EgUuqpa9c7V+oZmxX+d75Y8x DO7Rje9sx9nM6QvVbXvY2szhw8IbgwxLdZ4bOoqQHdiGf4+MQAMJTnTpWAlALwtsCVRJ MpbuWp3jSuY6f57ugYLWreBetbZRAGIvB+AgfjYfrKIv9gT89/l170eYvv8br2Z6Sa6x fcHVi579/hf1isNzpY28fAZGSH9KwnvsbL8NpRhr5a5/hVkoth2hSVpgvLXiLuDiGcU8 EEEb+WDlqFMDloTlii3VaOiI1YbBC5CMYidIDdyQdZA96spa5h+mgYZzgF/WeFKtkkUG YQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3gm7h69yx0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:06 +0000 Received: from m0098420.ppops.net (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 25AFcj1g007755; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:05 GMT Received: from ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (6a.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.106]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3gm7h69yw9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:05 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 25AFoIT4013077; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:03 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3gfy18xnxe-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:03 +0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 25AFu1A521889378 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:01 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8754C046; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5366A4C040; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:55:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hbathini-workstation.in.ibm.com (unknown [9.203.106.231]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:55:57 +0000 (GMT) From: Hari Bathini To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev Subject: [PATCH v2 1/5] bpf ppc64: add support for BPF_ATOMIC bitwise operations Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 21:25:48 +0530 Message-Id: <20220610155552.25892-2-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.3 In-Reply-To: <20220610155552.25892-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> References: <20220610155552.25892-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: M5WOpzHduT7Zedk72RlnzxJFzOotDr2J X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: Vo92_niTa5d-UYM9pXLy97tPNUiiWd2y X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.874,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-06-10_06,2022-06-09_02,2022-02-23_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2204290000 definitions=main-2206100061 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Song Liu , Daniel Borkmann , John Fastabend , Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , "Naveen N. Rao" , Yonghong Song , KP Singh , Jordan Niethe , Martin KaFai Lau Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Adding instructions for ppc64 for atomic[64]_and atomic[64]_or atomic[64]_xor Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini --- * No changes in v2. arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index 594c54931e20..c421bedd0e98 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -777,41 +777,42 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * * BPF_STX ATOMIC (atomic ops) */ case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_W: - if (imm != BPF_ADD) { - pr_err_ratelimited( - "eBPF filter atomic op code %02x (@%d) unsupported\n", - code, i); - return -ENOTSUPP; - } - - /* *(u32 *)(dst + off) += src */ - - /* Get EA into TMP_REG_1 */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(tmp1_reg, dst_reg, off)); + case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_DW: + /* Get offset into TMP_REG_1 */ + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(tmp1_reg, off)); tmp_idx = ctx->idx * 4; /* load value from memory into TMP_REG_2 */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWARX(tmp2_reg, 0, tmp1_reg, 0)); - /* add value from src_reg into this */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(tmp2_reg, tmp2_reg, src_reg)); - /* store result back */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_STWCX(tmp2_reg, 0, tmp1_reg)); - /* we're done if this succeeded */ - PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, tmp_idx); - break; - case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_DW: - if (imm != BPF_ADD) { + if (size == BPF_DW) + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LDARX(tmp2_reg, tmp1_reg, dst_reg, 0)); + else + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWARX(tmp2_reg, tmp1_reg, dst_reg, 0)); + + switch (imm) { + case BPF_ADD: + EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(tmp2_reg, tmp2_reg, src_reg)); + break; + case BPF_AND: + EMIT(PPC_RAW_AND(tmp2_reg, tmp2_reg, src_reg)); + break; + case BPF_OR: + EMIT(PPC_RAW_OR(tmp2_reg, tmp2_reg, src_reg)); + break; + case BPF_XOR: + EMIT(PPC_RAW_XOR(tmp2_reg, tmp2_reg, src_reg)); + break; + default: pr_err_ratelimited( "eBPF filter atomic op code %02x (@%d) unsupported\n", code, i); - return -ENOTSUPP; + return -EOPNOTSUPP; } - /* *(u64 *)(dst + off) += src */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(tmp1_reg, dst_reg, off)); - tmp_idx = ctx->idx * 4; - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LDARX(tmp2_reg, 0, tmp1_reg, 0)); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(tmp2_reg, tmp2_reg, src_reg)); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_STDCX(tmp2_reg, 0, tmp1_reg)); + /* store result back */ + if (size == BPF_DW) + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STDCX(tmp2_reg, tmp1_reg, dst_reg)); + else + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STWCX(tmp2_reg, tmp1_reg, dst_reg)); + /* we're done if this succeeded */ PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, tmp_idx); break; From patchwork Fri Jun 10 15:55:49 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hari Bathini X-Patchwork-Id: 1642020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=jVv6BO89; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4LKQbV06Flz9s1l for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 01:57:58 +1000 (AEST) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4LKQbT6Hqmz3cdK for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 01:57:57 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=jVv6BO89; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=hbathini@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=jVv6BO89; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4LKQYp58xbz3bwg for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 01:56:30 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 25AEuXFJ007584; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:10 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=dJb/lXj3jl4VfTDeImilpTex2ktNmB2l4+NNwzRr3Vk=; b=jVv6BO89bEccN9FwAt90AcZS8oNEYCMZv13bD5WgNgZxvxx09N/lGoGP6A5JQPrtW7t0 ac0mCCEFhqSWgaf9iIjTLWyuF5qjuUFfNRvQYBdHL9wt158vF35M+ZEBthr1o3B99C8w B0hNrRLPg9v2HTZe5cirbYC+rgPhFgbiOL0xS81MdvwmVUxB8byNtCbunmSID5e3dwJi isNxbBCIlp/WJp1XrlCfBhvOG8BhRxFnik2vkP4Cs7AsnWHBHYwD7gspcvQxGPOuM71T BwGIF/bOdZc74DDbiiIbZ03D4lBOTjx66GpNc2dg8N4cz23kmDSDSFrK+A05VSYEB9DX Qg== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3gm85ps28b-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:10 +0000 Received: from m0098413.ppops.net (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 25AFoCEe008049; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:09 GMT Received: from ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (62.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.98]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3gm85ps27q-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:09 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 25AFoRX3013860; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:07 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.195]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3gfy19gefb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:07 +0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 25AFu5YN21955070 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:05 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327704C044; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 772214C040; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hbathini-workstation.in.ibm.com (unknown [9.203.106.231]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:01 +0000 (GMT) From: Hari Bathini To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] bpf ppc64: add support for atomic fetch operations Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 21:25:49 +0530 Message-Id: <20220610155552.25892-3-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.3 In-Reply-To: <20220610155552.25892-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> References: <20220610155552.25892-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: QulAns6e6jerUzYVw0jpQIGkD46kBAgl X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: l8hK_OLVrbR0Pcu_MpkUN8m6bUpaUcsH X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.874,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-06-10_06,2022-06-09_02,2022-02-23_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2204290000 definitions=main-2206100061 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Song Liu , Daniel Borkmann , John Fastabend , Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , "Naveen N. Rao" , Yonghong Song , KP Singh , Jordan Niethe , Martin KaFai Lau Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Adding instructions for ppc64 for atomic[64]_fetch_add atomic[64]_fetch_and atomic[64]_fetch_or atomic[64]_fetch_xor Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini --- * No changes in v2. arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 14 +++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index c421bedd0e98..c53236b3a8b1 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -787,17 +787,25 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * else EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWARX(tmp2_reg, tmp1_reg, dst_reg, 0)); + /* Save old value in _R0 */ + if (imm & BPF_FETCH) + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(_R0, tmp2_reg)); + switch (imm) { case BPF_ADD: + case BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH: EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(tmp2_reg, tmp2_reg, src_reg)); break; case BPF_AND: + case BPF_AND | BPF_FETCH: EMIT(PPC_RAW_AND(tmp2_reg, tmp2_reg, src_reg)); break; case BPF_OR: + case BPF_OR | BPF_FETCH: EMIT(PPC_RAW_OR(tmp2_reg, tmp2_reg, src_reg)); break; case BPF_XOR: + case BPF_XOR | BPF_FETCH: EMIT(PPC_RAW_XOR(tmp2_reg, tmp2_reg, src_reg)); break; default: @@ -807,13 +815,17 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * return -EOPNOTSUPP; } - /* store result back */ + /* store new value */ if (size == BPF_DW) EMIT(PPC_RAW_STDCX(tmp2_reg, tmp1_reg, dst_reg)); else EMIT(PPC_RAW_STWCX(tmp2_reg, tmp1_reg, dst_reg)); /* we're done if this succeeded */ PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, tmp_idx); + + /* For the BPF_FETCH variant, get old value into src_reg */ + if (imm & BPF_FETCH) + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(src_reg, _R0)); break; /* From patchwork Fri Jun 10 15:55:50 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hari Bathini X-Patchwork-Id: 1642021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=ASBtC/NZ; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4LKQcF0vl7z9s1l for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 01:58:37 +1000 (AEST) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4LKQcF02Drz3cgB for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 01:58:37 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=ASBtC/NZ; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=hbathini@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=ASBtC/NZ; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4LKQYt6HRGz3byL for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 01:56:34 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 25AFtrEf011189; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:15 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=SgpFwGA9RTkKfBKq1OguzDdqQthzqHGegbMtmXtjgWc=; b=ASBtC/NZaE4FWmn68UgoBgMFhIXXUSbUxVd+yGdutH9+61KY2cIR2sKEOMvZH1vzo75a H1JxtccPz68puCo/BTyBmQTuPobARSjJCuSDzQAfoN/C8sm/nh7ss1EIHC2FHstAP2gi 0oqUj7iI4CeZsKLjTZXfNuAgR63LMQ1I1Ros+YhpbDxG2VdLQ1427Oi7gYE53yHWJcWW mThrldBhFfX4XHNsH2eZqw3/M0df36QJYrOeOkmwD7ipe5u5bjM/Uo5OUSL6wd+15cGM nk2o7KqmpViNCxBZL6JMadEJjfb9AFiMPSwnEKKbswVqGBmXSeSNs28kWQnPEKRIUNw9 eg== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3gm91gr08m-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:15 +0000 Received: from m0098409.ppops.net (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 25AFuEck011740; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:14 GMT Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3gm91gr080-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:14 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 25AFoWb9021291; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:11 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay13.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.198]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3gfy19geew-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:11 +0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 25AFu9e722413814 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:09 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4296D4C040; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E5434C044; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hbathini-workstation.in.ibm.com (unknown [9.203.106.231]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:05 +0000 (GMT) From: Hari Bathini To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] bpf ppc64: Add instructions for atomic_[cmp]xchg Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 21:25:50 +0530 Message-Id: <20220610155552.25892-4-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.3 In-Reply-To: <20220610155552.25892-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> References: <20220610155552.25892-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: QBDuw1EA2QflXNjpUmrSV6cp1G3QdAKg X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: Xup1eUiqYZ7I8PmvCo8BMf9aJDJ2N6w7 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.874,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-06-10_06,2022-06-09_02,2022-02-23_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1015 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2204290000 definitions=main-2206100061 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Song Liu , Daniel Borkmann , John Fastabend , Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , "Naveen N. Rao" , Yonghong Song , KP Singh , Jordan Niethe , Martin KaFai Lau Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" This adds two atomic opcodes BPF_XCHG and BPF_CMPXCHG on ppc64, both of which include the BPF_FETCH flag. The kernel's atomic_cmpxchg operation fundamentally has 3 operands, but we only have two register fields. Therefore the operand we compare against (the kernel's API calls it 'old') is hard-coded to be BPF_REG_R0. Also, kernel's atomic_cmpxchg returns the previous value at dst_reg + off. JIT the same for BPF too with return value put in BPF_REG_0. BPF_REG_R0 = atomic_cmpxchg(dst_reg + off, BPF_REG_R0, src_reg); Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini --- Changes in v2: * Moved variable declaration to avoid late declaration error on some compilers. * Added an optimization for 32-bit cmpxchg with regard to commit see commit 39491867ace5. arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index c53236b3a8b1..29ee306d6302 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -360,6 +360,7 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * u32 size = BPF_SIZE(code); u32 tmp1_reg = bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1); u32 tmp2_reg = bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2); + u32 save_reg, ret_reg; s16 off = insn[i].off; s32 imm = insn[i].imm; bool func_addr_fixed; @@ -778,6 +779,9 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * */ case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_W: case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_DW: + save_reg = tmp2_reg; + ret_reg = src_reg; + /* Get offset into TMP_REG_1 */ EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(tmp1_reg, off)); tmp_idx = ctx->idx * 4; @@ -808,6 +812,24 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * case BPF_XOR | BPF_FETCH: EMIT(PPC_RAW_XOR(tmp2_reg, tmp2_reg, src_reg)); break; + case BPF_CMPXCHG: + /* + * Return old value in BPF_REG_0 for BPF_CMPXCHG & + * in src_reg for other cases. + */ + ret_reg = bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_0); + + /* Compare with old value in BPF_R0 */ + if (size == BPF_DW) + EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPD(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_0), tmp2_reg)); + else + EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPW(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_0), tmp2_reg)); + /* Don't set if different from old value */ + PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, (ctx->idx + 3) * 4); + fallthrough; + case BPF_XCHG: + save_reg = src_reg; + break; default: pr_err_ratelimited( "eBPF filter atomic op code %02x (@%d) unsupported\n", @@ -817,15 +839,22 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * /* store new value */ if (size == BPF_DW) - EMIT(PPC_RAW_STDCX(tmp2_reg, tmp1_reg, dst_reg)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STDCX(save_reg, tmp1_reg, dst_reg)); else - EMIT(PPC_RAW_STWCX(tmp2_reg, tmp1_reg, dst_reg)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STWCX(save_reg, tmp1_reg, dst_reg)); /* we're done if this succeeded */ PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, tmp_idx); - /* For the BPF_FETCH variant, get old value into src_reg */ - if (imm & BPF_FETCH) - EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(src_reg, _R0)); + if (imm & BPF_FETCH) { + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(ret_reg, _R0)); + /* + * Skip unnecessary zero-extension for 32-bit cmpxchg. + * For context, see commit 39491867ace5. + */ + if (size != BPF_DW && imm == BPF_CMPXCHG && + insn_is_zext(&insn[i + 1])) + addrs[++i] = ctx->idx * 4; + } break; /* From patchwork Fri Jun 10 15:55:51 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hari Bathini X-Patchwork-Id: 1642022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=pRdUC0U/; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4LKQd741rKz9s1l for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 01:59:23 +1000 (AEST) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4LKQd72SJ2z3chp for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 01:59:23 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=pRdUC0U/; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=hbathini@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=pRdUC0U/; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4LKQYy2GkQz3c98 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 01:56:37 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 25AFR7SE025200; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:18 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=I1afDjTRkcT29LEzqpObNh6JGr7EtIyVa/zoHKUbahQ=; b=pRdUC0U/Z6HIsy8Xp+mGDsEIkhb7UZToGW1ZYWq4hwHpeb8tiGFTQVk6CLOSswFkkOru l+5lqYysWrICcRKpcuaq1Ya2oTD+GeEyYI565dMhgxkHDZjrbQfdYBodGYDY9iu+rPGD 3lWdsMLs2KYJReFjsPgxH5UY9uPumHl0jmGoey9UdBkfrzIXsh964c304HVNWnat/HtO EsPaoZpkGefuQXkTRw7XaG2DoazEjEr8/phXTFb3D/XsFV3BKrs0IERsGOcmsDrGuAUr sJ11HsUxTTIxGPcYSoWMPGWhvYXzflsTLMKSN5ExvSqRgO76JGIm6QZtRnO77u8uLC9B Iw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3gm8ksggjs-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:18 +0000 Received: from m0098404.ppops.net (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 25AFjClZ015303; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:17 GMT Received: from ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (66.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.102]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3gm8ksggjc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:17 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 25AFo4Np029817; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:15 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.195]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3gfxnj0gad-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:14 +0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 25AFuC5B21365010 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:12 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B430E4C040; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A62D44C04A; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hbathini-workstation.in.ibm.com (unknown [9.203.106.231]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:09 +0000 (GMT) From: Hari Bathini To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev Subject: [PATCH v2 4/5] bpf ppc32: add support for BPF_ATOMIC bitwise operations Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 21:25:51 +0530 Message-Id: <20220610155552.25892-5-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.3 In-Reply-To: <20220610155552.25892-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> References: <20220610155552.25892-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: al_VxdLHl_xZzFEqvo5VQZZXMCV6U71E X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 3BiqQ84zlO9If6zmokbeJHtWTbjnMzL_ X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.874,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-06-10_06,2022-06-09_02,2022-02-23_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=942 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2204290000 definitions=main-2206100061 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Song Liu , Daniel Borkmann , John Fastabend , Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , "Naveen N. Rao" , Yonghong Song , KP Singh , Jordan Niethe , Martin KaFai Lau Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Adding instructions for ppc32 for atomic_and atomic_or atomic_xor atomic_fetch_add atomic_fetch_and atomic_fetch_or atomic_fetch_xor Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini --- Changes in v2: * Used an additional register (BPF_REG_AX) - to avoid clobbering src_reg. - to keep the lwarx reservation as intended. - to avoid the odd switch/goto construct. * Zero'ed out the higher 32-bit explicitly when required. arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c index e46ed1e8c6ca..28dc6a1a8f2f 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c @@ -294,6 +294,7 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * u32 dst_reg_h = dst_reg - 1; u32 src_reg = bpf_to_ppc(insn[i].src_reg); u32 src_reg_h = src_reg - 1; + u32 ax_reg = bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_AX); u32 tmp_reg = bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG); u32 size = BPF_SIZE(code); s16 off = insn[i].off; @@ -798,25 +799,53 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * * BPF_STX ATOMIC (atomic ops) */ case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_W: - if (imm != BPF_ADD) { - pr_err_ratelimited("eBPF filter atomic op code %02x (@%d) unsupported\n", - code, i); - return -ENOTSUPP; - } - - /* *(u32 *)(dst + off) += src */ - bpf_set_seen_register(ctx, tmp_reg); + bpf_set_seen_register(ctx, ax_reg); + /* Get offset into TMP_REG */ EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(tmp_reg, off)); + tmp_idx = ctx->idx * 4; /* load value from memory into r0 */ EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWARX(_R0, tmp_reg, dst_reg, 0)); - /* add value from src_reg into this */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(_R0, _R0, src_reg)); - /* store result back */ + + /* Save old value in BPF_REG_AX */ + if (imm & BPF_FETCH) + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(ax_reg, _R0)); + + switch (imm) { + case BPF_ADD: + case BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH: + EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(_R0, _R0, src_reg)); + break; + case BPF_AND: + case BPF_AND | BPF_FETCH: + EMIT(PPC_RAW_AND(_R0, _R0, src_reg)); + break; + case BPF_OR: + case BPF_OR | BPF_FETCH: + EMIT(PPC_RAW_OR(_R0, _R0, src_reg)); + break; + case BPF_XOR: + case BPF_XOR | BPF_FETCH: + EMIT(PPC_RAW_XOR(_R0, _R0, src_reg)); + break; + default: + pr_err_ratelimited("eBPF filter atomic op code %02x (@%d) unsupported\n", + code, i); + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } + + /* store new value */ EMIT(PPC_RAW_STWCX(_R0, tmp_reg, dst_reg)); /* we're done if this succeeded */ - PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, (ctx->idx - 3) * 4); + PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, tmp_idx); + + /* For the BPF_FETCH variant, get old data into src_reg */ + if (imm & BPF_FETCH) { + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(src_reg, ax_reg)); + if (!fp->aux->verifier_zext) + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(src_reg_h, 0)); + } break; case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_DW: /* *(u64 *)(dst + off) += src */ From patchwork Fri Jun 10 15:55:52 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hari Bathini X-Patchwork-Id: 1642023 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=mgB29cJu; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4LKQdt33WFz9s1l for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 02:00:02 +1000 (AEST) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4LKQds4L1jz3dvp for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 02:00:01 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=mgB29cJu; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=hbathini@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=mgB29cJu; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4LKQZ03gkmz3cBB for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 01:56:40 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 25AEuah3007690; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:21 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=s32GZyBD7QhYHjhNHiY86tpczYjEJMbszSFFN4zdBfM=; b=mgB29cJuYGOYivogWqXHujPbuYV5E+MCcRdo8ImqyvKOvDyUPLPfwdPyLUs6rGz5Wm4G O2vm0i3/8TKYsQOOyQcPB1AfuRMSvVAZRyBOGvNP4ddMevgimvCZQWmt3UrAEqEjZ1c+ UnR/Vyv+YNNTHAx4uCLGghwjtdxr3/5sZb3N03Rrg1bA1rn4ZsANsMHWOACFs6eeYpsR +5FDc0TYWpJxDjWzgE0B5YlBnaa8fOkCU3saJsbwFoVnG7dGZ6xH3A18hYhtA/gPsUOS Ox1phGpED0+NsfmGeWRw3uQfqeYRO+w4an0qu9PqoidgpWY3SuvJD440U2rQmOd5SwIc HA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3gm85ps2c9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:21 +0000 Received: from m0098413.ppops.net (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 25AF0ZEX016927; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:20 GMT Received: from ppma05fra.de.ibm.com (6c.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.108]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3gm85ps2bs-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:20 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma05fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma05fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 25AFpdpW020876; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:18 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay13.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.198]) by ppma05fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3gfy18xp6v-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:18 +0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 25AFuGCJ22479224 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:16 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A064C046; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0975A4C040; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hbathini-workstation.in.ibm.com (unknown [9.203.106.231]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:12 +0000 (GMT) From: Hari Bathini To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev Subject: [PATCH v2 5/5] bpf ppc32: Add instructions for atomic_[cmp]xchg Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 21:25:52 +0530 Message-Id: <20220610155552.25892-6-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.3 In-Reply-To: <20220610155552.25892-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> References: <20220610155552.25892-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: ZetIobXS02btdggG2UPwAI2nq-1RNAk7 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: xVhgE7kk95bUxARjKoukvRZo7kdqN2Gm X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.874,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-06-10_06,2022-06-09_02,2022-02-23_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2204290000 definitions=main-2206100061 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Song Liu , Daniel Borkmann , John Fastabend , Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , "Naveen N. Rao" , Yonghong Song , KP Singh , Jordan Niethe , Martin KaFai Lau Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" This adds two atomic opcodes BPF_XCHG and BPF_CMPXCHG on ppc32, both of which include the BPF_FETCH flag. The kernel's atomic_cmpxchg operation fundamentally has 3 operands, but we only have two register fields. Therefore the operand we compare against (the kernel's API calls it 'old') is hard-coded to be BPF_REG_R0. Also, kernel's atomic_cmpxchg returns the previous value at dst_reg + off. JIT the same for BPF too with return value put in BPF_REG_0. BPF_REG_R0 = atomic_cmpxchg(dst_reg + off, BPF_REG_R0, src_reg); Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini --- Changes in v2: * Moved variable declaration to avoid late declaration error on some compilers. * Tried to make code readable and compact. arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c index 28dc6a1a8f2f..43f1c76d48ce 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c @@ -297,6 +297,7 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * u32 ax_reg = bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_AX); u32 tmp_reg = bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG); u32 size = BPF_SIZE(code); + u32 save_reg, ret_reg; s16 off = insn[i].off; s32 imm = insn[i].imm; bool func_addr_fixed; @@ -799,6 +800,9 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * * BPF_STX ATOMIC (atomic ops) */ case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_W: + save_reg = _R0; + ret_reg = src_reg; + bpf_set_seen_register(ctx, tmp_reg); bpf_set_seen_register(ctx, ax_reg); @@ -829,6 +833,21 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * case BPF_XOR | BPF_FETCH: EMIT(PPC_RAW_XOR(_R0, _R0, src_reg)); break; + case BPF_CMPXCHG: + /* + * Return old value in BPF_REG_0 for BPF_CMPXCHG & + * in src_reg for other cases. + */ + ret_reg = bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_0); + + /* Compare with old value in BPF_REG_0 */ + EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPW(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_0), _R0)); + /* Don't set if different from old value */ + PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, (ctx->idx + 3) * 4); + fallthrough; + case BPF_XCHG: + save_reg = src_reg; + break; default: pr_err_ratelimited("eBPF filter atomic op code %02x (@%d) unsupported\n", code, i); @@ -836,15 +855,15 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * } /* store new value */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_STWCX(_R0, tmp_reg, dst_reg)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STWCX(save_reg, tmp_reg, dst_reg)); /* we're done if this succeeded */ PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, tmp_idx); /* For the BPF_FETCH variant, get old data into src_reg */ if (imm & BPF_FETCH) { - EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(src_reg, ax_reg)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(ret_reg, ax_reg)); if (!fp->aux->verifier_zext) - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(src_reg_h, 0)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(ret_reg - 1, 0)); /* higher 32-bit */ } break;