From patchwork Mon Feb 14 10:41:35 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Naveen N. Rao" X-Patchwork-Id: 1592419 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=sCcCptFe; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy1643ylQz9s8s for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:43:24 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Jy1633DG0z3bcB for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:43:23 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=sCcCptFe; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=sCcCptFe; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy1552J0cz2ywt for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:42:32 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21E9E41u003446; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:15 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=FUefhHlovKHvSxorDvsShQYTpbtcDRxQomkvjmrhEQ0=; b=sCcCptFeU7bjTuGZ/zltw6Qo1X3v97XSthcfMRgwimdHxQKQtDW1O7o83tEeTuySmq9D dToxUGvDicXhAfFcE72oUaL6GYS/RNJdirFZxkHHdnTSVrj3bFHYCqGXcH+i8pKwRu95 Ibz1ehnuPQPfsP+3GquAHPYB9zchWF0P6PQSMuUwLo61a255DNRiKI51ZX8wx709sTCX S5byHfq2hs/6PdUBqn8XH20VAbDB7pE3I3mxas1iMImTlnwDUdTtY5Dk8Uiw1ascPVGU nRBqYgtQhl55gdWLz5q1GFp4ilSvLznVNnJMVt1C+CSx3PceFrAKzirl7Wf8bNtkMMK9 Dg== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e6rt11wdk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:15 +0000 Received: from m0098410.ppops.net (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 21EAKiBT024681; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:15 GMT Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e6rt11wcx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:14 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21EAXecv028257; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:12 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3e64h9m0ny-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:12 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 21EAg8uC41943304 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:08 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3B38AE045; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA45AE05F; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-NotSettable.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.124.167]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:06 +0000 (GMT) From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Michael Ellerman Subject: [PATCH powerpc/next 01/17] powerpc/bpf: Skip branch range validation during first pass Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 16:11:35 +0530 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: wgVAv8MaGgRMSGjs7IIED0oe0vUS_oad X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: LlYy-R8l7RdSGKhWrRiXvnVwU5iM_qZb X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.816,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.62.513 definitions=2022-02-14_02,2022-02-14_03,2021-12-02_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2201110000 definitions=main-2202140062 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Daniel Borkmann , Yauheni Kaliuta , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Hari Bathini Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" During the first pass, addrs[] is still being populated. So, all branches to following instructions will appear to be going to the start of the JIT program. Ignore branch range validation for such instructions and assume those to be in range. Branch range validation will happen during the second pass after addrs[] is setup properly. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h index b20a2a83a6e75b..9cdd33d6be4cc0 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ #define PPC_JMP(dest) \ do { \ long offset = (long)(dest) - (ctx->idx * 4); \ - if (!is_offset_in_branch_range(offset)) { \ + if ((dest) != 0 && !is_offset_in_branch_range(offset)) { \ pr_err_ratelimited("Branch offset 0x%lx (@%u) out of range\n", offset, ctx->idx); \ return -ERANGE; \ } \ @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ #define PPC_BCC_SHORT(cond, dest) \ do { \ long offset = (long)(dest) - (ctx->idx * 4); \ - if (!is_offset_in_cond_branch_range(offset)) { \ + if ((dest) != 0 && !is_offset_in_cond_branch_range(offset)) { \ pr_err_ratelimited("Conditional branch offset 0x%lx (@%u) out of range\n", offset, ctx->idx); \ return -ERANGE; \ } \ From patchwork Mon Feb 14 10:41:36 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Naveen N. Rao" X-Patchwork-Id: 1592420 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=WFknDgoc; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy16r1Wb9z9s8s for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:44:04 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Jy16q5KXnz3cTl for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:44:03 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=WFknDgoc; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=WFknDgoc; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy1564KV3z3bYw for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:42:34 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21E98GPV016790; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:18 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=XQ6lCiR4LKy7Umsg3hkLr/V6hAFrgSAGCRT7uapK/10=; b=WFknDgocQv2N+xrRXyS3p1eVSoiNqq7se8G8XrZm1C9v/LKopsipcSaiLg58uowhZV08 ffk01t7iWXUbki3GPW/hrMTQoLfpuF5/1Wins7pb7vTBn4n3oOYzk0HekA/QCMarW0qu dv4XpSOjuh5JxhxnLIMaPz+ddedBVGrIzHrk7uJqMVG2eBp4GMyDeHhxubxvVLZdk8RO UpzomSWi75swgB9I3uSY3no8L0wo2CJl8CF5z7G7KYGo+6oszMG2hkaGd9+qnpVao7GI jJ5JJeYvxRV+xGdjj+l/LHMmEATKBRd9zRdAqnisC0tjcMlj+DoB9qInAikoKawkAvly eg== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e6rt11wea-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:17 +0000 Received: from m0098410.ppops.net (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 21EAKBaU022666; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:17 GMT Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e6rt11wdp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:17 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21EAXfeh028272; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:14 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3e64h9m0p8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:14 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 21EAgBv344695882 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:11 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC54AE051; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C248AE057; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-NotSettable.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.124.167]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:08 +0000 (GMT) From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Michael Ellerman Subject: [PATCH powerpc/next 02/17] powerpc/bpf: Emit a single branch instruction for known short branch ranges Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 16:11:36 +0530 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: oha8cpTjk6aMfEZ6829g7w6OgqljNmlC X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: KKR5asIXZNWXgfPUxB9fbEaoa-QTBWDN X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.816,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.62.513 definitions=2022-02-14_02,2022-02-14_03,2021-12-02_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2201110000 definitions=main-2202140062 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Daniel Borkmann , Yauheni Kaliuta , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Hari Bathini Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" PPC_BCC() emits two instructions to accommodate scenarios where we need to branch outside the range of a conditional branch. PPC_BCC_SHORT() emits a single branch instruction and can be used when the branch is known to be within a conditional branch range. Convert some of the uses of PPC_BCC() in the powerpc BPF JIT over to PPC_BCC_SHORT() where we know the branch range. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 8 ++++---- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 8 ++++---- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c index cf8dd8aea386c4..81e0c56661ddf2 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWZ(_R0, b2p_bpf_array, offsetof(struct bpf_array, map.max_entries))); EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLW(b2p_index, _R0)); EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWZ(_R0, _R1, bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(ctx, BPF_PPC_TC))); - PPC_BCC(COND_GE, out); + PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_GE, out); /* * if (tail_call_cnt >= MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT) @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLWI(_R0, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)); /* tail_call_cnt++; */ EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDIC(_R0, _R0, 1)); - PPC_BCC(COND_GE, out); + PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_GE, out); /* prog = array->ptrs[index]; */ EMIT(PPC_RAW_RLWINM(_R3, b2p_index, 2, 0, 29)); @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o * goto out; */ EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLWI(_R3, 0)); - PPC_BCC(COND_EQ, out); + PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_EQ, out); /* goto *(prog->bpf_func + prologue_size); */ EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWZ(_R3, _R3, offsetof(struct bpf_prog, bpf_func))); @@ -834,7 +834,7 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * if (BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_PROBE_MEM) { PPC_LI32(_R0, TASK_SIZE - off); EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLW(src_reg, _R0)); - PPC_BCC(COND_GT, (ctx->idx + 5) * 4); + PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_GT, (ctx->idx + 4) * 4); EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(dst_reg, 0)); /* * For BPF_DW case, "li reg_h,0" would be needed when diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index e1e8c934308adb..b1ed8611091d2b 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWZ(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p_bpf_array, offsetof(struct bpf_array, map.max_entries))); EMIT(PPC_RAW_RLWINM(b2p_index, b2p_index, 0, 0, 31)); EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLW(b2p_index, b2p[TMP_REG_1])); - PPC_BCC(COND_GE, out); + PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_GE, out); /* * if (tail_call_cnt >= MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT) @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o */ PPC_BPF_LL(b2p[TMP_REG_1], 1, bpf_jit_stack_tailcallcnt(ctx)); EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLWI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)); - PPC_BCC(COND_GE, out); + PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_GE, out); /* * tail_call_cnt++; @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o * goto out; */ EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLDI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], 0)); - PPC_BCC(COND_EQ, out); + PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_EQ, out); /* goto *(prog->bpf_func + prologue_size); */ PPC_BPF_LL(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p[TMP_REG_1], offsetof(struct bpf_prog, bpf_func)); @@ -807,7 +807,7 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * else /* BOOK3S_64 */ PPC_LI64(b2p[TMP_REG_2], PAGE_OFFSET); EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLD(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p[TMP_REG_2])); - PPC_BCC(COND_GT, (ctx->idx + 4) * 4); + PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_GT, (ctx->idx + 3) * 4); EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(dst_reg, 0)); /* * Check if 'off' is word aligned because PPC_BPF_LL() From patchwork Mon Feb 14 10:41:37 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Naveen N. Rao" X-Patchwork-Id: 1592430 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=LDMLj5VS; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy1Fy2Pdnz9s8s for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:50:14 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Jy1Fx5fYLz3dxX for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:50:13 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=LDMLj5VS; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=LDMLj5VS; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy15c0Clxz3cRP for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:42:59 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21E9LCft003556; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:21 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=0YUswnmmsPdrnIUuNRNtpZu2+MBxfUX1qSGmicM6LvE=; b=LDMLj5VSyevVlnO6ul3GLvzHE96mYQegN0OK4Hfm4+x7tZdANDo9snewvAsakzPHPb6P PjB5bXac4q3/2KDWATFZbkR0cUOiMNMq159ARQCGLS/rcgaaq2kbL4aOeIFo7jYNB48A kfHCiyo+UMDiv/4w3z45fuMYk25DH4cKCp4zHODt6IQQZ60o9mWz9shQAuip++JU4rad 8rvxauAlmh/2wWgMUhdh69pLGcU35LyGv1bo9AmFMfeenOxk9ZPMT5bBk3jRLy/+sdkM 5fiq7wuVtpBQLXxu65+ws2ocLXlqQOuZF5aoR3/h5F67ZOaGPFZVp5jnC+ySO+k9iQIj eA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e7ath407n-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:20 +0000 Received: from m0098404.ppops.net (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 21EA0iTV012824; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:20 GMT Received: from ppma01fra.de.ibm.com (46.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.70]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e7ath406w-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:20 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21EAXt0h005444; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:17 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.196]) by ppma01fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3e64h937ky-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:17 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 21EAgEoc44368164 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:14 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E36AE061; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C419EAE045; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-NotSettable.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.124.167]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:11 +0000 (GMT) From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Michael Ellerman Subject: [PATCH powerpc/next 03/17] powerpc/bpf: Handle large branch ranges with BPF_EXIT Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 16:11:37 +0530 Message-Id: <33aa2e92645a92712be23b18035a2c6dcb92ff8d.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: DktMQKaM_gIxIasgzYa-ByYSL8ffYfHr X-Proofpoint-GUID: WLY8b783cQYNBouAcTswsVr-pjtwC3hA X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.816,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.62.513 definitions=2022-02-14_02,2022-02-14_03,2021-12-02_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=813 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2201110000 definitions=main-2202140064 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Daniel Borkmann , Yauheni Kaliuta , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Hari Bathini Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" In some scenarios, it is possible that the program epilogue is outside the branch range for a BPF_EXIT instruction. Instead of rejecting such programs, emit epilogue as an alternate exit point from the program. Track the location of the same so that subsequent exits can take either of the two paths. Reported-by: Jordan Niethe Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h | 2 ++ arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 7 +++++-- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 7 +++++-- 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h index 9cdd33d6be4cc0..3b5c44c0b6638d 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h @@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ struct codegen_context { unsigned int stack_size; int b2p[ARRAY_SIZE(b2p)]; unsigned int exentry_idx; + unsigned int alt_exit_addr; }; #ifdef CONFIG_PPC32 @@ -186,6 +187,7 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * void bpf_jit_build_prologue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx); void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx); void bpf_jit_realloc_regs(struct codegen_context *ctx); +int bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, int tmp_reg, long exit_addr); int bpf_add_extable_entry(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, int pass, struct codegen_context *ctx, int insn_idx, int jmp_off, int dst_reg); diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 56dd1f4e3e4447..141e64585b6458 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -89,6 +89,22 @@ static int bpf_jit_fixup_addresses(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, return 0; } +int bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, int tmp_reg, long exit_addr) +{ + if (!exit_addr || is_offset_in_branch_range(exit_addr - (ctx->idx * 4))) { + PPC_JMP(exit_addr); + } else if (ctx->alt_exit_addr) { + if (WARN_ON(!is_offset_in_branch_range((long)ctx->alt_exit_addr - (ctx->idx * 4)))) + return -1; + PPC_JMP(ctx->alt_exit_addr); + } else { + ctx->alt_exit_addr = ctx->idx * 4; + bpf_jit_build_epilogue(image, ctx); + } + + return 0; +} + struct powerpc64_jit_data { struct bpf_binary_header *header; u32 *addrs; @@ -177,8 +193,10 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp) * If we have seen a tail call, we need a second pass. * This is because bpf_jit_emit_common_epilogue() is called * from bpf_jit_emit_tail_call() with a not yet stable ctx->seen. + * We also need a second pass if we ended up with too large + * a program so as to ensure BPF_EXIT branches are in range. */ - if (cgctx.seen & SEEN_TAILCALL) { + if (cgctx.seen & SEEN_TAILCALL || !is_offset_in_branch_range((long)cgctx.idx * 4)) { cgctx.idx = 0; if (bpf_jit_build_body(fp, 0, &cgctx, addrs, 0)) { fp = org_fp; @@ -193,6 +211,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp) * calculate total size from idx. */ bpf_jit_build_prologue(0, &cgctx); + addrs[fp->len] = cgctx.idx * 4; bpf_jit_build_epilogue(0, &cgctx); fixup_len = fp->aux->num_exentries * BPF_FIXUP_LEN * 4; @@ -233,6 +252,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp) for (pass = 1; pass < 3; pass++) { /* Now build the prologue, body code & epilogue for real. */ cgctx.idx = 0; + cgctx.alt_exit_addr = 0; bpf_jit_build_prologue(code_base, &cgctx); if (bpf_jit_build_body(fp, code_base, &cgctx, addrs, pass)) { bpf_jit_binary_free(bpf_hdr); diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c index 81e0c56661ddf2..f401bfc5a67684 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c @@ -929,8 +929,11 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * * the epilogue. If we _are_ the last instruction, * we'll just fall through to the epilogue. */ - if (i != flen - 1) - PPC_JMP(exit_addr); + if (i != flen - 1) { + ret = bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(image, ctx, _R0, exit_addr); + if (ret) + return ret; + } /* else fall through to the epilogue */ break; diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index b1ed8611091d2b..371bd5a16859c7 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -871,8 +871,11 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * * the epilogue. If we _are_ the last instruction, * we'll just fall through to the epilogue. */ - if (i != flen - 1) - PPC_JMP(exit_addr); + if (i != flen - 1) { + ret = bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(image, ctx, b2p[TMP_REG_1], exit_addr); + if (ret) + return ret; + } /* else fall through to the epilogue */ break; From patchwork Mon Feb 14 10:41:38 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Naveen N. Rao" X-Patchwork-Id: 1592421 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=atUa09x0; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy17c4mv8z9s8s for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:44:44 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Jy17c0v3mz3ckn for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:44:44 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=atUa09x0; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=atUa09x0; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy15G6tCLz3cC5 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:42:42 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21EATvdn008456; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:26 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=okrLT1xDwpngLCadI+yF/GujCEhk0oJvugaOrrtU7lQ=; b=atUa09x0iEx2YotDNH7Vn50GkWoJs/O+gCVe83Q6tl72aaT2g5OrlAeSuc4Ikfk8pi8M RxSgbUp8IJyxBxS1cRNE02tTXEiUUYwy93CIoNuX6urzCnTKVElOlKT+pEj6X+RQN9aw LenxutHmwnRzhZcoTx3e423NlfIrepkguJl/1+DxdpVaWZ5rPWjs8uZ+qK1Bs1vS7P++ 1MRTmvPGlqntbtGfvPu9b0E0YIZ2/rtYM+LF0HaPCLWh4nc0fJix+Lq8lw8OYlWvXLn2 1o4mOiF9qmN7GLao1RQvO/cymu2cLLcEqJq3kCN+ywKVdsugYGzltUQHf92SoGTHq0QG Iw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e78m0e5mv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:25 +0000 Received: from m0098396.ppops.net (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 21EATG3T021434; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:25 GMT Received: from ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (62.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e78m0e5m8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:25 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21EAXU9W012170; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:23 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay13.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.198]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3e64h9m0vm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:23 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 21EAgGIa32702912 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:16 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6E4AE05A; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7607CAE056; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-NotSettable.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.124.167]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:14 +0000 (GMT) From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Michael Ellerman Subject: [PATCH powerpc/next 04/17] powerpc64/bpf: Do not save/restore LR on each call to bpf_stf_barrier() Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 16:11:38 +0530 Message-Id: <4446f25478d82a2a4ac9dab2ebdfd88ddf923eb7.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: IMbuLvsPp4JB0SdTzjAZdyZ0peI8sCDl X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: GP9aViPKxCQc9ksxJBY0ZiviArFT3aCd X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.816,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.62.513 definitions=2022-02-14_02,2022-02-14_03,2021-12-02_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2201110000 definitions=main-2202140064 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Daniel Borkmann , Yauheni Kaliuta , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Hari Bathini Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Instead of saving and restoring LR before each invocation to bpf_stf_barrier(), set SEEN_FUNC flag so that we save/restore LR in prologue/epilogue. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index 371bd5a16859c7..27ac2fc7670298 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -690,11 +690,10 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * EMIT(PPC_RAW_ORI(_R31, _R31, 0)); break; case STF_BARRIER_FALLBACK: - EMIT(PPC_RAW_MFLR(b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + ctx->seen |= SEEN_FUNC; PPC_LI64(12, dereference_kernel_function_descriptor(bpf_stf_barrier)); EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTCTR(12)); EMIT(PPC_RAW_BCTRL()); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTLR(b2p[TMP_REG_1])); break; case STF_BARRIER_NONE: break; From patchwork Mon Feb 14 10:41:39 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Naveen N. Rao" X-Patchwork-Id: 1592422 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=lZ4fUxUy; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy18L2bwXz9s8s for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:45:22 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Jy18K4j1kz3cRv for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:45:21 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=lZ4fUxUy; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=lZ4fUxUy; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy15H6GYKz3cC5 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:42:43 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21E9MQsV031392; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:26 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=iLAJlG8FaVBV8smwR6edAPEzNg+XPnb2S7khYUvw26A=; b=lZ4fUxUyAIR8/1rGzQqWrOIF0E4mtAxUvQdvQcXImz0Gmo3zShmEP2J9z1Jq6lqzNAuN DP48bEHvu5z5A4oRFIRkgkqK3xjtVmSbsMm8N1hmq1NFM00kwvkVenG7bqS2fB18J1T+ YZ/dpBaa650wBJVuoGOUqUWagP4AtFILdQe9tyAqsrD3LedIWdlzK7pJuiYMR4bDsfX3 eYOjUnykzUD6rEO3lXaCpp1GXUqxVe9Br45WzhY6Uil2sQAkTPfeusioPsiwVLqcaFs9 PapgBppZ59pErP5yGhAAA0eDTjIzhO5lOFkiPD4yKLtiETqAr8o6wWELQpj/SlAbIuVr tQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e6thxg82n-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:26 +0000 Received: from m0098414.ppops.net (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 21EAbwP6030010; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:26 GMT Received: from ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (66.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.102]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e6thxg81u-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:26 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21EAXXJw000919; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:24 GMT Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.192]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3e645jc36c-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:24 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 21EAW10v35848666 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:32:01 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 732BFAE053; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BAD7AE058; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-NotSettable.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.124.167]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:16 +0000 (GMT) From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Michael Ellerman Subject: [PATCH powerpc/next 05/17] powerpc64/bpf: Use r12 for constant blinding Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 16:11:39 +0530 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: 0QpUWiOGPIBfU5ZR1n02rz58kPxBUOvK X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: aOcz7zg4bn0UXylnR1suEORZUzUO2CSf X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.816,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.62.513 definitions=2022-02-14_02,2022-02-14_03,2021-12-02_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=999 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2201110000 definitions=main-2202140064 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Daniel Borkmann , Yauheni Kaliuta , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Hari Bathini Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" In preparation for preserving kernel toc in r2, switch BPF_REG_AX from r2 to r12. r12 is not used by bpf JIT except during external helper/bpf calls, or with BPF_NOSPEC. These sequences aren't emitted when BPF_REG_AX is used for constant blinding and other purposes. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit64.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit64.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit64.h index b63b35e45e558c..82cdfee412784a 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit64.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit64.h @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ const int b2p[MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 2] = { /* frame pointer aka BPF_REG_10 */ [BPF_REG_FP] = 31, /* eBPF jit internal registers */ - [BPF_REG_AX] = 2, + [BPF_REG_AX] = 12, [TMP_REG_1] = 9, [TMP_REG_2] = 10 }; From patchwork Mon Feb 14 10:41:40 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Naveen N. Rao" X-Patchwork-Id: 1592423 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=PhAJ6Yui; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy1946h3Dz9s8s for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:46:00 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Jy1941n1Wz3cWG for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:46:00 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=PhAJ6Yui; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=PhAJ6Yui; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy15J0cPQz3c79 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:42:43 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21E8MtNp010931; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:27 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=QBB9Y4gdbtEYHEf+KFyWfns4N4yDeWGeN7nFA6hapo4=; b=PhAJ6YuiId2LOvpXBUwJxC5qP1qZxcQd6UZ3NOekw3kcd1RiiL4XY9TU/urI8ZgevXmd 6x/paoscAVp6UbkxeqbIfuk+KtymYUJARRWvloUJUXYMXh0UhniOH04R4oD6AcMKNsL4 1OdXxHwRsyeh8jtv9tSh+u0ZVsajueeu+gGMnRDP16rRjbAqEwZ9MgZUPtTVDGDP2571 i9ya6n6EIg664L+l2j7BU0SLTUwPpKGoUY7d6Yw+ZQd4G4Gj87piv2BO3Mbu+6PLmgGG X1CpKyT/VrpaxwTQ7Oy+vUaoAr4wYLu+zXvElXWdErwjV9+A26gYnjvqkImAjzGE7NO4 VQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e7avevhqh-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:27 +0000 Received: from m0098413.ppops.net (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 21EAOaYS010577; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:27 GMT Received: from ppma05fra.de.ibm.com (6c.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.108]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e7avevhq4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:27 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma05fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma05fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21EAXmww021691; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:25 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by ppma05fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3e64h9b82k-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:25 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 21EAgMHB32833912 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:22 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 205F8AE045; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5193AE055; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-NotSettable.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.124.167]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:19 +0000 (GMT) From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Michael Ellerman Subject: [PATCH powerpc/next 06/17] powerpc64: Set PPC64_ELF_ABI_v[1|2] macros to 1 Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 16:11:40 +0530 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: OeuqzbaSvufBfGRWibfQLx7ma_U6esAa X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: mVcX_4GgrzsUJGgdgCbD3c8SGKMfG25U X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.816,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.62.513 definitions=2022-02-14_02,2022-02-14_03,2021-12-02_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=961 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2201110000 definitions=main-2202140062 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Daniel Borkmann , Yauheni Kaliuta , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Hari Bathini Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Set macros to 1 so that they can be used with __is_defined(). Suggested-by: Christophe Leroy Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/types.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/types.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/types.h index f1630c553efe43..6c0411ce406255 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/types.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/types.h @@ -13,9 +13,9 @@ #ifdef __powerpc64__ #if defined(_CALL_ELF) && _CALL_ELF == 2 -#define PPC64_ELF_ABI_v2 +#define PPC64_ELF_ABI_v2 1 #else -#define PPC64_ELF_ABI_v1 +#define PPC64_ELF_ABI_v1 1 #endif #endif /* __powerpc64__ */ From patchwork Mon Feb 14 10:41:41 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Naveen N. Rao" X-Patchwork-Id: 1592425 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=gBZmJm3T; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy1B06MGjz9s8s for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:46:48 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Jy1B01dQDz3cVX for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:46:48 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=gBZmJm3T; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=gBZmJm3T; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy15P43pVz3cBq for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:42:49 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21E9KcXt003835; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:32 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=qR8jr5cL1XsNd9SeyXVEBz02oFdfMhnbRLDfeU/T6WY=; b=gBZmJm3TiLoBiqqmqHzjKjBX8A3hN5Nji2E4bNoA6Kub7i8vBpygZ8tGzAnlRple5cyf 7arHh7YP+Jt1eVCyFxhCmbb+bTC73rDu7fB7brHTP/10IMQTFvsYFWWeRa/zdEfbx8fN hwvVGcyWCyf2dReVCIJnDmf41zvSLqLjMdolxBJJBGBs3vhyGYmUZE1KFQTIlBqLsFgn fxXzToJHLwO7oUO4GRjPLxG+/4nwg81Xw1CqRCk+N8Dk7dUvxbdeblfUbJjczIRyWrvG SKy9vxHElrxYLHygX9Ax96g/nsSiQvn4bB0E3nEtQeK0fpXXNn4joyp+CQffyzkcEgmM 2w== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e6rt11wjj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:32 +0000 Received: from m0098410.ppops.net (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 21EARLIh013518; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:31 GMT Received: from ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (6a.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.106]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e6rt11whs-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:31 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21EAXZtj009881; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:29 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3e64h9k8sh-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:29 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 21EAgPtv42795338 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:25 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7B8AE061; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C2F5AE053; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-NotSettable.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.124.167]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:22 +0000 (GMT) From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Michael Ellerman Subject: [PATCH powerpc/next 07/17] powerpc64/bpf elfv2: Setup kernel TOC in r2 on entry Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 16:11:41 +0530 Message-Id: <18a05a4ceec14a8617c9dd4b7128d0afa83fd14e.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: Y7nwRu5BjKiux17tQPqNIsY-2uutkei1 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: JXR7n1RK3MV3YZc1p4kpqUeVKxjd6aK2 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.816,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.62.513 definitions=2022-02-14_02,2022-02-14_03,2021-12-02_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2201110000 definitions=main-2202140062 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Daniel Borkmann , Yauheni Kaliuta , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Hari Bathini Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" In preparation for using kernel TOC, load the same in r2 on entry. With elfv1, the kernel TOC is already setup by our caller. We adjust the number of instructions to skip on a tail call accordingly. We get rid of the #ifdef in bpf_jit_emit_tail_call() since FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE is itself under a #ifdef. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index 27ac2fc7670298..44314ee60155e4 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -73,6 +73,9 @@ void bpf_jit_build_prologue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx) { int i; + if (__is_defined(PPC64_ELF_ABI_v2)) + PPC_BPF_LL(_R2, _R13, offsetof(struct paca_struct, kernel_toc)); + /* * Initialize tail_call_cnt if we do tail calls. * Otherwise, put in NOPs so that it can be skipped when we are @@ -87,8 +90,6 @@ void bpf_jit_build_prologue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx) EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP()); } -#define BPF_TAILCALL_PROLOGUE_SIZE 8 - if (bpf_has_stack_frame(ctx)) { /* * We need a stack frame, but we don't necessarily need to @@ -217,6 +218,10 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o */ int b2p_bpf_array = b2p[BPF_REG_2]; int b2p_index = b2p[BPF_REG_3]; + int bpf_tailcall_prologue_size = 8; + + if (__is_defined(PPC64_ELF_ABI_v2)) + bpf_tailcall_prologue_size += 4; /* skip past the toc load */ /* * if (index >= array->map.max_entries) @@ -255,13 +260,8 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o /* goto *(prog->bpf_func + prologue_size); */ PPC_BPF_LL(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p[TMP_REG_1], offsetof(struct bpf_prog, bpf_func)); -#ifdef PPC64_ELF_ABI_v1 - /* skip past the function descriptor */ EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p[TMP_REG_1], - FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE + BPF_TAILCALL_PROLOGUE_SIZE)); -#else - EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p[TMP_REG_1], BPF_TAILCALL_PROLOGUE_SIZE)); -#endif + FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE + bpf_tailcall_prologue_size)); EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTCTR(b2p[TMP_REG_1])); /* tear down stack, restore NVRs, ... */ From patchwork Mon Feb 14 10:41:42 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Naveen N. Rao" X-Patchwork-Id: 1592426 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=rzgBy7Vo; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy1Bm3kgJz9s8s for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:47:28 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Jy1Bm0VYwz3cmk for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:47:28 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=rzgBy7Vo; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=rzgBy7Vo; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy15S5YPjz3bSs for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:42:52 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21E8kHbD012501; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:36 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=01X0wh4IqhJB9RmsggWnnjv+0T5Ve6071p8cn01Pvu4=; b=rzgBy7VozGAzMkj7jNDPI37ODdg3ZwAvaU5NhkQaKSqI5XSvbn07Tw/ccB2yz3vqRjWo 1XzI6y5wkdpP06nnWvpaqxhRw0Gm22U8duyctArbGQPWUTmQdLn5OwwFEwQthzJ0E9Sf 5eIhPPc/ZSvnMZnLzad+0h1t5KE/JPNHaDa6evs9Cdb/elsdPb5ulcFl0B1OwaesRD3d KdbtHZDGPV0ILn+2FdP6SVrW/BiHKjtUIM21OrRf9xZtZzOH+mJl/S8CAngsgFt9q+14 HsbMlHsDTOGc02IMymGFAY6VPUFBh5LHD5pccM6qxNFN3B4UZCWZDlgDNDvqgmOT0YqS sg== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e785sxrej-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:35 +0000 Received: from m0098409.ppops.net (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 21EAb4Bf016161; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:34 GMT Received: from ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (48.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.72]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e785sxrdy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:34 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21EAXiRI014776; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:32 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.196]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3e645jb9wu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:31 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 21EAgTMv28442882 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:29 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A99AE055; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C98AE05D; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-NotSettable.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.124.167]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:25 +0000 (GMT) From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Michael Ellerman Subject: [PATCH powerpc/next 08/17] powerpc64/bpf elfv1: Do not load TOC before calling functions Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 16:11:42 +0530 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: 5-iMrdFGFSgFVsOdvFCj1WC0CEw6dN4a X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: qUKRNmnKzHHJpHvW8UIMsKKIsxWBQCti X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.816,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.62.513 definitions=2022-02-14_02,2022-02-14_03,2021-12-02_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2201110000 definitions=main-2202140062 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Daniel Borkmann , Yauheni Kaliuta , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Hari Bathini Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" BPF helpers always reside in core kernel and all BPF programs use the kernel TOC. As such, there is no need to load the TOC before calling helpers or other BPF functions. Drop code to do the same. Add a check to ensure we don't proceed if this assumption ever changes in future. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h | 2 +- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 4 +++- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 8 +++++-- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++--------------- 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h index 3b5c44c0b6638d..5cb3efd76715a9 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ static inline void bpf_clear_seen_register(struct codegen_context *ctx, int i) ctx->seen &= ~(1 << (31 - i)); } -void bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func); +int bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func); int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 *addrs, int pass); void bpf_jit_build_prologue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx); diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 141e64585b6458..635f7448ff7952 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -59,7 +59,9 @@ static int bpf_jit_fixup_addresses(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, */ tmp_idx = ctx->idx; ctx->idx = addrs[i] / 4; - bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(image, ctx, func_addr); + ret = bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(image, ctx, func_addr); + if (ret) + return ret; /* * Restore ctx->idx here. This is safe as the length diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c index f401bfc5a67684..014cf893ce90d6 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx) EMIT(PPC_RAW_BLR()); } -void bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func) +int bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func) { s32 rel = (s32)func - (s32)(image + ctx->idx); @@ -201,6 +201,8 @@ void bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 fun EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTCTR(_R0)); EMIT(PPC_RAW_BCTRL()); } + + return 0; } static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 out) @@ -953,7 +955,9 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * EMIT(PPC_RAW_STW(bpf_to_ppc(ctx, BPF_REG_5), _R1, 12)); } - bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(image, ctx, func_addr); + ret = bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(image, ctx, func_addr); + if (ret) + return ret; EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(bpf_to_ppc(ctx, BPF_REG_0) - 1, _R3)); EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(bpf_to_ppc(ctx, BPF_REG_0), _R4)); diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index 44314ee60155e4..e9fd4694226fe0 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -147,9 +147,13 @@ void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx) EMIT(PPC_RAW_BLR()); } -static void bpf_jit_emit_func_call_hlp(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, - u64 func) +static int bpf_jit_emit_func_call_hlp(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func) { + unsigned long func_addr = func ? ppc_function_entry((void *)func) : 0; + + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!core_kernel_text(func_addr))) + return -EINVAL; + #ifdef PPC64_ELF_ABI_v1 /* func points to the function descriptor */ PPC_LI64(b2p[TMP_REG_2], func); @@ -157,25 +161,23 @@ static void bpf_jit_emit_func_call_hlp(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, PPC_BPF_LL(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p[TMP_REG_2], 0); /* ... and move it to CTR */ EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTCTR(b2p[TMP_REG_1])); - /* - * Load TOC from function descriptor at offset 8. - * We can clobber r2 since we get called through a - * function pointer (so caller will save/restore r2) - * and since we don't use a TOC ourself. - */ - PPC_BPF_LL(2, b2p[TMP_REG_2], 8); #else /* We can clobber r12 */ PPC_FUNC_ADDR(12, func); EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTCTR(12)); #endif EMIT(PPC_RAW_BCTRL()); + + return 0; } -void bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func) +int bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func) { unsigned int i, ctx_idx = ctx->idx; + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(func && is_module_text_address(func))) + return -EINVAL; + /* Load function address into r12 */ PPC_LI64(12, func); @@ -193,19 +195,14 @@ void bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 fun EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP()); #ifdef PPC64_ELF_ABI_v1 - /* - * Load TOC from function descriptor at offset 8. - * We can clobber r2 since we get called through a - * function pointer (so caller will save/restore r2) - * and since we don't use a TOC ourself. - */ - PPC_BPF_LL(2, 12, 8); /* Load actual entry point from function descriptor */ PPC_BPF_LL(12, 12, 0); #endif EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTCTR(12)); EMIT(PPC_RAW_BCTRL()); + + return 0; } static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 out) @@ -890,9 +887,13 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * return ret; if (func_addr_fixed) - bpf_jit_emit_func_call_hlp(image, ctx, func_addr); + ret = bpf_jit_emit_func_call_hlp(image, ctx, func_addr); else - bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(image, ctx, func_addr); + ret = bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(image, ctx, func_addr); + + if (ret) + return ret; + /* move return value from r3 to BPF_REG_0 */ EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(b2p[BPF_REG_0], 3)); break; From patchwork Mon Feb 14 10:41:43 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Naveen N. Rao" X-Patchwork-Id: 1592427 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=cB1mt2h8; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy1CX4vsnz9s8s for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:48:08 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Jy1CW3bZ5z3dcp for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:48:07 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=cB1mt2h8; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=cB1mt2h8; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy15V1tFgz3bPS for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:42:54 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0127361.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21E9qSgl021250; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:37 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=lAEgJpRc7Axt19nA4v7qlvjY18H3dJUjf7i1M5n8Eeo=; b=cB1mt2h8AwBSS07ozLi+mhUy6n2uwG3IqLkqjPNCPw/L2XFjxsO7fx4y3pxokMn5NB/H FCF9rvFLgfJvZI/hyODKHJHUA5lcbHfUIW955JAg83b43XYSKA/2en5WewFzgnat6+DT Zy+ghGFPtNjZFec6rfUelJQ1J79OzOQHiIUrvpEijSGFmY0raGbPmamdYA7eKClnUpS1 b3aFJdLep9exkYsWXghdwdKQODsBJXwFCTenRI3lT45dCU7LgahJQvdQabKROr93zF8C GSaJ4nRzpDniLU0OjdZxmFFPjuR5Bk1dNHflxqzhXB5Pa4IgPT/yFZ4LdRm1ZJ8HxpCz 1g== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e7c4dtp7s-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:36 +0000 Received: from m0127361.ppops.net (m0127361.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 21EAM3Rk014859; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:36 GMT Received: from ppma05fra.de.ibm.com (6c.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.108]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e7c4dtp79-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:36 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma05fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma05fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21EAXmx5021691; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:34 GMT Received: from b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.194]) by ppma05fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3e64h9b841-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:34 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 21EAgVrN32178644 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:31 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93165AE053; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B19AE055; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-NotSettable.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.124.167]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:29 +0000 (GMT) From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Michael Ellerman Subject: [PATCH powerpc/next 09/17] powerpc64/bpf: Optimize instruction sequence used for function calls Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 16:11:43 +0530 Message-Id: <1233c7544e60dcb021c52b1f840b0f21a87b33ed.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: 5Mc-DbJ7PjjnKXp5VFsHPzA9JLpXvwyr X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: raRKn1-IqFLoHkTL09sr08sJ91fij1nz X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.816,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.62.513 definitions=2022-02-14_02,2022-02-14_03,2021-12-02_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2201110000 definitions=main-2202140064 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Daniel Borkmann , Yauheni Kaliuta , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Hari Bathini Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" When calling BPF helpers, we load the function address to call into a register. This can result in upto 5 instructions. Optimize this by instead using the kernel toc in r2 and adjusting offset to the BPF helper. This works since all BPF helpers are part of kernel text, and all BPF programs/functions utilize the kernel TOC. Further more: - load the actual function entry address in elf v1, rather than loading it through the function descriptor address. - load the Local Entry Point (LEP) in elf v2 skipping TOC setup. - consolidate code across elf abi v1 and v2 by using r12 on both. Reported-by: Anton Blanchard Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 30 +++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index e9fd4694226fe0..bff200723e7282 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -150,22 +150,20 @@ void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx) static int bpf_jit_emit_func_call_hlp(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func) { unsigned long func_addr = func ? ppc_function_entry((void *)func) : 0; + long reladdr; if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!core_kernel_text(func_addr))) return -EINVAL; -#ifdef PPC64_ELF_ABI_v1 - /* func points to the function descriptor */ - PPC_LI64(b2p[TMP_REG_2], func); - /* Load actual entry point from function descriptor */ - PPC_BPF_LL(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p[TMP_REG_2], 0); - /* ... and move it to CTR */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTCTR(b2p[TMP_REG_1])); -#else - /* We can clobber r12 */ - PPC_FUNC_ADDR(12, func); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTCTR(12)); -#endif + reladdr = func_addr - kernel_toc_addr(); + if (reladdr > 0x7FFFFFFF || reladdr < -(0x80000000L)) { + pr_err("eBPF: address of %ps out of range of kernel_toc.\n", (void *)func); + return -ERANGE; + } + + EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDIS(_R12, _R2, PPC_HA(reladdr))); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(_R12, _R12, PPC_LO(reladdr))); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTCTR(_R12)); EMIT(PPC_RAW_BCTRL()); return 0; @@ -178,6 +176,9 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func if (WARN_ON_ONCE(func && is_module_text_address(func))) return -EINVAL; + /* skip past descriptor if elf v1 */ + func += FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE; + /* Load function address into r12 */ PPC_LI64(12, func); @@ -194,11 +195,6 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func for (i = ctx->idx - ctx_idx; i < 5; i++) EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP()); -#ifdef PPC64_ELF_ABI_v1 - /* Load actual entry point from function descriptor */ - PPC_BPF_LL(12, 12, 0); -#endif - EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTCTR(12)); EMIT(PPC_RAW_BCTRL()); From patchwork Mon Feb 14 10:41:44 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Naveen N. Rao" X-Patchwork-Id: 1592428 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=Ae3b08SH; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy1DH6bV3z9s8s for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:48:47 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Jy1DH3N03z3dg1 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:48:47 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=Ae3b08SH; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=Ae3b08SH; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy15X584sz3bTy for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:42:56 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21EAGO8p004198; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:40 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=YunodSmrIMXAQ10JIy1AZFr6/O9HirSXq4a9B+d2V6o=; b=Ae3b08SHg4TET7HCd9hfEDNb5fGQtyWLZ/SxIA2jjNF+FfkPXTTzbaKiCPGxDiluCBwo Oh7hFnzN39siScfXtYc/1FD1tkMB1xzg7XE/tII4wcDUuDaTBNDY2isgMw8HjPmVBxwo /dgfgUkQEefYSatGoZM3/U+V4gqSpLEAK/2RoCT8x940OATessOAvf2jCjKNNp1fJOUE VjbpqKejMIK8lch8ClXpxA+hqgPeCYtDGhRVGH6p8eWMvPv7/OgFgC/krsgmupdkwNuS v5iWfK3hK19Hy3HKHPxHmtevHSTgPe49wRbMUVuWc7eNUL72iIxcVu/ZUyoqYWIJQERm Bw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e7cjdu5qd-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:40 +0000 Received: from m0098420.ppops.net (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 21EAb3Ri015291; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:39 GMT Received: from ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (48.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.72]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e7cjdu5q3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:39 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21EAXs0K014881; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:37 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.195]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3e645jb9xf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:37 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 21EAgYnG33423858 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:34 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F8E8AE045; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F64AE055; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-NotSettable.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.124.167]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:31 +0000 (GMT) From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Michael Ellerman Subject: [PATCH powerpc/next 10/17] powerpc/bpf: Rename PPC_BL_ABS() to PPC_BL() Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 16:11:44 +0530 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: mTzbHhuWoNwPvheG5x329oHxwFJy8MRE X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: VhmIh-o0zHFnB4TTr26OGcn-rbJ_H59v X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.816,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.62.513 definitions=2022-02-14_02,2022-02-14_03,2021-12-02_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 mlxscore=0 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1015 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2201110000 definitions=main-2202140064 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Daniel Borkmann , Yauheni Kaliuta , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Hari Bathini Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" PPC_BL_ABS() is just doing a relative branch with link. The name suggests that it is for branching to an absolute address, which is incorrect. Rename the macro to a more appropriate PPC_BL(). Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h | 6 +++--- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h index 5cb3efd76715a9..0832235a274983 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h @@ -34,9 +34,9 @@ EMIT(PPC_RAW_BRANCH(offset)); \ } while (0) -/* blr; (unconditional 'branch' with link) to absolute address */ -#define PPC_BL_ABS(dest) EMIT(PPC_INST_BL | \ - (((dest) - (unsigned long)(image + ctx->idx)) & 0x03fffffc)) +/* bl (unconditional 'branch' with link) */ +#define PPC_BL(dest) EMIT(PPC_INST_BL | (((dest) - (unsigned long)(image + ctx->idx)) & 0x03fffffc)) + /* "cond" here covers BO:BI fields. */ #define PPC_BCC_SHORT(cond, dest) \ do { \ diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c index 014cf893ce90d6..cf66b25ed7c865 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func s32 rel = (s32)func - (s32)(image + ctx->idx); if (image && rel < 0x2000000 && rel >= -0x2000000) { - PPC_BL_ABS(func); + PPC_BL(func); EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP()); EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP()); EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP()); From patchwork Mon Feb 14 10:41:45 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Naveen N. Rao" X-Patchwork-Id: 1592429 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=gdc7/xxl; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy1FC3Zspz9s8s for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:49:35 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Jy1FB5Sfzz3dhd for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:49:34 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=gdc7/xxl; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=gdc7/xxl; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy15Z176Rz3cDr for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:42:57 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0127361.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21E9EYxU012544; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:42 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=cvC9ObvzbPeJImfegywRzrG32AOasf1vvzL4P8RqNwo=; b=gdc7/xxl8reYL6iv0NMEcuNaEDsKR5SMmUon/sqLzrRqDgzBCN9X1cENrbpXfd57W9jy DZPfH7+aonERLyV9usLMazfXfjl8T1eaKpIixzN62Atj66dpTYwoChHt8CHWfjVoa1D7 j581eIndTE4pRPGhDPALJ1flxMd8wtRYxRiQw1yl2uQHMC8c4z/rsG8pwQaPbxcFDT+U 8eXURyQhl8zBFyt913n6HFJyJ4N3bjNaG6zENZntIJUQxWPRmdiiDzJ6GMDcGmPQo1eG 8Ia60eEsMlRgl1ndErQ7w9jYi8nTB391So7+R94BbdAUmJgEsn6qxoM4DXRIV5Wyl8st gw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e7c4dtp9d-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:42 +0000 Received: from m0127361.ppops.net (m0127361.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 21E9d6V0013910; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:41 GMT Received: from ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (66.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.102]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e7c4dtp90-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:41 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21EAXYL4000926; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:40 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3e645jc383-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:40 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 21EAgb3932833918 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:37 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2826AE059; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1BDDAE045; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-NotSettable.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.124.167]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:34 +0000 (GMT) From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Michael Ellerman Subject: [PATCH powerpc/next 11/17] powerpc64/bpf: Convert some of the uses of PPC_BPF_[LL|STL] to PPC_BPF_[LD|STD] Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 16:11:45 +0530 Message-Id: <0eb472428165a307f6fdaf22b0c33cbf13a9a635.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: aZcVICrcDgTOmsjqf5v_Ys67Mud2IhM9 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: KgKB4ESyAHWLaf91gCzRClvJD2VNpFXQ X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.816,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.62.513 definitions=2022-02-14_02,2022-02-14_03,2021-12-02_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2201110000 definitions=main-2202140064 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Daniel Borkmann , Yauheni Kaliuta , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Hari Bathini Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" PPC_BPF_[LL|STL] are macros meant for scenarios where we may have to deal with a non-word aligned offset. Limit their usage to only those scenarios by converting the rest to just use PPC_BPF_[LD|STD]. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 22 +++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index bff200723e7282..411ac41dba4293 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ void bpf_jit_build_prologue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx) int i; if (__is_defined(PPC64_ELF_ABI_v2)) - PPC_BPF_LL(_R2, _R13, offsetof(struct paca_struct, kernel_toc)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(_R2, _R13, offsetof(struct paca_struct, kernel_toc))); /* * Initialize tail_call_cnt if we do tail calls. @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ void bpf_jit_build_prologue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx) if (ctx->seen & SEEN_TAILCALL) { EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], 0)); /* this goes in the redzone */ - PPC_BPF_STL(b2p[TMP_REG_1], 1, -(BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE + 8)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(b2p[TMP_REG_1], 1, -(BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE + 8))); } else { EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP()); EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP()); @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ void bpf_jit_build_prologue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx) */ if (ctx->seen & SEEN_FUNC) { EMIT(PPC_RAW_MFLR(_R0)); - PPC_BPF_STL(0, 1, PPC_LR_STKOFF); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(0, 1, PPC_LR_STKOFF)); } PPC_BPF_STLU(1, 1, -(BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME + ctx->stack_size)); @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ void bpf_jit_build_prologue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx) */ for (i = BPF_REG_6; i <= BPF_REG_10; i++) if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, b2p[i])) - PPC_BPF_STL(b2p[i], 1, bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(ctx, b2p[i])); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(b2p[i], 1, bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(ctx, b2p[i]))); /* Setup frame pointer to point to the bpf stack area */ if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, b2p[BPF_REG_FP])) @@ -125,13 +125,13 @@ static void bpf_jit_emit_common_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx /* Restore NVRs */ for (i = BPF_REG_6; i <= BPF_REG_10; i++) if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, b2p[i])) - PPC_BPF_LL(b2p[i], 1, bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(ctx, b2p[i])); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(b2p[i], 1, bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(ctx, b2p[i]))); /* Tear down our stack frame */ if (bpf_has_stack_frame(ctx)) { EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(1, 1, BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME + ctx->stack_size)); if (ctx->seen & SEEN_FUNC) { - PPC_BPF_LL(0, 1, PPC_LR_STKOFF); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(0, 1, PPC_LR_STKOFF)); EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTLR(0)); } } @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o * if (tail_call_cnt >= MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT) * goto out; */ - PPC_BPF_LL(b2p[TMP_REG_1], 1, bpf_jit_stack_tailcallcnt(ctx)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(b2p[TMP_REG_1], 1, bpf_jit_stack_tailcallcnt(ctx))); EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLWI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)); PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_GE, out); @@ -237,12 +237,12 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o * tail_call_cnt++; */ EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p[TMP_REG_1], 1)); - PPC_BPF_STL(b2p[TMP_REG_1], 1, bpf_jit_stack_tailcallcnt(ctx)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(b2p[TMP_REG_1], 1, bpf_jit_stack_tailcallcnt(ctx))); /* prog = array->ptrs[index]; */ EMIT(PPC_RAW_MULI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p_index, 8)); EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p_bpf_array)); - PPC_BPF_LL(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p[TMP_REG_1], offsetof(struct bpf_array, ptrs)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p[TMP_REG_1], offsetof(struct bpf_array, ptrs))); /* * if (prog == NULL) @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_EQ, out); /* goto *(prog->bpf_func + prologue_size); */ - PPC_BPF_LL(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p[TMP_REG_1], offsetof(struct bpf_prog, bpf_func)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p[TMP_REG_1], offsetof(struct bpf_prog, bpf_func))); EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p[TMP_REG_1], FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE + bpf_tailcall_prologue_size)); EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTCTR(b2p[TMP_REG_1])); @@ -628,7 +628,7 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * break; case 64: /* Store the value to stack and then use byte-reverse loads */ - PPC_BPF_STL(dst_reg, 1, bpf_jit_stack_local(ctx)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(dst_reg, 1, bpf_jit_stack_local(ctx))); EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], 1, bpf_jit_stack_local(ctx))); if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_206)) { EMIT(PPC_RAW_LDBRX(dst_reg, 0, b2p[TMP_REG_1])); From patchwork Mon Feb 14 10:41:46 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Naveen N. Rao" X-Patchwork-Id: 1592431 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=qshKKDKs; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy1Gh6TKWz9s8s for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:50:52 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Jy1Gh0HcXz3f1h for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:50:52 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=qshKKDKs; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=qshKKDKs; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy15f6CGXz3cTD for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:43:02 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21E91fwq003287; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:45 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=HiKsGPcz0CNIMy0amaxaBRi2aeH099rWT2ASLHqkkiM=; b=qshKKDKsUAKdD+yfddoaIpALDqepNCdm3fZIc0fzvNlntPdYDKGfBfAyXdBc04ZDCcy1 aQ0HwLv1wZ59HMxCHOkRh81/S3Ztk5ss8+rY1m6ZBJunHimG3FEZYs0kQ+n9WJAnTzSD rJ9EhqSiJxLQ03ajBZ39saDkb8PmrRH8kaopm582zBRnbcM1TRuW/SSoLETpSqG8mUP4 6eWDPAtbz3QTa946uGc0zzYpDVjeL+UzHz25vWQhOtzhQ4DJ47KC+L/5NbfYFizyt9Fp 9lKCvkTfoXqmtb1L9OwX25rfy+X5C0Fuz8iQMg+9W3+BorXnBkwZWtf10IMr+NrunKbG ug== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e71jvm9v3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:45 +0000 Received: from m0098393.ppops.net (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 21EAeCMt014766; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:45 GMT Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e71jvm9ue-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:44 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21EAXmjC028311; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:42 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3e64h9m0st-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:42 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 21EAgd6a46268726 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:39 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913CEAE051; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5078BAE056; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-NotSettable.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.124.167]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:37 +0000 (GMT) From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Michael Ellerman Subject: [PATCH powerpc/next 12/17] powerpc64/bpf: Get rid of PPC_BPF_[LL|STL|STLU] macros Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 16:11:46 +0530 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: NfKREzvWRmvDk5kU6rGGWl377i5FJ-k4 X-Proofpoint-GUID: sbbbs-3QEHmRTDh0yAg_e9v7X6QtENW6 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.816,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.62.513 definitions=2022-02-14_02,2022-02-14_03,2021-12-02_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2201110000 definitions=main-2202140062 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Daniel Borkmann , Yauheni Kaliuta , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Hari Bathini Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" All these macros now have a single user. Expand their usage in place. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit64.h | 22 ---------------------- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------ 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit64.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit64.h index 82cdfee412784a..199348b7296653 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit64.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit64.h @@ -64,28 +64,6 @@ const int b2p[MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 2] = { /* PPC NVR range -- update this if we ever use NVRs below r27 */ #define BPF_PPC_NVR_MIN 27 -/* - * WARNING: These can use TMP_REG_2 if the offset is not at word boundary, - * so ensure that it isn't in use already. - */ -#define PPC_BPF_LL(r, base, i) do { \ - if ((i) % 4) { \ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(b2p[TMP_REG_2], (i)));\ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LDX(r, base, \ - b2p[TMP_REG_2])); \ - } else \ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(r, base, i)); \ - } while(0) -#define PPC_BPF_STL(r, base, i) do { \ - if ((i) % 4) { \ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(b2p[TMP_REG_2], (i)));\ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_STDX(r, base, \ - b2p[TMP_REG_2])); \ - } else \ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(r, base, i)); \ - } while(0) -#define PPC_BPF_STLU(r, base, i) do { EMIT(PPC_RAW_STDU(r, base, i)); } while(0) - #endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */ #endif diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index 411ac41dba4293..eeda636cd7be64 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ void bpf_jit_build_prologue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx) EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(0, 1, PPC_LR_STKOFF)); } - PPC_BPF_STLU(1, 1, -(BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME + ctx->stack_size)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STDU(1, 1, -(BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME + ctx->stack_size))); } /* @@ -726,7 +726,12 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * PPC_LI32(b2p[TMP_REG_1], imm); src_reg = b2p[TMP_REG_1]; } - PPC_BPF_STL(src_reg, dst_reg, off); + if (off % 4) { + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(b2p[TMP_REG_2], off)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STDX(src_reg, dst_reg, b2p[TMP_REG_2])); + } else { + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(src_reg, dst_reg, off)); + } break; /* @@ -802,9 +807,8 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_GT, (ctx->idx + 3) * 4); EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(dst_reg, 0)); /* - * Check if 'off' is word aligned because PPC_BPF_LL() - * (BPF_DW case) generates two instructions if 'off' is not - * word-aligned and one instruction otherwise. + * Check if 'off' is word aligned for BPF_DW, because + * we might generate two instructions. */ if (BPF_SIZE(code) == BPF_DW && (off & 3)) PPC_JMP((ctx->idx + 3) * 4); @@ -823,7 +827,12 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWZ(dst_reg, src_reg, off)); break; case BPF_DW: - PPC_BPF_LL(dst_reg, src_reg, off); + if (off % 4) { + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], off)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LDX(dst_reg, src_reg, b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + } else { + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(dst_reg, src_reg, off)); + } break; } From patchwork Mon Feb 14 10:41:47 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Naveen N. Rao" X-Patchwork-Id: 1592432 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=coBkViJH; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy1HS1RKLz9s8s for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:51:32 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Jy1HR4ktQz3dmG for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:51:31 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=coBkViJH; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=coBkViJH; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy15k0X12z3cMd for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:43:05 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21EACXiA019451; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:49 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=MVQHIIBpzH6OZ8xpkM6q+31SYym7l8sm9Kl7rsQBP7U=; b=coBkViJHQqQHXJC8GVFAl9dLV/GTXEah+6npMCHbCg96E3U8g9QNTZzwKZJpE8FlZQMM 4TW3A6yVpVWphtTNU9CG3im5TrDYhd+HI7pgsDYjRgG6FyGoALzGCmuii6+tzbZrysVf JyAy5c5PDs0j6GnyUmlnTWUFwxrrLOCtdfULgbbWlaBjKYucjiwE7Y62VSbvDJs5W5l7 JYhqzSOIFgi+VposOIozepA9x6CT7SXSgeFZGyT7mMgbxWEhDhwc+ECi55g1YD4ZshEl WPMkMsUd+viQsD0MjXjkQtK/dNa/xU3u8P6AqHiSqrIsf1A4SB2DPOdpmU5WX8EBIfFK vw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e79fvnjae-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:48 +0000 Received: from m0098394.ppops.net (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 21E9tmCO020614; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:48 GMT Received: from ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (62.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e79fvnj9j-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:48 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21EAXU9h012170; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:45 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.196]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3e64h9m0xn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:45 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 21EAgg7M44237208 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:42 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F33AAE04D; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03476AE05A; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-NotSettable.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.124.167]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:39 +0000 (GMT) From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Michael Ellerman Subject: [PATCH powerpc/next 13/17] powerpc/bpf: Cleanup bpf_jit.h Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 16:11:47 +0530 Message-Id: <58f5b66b2f8546bbbee620f62103a8e97a63eb7c.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: KeL6gA27nvDW6lUMnFk9fih_eR2R2L_p X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: RZifukq6SG65Aqu1bNHMqyII-4_zsAfP X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.816,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.62.513 definitions=2022-02-14_02,2022-02-14_03,2021-12-02_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=962 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2201110000 definitions=main-2202140058 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Daniel Borkmann , Yauheni Kaliuta , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Hari Bathini Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" - PPC_EX32() is only used by ppc32 JIT. Move it to bpf_jit_comp32.c - PPC_LI64() is only valid in ppc64. #ifdef it - PPC_FUNC_ADDR() is not used anymore. Remove it. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h | 10 +--------- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h index 0832235a274983..d9bdc9df2e48ed 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h @@ -59,10 +59,7 @@ EMIT(PPC_RAW_ORI(d, d, IMM_L(i))); \ } } while(0) -#ifdef CONFIG_PPC32 -#define PPC_EX32(r, i) EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI((r), (i) < 0 ? -1 : 0)) -#endif - +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 #define PPC_LI64(d, i) do { \ if ((long)(i) >= -2147483648 && \ (long)(i) < 2147483648) \ @@ -85,11 +82,6 @@ EMIT(PPC_RAW_ORI(d, d, (uintptr_t)(i) & \ 0xffff)); \ } } while (0) - -#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 -#define PPC_FUNC_ADDR(d,i) do { PPC_LI64(d, i); } while(0) -#else -#define PPC_FUNC_ADDR(d,i) do { PPC_LI32(d, i); } while(0) #endif /* diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c index cf66b25ed7c865..063e3a1be9270d 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c @@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ /* BPF register usage */ #define TMP_REG (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 0) +#define PPC_EX32(r, i) EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI((r), (i) < 0 ? -1 : 0)) + /* BPF to ppc register mappings */ const int b2p[MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 1] = { /* function return value */ From patchwork Mon Feb 14 10:41:48 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Naveen N. Rao" X-Patchwork-Id: 1592434 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=Pohzy8te; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy1K72y1xz9s8s for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:52:59 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Jy1K66BGNz3dqK for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:52:58 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=Pohzy8te; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=Pohzy8te; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy15r6Sl8z3cV2 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:43:12 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0127361.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21EA989O012418; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:57 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=jciDulqJWPzW2WJ3Xrcy9hExfdSEWKkmsuYqrMQx61o=; b=Pohzy8te5LeI2NdGyXNJBT4mXzdIQuuHDaEUWgxY3p6FG5VTfzSMgH0nxfQtwWoG4yDE oTMd4upFpa1obp8aeH5sCisDCWnca/o9POFKaiPWjSSsPSRoVcYr78v5/MHaYBK2ti3S qKV2aOELrRxKcPd6eVtItfoVGn+g0AF1KA9G8Fb39mMcOt8EAPORpqjt/kkt5D6nbwrU lmcRSDTCb51mK5/RL5s8uQjkWBmlsBI0WJDGH5VKkWx3kjCk6GgJV27sHDuYuH/exh7I zANkjzJJPQXbOi8iL+MTLupD1DgDRNIuPv1VSpnMWYERI8IzfGXwJw7APKQwCCfFzDMB nw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e7c4dtpeq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:56 +0000 Received: from m0127361.ppops.net (m0127361.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 21EAA2qR011285; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:56 GMT Received: from ppma01fra.de.ibm.com (46.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.70]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e7c4dtpdv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:56 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21EAXsHJ005422; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:54 GMT Received: from b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.194]) by ppma01fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3e64h937rc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:54 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 21EAgjGw47645078 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:45 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06680AE058; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1BE5AE04D; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-NotSettable.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.124.167]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:42 +0000 (GMT) From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Michael Ellerman Subject: [PATCH powerpc/next 14/17] powerpc/bpf: Move bpf_jit64.h into bpf_jit_comp64.c Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 16:11:48 +0530 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: Y1qYPZT-u3RhJr0PNd6A8t7xp3IpX1AJ X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 2Dj-yHXCr5IrAtfH_ON039csJv-Hr2GL X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.816,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.62.513 definitions=2022-02-14_02,2022-02-14_03,2021-12-02_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2201110000 definitions=main-2202140064 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Daniel Borkmann , Yauheni Kaliuta , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Hari Bathini Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" There is no need for a separate header anymore. Move the contents of bpf_jit64.h into bpf_jit_comp64.c Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit64.h | 69 ------------------------------- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit64.h diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit64.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit64.h deleted file mode 100644 index 199348b7296653..00000000000000 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit64.h +++ /dev/null @@ -1,69 +0,0 @@ -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ -/* - * bpf_jit64.h: BPF JIT compiler for PPC64 - * - * Copyright 2016 Naveen N. Rao - * IBM Corporation - */ -#ifndef _BPF_JIT64_H -#define _BPF_JIT64_H - -#include "bpf_jit.h" - -/* - * Stack layout: - * Ensure the top half (upto local_tmp_var) stays consistent - * with our redzone usage. - * - * [ prev sp ] <------------- - * [ nv gpr save area ] 5*8 | - * [ tail_call_cnt ] 8 | - * [ local_tmp_var ] 16 | - * fp (r31) --> [ ebpf stack space ] upto 512 | - * [ frame header ] 32/112 | - * sp (r1) ---> [ stack pointer ] -------------- - */ - -/* for gpr non volatile registers BPG_REG_6 to 10 */ -#define BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE (5*8) -/* for bpf JIT code internal usage */ -#define BPF_PPC_STACK_LOCALS 24 -/* stack frame excluding BPF stack, ensure this is quadword aligned */ -#define BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME (STACK_FRAME_MIN_SIZE + \ - BPF_PPC_STACK_LOCALS + BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE) - -#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ - -/* BPF register usage */ -#define TMP_REG_1 (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 0) -#define TMP_REG_2 (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 1) - -/* BPF to ppc register mappings */ -const int b2p[MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 2] = { - /* function return value */ - [BPF_REG_0] = 8, - /* function arguments */ - [BPF_REG_1] = 3, - [BPF_REG_2] = 4, - [BPF_REG_3] = 5, - [BPF_REG_4] = 6, - [BPF_REG_5] = 7, - /* non volatile registers */ - [BPF_REG_6] = 27, - [BPF_REG_7] = 28, - [BPF_REG_8] = 29, - [BPF_REG_9] = 30, - /* frame pointer aka BPF_REG_10 */ - [BPF_REG_FP] = 31, - /* eBPF jit internal registers */ - [BPF_REG_AX] = 12, - [TMP_REG_1] = 9, - [TMP_REG_2] = 10 -}; - -/* PPC NVR range -- update this if we ever use NVRs below r27 */ -#define BPF_PPC_NVR_MIN 27 - -#endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */ - -#endif diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index eeda636cd7be64..3e4ed556094770 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -17,7 +17,59 @@ #include #include -#include "bpf_jit64.h" +#include "bpf_jit.h" + +/* + * Stack layout: + * Ensure the top half (upto local_tmp_var) stays consistent + * with our redzone usage. + * + * [ prev sp ] <------------- + * [ nv gpr save area ] 5*8 | + * [ tail_call_cnt ] 8 | + * [ local_tmp_var ] 16 | + * fp (r31) --> [ ebpf stack space ] upto 512 | + * [ frame header ] 32/112 | + * sp (r1) ---> [ stack pointer ] -------------- + */ + +/* for gpr non volatile registers BPG_REG_6 to 10 */ +#define BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE (5*8) +/* for bpf JIT code internal usage */ +#define BPF_PPC_STACK_LOCALS 24 +/* stack frame excluding BPF stack, ensure this is quadword aligned */ +#define BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME (STACK_FRAME_MIN_SIZE + \ + BPF_PPC_STACK_LOCALS + BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE) + +/* BPF register usage */ +#define TMP_REG_1 (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 0) +#define TMP_REG_2 (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 1) + +/* BPF to ppc register mappings */ +const int b2p[MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 2] = { + /* function return value */ + [BPF_REG_0] = 8, + /* function arguments */ + [BPF_REG_1] = 3, + [BPF_REG_2] = 4, + [BPF_REG_3] = 5, + [BPF_REG_4] = 6, + [BPF_REG_5] = 7, + /* non volatile registers */ + [BPF_REG_6] = 27, + [BPF_REG_7] = 28, + [BPF_REG_8] = 29, + [BPF_REG_9] = 30, + /* frame pointer aka BPF_REG_10 */ + [BPF_REG_FP] = 31, + /* eBPF jit internal registers */ + [BPF_REG_AX] = 12, + [TMP_REG_1] = 9, + [TMP_REG_2] = 10 +}; + +/* PPC NVR range -- update this if we ever use NVRs below r27 */ +#define BPF_PPC_NVR_MIN 27 static inline bool bpf_has_stack_frame(struct codegen_context *ctx) { From patchwork Mon Feb 14 10:41:49 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Naveen N. Rao" X-Patchwork-Id: 1592433 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=hwx4k26n; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy1JL6wjDz9s8s for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:52:18 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Jy1JL30XFz3f6h for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:52:18 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=hwx4k26n; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=hwx4k26n; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy15q4xYmz3cTp for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:43:11 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0187473.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21EAcjEK036679; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:54 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=5pcADrzSsK/IOVrfZRfqNMCQ5THYLAee93G67vbM6cc=; b=hwx4k26nqzqlird/B341a5SgVJU4cL6s30PpKtTdlVE9JP8hT5OxDi4drEutDbmf5xDn VGwuS+aNMjE3biPALYd5yTv8Ff4rPLjbQdG1waHNx6s0oSiXkXFUcIwyVaDRYXQSA7je aUXfzkt14cV9N2AxVyV8uOc0eJeCdrGrrmj0B/cP+3DmizUrYldW0KFYllK1AR/fKc/0 e4mKWSFNWUEeIFn1pYXQBSHZ+fYmykH3FQ5hxc4B6DjhWGgZY7gOaFzxZWyMpWisGHCk Z6HT1OxLu60RfaB2DX8AsMD9iRmif5uMffvJLOc2e6csOT4ShxI1FpQQ4lpiZIWjlEql TQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e7920nu2n-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:54 +0000 Received: from m0187473.ppops.net (m0187473.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 21EATDpt039812; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:53 GMT Received: from ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (48.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.72]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e7920nu23-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:53 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21EAXfXE014706; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:51 GMT Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.192]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3e645jb9yt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:50 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 21EAWT3T50200918 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:32:29 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4684AE053; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A169AE057; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-NotSettable.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.124.167]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:45 +0000 (GMT) From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Michael Ellerman Subject: [PATCH powerpc/next 15/17] powerpc/bpf: Use _Rn macros for GPRs Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 16:11:49 +0530 Message-Id: <7df626b8cdc6141d4295ac16137c82ad570b6637.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: vAg8hQTHpmz9QM9rnD6Pz_896M7hk2UF X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: PhXCRRApbsZ5ECpzBTkJgtz6-mrJt-8- X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.816,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.62.513 definitions=2022-02-14_02,2022-02-14_03,2021-12-02_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2201110000 definitions=main-2202140064 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Daniel Borkmann , Yauheni Kaliuta , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Hari Bathini Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Use _Rn macros to specify register names to make their usage clear. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 30 +++++++------- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 68 +++++++++++++++---------------- 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c index 063e3a1be9270d..fe4e0eca017ede 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c @@ -41,23 +41,23 @@ /* BPF to ppc register mappings */ const int b2p[MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 1] = { /* function return value */ - [BPF_REG_0] = 12, + [BPF_REG_0] = _R12, /* function arguments */ - [BPF_REG_1] = 4, - [BPF_REG_2] = 6, - [BPF_REG_3] = 8, - [BPF_REG_4] = 10, - [BPF_REG_5] = 22, + [BPF_REG_1] = _R4, + [BPF_REG_2] = _R6, + [BPF_REG_3] = _R8, + [BPF_REG_4] = _R10, + [BPF_REG_5] = _R22, /* non volatile registers */ - [BPF_REG_6] = 24, - [BPF_REG_7] = 26, - [BPF_REG_8] = 28, - [BPF_REG_9] = 30, + [BPF_REG_6] = _R24, + [BPF_REG_7] = _R26, + [BPF_REG_8] = _R28, + [BPF_REG_9] = _R30, /* frame pointer aka BPF_REG_10 */ - [BPF_REG_FP] = 18, + [BPF_REG_FP] = _R18, /* eBPF jit internal registers */ - [BPF_REG_AX] = 20, - [TMP_REG] = 31, /* 32 bits */ + [BPF_REG_AX] = _R20, + [TMP_REG] = _R31, /* 32 bits */ }; static int bpf_to_ppc(struct codegen_context *ctx, int reg) @@ -66,8 +66,8 @@ static int bpf_to_ppc(struct codegen_context *ctx, int reg) } /* PPC NVR range -- update this if we ever use NVRs below r17 */ -#define BPF_PPC_NVR_MIN 17 -#define BPF_PPC_TC 16 +#define BPF_PPC_NVR_MIN _R17 +#define BPF_PPC_TC _R16 static int bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(struct codegen_context *ctx, int reg) { diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index 3e4ed556094770..ac06efa7022379 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -48,28 +48,28 @@ /* BPF to ppc register mappings */ const int b2p[MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 2] = { /* function return value */ - [BPF_REG_0] = 8, + [BPF_REG_0] = _R8, /* function arguments */ - [BPF_REG_1] = 3, - [BPF_REG_2] = 4, - [BPF_REG_3] = 5, - [BPF_REG_4] = 6, - [BPF_REG_5] = 7, + [BPF_REG_1] = _R3, + [BPF_REG_2] = _R4, + [BPF_REG_3] = _R5, + [BPF_REG_4] = _R6, + [BPF_REG_5] = _R7, /* non volatile registers */ - [BPF_REG_6] = 27, - [BPF_REG_7] = 28, - [BPF_REG_8] = 29, - [BPF_REG_9] = 30, + [BPF_REG_6] = _R27, + [BPF_REG_7] = _R28, + [BPF_REG_8] = _R29, + [BPF_REG_9] = _R30, /* frame pointer aka BPF_REG_10 */ - [BPF_REG_FP] = 31, + [BPF_REG_FP] = _R31, /* eBPF jit internal registers */ - [BPF_REG_AX] = 12, - [TMP_REG_1] = 9, - [TMP_REG_2] = 10 + [BPF_REG_AX] = _R12, + [TMP_REG_1] = _R9, + [TMP_REG_2] = _R10 }; /* PPC NVR range -- update this if we ever use NVRs below r27 */ -#define BPF_PPC_NVR_MIN 27 +#define BPF_PPC_NVR_MIN _R27 static inline bool bpf_has_stack_frame(struct codegen_context *ctx) { @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ void bpf_jit_build_prologue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx) if (ctx->seen & SEEN_TAILCALL) { EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], 0)); /* this goes in the redzone */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(b2p[TMP_REG_1], 1, -(BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE + 8))); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(b2p[TMP_REG_1], _R1, -(BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE + 8))); } else { EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP()); EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP()); @@ -149,10 +149,10 @@ void bpf_jit_build_prologue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx) */ if (ctx->seen & SEEN_FUNC) { EMIT(PPC_RAW_MFLR(_R0)); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(0, 1, PPC_LR_STKOFF)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(_R0, _R1, PPC_LR_STKOFF)); } - EMIT(PPC_RAW_STDU(1, 1, -(BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME + ctx->stack_size))); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STDU(_R1, _R1, -(BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME + ctx->stack_size))); } /* @@ -162,11 +162,11 @@ void bpf_jit_build_prologue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx) */ for (i = BPF_REG_6; i <= BPF_REG_10; i++) if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, b2p[i])) - EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(b2p[i], 1, bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(ctx, b2p[i]))); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(b2p[i], _R1, bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(ctx, b2p[i]))); /* Setup frame pointer to point to the bpf stack area */ if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, b2p[BPF_REG_FP])) - EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(b2p[BPF_REG_FP], 1, + EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(b2p[BPF_REG_FP], _R1, STACK_FRAME_MIN_SIZE + ctx->stack_size)); } @@ -177,14 +177,14 @@ static void bpf_jit_emit_common_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx /* Restore NVRs */ for (i = BPF_REG_6; i <= BPF_REG_10; i++) if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, b2p[i])) - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(b2p[i], 1, bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(ctx, b2p[i]))); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(b2p[i], _R1, bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(ctx, b2p[i]))); /* Tear down our stack frame */ if (bpf_has_stack_frame(ctx)) { - EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(1, 1, BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME + ctx->stack_size)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(_R1, _R1, BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME + ctx->stack_size)); if (ctx->seen & SEEN_FUNC) { - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(0, 1, PPC_LR_STKOFF)); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTLR(0)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(_R0, _R1, PPC_LR_STKOFF)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTLR(_R0)); } } } @@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx) bpf_jit_emit_common_epilogue(image, ctx); /* Move result to r3 */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(3, b2p[BPF_REG_0])); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(_R3, b2p[BPF_REG_0])); EMIT(PPC_RAW_BLR()); } @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func func += FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE; /* Load function address into r12 */ - PPC_LI64(12, func); + PPC_LI64(_R12, func); /* For bpf-to-bpf function calls, the callee's address is unknown * until the last extra pass. As seen above, we use PPC_LI64() to @@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func for (i = ctx->idx - ctx_idx; i < 5; i++) EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP()); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTCTR(12)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTCTR(_R12)); EMIT(PPC_RAW_BCTRL()); return 0; @@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o * if (tail_call_cnt >= MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT) * goto out; */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(b2p[TMP_REG_1], 1, bpf_jit_stack_tailcallcnt(ctx))); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(b2p[TMP_REG_1], _R1, bpf_jit_stack_tailcallcnt(ctx))); EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLWI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)); PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_GE, out); @@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o * tail_call_cnt++; */ EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p[TMP_REG_1], 1)); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(b2p[TMP_REG_1], 1, bpf_jit_stack_tailcallcnt(ctx))); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(b2p[TMP_REG_1], _R1, bpf_jit_stack_tailcallcnt(ctx))); /* prog = array->ptrs[index]; */ EMIT(PPC_RAW_MULI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p_index, 8)); @@ -680,8 +680,8 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * break; case 64: /* Store the value to stack and then use byte-reverse loads */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(dst_reg, 1, bpf_jit_stack_local(ctx))); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], 1, bpf_jit_stack_local(ctx))); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(dst_reg, _R1, bpf_jit_stack_local(ctx))); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], _R1, bpf_jit_stack_local(ctx))); if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_206)) { EMIT(PPC_RAW_LDBRX(dst_reg, 0, b2p[TMP_REG_1])); } else { @@ -736,8 +736,8 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * break; case STF_BARRIER_FALLBACK: ctx->seen |= SEEN_FUNC; - PPC_LI64(12, dereference_kernel_function_descriptor(bpf_stf_barrier)); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTCTR(12)); + PPC_LI64(_R12, dereference_kernel_function_descriptor(bpf_stf_barrier)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTCTR(_R12)); EMIT(PPC_RAW_BCTRL()); break; case STF_BARRIER_NONE: @@ -952,7 +952,7 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * return ret; /* move return value from r3 to BPF_REG_0 */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(b2p[BPF_REG_0], 3)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(b2p[BPF_REG_0], _R3)); break; /* From patchwork Mon Feb 14 10:41:50 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Naveen N. Rao" X-Patchwork-Id: 1592435 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=VwpCn7CS; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy1Kv4gsfz9s8s for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:53:39 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Jy1Kt6Vmfz3dcy for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:53:38 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=VwpCn7CS; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=VwpCn7CS; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy15t3B31z3cVP for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:43:13 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21EAQX2I010442; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:58 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=syxqMxbuM7NRQXrqtFkxXwmz0126fiZi6MKSzVoKFAM=; b=VwpCn7CSM+64lGNE1BhmEa+D22PBfpmJLM74tBlGJwA4jsx3/R3Cvpaljc5XPMjWHDEi /bMvojgoho8Irx3cLMfstoR4fYOx+0sVl1lbmYyqk5iwFSVX4908CHkmzxh8v8trECKQ nq6udzx2wuomAH8xYBfbFetdfsQfcVpDKHTY9WqgZIdsZtZgxorESvKq0lwx3xJgbBEx w02rFEKQ6xxs3lnovDs30sPEhWppJ382duFyeHLviPZZdXi+6ZjJ3t+mCuVfWlvg9cVO xh8QF6Tf9NgRaZ0jtJprmyUICItWPP09rq6aCjIJ9mXkAidg+tAp6P+Sl1B6yheyo9sD SQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e7avevj10-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:57 +0000 Received: from m0098413.ppops.net (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 21EAg5Yg011508; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:57 GMT Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e7avevj0f-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:57 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21EAXfbs028260; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:55 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3e64h9m0up-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:55 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 21EAgoEm46727522 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:50 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D214AE053; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239E3AE051; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-NotSettable.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.124.167]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:47 +0000 (GMT) From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Michael Ellerman Subject: [PATCH powerpc/next 16/17] powerpc64/bpf: Store temp registers' bpf to ppc mapping Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 16:11:50 +0530 Message-Id: <0944e2f0fa6dd254ea401f1c946fb6c9a5294278.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: TSNur4hFRIAAIjORVza01obUQHZEDUYt X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: h9BXE6XVYd79JofE8mL_eASkSqeGwgnE X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.816,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.62.513 definitions=2022-02-14_02,2022-02-14_03,2021-12-02_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2201110000 definitions=main-2202140062 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Daniel Borkmann , Yauheni Kaliuta , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Hari Bathini Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Jordan Niethe In bpf_jit_build_body(), the mapping of TMP_REG_1 and TMP_REG_2's bpf register to ppc register is evalulated at every use despite not changing. Instead, determine the ppc register once and store the result. Signed-off-by: Jordan Niethe [Rebased, converted additional usage sites] Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 197 +++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 111 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index ac06efa7022379..b4de0c35c8a4ab 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -357,6 +357,8 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * u32 dst_reg = b2p[insn[i].dst_reg]; u32 src_reg = b2p[insn[i].src_reg]; u32 size = BPF_SIZE(code); + u32 tmp1_reg = b2p[TMP_REG_1]; + u32 tmp2_reg = b2p[TMP_REG_2]; s16 off = insn[i].off; s32 imm = insn[i].imm; bool func_addr_fixed; @@ -407,8 +409,8 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * } else if (imm >= -32768 && imm < 32768) { EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(dst_reg, dst_reg, IMM_L(imm))); } else { - PPC_LI32(b2p[TMP_REG_1], imm); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(dst_reg, dst_reg, b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + PPC_LI32(tmp1_reg, imm); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(dst_reg, dst_reg, tmp1_reg)); } goto bpf_alu32_trunc; case BPF_ALU | BPF_SUB | BPF_K: /* (u32) dst -= (u32) imm */ @@ -418,8 +420,8 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * } else if (imm > -32768 && imm <= 32768) { EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(dst_reg, dst_reg, IMM_L(-imm))); } else { - PPC_LI32(b2p[TMP_REG_1], imm); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_SUB(dst_reg, dst_reg, b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + PPC_LI32(tmp1_reg, imm); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_SUB(dst_reg, dst_reg, tmp1_reg)); } goto bpf_alu32_trunc; case BPF_ALU | BPF_MUL | BPF_X: /* (u32) dst *= (u32) src */ @@ -434,32 +436,28 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * if (imm >= -32768 && imm < 32768) EMIT(PPC_RAW_MULI(dst_reg, dst_reg, IMM_L(imm))); else { - PPC_LI32(b2p[TMP_REG_1], imm); + PPC_LI32(tmp1_reg, imm); if (BPF_CLASS(code) == BPF_ALU) - EMIT(PPC_RAW_MULW(dst_reg, dst_reg, - b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MULW(dst_reg, dst_reg, tmp1_reg)); else - EMIT(PPC_RAW_MULD(dst_reg, dst_reg, - b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MULD(dst_reg, dst_reg, tmp1_reg)); } goto bpf_alu32_trunc; case BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV | BPF_X: /* (u32) dst /= (u32) src */ case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_X: /* (u32) dst %= (u32) src */ if (BPF_OP(code) == BPF_MOD) { - EMIT(PPC_RAW_DIVWU(b2p[TMP_REG_1], dst_reg, src_reg)); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_MULW(b2p[TMP_REG_1], src_reg, - b2p[TMP_REG_1])); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_SUB(dst_reg, dst_reg, b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_DIVWU(tmp1_reg, dst_reg, src_reg)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MULW(tmp1_reg, src_reg, tmp1_reg)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_SUB(dst_reg, dst_reg, tmp1_reg)); } else EMIT(PPC_RAW_DIVWU(dst_reg, dst_reg, src_reg)); goto bpf_alu32_trunc; case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_DIV | BPF_X: /* dst /= src */ case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_X: /* dst %= src */ if (BPF_OP(code) == BPF_MOD) { - EMIT(PPC_RAW_DIVDU(b2p[TMP_REG_1], dst_reg, src_reg)); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_MULD(b2p[TMP_REG_1], src_reg, - b2p[TMP_REG_1])); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_SUB(dst_reg, dst_reg, b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_DIVDU(tmp1_reg, dst_reg, src_reg)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MULD(tmp1_reg, src_reg, tmp1_reg)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_SUB(dst_reg, dst_reg, tmp1_reg)); } else EMIT(PPC_RAW_DIVDU(dst_reg, dst_reg, src_reg)); break; @@ -478,35 +476,23 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * } } - PPC_LI32(b2p[TMP_REG_1], imm); + PPC_LI32(tmp1_reg, imm); switch (BPF_CLASS(code)) { case BPF_ALU: if (BPF_OP(code) == BPF_MOD) { - EMIT(PPC_RAW_DIVWU(b2p[TMP_REG_2], - dst_reg, - b2p[TMP_REG_1])); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_MULW(b2p[TMP_REG_1], - b2p[TMP_REG_1], - b2p[TMP_REG_2])); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_SUB(dst_reg, dst_reg, - b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_DIVWU(tmp2_reg, dst_reg, tmp1_reg)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MULW(tmp1_reg, tmp1_reg, tmp2_reg)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_SUB(dst_reg, dst_reg, tmp1_reg)); } else - EMIT(PPC_RAW_DIVWU(dst_reg, dst_reg, - b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_DIVWU(dst_reg, dst_reg, tmp1_reg)); break; case BPF_ALU64: if (BPF_OP(code) == BPF_MOD) { - EMIT(PPC_RAW_DIVDU(b2p[TMP_REG_2], - dst_reg, - b2p[TMP_REG_1])); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_MULD(b2p[TMP_REG_1], - b2p[TMP_REG_1], - b2p[TMP_REG_2])); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_SUB(dst_reg, dst_reg, - b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_DIVDU(tmp2_reg, dst_reg, tmp1_reg)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MULD(tmp1_reg, tmp1_reg, tmp2_reg)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_SUB(dst_reg, dst_reg, tmp1_reg)); } else - EMIT(PPC_RAW_DIVDU(dst_reg, dst_reg, - b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_DIVDU(dst_reg, dst_reg, tmp1_reg)); break; } goto bpf_alu32_trunc; @@ -528,8 +514,8 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * EMIT(PPC_RAW_ANDI(dst_reg, dst_reg, IMM_L(imm))); else { /* Sign-extended */ - PPC_LI32(b2p[TMP_REG_1], imm); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_AND(dst_reg, dst_reg, b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + PPC_LI32(tmp1_reg, imm); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_AND(dst_reg, dst_reg, tmp1_reg)); } goto bpf_alu32_trunc; case BPF_ALU | BPF_OR | BPF_X: /* dst = (u32) dst | (u32) src */ @@ -540,8 +526,8 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_OR | BPF_K:/* dst = dst | imm */ if (imm < 0 && BPF_CLASS(code) == BPF_ALU64) { /* Sign-extended */ - PPC_LI32(b2p[TMP_REG_1], imm); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_OR(dst_reg, dst_reg, b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + PPC_LI32(tmp1_reg, imm); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_OR(dst_reg, dst_reg, tmp1_reg)); } else { if (IMM_L(imm)) EMIT(PPC_RAW_ORI(dst_reg, dst_reg, IMM_L(imm))); @@ -557,8 +543,8 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_XOR | BPF_K: /* dst ^= imm */ if (imm < 0 && BPF_CLASS(code) == BPF_ALU64) { /* Sign-extended */ - PPC_LI32(b2p[TMP_REG_1], imm); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_XOR(dst_reg, dst_reg, b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + PPC_LI32(tmp1_reg, imm); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_XOR(dst_reg, dst_reg, tmp1_reg)); } else { if (IMM_L(imm)) EMIT(PPC_RAW_XORI(dst_reg, dst_reg, IMM_L(imm))); @@ -659,11 +645,11 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * switch (imm) { case 16: /* Rotate 8 bits left & mask with 0x0000ff00 */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_RLWINM(b2p[TMP_REG_1], dst_reg, 8, 16, 23)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_RLWINM(tmp1_reg, dst_reg, 8, 16, 23)); /* Rotate 8 bits right & insert LSB to reg */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_RLWIMI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], dst_reg, 24, 24, 31)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_RLWIMI(tmp1_reg, dst_reg, 24, 24, 31)); /* Move result back to dst_reg */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(dst_reg, b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(dst_reg, tmp1_reg)); break; case 32: /* @@ -671,28 +657,28 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * * 2 bytes are already in their final position * -- byte 2 and 4 (of bytes 1, 2, 3 and 4) */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_RLWINM(b2p[TMP_REG_1], dst_reg, 8, 0, 31)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_RLWINM(tmp1_reg, dst_reg, 8, 0, 31)); /* Rotate 24 bits and insert byte 1 */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_RLWIMI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], dst_reg, 24, 0, 7)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_RLWIMI(tmp1_reg, dst_reg, 24, 0, 7)); /* Rotate 24 bits and insert byte 3 */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_RLWIMI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], dst_reg, 24, 16, 23)); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(dst_reg, b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_RLWIMI(tmp1_reg, dst_reg, 24, 16, 23)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(dst_reg, tmp1_reg)); break; case 64: /* Store the value to stack and then use byte-reverse loads */ EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(dst_reg, _R1, bpf_jit_stack_local(ctx))); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], _R1, bpf_jit_stack_local(ctx))); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(tmp1_reg, _R1, bpf_jit_stack_local(ctx))); if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_206)) { - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LDBRX(dst_reg, 0, b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LDBRX(dst_reg, 0, tmp1_reg)); } else { - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWBRX(dst_reg, 0, b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWBRX(dst_reg, 0, tmp1_reg)); if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN)) EMIT(PPC_RAW_SLDI(dst_reg, dst_reg, 32)); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(b2p[TMP_REG_2], 4)); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWBRX(b2p[TMP_REG_2], b2p[TMP_REG_2], b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(tmp2_reg, 4)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWBRX(tmp2_reg, tmp2_reg, tmp1_reg)); if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN)) - EMIT(PPC_RAW_SLDI(b2p[TMP_REG_2], b2p[TMP_REG_2], 32)); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_OR(dst_reg, dst_reg, b2p[TMP_REG_2])); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_SLDI(tmp2_reg, tmp2_reg, 32)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_OR(dst_reg, dst_reg, tmp2_reg)); } break; } @@ -731,7 +717,7 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * break; case STF_BARRIER_SYNC_ORI: EMIT(PPC_RAW_SYNC()); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(b2p[TMP_REG_1], _R13, 0)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(tmp1_reg, _R13, 0)); EMIT(PPC_RAW_ORI(_R31, _R31, 0)); break; case STF_BARRIER_FALLBACK: @@ -751,36 +737,36 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * case BPF_STX | BPF_MEM | BPF_B: /* *(u8 *)(dst + off) = src */ case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_B: /* *(u8 *)(dst + off) = imm */ if (BPF_CLASS(code) == BPF_ST) { - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], imm)); - src_reg = b2p[TMP_REG_1]; + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(tmp1_reg, imm)); + src_reg = tmp1_reg; } EMIT(PPC_RAW_STB(src_reg, dst_reg, off)); break; case BPF_STX | BPF_MEM | BPF_H: /* (u16 *)(dst + off) = src */ case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_H: /* (u16 *)(dst + off) = imm */ if (BPF_CLASS(code) == BPF_ST) { - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], imm)); - src_reg = b2p[TMP_REG_1]; + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(tmp1_reg, imm)); + src_reg = tmp1_reg; } EMIT(PPC_RAW_STH(src_reg, dst_reg, off)); break; case BPF_STX | BPF_MEM | BPF_W: /* *(u32 *)(dst + off) = src */ case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_W: /* *(u32 *)(dst + off) = imm */ if (BPF_CLASS(code) == BPF_ST) { - PPC_LI32(b2p[TMP_REG_1], imm); - src_reg = b2p[TMP_REG_1]; + PPC_LI32(tmp1_reg, imm); + src_reg = tmp1_reg; } EMIT(PPC_RAW_STW(src_reg, dst_reg, off)); break; case BPF_STX | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW: /* (u64 *)(dst + off) = src */ case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW: /* *(u64 *)(dst + off) = imm */ if (BPF_CLASS(code) == BPF_ST) { - PPC_LI32(b2p[TMP_REG_1], imm); - src_reg = b2p[TMP_REG_1]; + PPC_LI32(tmp1_reg, imm); + src_reg = tmp1_reg; } if (off % 4) { - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(b2p[TMP_REG_2], off)); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_STDX(src_reg, dst_reg, b2p[TMP_REG_2])); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(tmp2_reg, off)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STDX(src_reg, dst_reg, tmp2_reg)); } else { EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(src_reg, dst_reg, off)); } @@ -800,14 +786,14 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * /* *(u32 *)(dst + off) += src */ /* Get EA into TMP_REG_1 */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], dst_reg, off)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(tmp1_reg, dst_reg, off)); tmp_idx = ctx->idx * 4; /* load value from memory into TMP_REG_2 */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWARX(b2p[TMP_REG_2], 0, b2p[TMP_REG_1], 0)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWARX(tmp2_reg, 0, tmp1_reg, 0)); /* add value from src_reg into this */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(b2p[TMP_REG_2], b2p[TMP_REG_2], src_reg)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(tmp2_reg, tmp2_reg, src_reg)); /* store result back */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_STWCX(b2p[TMP_REG_2], 0, b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STWCX(tmp2_reg, 0, tmp1_reg)); /* we're done if this succeeded */ PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, tmp_idx); break; @@ -820,11 +806,11 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * } /* *(u64 *)(dst + off) += src */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], dst_reg, off)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(tmp1_reg, dst_reg, off)); tmp_idx = ctx->idx * 4; - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LDARX(b2p[TMP_REG_2], 0, b2p[TMP_REG_1], 0)); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(b2p[TMP_REG_2], b2p[TMP_REG_2], src_reg)); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_STDCX(b2p[TMP_REG_2], 0, b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LDARX(tmp2_reg, 0, tmp1_reg, 0)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(tmp2_reg, tmp2_reg, src_reg)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STDCX(tmp2_reg, 0, tmp1_reg)); PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, tmp_idx); break; @@ -850,12 +836,12 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * * set dst_reg=0 and move on. */ if (BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_PROBE_MEM) { - EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], src_reg, off)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(tmp1_reg, src_reg, off)); if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3E_64)) - PPC_LI64(b2p[TMP_REG_2], 0x8000000000000000ul); + PPC_LI64(tmp2_reg, 0x8000000000000000ul); else /* BOOK3S_64 */ - PPC_LI64(b2p[TMP_REG_2], PAGE_OFFSET); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLD(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p[TMP_REG_2])); + PPC_LI64(tmp2_reg, PAGE_OFFSET); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLD(tmp1_reg, tmp2_reg)); PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_GT, (ctx->idx + 3) * 4); EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(dst_reg, 0)); /* @@ -880,8 +866,8 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * break; case BPF_DW: if (off % 4) { - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], off)); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LDX(dst_reg, src_reg, b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(tmp1_reg, off)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LDX(dst_reg, src_reg, tmp1_reg)); } else { EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(dst_reg, src_reg, off)); } @@ -925,7 +911,7 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * * we'll just fall through to the epilogue. */ if (i != flen - 1) { - ret = bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(image, ctx, b2p[TMP_REG_1], exit_addr); + ret = bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(image, ctx, tmp1_reg, exit_addr); if (ret) return ret; } @@ -1058,14 +1044,10 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSET | BPF_X: case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JSET | BPF_X: if (BPF_CLASS(code) == BPF_JMP) { - EMIT(PPC_RAW_AND_DOT(b2p[TMP_REG_1], dst_reg, - src_reg)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_AND_DOT(tmp1_reg, dst_reg, src_reg)); } else { - int tmp_reg = b2p[TMP_REG_1]; - - EMIT(PPC_RAW_AND(tmp_reg, dst_reg, src_reg)); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_RLWINM_DOT(tmp_reg, tmp_reg, 0, 0, - 31)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_AND(tmp1_reg, dst_reg, src_reg)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_RLWINM_DOT(tmp1_reg, tmp1_reg, 0, 0, 31)); } break; case BPF_JMP | BPF_JNE | BPF_K: @@ -1094,14 +1076,12 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLDI(dst_reg, imm)); } else { /* sign-extending load */ - PPC_LI32(b2p[TMP_REG_1], imm); + PPC_LI32(tmp1_reg, imm); /* ... but unsigned comparison */ if (is_jmp32) - EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLW(dst_reg, - b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLW(dst_reg, tmp1_reg)); else - EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLD(dst_reg, - b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLD(dst_reg, tmp1_reg)); } break; } @@ -1126,13 +1106,11 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * else EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPDI(dst_reg, imm)); } else { - PPC_LI32(b2p[TMP_REG_1], imm); + PPC_LI32(tmp1_reg, imm); if (is_jmp32) - EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPW(dst_reg, - b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPW(dst_reg, tmp1_reg)); else - EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPD(dst_reg, - b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPD(dst_reg, tmp1_reg)); } break; } @@ -1141,19 +1119,16 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * /* andi does not sign-extend the immediate */ if (imm >= 0 && imm < 32768) /* PPC_ANDI is _only/always_ dot-form */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_ANDI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], dst_reg, imm)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_ANDI(tmp1_reg, dst_reg, imm)); else { - int tmp_reg = b2p[TMP_REG_1]; - - PPC_LI32(tmp_reg, imm); + PPC_LI32(tmp1_reg, imm); if (BPF_CLASS(code) == BPF_JMP) { - EMIT(PPC_RAW_AND_DOT(tmp_reg, dst_reg, - tmp_reg)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_AND_DOT(tmp1_reg, dst_reg, + tmp1_reg)); } else { - EMIT(PPC_RAW_AND(tmp_reg, dst_reg, - tmp_reg)); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_RLWINM_DOT(tmp_reg, tmp_reg, - 0, 0, 31)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_AND(tmp1_reg, dst_reg, tmp1_reg)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_RLWINM_DOT(tmp1_reg, tmp1_reg, + 0, 0, 31)); } } break; From patchwork Mon Feb 14 10:41:51 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Naveen N. Rao" X-Patchwork-Id: 1592436 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=tF86Ecjs; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy1Lr20KSz9s8s for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:54:28 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Jy1Lq5DZgz3dsk for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:54:27 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=tF86Ecjs; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=tF86Ecjs; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy15y02cNz3cV5 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:43:17 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21E9v1Bj023757; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:43:00 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=/Jg/iAny1dcOckC1ITy+N/f+cRVkl9vomfeJxhEbeGQ=; b=tF86EcjskTYngItd/JagEryJPwGFMSJ8QD4jOjXY0N8YGDsXeaMkv+sdRWw2xyRyN7k3 qmjl7KD9W9UqIFnWe3qubv53R8SMhpSaLlc5Bzbeoizgf+YFhP7wj7B/HCiM9sgduMIg X3rQqCldyoqoyxjStqv+Pxri3jclrHWog4uxPNcD4jBraWTmFRJ5gVbUac+/creuyc0P MeDDkPXACK892JlEpkRqB6GLKhP2iN4aDsEu3ZGqcav+5rkiHY9iBWDEbkFfL/FSKgDE m6E8MvKR5hCjscgt2nppST6mn0rhhPRBTG4zDg6Y7+QmHgoJkRfQRroEvbdkzcEyYXxx IA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e78m0e60s-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:43:00 +0000 Received: from m0098396.ppops.net (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 21EAZoMw010326; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:43:00 GMT Received: from ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (66.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.102]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e78m0e5yu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:59 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21EAXYN0000930; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:57 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3e645jc3a5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:57 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 21EAgrAi23593406 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:53 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24D4AE051; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD7EAE053; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-NotSettable.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.124.167]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:50 +0000 (GMT) From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Michael Ellerman Subject: [PATCH powerpc/next 17/17] powerpc/bpf: Simplify bpf_to_ppc() and adopt it for powerpc64 Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 16:11:51 +0530 Message-Id: <09f0540ce3e0cd4120b5b33993b5e73b6ef9e979.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: Bnfqcdsqrx5ImpwwcFPB2e0dy8kUJWjk X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: GkliYTe4yxOpl1_pXM1hQjNUmnphLz01 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.816,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.62.513 definitions=2022-02-14_02,2022-02-14_03,2021-12-02_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2201110000 definitions=main-2202140064 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Daniel Borkmann , Yauheni Kaliuta , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Hari Bathini Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Convert bpf_to_ppc() to a macro to help simplify its usage since codegen_context is available in all places it is used. Adopt it also for powerpc64 for uniformity and get rid of the global b2p structure. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h | 11 ++-- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 8 +-- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 90 ++++++++++++++---------------- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++--------------- 4 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h index d9bdc9df2e48ed..c16271a456b343 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h @@ -122,12 +122,6 @@ #define SEEN_VREG_MASK 0x1ff80000 /* Volatile registers r3-r12 */ #define SEEN_NVREG_MASK 0x0003ffff /* Non volatile registers r14-r31 */ -#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 -extern const int b2p[MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 2]; -#else -extern const int b2p[MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 1]; -#endif - struct codegen_context { /* * This is used to track register usage as well @@ -141,11 +135,13 @@ struct codegen_context { unsigned int seen; unsigned int idx; unsigned int stack_size; - int b2p[ARRAY_SIZE(b2p)]; + int b2p[MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 2]; unsigned int exentry_idx; unsigned int alt_exit_addr; }; +#define bpf_to_ppc(r) (ctx->b2p[r]) + #ifdef CONFIG_PPC32 #define BPF_FIXUP_LEN 3 /* Three instructions => 12 bytes */ #else @@ -173,6 +169,7 @@ static inline void bpf_clear_seen_register(struct codegen_context *ctx, int i) ctx->seen &= ~(1 << (31 - i)); } +void bpf_jit_init_reg_mapping(struct codegen_context *ctx); int bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func); int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 *addrs, int pass); diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 635f7448ff7952..fc160d33c83960 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -72,13 +72,13 @@ static int bpf_jit_fixup_addresses(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, tmp_idx = ctx->idx; ctx->idx = addrs[i] / 4; #ifdef CONFIG_PPC32 - PPC_LI32(ctx->b2p[insn[i].dst_reg] - 1, (u32)insn[i + 1].imm); - PPC_LI32(ctx->b2p[insn[i].dst_reg], (u32)insn[i].imm); + PPC_LI32(bpf_to_ppc(insn[i].dst_reg) - 1, (u32)insn[i + 1].imm); + PPC_LI32(bpf_to_ppc(insn[i].dst_reg), (u32)insn[i].imm); for (j = ctx->idx - addrs[i] / 4; j < 4; j++) EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP()); #else func_addr = ((u64)(u32)insn[i].imm) | (((u64)(u32)insn[i + 1].imm) << 32); - PPC_LI64(b2p[insn[i].dst_reg], func_addr); + PPC_LI64(bpf_to_ppc(insn[i].dst_reg), func_addr); /* overwrite rest with nops */ for (j = ctx->idx - addrs[i] / 4; j < 5; j++) EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP()); @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp) } memset(&cgctx, 0, sizeof(struct codegen_context)); - memcpy(cgctx.b2p, b2p, sizeof(cgctx.b2p)); + bpf_jit_init_reg_mapping(&cgctx); /* Make sure that the stack is quadword aligned. */ cgctx.stack_size = round_up(fp->aux->stack_depth, 16); diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c index fe4e0eca017ede..7dc716cd64bcbc 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c @@ -33,42 +33,38 @@ /* stack frame, ensure this is quadword aligned */ #define BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME(ctx) (STACK_FRAME_MIN_SIZE + BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE + (ctx)->stack_size) -/* BPF register usage */ -#define TMP_REG (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 0) - #define PPC_EX32(r, i) EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI((r), (i) < 0 ? -1 : 0)) +/* PPC NVR range -- update this if we ever use NVRs below r17 */ +#define BPF_PPC_NVR_MIN _R17 +#define BPF_PPC_TC _R16 + +/* BPF register usage */ +#define TMP_REG (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 0) + /* BPF to ppc register mappings */ -const int b2p[MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 1] = { +void bpf_jit_init_reg_mapping(struct codegen_context *ctx) +{ /* function return value */ - [BPF_REG_0] = _R12, + ctx->b2p[BPF_REG_0] = _R12; /* function arguments */ - [BPF_REG_1] = _R4, - [BPF_REG_2] = _R6, - [BPF_REG_3] = _R8, - [BPF_REG_4] = _R10, - [BPF_REG_5] = _R22, + ctx->b2p[BPF_REG_1] = _R4; + ctx->b2p[BPF_REG_2] = _R6; + ctx->b2p[BPF_REG_3] = _R8; + ctx->b2p[BPF_REG_4] = _R10; + ctx->b2p[BPF_REG_5] = _R22; /* non volatile registers */ - [BPF_REG_6] = _R24, - [BPF_REG_7] = _R26, - [BPF_REG_8] = _R28, - [BPF_REG_9] = _R30, + ctx->b2p[BPF_REG_6] = _R24; + ctx->b2p[BPF_REG_7] = _R26; + ctx->b2p[BPF_REG_8] = _R28; + ctx->b2p[BPF_REG_9] = _R30; /* frame pointer aka BPF_REG_10 */ - [BPF_REG_FP] = _R18, + ctx->b2p[BPF_REG_FP] = _R18; /* eBPF jit internal registers */ - [BPF_REG_AX] = _R20, - [TMP_REG] = _R31, /* 32 bits */ -}; - -static int bpf_to_ppc(struct codegen_context *ctx, int reg) -{ - return ctx->b2p[reg]; + ctx->b2p[BPF_REG_AX] = _R20; + ctx->b2p[TMP_REG] = _R31; /* 32 bits */ } -/* PPC NVR range -- update this if we ever use NVRs below r17 */ -#define BPF_PPC_NVR_MIN _R17 -#define BPF_PPC_TC _R16 - static int bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(struct codegen_context *ctx, int reg) { if ((reg >= BPF_PPC_NVR_MIN && reg < 32) || reg == BPF_PPC_TC) @@ -110,8 +106,8 @@ void bpf_jit_build_prologue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx) int i; /* First arg comes in as a 32 bits pointer. */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(bpf_to_ppc(ctx, BPF_REG_1), _R3)); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(bpf_to_ppc(ctx, BPF_REG_1) - 1, 0)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_1), _R3)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_1) - 1, 0)); EMIT(PPC_RAW_STWU(_R1, _R1, -BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME(ctx))); /* @@ -120,7 +116,7 @@ void bpf_jit_build_prologue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx) * invoked through a tail call. */ if (ctx->seen & SEEN_TAILCALL) - EMIT(PPC_RAW_STW(bpf_to_ppc(ctx, BPF_REG_1) - 1, _R1, + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STW(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_1) - 1, _R1, bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(ctx, BPF_PPC_TC))); else EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP()); @@ -142,15 +138,15 @@ void bpf_jit_build_prologue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx) EMIT(PPC_RAW_STW(i, _R1, bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(ctx, i))); /* If needed retrieve arguments 9 and 10, ie 5th 64 bits arg.*/ - if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(ctx, BPF_REG_5))) { - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWZ(bpf_to_ppc(ctx, BPF_REG_5) - 1, _R1, BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME(ctx)) + 8); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWZ(bpf_to_ppc(ctx, BPF_REG_5), _R1, BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME(ctx)) + 12); + if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_5))) { + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWZ(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_5) - 1, _R1, BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME(ctx)) + 8); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWZ(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_5), _R1, BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME(ctx)) + 12); } /* Setup frame pointer to point to the bpf stack area */ - if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(ctx, BPF_REG_FP))) { - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(bpf_to_ppc(ctx, BPF_REG_FP) - 1, 0)); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(bpf_to_ppc(ctx, BPF_REG_FP), _R1, + if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_FP))) { + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_FP) - 1, 0)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_FP), _R1, STACK_FRAME_MIN_SIZE + ctx->stack_size)); } @@ -170,7 +166,7 @@ static void bpf_jit_emit_common_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx) { - EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(_R3, bpf_to_ppc(ctx, BPF_REG_0))); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(_R3, bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_0))); bpf_jit_emit_common_epilogue(image, ctx); @@ -215,8 +211,8 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o * r5-r6/BPF_REG_2 - pointer to bpf_array * r7-r8/BPF_REG_3 - index in bpf_array */ - int b2p_bpf_array = bpf_to_ppc(ctx, BPF_REG_2); - int b2p_index = bpf_to_ppc(ctx, BPF_REG_3); + int b2p_bpf_array = bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_2); + int b2p_index = bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_3); /* * if (index >= array->map.max_entries) @@ -262,7 +258,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTCTR(_R3)); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(_R3, bpf_to_ppc(ctx, BPF_REG_1))); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(_R3, bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_1))); /* tear restore NVRs, ... */ bpf_jit_emit_common_epilogue(image, ctx); @@ -286,11 +282,11 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * for (i = 0; i < flen; i++) { u32 code = insn[i].code; - u32 dst_reg = bpf_to_ppc(ctx, insn[i].dst_reg); + u32 dst_reg = bpf_to_ppc(insn[i].dst_reg); u32 dst_reg_h = dst_reg - 1; - u32 src_reg = bpf_to_ppc(ctx, insn[i].src_reg); + u32 src_reg = bpf_to_ppc(insn[i].src_reg); u32 src_reg_h = src_reg - 1; - u32 tmp_reg = bpf_to_ppc(ctx, TMP_REG); + u32 tmp_reg = bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG); u32 size = BPF_SIZE(code); s16 off = insn[i].off; s32 imm = insn[i].imm; @@ -952,17 +948,17 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * if (ret < 0) return ret; - if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(ctx, BPF_REG_5))) { - EMIT(PPC_RAW_STW(bpf_to_ppc(ctx, BPF_REG_5) - 1, _R1, 8)); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_STW(bpf_to_ppc(ctx, BPF_REG_5), _R1, 12)); + if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_5))) { + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STW(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_5) - 1, _R1, 8)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STW(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_5), _R1, 12)); } ret = bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(image, ctx, func_addr); if (ret) return ret; - EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(bpf_to_ppc(ctx, BPF_REG_0) - 1, _R3)); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(bpf_to_ppc(ctx, BPF_REG_0), _R4)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_0) - 1, _R3)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_0), _R4)); break; /* diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index b4de0c35c8a4ab..585f257da04587 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -46,27 +46,28 @@ #define TMP_REG_2 (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 1) /* BPF to ppc register mappings */ -const int b2p[MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 2] = { +void bpf_jit_init_reg_mapping(struct codegen_context *ctx) +{ /* function return value */ - [BPF_REG_0] = _R8, + ctx->b2p[BPF_REG_0] = _R8; /* function arguments */ - [BPF_REG_1] = _R3, - [BPF_REG_2] = _R4, - [BPF_REG_3] = _R5, - [BPF_REG_4] = _R6, - [BPF_REG_5] = _R7, + ctx->b2p[BPF_REG_1] = _R3; + ctx->b2p[BPF_REG_2] = _R4; + ctx->b2p[BPF_REG_3] = _R5; + ctx->b2p[BPF_REG_4] = _R6; + ctx->b2p[BPF_REG_5] = _R7; /* non volatile registers */ - [BPF_REG_6] = _R27, - [BPF_REG_7] = _R28, - [BPF_REG_8] = _R29, - [BPF_REG_9] = _R30, + ctx->b2p[BPF_REG_6] = _R27; + ctx->b2p[BPF_REG_7] = _R28; + ctx->b2p[BPF_REG_8] = _R29; + ctx->b2p[BPF_REG_9] = _R30; /* frame pointer aka BPF_REG_10 */ - [BPF_REG_FP] = _R31, + ctx->b2p[BPF_REG_FP] = _R31; /* eBPF jit internal registers */ - [BPF_REG_AX] = _R12, - [TMP_REG_1] = _R9, - [TMP_REG_2] = _R10 -}; + ctx->b2p[BPF_REG_AX] = _R12; + ctx->b2p[TMP_REG_1] = _R9; + ctx->b2p[TMP_REG_2] = _R10; +} /* PPC NVR range -- update this if we ever use NVRs below r27 */ #define BPF_PPC_NVR_MIN _R27 @@ -79,7 +80,7 @@ static inline bool bpf_has_stack_frame(struct codegen_context *ctx) * - the bpf program uses its stack area * The latter condition is deduced from the usage of BPF_REG_FP */ - return ctx->seen & SEEN_FUNC || bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, b2p[BPF_REG_FP]); + return ctx->seen & SEEN_FUNC || bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_FP)); } /* @@ -134,9 +135,9 @@ void bpf_jit_build_prologue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx) * invoked through a tail call. */ if (ctx->seen & SEEN_TAILCALL) { - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], 0)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), 0)); /* this goes in the redzone */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(b2p[TMP_REG_1], _R1, -(BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE + 8))); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), _R1, -(BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE + 8))); } else { EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP()); EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP()); @@ -161,12 +162,12 @@ void bpf_jit_build_prologue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx) * in the protected zone below the previous stack frame */ for (i = BPF_REG_6; i <= BPF_REG_10; i++) - if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, b2p[i])) - EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(b2p[i], _R1, bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(ctx, b2p[i]))); + if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(i))) + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(bpf_to_ppc(i), _R1, bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(i)))); /* Setup frame pointer to point to the bpf stack area */ - if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, b2p[BPF_REG_FP])) - EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(b2p[BPF_REG_FP], _R1, + if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_FP))) + EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_FP), _R1, STACK_FRAME_MIN_SIZE + ctx->stack_size)); } @@ -176,8 +177,8 @@ static void bpf_jit_emit_common_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx /* Restore NVRs */ for (i = BPF_REG_6; i <= BPF_REG_10; i++) - if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, b2p[i])) - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(b2p[i], _R1, bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(ctx, b2p[i]))); + if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(i))) + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(bpf_to_ppc(i), _R1, bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(i)))); /* Tear down our stack frame */ if (bpf_has_stack_frame(ctx)) { @@ -194,7 +195,7 @@ void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx) bpf_jit_emit_common_epilogue(image, ctx); /* Move result to r3 */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(_R3, b2p[BPF_REG_0])); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(_R3, bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_0))); EMIT(PPC_RAW_BLR()); } @@ -261,8 +262,8 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o * r4/BPF_REG_2 - pointer to bpf_array * r5/BPF_REG_3 - index in bpf_array */ - int b2p_bpf_array = b2p[BPF_REG_2]; - int b2p_index = b2p[BPF_REG_3]; + int b2p_bpf_array = bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_2); + int b2p_index = bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_3); int bpf_tailcall_prologue_size = 8; if (__is_defined(PPC64_ELF_ABI_v2)) @@ -272,42 +273,42 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o * if (index >= array->map.max_entries) * goto out; */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWZ(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p_bpf_array, offsetof(struct bpf_array, map.max_entries))); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWZ(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), b2p_bpf_array, offsetof(struct bpf_array, map.max_entries))); EMIT(PPC_RAW_RLWINM(b2p_index, b2p_index, 0, 0, 31)); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLW(b2p_index, b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLW(b2p_index, bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1))); PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_GE, out); /* * if (tail_call_cnt >= MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT) * goto out; */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(b2p[TMP_REG_1], _R1, bpf_jit_stack_tailcallcnt(ctx))); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLWI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), _R1, bpf_jit_stack_tailcallcnt(ctx))); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLWI(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)); PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_GE, out); /* * tail_call_cnt++; */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p[TMP_REG_1], 1)); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(b2p[TMP_REG_1], _R1, bpf_jit_stack_tailcallcnt(ctx))); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), 1)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), _R1, bpf_jit_stack_tailcallcnt(ctx))); /* prog = array->ptrs[index]; */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_MULI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p_index, 8)); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p_bpf_array)); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p[TMP_REG_1], offsetof(struct bpf_array, ptrs))); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MULI(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), b2p_index, 8)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), b2p_bpf_array)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), offsetof(struct bpf_array, ptrs))); /* * if (prog == NULL) * goto out; */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLDI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], 0)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLDI(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), 0)); PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_EQ, out); /* goto *(prog->bpf_func + prologue_size); */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p[TMP_REG_1], offsetof(struct bpf_prog, bpf_func))); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p[TMP_REG_1], + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), offsetof(struct bpf_prog, bpf_func))); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1), FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE + bpf_tailcall_prologue_size)); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTCTR(b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTCTR(bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1))); /* tear down stack, restore NVRs, ... */ bpf_jit_emit_common_epilogue(image, ctx); @@ -354,11 +355,11 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * for (i = 0; i < flen; i++) { u32 code = insn[i].code; - u32 dst_reg = b2p[insn[i].dst_reg]; - u32 src_reg = b2p[insn[i].src_reg]; + u32 dst_reg = bpf_to_ppc(insn[i].dst_reg); + u32 src_reg = bpf_to_ppc(insn[i].src_reg); u32 size = BPF_SIZE(code); - u32 tmp1_reg = b2p[TMP_REG_1]; - u32 tmp2_reg = b2p[TMP_REG_2]; + u32 tmp1_reg = bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1); + u32 tmp2_reg = bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2); s16 off = insn[i].off; s32 imm = insn[i].imm; bool func_addr_fixed; @@ -938,7 +939,7 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * return ret; /* move return value from r3 to BPF_REG_0 */ - EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(b2p[BPF_REG_0], _R3)); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_0), _R3)); break; /*