From patchwork Mon Oct 11 12:46:50 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Nicolas Ferre X-Patchwork-Id: 1539299 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming-imx@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming-imx@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=wSGxKF1E; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=microchip.com header.i=@microchip.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mchp header.b=tFuxhPPQ; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org (client-ip=2607:7c80:54:e::133; helo=bombadil.infradead.org; envelope-from=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+incoming-imx=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org; receiver=) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:e::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HSdqp4JgHz9sNH for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 23:47:50 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To :From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: List-Owner; bh=ywgDNsjwdpni8IAAQciAeNODpe4dkFarzS33gGuy7Ag=; b=wSGxKF1E99kLB+ LjUaHU+6Y5+JimOnQc3C0zmu6ju0RsE7+txMnWl/kJeyXLF13IJ7TxEdAKRCRSxwd0bYpf2ewjsGY pnKgPdK/gqui+7779ujeFL/pGZyt1Wy22K0JQfeFoAGaOTWbq3O6QRNmyAa3gJ/xQwVA4JjQcOial 59K6JxZueOKBVMRDzjV/M4YbkuSf85zaxihz4weKoa4s09kBzLXxDIPhcc4Ei3Lk2jymtfjyZoFnn Vs0v6uqsXaZWwh5XzRnnXhXsPGy9LOk+ENcZVMpp2HoyQIJGHIiU/ntTHJME+LyJ5L3PMrao222bJ PhKFxa3pA/e+XMiqmPTw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mZuhs-009Of3-Ii; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 12:47:04 +0000 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com ([68.232.154.123]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mZuhm-009OdB-MS for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 12:47:01 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1633956418; x=1665492418; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=jR4VLxh2n5xrvKbxAr/Rz+ZWsobmRxxPA6ztv3jzo5Y=; b=tFuxhPPQyyAkvQ+E/+COsA7u/MI+KENE4wtUr6B9CH8DgVPF5nVgCFgn HEGDfhUa2jxW0gDeoKLhQeAjtL2sggR6kSYbPVX3XBxgmmgXBj+8BSRQs h5xH/WTIbQtr0+JCcmuJyyDsxTxnvG+xIPSVmRQzOjdTr3O4lJYZmtMe1 nIK8muBYsKVps9tvJd+nGXOQRTpzPYI89lcIkN1MVGDw/KElIOYe30zDn g+ZvELeiB25MAF6m6RzuDrs+wgeCpWGwXjqd7KWPeJhfzrC1J1dlzs9s3 qLSYtuPX7f0Bd2NMJkuPkxeUj7RwATmvmdjtsnxJd5XvUGNoBLwwDw0MR Q==; IronPort-SDR: X42KZZDPyQaa+T8ATntHjJcZxHb52QJuGuGjbsyKrSRRFVNbBTdE3QGejyswvNRYX43DXglH5j cM5PUXq2ceda7Svum7SfewApl+pA+C6w6ncQf8XGN3vdeM9Hs3g6eB+cE6kvXlkhoA276BBYCM oAUjJPfrebXWIk9ZE9YitXJbc0NY2FQx2E5BYFUMpf86nwu0lCRQUlRpPumI+onWAIT1mygVb8 wH0YpHYNeSuKAytnc7B0DW+1uiUh4aDZ/ZE3fXz3fMFKPT71vXfyeDItVFOeasMtVAYiQVAhIF EJAaaHtU97W1iYZBe1vBsbRc X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,364,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="72502423" Received: from smtpout.microchip.com (HELO email.microchip.com) ([198.175.253.82]) by esa6.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 11 Oct 2021 05:46:56 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex01.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.143) by chn-vm-ex01.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.14; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 05:46:56 -0700 Received: from ness.microchip.com (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex01.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.2176.14 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 05:46:54 -0700 From: To: Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , , Subject: [GIT PULL] ARM: at91: soc for 5.16 Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 14:46:50 +0200 Message-ID: <20211011124650.17218-1-nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.32.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Organization: microchip X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211011_054658_826598_345E233B X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 6.65 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bombadil.infradead.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: From: Nicolas Ferre Arnd, Olof, Here are the at91 soc changes for 5.16. We are really at the beginning for lan966 family with an ongoing activity in the clock sub-system, for instance. Content analysis details: (-2.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [68.232.154.123 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [68.232.154.123 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders -0.2 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - High trust sender X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Alexandre Belloni , Linux Kernel list , Ludovic Desroches , Kavyasree Kotagiri - I30978 , linux-arm-kernel Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+incoming-imx=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org From: Nicolas Ferre Arnd, Olof, Here are the at91 soc changes for 5.16. We are really at the beginning for lan966 family with an ongoing activity in the clock sub-system, for instance. Thanks, best regards, Nicolas The following changes since commit 6880fa6c56601bb8ed59df6c30fd390cc5f6dd8f: Linux 5.15-rc1 (2021-09-12 16:28:37 -0700) are available in the Git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/at91/linux.git tags/at91-soc-5.16 for you to fetch changes up to 3efc443121180c2acc987929b3b7b86ca83e3ee5: ARM: at91: add basic support for new SoC family lan966 (2021-10-04 14:50:18 +0200) ---------------------------------------------------------------- AT91 SoC #1 for 5.16: - Documentation for sama7g5 and lan966 families - Kconfig entry for lan966 new SoC. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Kavyasree Kotagiri (3): ARM: at91: Documentation: add lan966 family dt-bindings: arm: at91: Document lan966 pcb8291 and pcb8290 boards ARM: at91: add basic support for new SoC family lan966 Nicolas Ferre (1): ARM: at91: Documentation: add sama7g5 family Documentation/arm/microchip.rst | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ .../devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml | 12 ++++++++++++ arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig | 9 +++++++++ 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+)