From patchwork Thu Aug 12 09:45:31 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Xianting Tian X-Patchwork-Id: 1516229 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GlhfS1cjxz9sjJ for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 19:46:40 +1000 (AEST) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4GlhfS0RkGz30gd for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 19:46:40 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com (client-ip=47.88.44.36; helo=out4436.biz.mail.alibaba.com; envelope-from=xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com; receiver=) Received: from out4436.biz.mail.alibaba.com (out4436.biz.mail.alibaba.com [47.88.44.36]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GlhdZ6jgqz2yMV for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 19:45:54 +1000 (AEST) X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS; BC=-1|-1; BR=01201311R641e4; CH=green; DM=||false|; DS=||; FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1; HT=e01e04395; MF=xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com; NM=1; PH=DS; RN=9; SR=0; TI=SMTPD_---0Uim0HUk_1628761535; Received: from localhost(mailfrom:xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0Uim0HUk_1628761535) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Thu, 12 Aug 2021 17:45:35 +0800 From: Xianting Tian To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jirislaby@kernel.org, amit@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, osandov@fb.com Subject: [PATCH v6 1/2] tty: hvc: pass DMA capable memory to put_chars() Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 17:45:31 +0800 Message-Id: <20210812094532.145497-2-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20210812094532.145497-1-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com> References: <20210812094532.145497-1-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Xianting Tian , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" As well known, hvc backend can register its opertions to hvc backend. the opertions contain put_chars(), get_chars() and so on. Some hvc backend may do dma in its opertions. eg, put_chars() of virtio-console. But in the code of hvc framework, it may pass DMA incapable memory to put_chars() under a specific configuration, which is explained in commit c4baad5029(virtio-console: avoid DMA from stack): 1, c[] is on stack, hvc_console_print(): char c[N_OUTBUF] __ALIGNED__; cons_ops[index]->put_chars(vtermnos[index], c, i); 2, ch is on stack, static void hvc_poll_put_char(,,char ch) { struct tty_struct *tty = driver->ttys[0]; struct hvc_struct *hp = tty->driver_data; int n; do { n = hp->ops->put_chars(hp->vtermno, &ch, 1); } while (n <= 0); } Commit c4baad5029 is just the fix to avoid DMA from stack memory, which is passed to virtio-console by hvc framework in above code. But I think the fix is aggressive, it directly uses kmemdup() to alloc new buffer from kmalloc area and do memcpy no matter the memory is in kmalloc area or not. But most importantly, it should better be fixed in the hvc framework, by changing it to never pass stack memory to the put_chars() function in the first place. Otherwise, we still face the same issue if a new hvc backend using dma added in the furture. We make 'char c[N_OUTBUF]' part of 'struct hvc_struct', so hp->c is no longer the stack memory. we can use it in above two cases. Other fix is use L1_CACHE_BYTES as the alignment, use 'sizeof(long)' as dma alignment is wrong. And use struct_size() to calculate size of hvc_struct. Introduce another array(cons_outbuf[]) for the hp->c pointers next to the cons_ops[] and vtermnos[] arrays. With the patch, we can remove the fix c4baad5029. Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian Tested-by: Xianting Tian Reported-by: kernel test robot --- drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------- drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.h | 16 ++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.c b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.c index 5bb8c4e44..c56564eb7 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.c +++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.c @@ -41,16 +41,6 @@ */ #define HVC_CLOSE_WAIT (HZ/100) /* 1/10 of a second */ -/* - * These sizes are most efficient for vio, because they are the - * native transfer size. We could make them selectable in the - * future to better deal with backends that want other buffer sizes. - */ -#define N_OUTBUF 16 -#define N_INBUF 16 - -#define __ALIGNED__ __attribute__((__aligned__(sizeof(long)))) - static struct tty_driver *hvc_driver; static struct task_struct *hvc_task; @@ -142,6 +132,7 @@ static int hvc_flush(struct hvc_struct *hp) static const struct hv_ops *cons_ops[MAX_NR_HVC_CONSOLES]; static uint32_t vtermnos[MAX_NR_HVC_CONSOLES] = {[0 ... MAX_NR_HVC_CONSOLES - 1] = -1}; +static char *cons_outbuf[MAX_NR_HVC_CONSOLES]; /* * Console APIs, NOT TTY. These APIs are available immediately when @@ -151,18 +142,23 @@ static uint32_t vtermnos[MAX_NR_HVC_CONSOLES] = static void hvc_console_print(struct console *co, const char *b, unsigned count) { - char c[N_OUTBUF] __ALIGNED__; + char *c; unsigned i = 0, n = 0; int r, donecr = 0, index = co->index; + unsigned long flags; + struct hvc_struct *hp; /* Console access attempt outside of acceptable console range. */ if (index >= MAX_NR_HVC_CONSOLES) return; /* This console adapter was removed so it is not usable. */ - if (vtermnos[index] == -1) + if (vtermnos[index] == -1 || !cons_outbuf[index]) return; + c = cons_outbuf[index]; + + spin_lock_irqsave(&hp->c_lock, flags); while (count > 0 || i > 0) { if (count > 0 && i < sizeof(c)) { if (b[n] == '\n' && !donecr) { @@ -191,6 +187,7 @@ static void hvc_console_print(struct console *co, const char *b, } } } + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hp->c_lock, flags); hvc_console_flush(cons_ops[index], vtermnos[index]); } @@ -878,9 +875,19 @@ static void hvc_poll_put_char(struct tty_driver *driver, int line, char ch) struct tty_struct *tty = driver->ttys[0]; struct hvc_struct *hp = tty->driver_data; int n; + unsigned long flags; + char *c; + + if (!hp || !cons_outbuf[hp->index]) + return; + + c = cons_outbuf[hp->index]; do { - n = hp->ops->put_chars(hp->vtermno, &ch, 1); + spin_lock_irqsave(&hp->c_lock, flags); + c[0] = ch; + n = hp->ops->put_chars(hp->vtermno, c, 1); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hp->c_lock, flags); } while (n <= 0); } #endif @@ -922,8 +929,7 @@ struct hvc_struct *hvc_alloc(uint32_t vtermno, int data, return ERR_PTR(err); } - hp = kzalloc(ALIGN(sizeof(*hp), sizeof(long)) + outbuf_size, - GFP_KERNEL); + hp = kzalloc(struct_size(hp, outbuf, outbuf_size), GFP_KERNEL); if (!hp) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); @@ -931,13 +937,13 @@ struct hvc_struct *hvc_alloc(uint32_t vtermno, int data, hp->data = data; hp->ops = ops; hp->outbuf_size = outbuf_size; - hp->outbuf = &((char *)hp)[ALIGN(sizeof(*hp), sizeof(long))]; tty_port_init(&hp->port); hp->port.ops = &hvc_port_ops; INIT_WORK(&hp->tty_resize, hvc_set_winsz); spin_lock_init(&hp->lock); + spin_lock_init(&hp->c_lock); mutex_lock(&hvc_structs_mutex); /* @@ -964,6 +970,7 @@ struct hvc_struct *hvc_alloc(uint32_t vtermno, int data, if (i < MAX_NR_HVC_CONSOLES) { cons_ops[i] = ops; vtermnos[i] = vtermno; + cons_outbuf[i] = hp->c; } list_add_tail(&(hp->next), &hvc_structs); @@ -988,6 +995,7 @@ int hvc_remove(struct hvc_struct *hp) if (hp->index < MAX_NR_HVC_CONSOLES) { vtermnos[hp->index] = -1; cons_ops[hp->index] = NULL; + cons_outbuf[hp->index] = NULL; } /* Don't whack hp->irq because tty_hangup() will need to free the irq. */ diff --git a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.h b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.h index 18d005814..52374e2da 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.h +++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.h @@ -32,13 +32,21 @@ */ #define HVC_ALLOC_TTY_ADAPTERS 8 +/* + * These sizes are most efficient for vio, because they are the + * native transfer size. We could make them selectable in the + * future to better deal with backends that want other buffer sizes. + */ +#define N_OUTBUF 16 +#define N_INBUF 16 + +#define __ALIGNED__ __attribute__((__aligned__(L1_CACHE_BYTES))) + struct hvc_struct { struct tty_port port; spinlock_t lock; int index; int do_wakeup; - char *outbuf; - int outbuf_size; int n_outbuf; uint32_t vtermno; const struct hv_ops *ops; @@ -48,6 +56,10 @@ struct hvc_struct { struct work_struct tty_resize; struct list_head next; unsigned long flags; + spinlock_t c_lock; + char c[N_OUTBUF] __ALIGNED__; + int outbuf_size; + char outbuf[0] __ALIGNED__; }; /* implemented by a low level driver */ From patchwork Thu Aug 12 09:45:32 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Xianting Tian X-Patchwork-Id: 1516231 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Glhg250Svz9s5R for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 19:47:10 +1000 (AEST) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Glhg23mznz3cR8 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 19:47:10 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com (client-ip=115.124.30.56; helo=out30-56.freemail.mail.aliyun.com; envelope-from=xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com; receiver=) Received: from out30-56.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-56.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.56]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Glhf422J6z3bnf for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 19:46:19 +1000 (AEST) X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS; BC=-1|-1; BR=01201311R411e4; CH=green; DM=||false|; DS=||; FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1; HT=alimailimapcm10staff010182156082; MF=xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com; NM=1; PH=DS; RN=9; SR=0; TI=SMTPD_---0Uimacum_1628761535; Received: from localhost(mailfrom:xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0Uimacum_1628761535) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Thu, 12 Aug 2021 17:45:35 +0800 From: Xianting Tian To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jirislaby@kernel.org, amit@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, osandov@fb.com Subject: [PATCH v6 2/2] virtio-console: remove unnecessary kmemdup() Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 17:45:32 +0800 Message-Id: <20210812094532.145497-3-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20210812094532.145497-1-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com> References: <20210812094532.145497-1-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Xianting Tian , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" hvc framework will never pass stack memory to the put_chars() function, So the calling of kmemdup() is unnecessary, we can remove it. This revert commit c4baad5029 ("virtio-console: avoid DMA from stack") Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian --- drivers/char/virtio_console.c | 12 ++---------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c index 7eaf303a7..4ed3ffb1d 100644 --- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c +++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c @@ -1117,8 +1117,6 @@ static int put_chars(u32 vtermno, const char *buf, int count) { struct port *port; struct scatterlist sg[1]; - void *data; - int ret; if (unlikely(early_put_chars)) return early_put_chars(vtermno, buf, count); @@ -1127,14 +1125,8 @@ static int put_chars(u32 vtermno, const char *buf, int count) if (!port) return -EPIPE; - data = kmemdup(buf, count, GFP_ATOMIC); - if (!data) - return -ENOMEM; - - sg_init_one(sg, data, count); - ret = __send_to_port(port, sg, 1, count, data, false); - kfree(data); - return ret; + sg_init_one(sg, buf, count); + return __send_to_port(port, sg, 1, count, (void *)buf, false); } /*