From patchwork Fri Feb 28 13:03:19 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo X-Patchwork-Id: 1246488 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ubuntu.com (client-ip=91.189.94.19; helo=huckleberry.canonical.com; envelope-from=kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=canonical.com Received: from huckleberry.canonical.com (huckleberry.canonical.com [91.189.94.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48TV924hjgz9sRt; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 00:03:48 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=huckleberry.canonical.com) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j7fIr-0005NO-FC; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 13:03:41 +0000 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j7fIp-0005N9-2z for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 13:03:39 +0000 Received: from 1.general.cascardo.us.vpn ([10.172.70.58] helo=localhost.localdomain) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j7fIo-0007Yz-Dd for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 13:03:38 +0000 From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo To: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: [Focal] mm: Avoid creating virtual address aliases in brk()/mmap()/mremap() Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 10:03:19 -0300 Message-Id: <20200228130319.716884-1-cascardo@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Kernel team discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com Sender: "kernel-team" From: Catalin Marinas CVE-2020-9391 Currently the arm64 kernel ignores the top address byte passed to brk(), mmap() and mremap(). When the user is not aware of the 56-bit address limit or relies on the kernel to return an error, untagging such pointers has the potential to create address aliases in user-space. Passing a tagged address to munmap(), madvise() is permitted since the tagged pointer is expected to be inside an existing mapping. The current behaviour breaks the existing glibc malloc() implementation which relies on brk() with an address beyond 56-bit to be rejected by the kernel. Remove untagging in the above functions by partially reverting commit ce18d171cb73 ("mm: untag user pointers in mmap/munmap/mremap/brk"). In addition, update the arm64 tagged-address-abi.rst document accordingly. Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1797052 Fixes: ce18d171cb73 ("mm: untag user pointers in mmap/munmap/mremap/brk") Cc: # 5.4.x- Cc: Florian Weimer Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton Reported-by: Victor Stinner Acked-by: Will Deacon Acked-by: Andrey Konovalov Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas Signed-off-by: Will Deacon (cherry picked from commit dcde237319e626d1ec3c9d8b7613032f0fd4663a) Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo --- This has been built-tested on arm64. --- Documentation/arm64/tagged-address-abi.rst | 11 +++++++++-- mm/mmap.c | 4 ---- mm/mremap.c | 1 - 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/tagged-address-abi.rst b/Documentation/arm64/tagged-address-abi.rst index d4a85d535bf9..4a9d9c794ee5 100644 --- a/Documentation/arm64/tagged-address-abi.rst +++ b/Documentation/arm64/tagged-address-abi.rst @@ -44,8 +44,15 @@ The AArch64 Tagged Address ABI has two stages of relaxation depending how the user addresses are used by the kernel: 1. User addresses not accessed by the kernel but used for address space - management (e.g. ``mmap()``, ``mprotect()``, ``madvise()``). The use - of valid tagged pointers in this context is always allowed. + management (e.g. ``mprotect()``, ``madvise()``). The use of valid + tagged pointers in this context is allowed with the exception of + ``brk()``, ``mmap()`` and the ``new_address`` argument to + ``mremap()`` as these have the potential to alias with existing + user addresses. + + NOTE: This behaviour changed in v5.6 and so some earlier kernels may + incorrectly accept valid tagged pointers for the ``brk()``, + ``mmap()`` and ``mremap()`` system calls. 2. User addresses accessed by the kernel (e.g. ``write()``). This ABI relaxation is disabled by default and the application thread needs to diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c index e697082d36e4..68aed9b1a7f5 100644 --- a/mm/mmap.c +++ b/mm/mmap.c @@ -195,8 +195,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(brk, unsigned long, brk) bool downgraded = false; LIST_HEAD(uf); - brk = untagged_addr(brk); - if (down_write_killable(&mm->mmap_sem)) return -EINTR; @@ -1583,8 +1581,6 @@ unsigned long ksys_mmap_pgoff(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len, struct file *file = NULL; unsigned long retval; - addr = untagged_addr(addr); - if (!(flags & MAP_ANONYMOUS)) { audit_mmap_fd(fd, flags); file = fget(fd); diff --git a/mm/mremap.c b/mm/mremap.c index 1fc8a29fbe3f..1d98281f7204 100644 --- a/mm/mremap.c +++ b/mm/mremap.c @@ -607,7 +607,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(mremap, unsigned long, addr, unsigned long, old_len, LIST_HEAD(uf_unmap); addr = untagged_addr(addr); - new_addr = untagged_addr(new_addr); if (flags & ~(MREMAP_FIXED | MREMAP_MAYMOVE)) return ret;