diff mbox series

[I/Unstable/OEM-5.13,01/10] platform/x86: amd-pmc: Fix command completion code

Message ID 20210726131509.280913-2-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com
State New
Headers show
Series [I/Unstable/OEM-5.13,01/10] platform/x86: amd-pmc: Fix command completion code | expand

Commit Message

Kai-Heng Feng July 26, 2021, 1:15 p.m. UTC
From: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934809

The protocol to submit a job request to SMU is to wait for
AMD_PMC_REGISTER_RESPONSE to return 1,meaning SMU is ready to take
requests. PMC driver has to make sure that the response code is always
AMD_PMC_RESULT_OK before making any command submissions.

When we submit a message to SMU, we have to wait until it processes
the request. Adding a read_poll_timeout() check as this was missing in
the existing code.

Also, add a mutex to protect amd_pmc_send_cmd() calls to SMU.

Fixes: 156ec4731cb2 ("platform/x86: amd-pmc: Add AMD platform support for S2Idle")
Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
Acked-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210629084803.248498-2-Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 95e1b60f8dc8f225b14619e9aca9bdd7d99167db linux-next)
Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c
index b9da58ee9b1e3..1b5f149932c1c 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@  struct amd_pmc_dev {
 	u32 base_addr;
 	u32 cpu_id;
 	struct device *dev;
+	struct mutex lock; /* generic mutex lock */
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
 	struct dentry *dbgfs_dir;
 #endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_FS */
@@ -138,9 +139,10 @@  static int amd_pmc_send_cmd(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev, bool set)
 	u8 msg;
 	u32 val;
 
+	mutex_lock(&dev->lock);
 	/* Wait until we get a valid response */
 	rc = readx_poll_timeout(ioread32, dev->regbase + AMD_PMC_REGISTER_RESPONSE,
-				val, val > 0, PMC_MSG_DELAY_MIN_US,
+				val, val != 0, PMC_MSG_DELAY_MIN_US,
 				PMC_MSG_DELAY_MIN_US * RESPONSE_REGISTER_LOOP_MAX);
 	if (rc) {
 		dev_err(dev->dev, "failed to talk to SMU\n");
@@ -156,7 +158,37 @@  static int amd_pmc_send_cmd(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev, bool set)
 	/* Write message ID to message ID register */
 	msg = (dev->cpu_id == AMD_CPU_ID_RN) ? MSG_OS_HINT_RN : MSG_OS_HINT_PCO;
 	amd_pmc_reg_write(dev, AMD_PMC_REGISTER_MESSAGE, msg);
-	return 0;
+	/* Wait until we get a valid response */
+	rc = readx_poll_timeout(ioread32, dev->regbase + AMD_PMC_REGISTER_RESPONSE,
+				val, val != 0, PMC_MSG_DELAY_MIN_US,
+				PMC_MSG_DELAY_MIN_US * RESPONSE_REGISTER_LOOP_MAX);
+	if (rc) {
+		dev_err(dev->dev, "SMU response timed out\n");
+		goto out_unlock;
+	}
+
+	switch (val) {
+	case AMD_PMC_RESULT_OK:
+		break;
+	case AMD_PMC_RESULT_CMD_REJECT_BUSY:
+		dev_err(dev->dev, "SMU not ready. err: 0x%x\n", val);
+		rc = -EBUSY;
+		goto out_unlock;
+	case AMD_PMC_RESULT_CMD_UNKNOWN:
+		dev_err(dev->dev, "SMU cmd unknown. err: 0x%x\n", val);
+		rc = -EINVAL;
+		goto out_unlock;
+	case AMD_PMC_RESULT_CMD_REJECT_PREREQ:
+	case AMD_PMC_RESULT_FAILED:
+	default:
+		dev_err(dev->dev, "SMU cmd failed. err: 0x%x\n", val);
+		rc = -EIO;
+		goto out_unlock;
+	}
+
+out_unlock:
+	mutex_unlock(&dev->lock);
+	return rc;
 }
 
 static int __maybe_unused amd_pmc_suspend(struct device *dev)
@@ -259,6 +291,7 @@  static int amd_pmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	amd_pmc_dump_registers(dev);
 
+	mutex_init(&dev->lock);
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dev);
 	amd_pmc_dbgfs_register(dev);
 	return 0;
@@ -269,6 +302,7 @@  static int amd_pmc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct amd_pmc_dev *dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
 
 	amd_pmc_dbgfs_unregister(dev);
+	mutex_destroy(&dev->lock);
 	return 0;
 }