From patchwork Tue Jun 22 17:23:48 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kai-Heng Feng X-Patchwork-Id: 1495815 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ubuntu.com (client-ip=91.189.94.19; helo=huckleberry.canonical.com; envelope-from=kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com; receiver=) Received: from huckleberry.canonical.com (huckleberry.canonical.com [91.189.94.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4G8YDq0bKwz9sWH; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 03:24:59 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=huckleberry.canonical.com) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lvk8t-0007uD-On; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 17:24:55 +0000 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lvk8q-0007s0-Hc for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 17:24:52 +0000 Received: from 1.general.khfeng.us.vpn ([10.172.68.174] helo=localhost) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1lvk8p-0002m5-KG for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 17:24:52 +0000 From: Kai-Heng Feng To: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: [OEM-5.10/OEM-5.13] [PATCH 13/17] ACPI: PM: s2idle: Use correct revision id Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 01:23:48 +0800 Message-Id: <20210622172352.3975782-15-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20210622172352.3975782-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> References: <20210622172352.3975782-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Kernel team discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com Sender: "kernel-team" From: Pratik Vishwakarma BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932577 AMD spec mentions only revision 0. With this change, device constraint list is populated properly. Signed-off-by: Pratik Vishwakarma Tested-by: Julian Sikorski Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki (cherry picked from commit 904d4a6c074b9d69b673c7cd7d66f55cfa7610ea linux-next) Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng --- drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c b/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c index 2d7ddb8a8cb6..da27c1c45c9f 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static void lpi_device_get_constraints_amd(void) int i, j, k; out_obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(lps0_device_handle, &lps0_dsm_guid, - 1, ACPI_LPS0_GET_DEVICE_CONSTRAINTS, + rev_id, ACPI_LPS0_GET_DEVICE_CONSTRAINTS, NULL, ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE); if (!out_obj)