From patchwork Tue Jun 22 17:16:23 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kai-Heng Feng X-Patchwork-Id: 1495798 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ubuntu.com (client-ip=91.189.94.19; helo=huckleberry.canonical.com; envelope-from=kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com; receiver=) Received: from huckleberry.canonical.com (huckleberry.canonical.com [91.189.94.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4G8Y3G4Tvqz9sVp; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 03:16:42 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=huckleberry.canonical.com) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lvk0s-0004xf-Eg; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 17:16:38 +0000 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lvk0q-0004x0-GH for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 17:16:36 +0000 Received: from 1.general.khfeng.us.vpn ([10.172.68.174] helo=localhost) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1lvk0p-0002BF-GT for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 17:16:36 +0000 From: Kai-Heng Feng To: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: [PATCH 2/2] x86, sched: Fix the AMD CPPC maximum performance value on certain AMD Ryzen generations Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 01:16:23 +0800 Message-Id: <20210622171623.3939815-3-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20210622171623.3939815-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> References: <20210622171623.3939815-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Kernel team discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com Sender: "kernel-team" From: Huang Rui BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928482 Some AMD Ryzen generations has different calculation method on maximum performance. 255 is not for all ASICs, some specific generations should use 166 as the maximum performance. Otherwise, it will report incorrect frequency value like below: ~ → lscpu | grep MHz CPU MHz: 3400.000 CPU max MHz: 7228.3198 CPU min MHz: 2200.0000 [ mingo: Tidied up whitespace use. ] [ Alexander Monakov : fix 225 -> 255 typo. ] Fixes: 41ea667227ba ("x86, sched: Calculate frequency invariance for AMD systems") Fixes: 3c55e94c0ade ("cpufreq: ACPI: Extend frequency tables to cover boost frequencies") Reported-by: Jason Bagavatsingham Fixed-by: Alexander Monakov Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Huang Rui Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Tested-by: Jason Bagavatsingham Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210425073451.2557394-1-ray.huang@amd.com Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211791 Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar (cherry picked from commit 3743d55b289c203d8f77b7cd47c24926b9d186ae) Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng --- arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 2 ++ arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 2 +- drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 6 +++++- 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h index 50d02db72317..019978fb8fa8 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h @@ -806,9 +806,11 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(u64, msr_misc_features_shadow); #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD extern u16 amd_get_nb_id(int cpu); extern u32 amd_get_nodes_per_socket(void); +extern u32 amd_get_highest_perf(void); #else static inline u16 amd_get_nb_id(int cpu) { return 0; } static inline u32 amd_get_nodes_per_socket(void) { return 0; } +static inline u32 amd_get_highest_perf(void) { return 0; } #endif static inline uint32_t hypervisor_cpuid_base(const char *sig, uint32_t leaves) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c index a2551b10780c..ee8271cfffa1 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c @@ -1197,3 +1197,19 @@ void set_dr_addr_mask(unsigned long mask, int dr) break; } } + +u32 amd_get_highest_perf(void) +{ + struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &boot_cpu_data; + + if (c->x86 == 0x17 && ((c->x86_model >= 0x30 && c->x86_model < 0x40) || + (c->x86_model >= 0x70 && c->x86_model < 0x80))) + return 166; + + if (c->x86 == 0x19 && ((c->x86_model >= 0x20 && c->x86_model < 0x30) || + (c->x86_model >= 0x40 && c->x86_model < 0x70))) + return 166; + + return 255; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(amd_get_highest_perf); diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c index dc7534d01f72..78c5c9293c9f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c @@ -2046,7 +2046,7 @@ static bool amd_set_max_freq_ratio(void) return false; } - highest_perf = perf_caps.highest_perf; + highest_perf = amd_get_highest_perf(); nominal_perf = perf_caps.nominal_perf; if (!highest_perf || !nominal_perf) { diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c index d1bbc16fba4b..7e7450453714 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c @@ -646,7 +646,11 @@ static u64 get_max_boost_ratio(unsigned int cpu) return 0; } - highest_perf = perf_caps.highest_perf; + if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD) + highest_perf = amd_get_highest_perf(); + else + highest_perf = perf_caps.highest_perf; + nominal_perf = perf_caps.nominal_perf; if (!highest_perf || !nominal_perf) {