| Message ID | 1448476958-30630-2-git-send-email-apw@canonical.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
If you apply this to Xenial, then should you add s390 ?
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:21:15PM -0700, Tim Gardner wrote:
> If you apply this to Xenial, then should you add s390 ?
I believe not as that is a single arch platform so I do not expect to
need it. But we will evaluate that when we enable s390x with builders.
This patch is already applied in Xenial as is.
-apw
Forgot/blanked we already had ppc64el in T... Seems so way in the past...
diff --git a/debian/tests/control b/debian/tests/control index 49f60ee..c24efa1 100644 --- a/debian/tests/control +++ b/debian/tests/control @@ -3,5 +3,5 @@ Depends: @builddeps@, fakeroot Restrictions: allow-stderr Tests: ubuntu-regression-suite -Depends: build-essential, gcc-multilib, gdb, git, bzr +Depends: build-essential, gcc-multilib [amd64 arm64 armhf i386 powerpc], gdb, git, bzr Restrictions: allow-stderr, isolation-machine, breaks-testbed
We have a hard dependency on gcc-multilib which is not available on ppc64el. Drop this dependancy by making it arch conditional. BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1515541 Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com> --- debian/tests/control | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)