From patchwork Fri Feb 7 11:21:59 2014 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Luis Henriques X-Patchwork-Id: 317679 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from huckleberry.canonical.com (huckleberry.canonical.com [91.189.94.19]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0F32C007E for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 22:23:58 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=huckleberry.canonical.com) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WBjXG-0002ix-7f; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 11:23:54 +0000 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WBjWu-0002ci-0d for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 11:23:32 +0000 Received: from bl6-52-134.dsl.telepac.pt ([82.155.52.134] helo=localhost) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBjWt-0004Xc-Na; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 11:23:31 +0000 From: Luis Henriques To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: [PATCH 3.5 02/88] writeback: Fix data corruption on NFS Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 11:21:59 +0000 Message-Id: <1391772205-22239-3-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.2 In-Reply-To: <1391772205-22239-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> References: <1391772205-22239-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> X-Extended-Stable: 3.5 Cc: Jan Kara X-BeenThere: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Kernel team discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com Sender: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com 3.5.7.30 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Jan Kara commit f9b0e058cbd04ada76b13afffa7e1df830543c24 upstream. Commit 4f8ad655dbc8 "writeback: Refactor writeback_single_inode()" added a condition to skip clean inode. However this is wrong in WB_SYNC_ALL mode because there we also want to wait for outstanding writeback on possibly clean inode. This was causing occasional data corruption issues on NFS because it uses sync_inode() to make sure all outstanding writes are flushed to the server before truncating the inode and with sync_inode() returning prematurely file was sometimes extended back by an outstanding write after it was truncated. So modify the test to also check for pages under writeback in WB_SYNC_ALL mode. Fixes: 4f8ad655dbc82cf05d2edc11e66b78a42d38bf93 Reported-and-tested-by: Dan Duval Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques --- fs/fs-writeback.c | 15 +++++++++------ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c index bf7e15d..554aeb7 100644 --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c @@ -523,13 +523,16 @@ writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb, } WARN_ON(inode->i_state & I_SYNC); /* - * Skip inode if it is clean. We don't want to mess with writeback - * lists in this function since flusher thread may be doing for example - * sync in parallel and if we move the inode, it could get skipped. So - * here we make sure inode is on some writeback list and leave it there - * unless we have completely cleaned the inode. + * Skip inode if it is clean and we have no outstanding writeback in + * WB_SYNC_ALL mode. We don't want to mess with writeback lists in this + * function since flusher thread may be doing for example sync in + * parallel and if we move the inode, it could get skipped. So here we + * make sure inode is on some writeback list and leave it there unless + * we have completely cleaned the inode. */ - if (!(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY)) + if (!(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) && + (wbc->sync_mode != WB_SYNC_ALL || + !mapping_tagged(inode->i_mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_WRITEBACK))) goto out; inode->i_state |= I_SYNC; spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);