From patchwork Tue May 7 13:38:42 2013 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Luis Henriques X-Patchwork-Id: 242263 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from huckleberry.canonical.com (huckleberry.canonical.com [91.189.94.19]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63CB62C0155 for ; Tue, 7 May 2013 23:44:09 +1000 (EST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=huckleberry.canonical.com) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UZiBX-0004iw-7l; Tue, 07 May 2013 13:44:03 +0000 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UZi9N-0003Jk-6q for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Tue, 07 May 2013 13:41:49 +0000 Received: from bl16-161-151.dsl.telepac.pt ([188.81.161.151] helo=localhost) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZi9L-0000T2-De; Tue, 07 May 2013 13:41:47 +0000 From: Luis Henriques To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: [PATCH 076/118] NFSv4: Handle NFS4ERR_DELAY and NFS4ERR_GRACE in nfs4_open_delegation_recall Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 14:38:42 +0100 Message-Id: <1367933964-1564-77-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.1.2 In-Reply-To: <1367933964-1564-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> References: <1367933964-1564-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> X-Extended-Stable: 3.5 Cc: Trond Myklebust X-BeenThere: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Kernel team discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com Sender: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com 3.5.7.12 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Trond Myklebust commit 8b6cc4d6f841d31f72fe7478453759166d366274 upstream. A server shouldn't normally return NFS4ERR_GRACE if the client holds a delegation, since no conflicting lock reclaims can be granted, however the spec does not require the server to grant the open in this instance Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust [ luis: adjust context ] Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques --- fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c index b96aa12..480918e 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c @@ -1381,6 +1381,12 @@ int nfs4_open_delegation_recall(struct nfs_open_context *ctx, struct nfs4_state case -ENOMEM: err = 0; goto out; + case -NFS4ERR_DELAY: + case -NFS4ERR_GRACE: + set_bit(NFS_DELEGATED_STATE, &state->flags); + ssleep(1); + err = -EAGAIN; + goto out; } err = nfs4_handle_exception(server, err, &exception); } while (exception.retry);