From patchwork Wed Jul 8 16:27:34 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Seth Forshee X-Patchwork-Id: 1325311 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ubuntu.com (client-ip=91.189.94.19; helo=huckleberry.canonical.com; envelope-from=kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=canonical.com Received: from huckleberry.canonical.com (huckleberry.canonical.com [91.189.94.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B24Tq1sp0z9sRf; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 02:27:43 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=huckleberry.canonical.com) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jtCv5-0000og-Vh; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 16:27:39 +0000 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]) by huckleberry.canonical.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jtCv3-0000nD-Tq for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 16:27:37 +0000 Received: from mail-il1-f198.google.com ([209.85.166.198]) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jtCv3-0003jZ-IR for kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 16:27:37 +0000 Received: by mail-il1-f198.google.com with SMTP id r4so33292373ilq.20 for ; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 09:27:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rQakKngZTK6UQZ2BpLKsNidkhQhV1NX/7nB5JiFcE7Y=; b=OXeAN5oBQLORRYHhFzLQpv/VRIpnZKaaTlIXZv4dXT95rNHXkVC0B0EPWftyoilInj Q0XIdL8N9GRq2nblNK2GDi3nb3fZTBNVKElYgeoFjECKC4c09f65r7iQzo4idLwKB5bm 0p8ThPwnTlRfurGrGNLzdGvYQzSt8cPxdpXNhflkyYF5XjnYxVX1BcRSUFIWkK+o8iml TUzEN+r7P7VGavTqJTGzraAEEU5WAQR4Dyq0h6h6YrJaDNUIYB4b+SxjliS5vYZcdu4c FEZiYOkdCVZ9UA45oHVWmfy1xkPIGU21EuiC5VoX86DSD4fVNuJCOJvJbxIRL+IxOlKe 8qaA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Er0B6GnSquOPyqr24UToLCt4adyD+rAvB0yMeU6Us6ftTLJaJ MhWDaSPApAs/QJ69oQXxOdLADDpoS8RrYq+75sp4iwPlHlE+SQXgrn7aalOPXhkzGlXUC/HDZxu bmSRDLChLGEDtjc94fKAOxS0uHmbbz62Q5p/EnzR6QA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:24d5:: with SMTP id y21mr9690510jat.140.1594225656455; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 09:27:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzkpRv6+QRDBMJVDqye1vgoCdcuxFDa7yPuldyPnmMZ/1XFpIGNJpLXuG2WipGzRRsgGWFRbA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:24d5:: with SMTP id y21mr9690485jat.140.1594225656170; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 09:27:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2605:a601:ac0f:820:9006:d88b:402a:f90]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w82sm128518ili.42.2020.07.08.09.27.35 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 08 Jul 2020 09:27:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Seth Forshee To: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: [PATCH 0/1][linux-riscv][F] Build linux-libc-dev for riscv64 from main kernel package Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 11:27:34 -0500 Message-Id: <20200708162735.44886-1-seth.forshee@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Kernel team discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: kernel-team-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com Sender: "kernel-team" BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886188 SRU Justification Impact: Building linux-libc-dev for riscv64 from the linux-riscv package means that it can have a different version from the package on other architectures. This makes it uninstallable for cross building. Fix: Move the riscv64 linux-libc-dev build back to the main kernel package so that the version will match. Test Case: See bug description. Regression Potential: This could cause trouble if the main kernel package version is behind the linux-riscv package version, and may require artificially inflating the version of the linux package. Currently this is not necessary, but it needs to be kept in mind when preparing packages for upload with the fixes applied. Note that these changes should only be applied along with the corresponding changes for linux, sent separately. Thanks, Seth Acked-by: Stefan Bader Acked-by: Marcelo Henrique Cerri Acked-by: Marcelo Henrique Cerri --- Seth Forshee (1): UBUNTU: [Config] Move build of linux-libc-dev to primary kernel debian.riscv/rules.d/riscv64.mk | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)