diff mbox series

[v6,1/8] lib: rsa: distinguish between tpl and spl for CONFIG_RSA_VERIFY

Message ID 20200618142328.1753036-1-heiko@sntech.de
State Accepted
Commit 3075eb70c912f7f1569117da719023fb1caf6275
Delegated to: Tom Rini
Headers show
Series [v6,1/8] lib: rsa: distinguish between tpl and spl for CONFIG_RSA_VERIFY | expand

Commit Message

Heiko Stübner June 18, 2020, 2:23 p.m. UTC
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>

While the SPL may want to do signature checking this won't be
the case for TPL in all cases, as TPL is mostly used when the
amount of initial memory is not enough for a full SPL.

So on a system where SPL uses DM but TPL does not we currently
end up with a TPL compile error of:

    lib/rsa/rsa-verify.c:48:25: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ‘struct checksum_algo’

To prevent that change the $(SPL_) to $(SPL_TPL_) to distinguish
between both. If someone really needs FIT signature checking in
TPL as well, a new TPL_RSA_VERIFY config symbol needs to be added.

Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
---
changes in v5:
- drop change that belongs in patch 2/8
changes in v4:
- amound -> amount
- found another entry to handle
changes in v2:
- fix typo "distinguis(h)"

 lib/rsa/Makefile | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Simon Glass June 26, 2020, 1:12 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 08:23, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
>
> From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
>
> While the SPL may want to do signature checking this won't be
> the case for TPL in all cases, as TPL is mostly used when the
> amount of initial memory is not enough for a full SPL.
>
> So on a system where SPL uses DM but TPL does not we currently
> end up with a TPL compile error of:
>
>     lib/rsa/rsa-verify.c:48:25: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ‘struct checksum_algo’
>
> To prevent that change the $(SPL_) to $(SPL_TPL_) to distinguish
> between both. If someone really needs FIT signature checking in
> TPL as well, a new TPL_RSA_VERIFY config symbol needs to be added.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
> Reviewed-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
> ---
> changes in v5:
> - drop change that belongs in patch 2/8
> changes in v4:
> - amound -> amount
> - found another entry to handle
> changes in v2:
> - fix typo "distinguis(h)"
>
>  lib/rsa/Makefile | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>

Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Heiko Stübner June 30, 2020, 12:49 p.m. UTC | #2
Am Donnerstag, 18. Juni 2020, 16:23:21 CEST schrieb Heiko Stuebner:
> From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
> 
> While the SPL may want to do signature checking this won't be
> the case for TPL in all cases, as TPL is mostly used when the
> amount of initial memory is not enough for a full SPL.
> 
> So on a system where SPL uses DM but TPL does not we currently
> end up with a TPL compile error of:
> 
>     lib/rsa/rsa-verify.c:48:25: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ‘struct checksum_algo’
> 
> To prevent that change the $(SPL_) to $(SPL_TPL_) to distinguish
> between both. If someone really needs FIT signature checking in
> TPL as well, a new TPL_RSA_VERIFY config symbol needs to be added.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
> Reviewed-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>

with it looking like everybody is happy with the fixes series now,
whom do I need to pester into picking it up? :-D


Thanks
Heiko


> ---
> changes in v5:
> - drop change that belongs in patch 2/8
> changes in v4:
> - amound -> amount
> - found another entry to handle
> changes in v2:
> - fix typo "distinguis(h)"
> 
>  lib/rsa/Makefile | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/rsa/Makefile b/lib/rsa/Makefile
> index 14ed3cb401..c61ebfd79e 100644
> --- a/lib/rsa/Makefile
> +++ b/lib/rsa/Makefile
> @@ -5,6 +5,6 @@
>  # (C) Copyright 2000-2007
>  # Wolfgang Denk, DENX Software Engineering, wd@denx.de.
>  
> -obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_)RSA_VERIFY) += rsa-verify.o rsa-checksum.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_TPL_)RSA_VERIFY) += rsa-verify.o rsa-checksum.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_RSA_VERIFY_WITH_PKEY) += rsa-keyprop.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_RSA_SOFTWARE_EXP) += rsa-mod-exp.o
>
Heinrich Schuchardt June 30, 2020, 12:54 p.m. UTC | #3
On 6/30/20 2:49 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 18. Juni 2020, 16:23:21 CEST schrieb Heiko Stuebner:
>> From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
>>
>> While the SPL may want to do signature checking this won't be
>> the case for TPL in all cases, as TPL is mostly used when the
>> amount of initial memory is not enough for a full SPL.
>>
>> So on a system where SPL uses DM but TPL does not we currently
>> end up with a TPL compile error of:
>>
>>     lib/rsa/rsa-verify.c:48:25: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ‘struct checksum_algo’
>>
>> To prevent that change the $(SPL_) to $(SPL_TPL_) to distinguish
>> between both. If someone really needs FIT signature checking in
>> TPL as well, a new TPL_RSA_VERIFY config symbol needs to be added.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
>
> with it looking like everybody is happy with the fixes series now,
> whom do I need to pester into picking it up? :-D

No pestering needed :) The series is assigned to Tom:

https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=184291

Best regards

Heinrich

>
>
> Thanks
> Heiko
>
>
>> ---
>> changes in v5:
>> - drop change that belongs in patch 2/8
>> changes in v4:
>> - amound -> amount
>> - found another entry to handle
>> changes in v2:
>> - fix typo "distinguis(h)"
>>
>>  lib/rsa/Makefile | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/rsa/Makefile b/lib/rsa/Makefile
>> index 14ed3cb401..c61ebfd79e 100644
>> --- a/lib/rsa/Makefile
>> +++ b/lib/rsa/Makefile
>> @@ -5,6 +5,6 @@
>>  # (C) Copyright 2000-2007
>>  # Wolfgang Denk, DENX Software Engineering, wd@denx.de.
>>
>> -obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_)RSA_VERIFY) += rsa-verify.o rsa-checksum.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_TPL_)RSA_VERIFY) += rsa-verify.o rsa-checksum.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_RSA_VERIFY_WITH_PKEY) += rsa-keyprop.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_RSA_SOFTWARE_EXP) += rsa-mod-exp.o
>>
>
>
>
>
Tom Rini July 9, 2020, 12:23 a.m. UTC | #4
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 04:23:21PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:

> From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
> 
> While the SPL may want to do signature checking this won't be
> the case for TPL in all cases, as TPL is mostly used when the
> amount of initial memory is not enough for a full SPL.
> 
> So on a system where SPL uses DM but TPL does not we currently
> end up with a TPL compile error of:
> 
>     lib/rsa/rsa-verify.c:48:25: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ‘struct checksum_algo’
> 
> To prevent that change the $(SPL_) to $(SPL_TPL_) to distinguish
> between both. If someone really needs FIT signature checking in
> TPL as well, a new TPL_RSA_VERIFY config symbol needs to be added.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
> Reviewed-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/lib/rsa/Makefile b/lib/rsa/Makefile
index 14ed3cb401..c61ebfd79e 100644
--- a/lib/rsa/Makefile
+++ b/lib/rsa/Makefile
@@ -5,6 +5,6 @@ 
 # (C) Copyright 2000-2007
 # Wolfgang Denk, DENX Software Engineering, wd@denx.de.
 
-obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_)RSA_VERIFY) += rsa-verify.o rsa-checksum.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_TPL_)RSA_VERIFY) += rsa-verify.o rsa-checksum.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_RSA_VERIFY_WITH_PKEY) += rsa-keyprop.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_RSA_SOFTWARE_EXP) += rsa-mod-exp.o