Message ID | 1292629858-10233-8-git-send-email-galak@kernel.crashing.org |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | Kumar Gala |
Headers | show |
Thanks for the cleanup. What branch should this series be applied to? And are there prerequisites? I'm having issues applying them to test and review. On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 17:50 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: > Remove duplicated code in MPC8572 DS board and utliize the common > fsl_pcie_init_board(). Looks like a copy/paste from the MPC8572. On all the patches in the series s/utliize/utilize/. <snip> > --- a/board/xes/common/fsl_8xxx_pci.c > +++ b/board/xes/common/fsl_8xxx_pci.c > @@ -34,15 +34,6 @@ > #ifdef CONFIG_PCI1 > static struct pci_controller pci1_hose; > #endif Is there a reason PCI1 wasn't changed over too? I see pci1_hose is still referenced below, but other boards with a PCI1 don't use similar code. > -#ifdef CONFIG_PCIE1 > -static struct pci_controller pcie1_hose; > -#endif > -#ifdef CONFIG_PCIE2 > -static struct pci_controller pcie2_hose; > -#endif > -#ifdef CONFIG_PCIE3 > -static struct pci_controller pcie3_hose; > -#endif <snip> > diff --git a/board/xes/xpedite520x/law.c b/board/xes/xpedite520x/law.c > index bbfcb9d..3afb3ae 100644 > --- a/board/xes/xpedite520x/law.c > +++ b/board/xes/xpedite520x/law.c > @@ -38,10 +38,6 @@ struct law_entry law_table[] = { > /* LBC window - maps 256M 0xf0000000 -> 0xffffffff */ > SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_BASE2, LAW_SIZE_256M, LAW_TRGT_IF_LBC), > SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE, LAW_SIZE_1M, LAW_TRGT_IF_LBC), > -#if CONFIG_SYS_PCI1_MEM_PHYS > - SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCI1_MEM_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_1G, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCI_1), > - SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCI1_IO_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_8M, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCI_1), > -#endif > #if CONFIG_SYS_PCI2_MEM_PHYS > SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCI2_MEM_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_256M, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCI_2), > SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCI2_IO_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_8M, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCI_2), The PCI2 law can be removed too. Its not currently used on any boards supported by mainline U-Boot. Thanks, Peter
On Dec 20, 2010, at 10:49 AM, Peter Tyser wrote: > Thanks for the cleanup. What branch should this series be applied to? > And are there prerequisites? I'm having issues applying them to test > and review. > > On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 17:50 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: >> Remove duplicated code in MPC8572 DS board and utliize the common >> fsl_pcie_init_board(). > > Looks like a copy/paste from the MPC8572. > > On all the patches in the series s/utliize/utilize/. > > <snip> Will fix, oops ;) > >> --- a/board/xes/common/fsl_8xxx_pci.c >> +++ b/board/xes/common/fsl_8xxx_pci.c >> @@ -34,15 +34,6 @@ >> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI1 >> static struct pci_controller pci1_hose; >> #endif > > Is there a reason PCI1 wasn't changed over too? I see pci1_hose is > still referenced below, but other boards with a PCI1 don't use similar > code. I was trying to limit how much clean up I did so left this to just PCIe interfaces. Normal PCI and PCI-X is something I might get around to but one thing at a time > >> -#ifdef CONFIG_PCIE1 >> -static struct pci_controller pcie1_hose; >> -#endif >> -#ifdef CONFIG_PCIE2 >> -static struct pci_controller pcie2_hose; >> -#endif >> -#ifdef CONFIG_PCIE3 >> -static struct pci_controller pcie3_hose; >> -#endif > > <snip> > >> diff --git a/board/xes/xpedite520x/law.c b/board/xes/xpedite520x/law.c >> index bbfcb9d..3afb3ae 100644 >> --- a/board/xes/xpedite520x/law.c >> +++ b/board/xes/xpedite520x/law.c >> @@ -38,10 +38,6 @@ struct law_entry law_table[] = { >> /* LBC window - maps 256M 0xf0000000 -> 0xffffffff */ >> SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_BASE2, LAW_SIZE_256M, LAW_TRGT_IF_LBC), >> SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE, LAW_SIZE_1M, LAW_TRGT_IF_LBC), >> -#if CONFIG_SYS_PCI1_MEM_PHYS >> - SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCI1_MEM_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_1G, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCI_1), >> - SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCI1_IO_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_8M, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCI_1), >> -#endif >> #if CONFIG_SYS_PCI2_MEM_PHYS >> SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCI2_MEM_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_256M, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCI_2), >> SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCI2_IO_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_8M, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCI_2), > > The PCI2 law can be removed too. Its not currently used on any boards > supported by mainline U-Boot. Ok, will remove in updated patch - k
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 11:49 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: > On Dec 20, 2010, at 10:49 AM, Peter Tyser wrote: > > > Thanks for the cleanup. What branch should this series be applied to? > > And are there prerequisites? I'm having issues applying them to test > > and review. Any direction on how these should be applied for testing? <snip> > >> --- a/board/xes/common/fsl_8xxx_pci.c > >> +++ b/board/xes/common/fsl_8xxx_pci.c > >> @@ -34,15 +34,6 @@ > >> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI1 > >> static struct pci_controller pci1_hose; > >> #endif > > > > Is there a reason PCI1 wasn't changed over too? I see pci1_hose is > > still referenced below, but other boards with a PCI1 don't use similar > > code. > > I was trying to limit how much clean up I did so left this to just PCIe interfaces. Normal PCI and PCI-X is something I might get around to but one thing at a time Ah, OK. If we're removing the LAW entries for PCI1 in law.c below, how is a LAW being set for PCI1? It looks like PCIe laws are set in fsl_configure_pcie(), and PCI LAWs are set via set_next_law() in board-specific code? I'm not seeing the call to set_next_law() in X-ES board specific code after this change though. Best, Peter > > <snip> > > > >> diff --git a/board/xes/xpedite520x/law.c b/board/xes/xpedite520x/law.c > >> index bbfcb9d..3afb3ae 100644 > >> --- a/board/xes/xpedite520x/law.c > >> +++ b/board/xes/xpedite520x/law.c > >> @@ -38,10 +38,6 @@ struct law_entry law_table[] = { > >> /* LBC window - maps 256M 0xf0000000 -> 0xffffffff */ > >> SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_BASE2, LAW_SIZE_256M, LAW_TRGT_IF_LBC), > >> SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE, LAW_SIZE_1M, LAW_TRGT_IF_LBC), > >> -#if CONFIG_SYS_PCI1_MEM_PHYS > >> - SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCI1_MEM_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_1G, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCI_1), > >> - SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCI1_IO_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_8M, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCI_1), > >> -#endif > >> #if CONFIG_SYS_PCI2_MEM_PHYS > >> SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCI2_MEM_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_256M, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCI_2), > >> SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCI2_IO_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_8M, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCI_2),
On Dec 21, 2010, at 2:23 PM, Peter Tyser wrote: > On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 11:49 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: >> On Dec 20, 2010, at 10:49 AM, Peter Tyser wrote: >> >>> Thanks for the cleanup. What branch should this series be applied to? >>> And are there prerequisites? I'm having issues applying them to test >>> and review. > > Any direction on how these should be applied for testing? > > <snip> I've pushed a 'dev' branch on u-boot-85xx.git on denx.de with the current set of patches applied. - k
On Dec 21, 2010, at 2:23 PM, Peter Tyser wrote: > > Ah, OK. If we're removing the LAW entries for PCI1 in law.c below, how > is a LAW being set for PCI1? It looks like PCIe laws are set in > fsl_configure_pcie(), and PCI LAWs are set via set_next_law() in > board-specific code? I'm not seeing the call to set_next_law() in X-ES > board specific code after this change though. > > Best, > Peter Yep, that was missing, will fix ;) - k
diff --git a/board/xes/common/fsl_8xxx_pci.c b/board/xes/common/fsl_8xxx_pci.c index 4135849..202520d 100644 --- a/board/xes/common/fsl_8xxx_pci.c +++ b/board/xes/common/fsl_8xxx_pci.c @@ -34,15 +34,6 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_PCI1 static struct pci_controller pci1_hose; #endif -#ifdef CONFIG_PCIE1 -static struct pci_controller pcie1_hose; -#endif -#ifdef CONFIG_PCIE2 -static struct pci_controller pcie2_hose; -#endif -#ifdef CONFIG_PCIE3 -static struct pci_controller pcie3_hose; -#endif /* * 85xx and 86xx share naming conventions, but different layout. @@ -69,22 +60,13 @@ static struct pci_controller pcie3_hose; void pci_init_board(void) { - struct fsl_pci_info pci_info[3]; int first_free_busno = 0; - int num = 0; - int pcie_ep; - __maybe_unused int pcie_configured; -#if defined(CONFIG_MPC85xx) +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI1 + int pcie_ep; + struct fsl_pci_info pci_info; volatile ccsr_gur_t *gur = (void *)(CONFIG_SYS_MPC85xx_GUTS_ADDR); -#elif defined(CONFIG_MPC86xx) - immap_t *immap = (immap_t *)CONFIG_SYS_IMMR; - volatile ccsr_gur_t *gur = &immap->im_gur; -#endif u32 devdisr = in_be32(&gur->devdisr); - -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI1 - u32 pordevsr = in_be32(&gur->pordevsr); uint pci_spd_norm = in_be32(&gur->pordevsr) & MPC85xx_PORDEVSR_PCI1_SPD; uint pci_32 = in_be32(&gur->pordevsr) & MPC85xx_PORDEVSR_PCI1_PCI32; uint pci_arb = in_be32(&gur->pordevsr) & MPC85xx_PORDEVSR_PCI1_ARB; @@ -92,8 +74,8 @@ void pci_init_board(void) uint freq = CONFIG_SYS_CLK_FREQ / 1000 / 1000; if (!(devdisr & MPC85xx_DEVDISR_PCI1)) { - SET_STD_PCI_INFO(pci_info[num], 1); - pcie_ep = fsl_setup_hose(&pci1_hose, pci_info[num].regs); + SET_STD_PCI_INFO(pci_info, 1); + pcie_ep = fsl_setup_hose(&pci1_hose, pci_info.regs); printf("PCI1: %d bit %s, %s %d MHz, %s, %s\n", pci_32 ? 32 : 64, pcix ? "PCIX" : "PCI", @@ -102,66 +84,18 @@ void pci_init_board(void) pcie_ep ? "agent" : "host", pci_arb ? "arbiter" : "external-arbiter"); - first_free_busno = fsl_pci_init_port(&pci_info[num++], + first_free_busno = fsl_pci_init_port(&pci_info, &pci1_hose, first_free_busno); } else { printf("PCI1: disabled\n"); } #elif defined CONFIG_MPC8548 + volatile ccsr_gur_t *gur = (void *)(CONFIG_SYS_MPC85xx_GUTS_ADDR); /* PCI1 not present on MPC8572 */ setbits_be32(&gur->devdisr, MPC85xx_DEVDISR_PCI1); #endif -#ifdef CONFIG_PCIE1 - pcie_configured = is_serdes_configured(PCIE1); - - if (pcie_configured && !(devdisr & MPC8xxx_DEVDISR_PCIE1)) { - SET_STD_PCIE_INFO(pci_info[num], 1); - pcie_ep = fsl_setup_hose(&pcie1_hose, pci_info[num].regs); - printf("PCIE1: connected as %s\n", - pcie_ep ? "Endpoint" : "Root Complex"); - first_free_busno = fsl_pci_init_port(&pci_info[num++], - &pcie1_hose, first_free_busno); - } else { - printf("PCIE1: disabled\n"); - } -#else - setbits_be32(&gur->devdisr, MPC8xxx_DEVDISR_PCIE1); -#endif /* CONFIG_PCIE1 */ - -#ifdef CONFIG_PCIE2 - pcie_configured = is_serdes_configured(PCIE2); - - if (pcie_configured && !(devdisr & MPC8xxx_DEVDISR_PCIE2)) { - SET_STD_PCIE_INFO(pci_info[num], 2); - pcie_ep = fsl_setup_hose(&pcie2_hose, pci_info[num].regs); - printf("PCIE2: connected as %s\n", - pcie_ep ? "Endpoint" : "Root Complex"); - first_free_busno = fsl_pci_init_port(&pci_info[num++], - &pcie2_hose, first_free_busno); - } else { - printf("PCIE2: disabled\n"); - } -#else - setbits_be32(&gur->devdisr, MPC8xxx_DEVDISR_PCIE2); -#endif /* CONFIG_PCIE2 */ - -#ifdef CONFIG_PCIE3 - pcie_configured = is_serdes_configured(PCIE3); - - if (pcie_configured && !(devdisr & MPC8xxx_DEVDISR_PCIE3)) { - SET_STD_PCIE_INFO(pci_info[num], 3); - pcie_ep = fsl_setup_hose(&pcie3_hose, pci_info[num].regs); - printf("PCIE3: connected as %s\n", - pcie_ep ? "Endpoint" : "Root Complex"); - first_free_busno = fsl_pci_init_port(&pci_info[num++], - &pcie3_hose, first_free_busno); - } else { - printf("PCIE3: disabled\n"); - } -#else - setbits_be32(&gur->devdisr, MPC8xxx_DEVDISR_PCIE3); -#endif /* CONFIG_PCIE3 */ + fsl_pcie_init_board(first_free_busno); } #if defined(CONFIG_OF_BOARD_SETUP) diff --git a/board/xes/xpedite517x/law.c b/board/xes/xpedite517x/law.c index 0b7d9ef..df23df1 100644 --- a/board/xes/xpedite517x/law.c +++ b/board/xes/xpedite517x/law.c @@ -39,14 +39,6 @@ struct law_entry law_table[] = { /* NAND LAW covers 2 NAND flashes */ SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE, LAW_SIZE_512K, LAW_TRGT_IF_LBC), #endif -#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_PCIE1_MEM_PHYS - SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCIE1_MEM_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_1G, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCIE_1), - SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCIE1_IO_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_8M, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCIE_1), -#endif -#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_PCIE2_MEM_PHYS - SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCIE2_MEM_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_256M, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCIE_2), - SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCIE2_IO_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_8M, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCIE_2), -#endif }; int num_law_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(law_table); diff --git a/board/xes/xpedite520x/law.c b/board/xes/xpedite520x/law.c index bbfcb9d..3afb3ae 100644 --- a/board/xes/xpedite520x/law.c +++ b/board/xes/xpedite520x/law.c @@ -38,10 +38,6 @@ struct law_entry law_table[] = { /* LBC window - maps 256M 0xf0000000 -> 0xffffffff */ SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_BASE2, LAW_SIZE_256M, LAW_TRGT_IF_LBC), SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE, LAW_SIZE_1M, LAW_TRGT_IF_LBC), -#if CONFIG_SYS_PCI1_MEM_PHYS - SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCI1_MEM_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_1G, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCI_1), - SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCI1_IO_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_8M, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCI_1), -#endif #if CONFIG_SYS_PCI2_MEM_PHYS SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCI2_MEM_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_256M, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCI_2), SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCI2_IO_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_8M, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCI_2), diff --git a/board/xes/xpedite537x/law.c b/board/xes/xpedite537x/law.c index daee676..54c28da 100644 --- a/board/xes/xpedite537x/law.c +++ b/board/xes/xpedite537x/law.c @@ -37,18 +37,6 @@ struct law_entry law_table[] = { SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_BASE2, LAW_SIZE_256M, LAW_TRGT_IF_LBC), SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE, LAW_SIZE_1M, LAW_TRGT_IF_LBC), -#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_PCIE1_MEM_PHYS - SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCIE1_MEM_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_1G, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCIE_1), - SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCIE1_IO_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_8M, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCIE_1), -#endif -#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_PCIE2_MEM_PHYS - SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCIE2_MEM_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_256M, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCIE_2), - SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCIE2_IO_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_8M, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCIE_2), -#endif -#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_PCIE3_MEM_PHYS - SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCIE3_MEM_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_256M, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCIE_3), - SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCIE3_IO_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_8M, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCIE_3), -#endif }; int num_law_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(law_table); diff --git a/board/xes/xpedite550x/law.c b/board/xes/xpedite550x/law.c index 4d4445d..66f1cf9 100644 --- a/board/xes/xpedite550x/law.c +++ b/board/xes/xpedite550x/law.c @@ -37,18 +37,6 @@ struct law_entry law_table[] = { SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_BASE2, LAW_SIZE_256M, LAW_TRGT_IF_LBC), SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE, LAW_SIZE_1M, LAW_TRGT_IF_LBC), -#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_PCIE1_MEM_PHYS - SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCIE1_MEM_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_1G, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCIE_1), - SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCIE1_IO_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_8M, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCIE_1), -#endif -#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_PCIE2_MEM_PHYS - SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCIE2_MEM_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_256M, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCIE_2), - SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCIE2_IO_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_8M, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCIE_2), -#endif -#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_PCIE3_MEM_PHYS - SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCIE3_MEM_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_256M, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCIE_3), - SET_LAW(CONFIG_SYS_PCIE3_IO_PHYS, LAW_SIZE_8M, LAW_TRGT_IF_PCIE_3), -#endif }; int num_law_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(law_table);
Remove duplicated code in MPC8572 DS board and utliize the common fsl_pcie_init_board(). Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> CC: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com> --- board/xes/common/fsl_8xxx_pci.c | 82 ++++----------------------------------- board/xes/xpedite517x/law.c | 8 ---- board/xes/xpedite520x/law.c | 4 -- board/xes/xpedite537x/law.c | 12 ------ board/xes/xpedite550x/law.c | 12 ------ 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-)