diff mbox

[2.6.29-rc2] RTC: rtc-dm355evm driver

Message ID 200901171316.15712.david-b@pacbell.net
State Accepted, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

David Brownell Jan. 17, 2009, 9:16 p.m. UTC
From David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: RTC: rtc-dm355evm driver
    
Simple RTC driver for the MSP430 firmware on the DM355 EVM board.
Other than not supporting atomic reads/writes of all four bytes,
this is reasonable as a basic no-alarm RTC.

Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
---
 drivers/rtc/Kconfig        |    6 +
 drivers/rtc/Makefile       |    1 
 drivers/rtc/rtc-dm355evm.c |  175 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 182 insertions(+)


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Comments

Alessandro Zummo Jan. 18, 2009, 2:13 p.m. UTC | #1
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:16:15 -0800
David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> wrote:

> From David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: RTC: rtc-dm355evm driver
>     
> Simple RTC driver for the MSP430 firmware on the DM355 EVM board.
> Other than not supporting atomic reads/writes of all four bytes,
> this is reasonable as a basic no-alarm RTC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>

 Acked-by: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Andrew Morton Jan. 27, 2009, 2:47 a.m. UTC | #2
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:16:15 -0800 David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> wrote:

> >From David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: RTC: rtc-dm355evm driver
>     
> Simple RTC driver for the MSP430 firmware on the DM355 EVM board.
> Other than not supporting atomic reads/writes of all four bytes,
> this is reasonable as a basic no-alarm RTC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>

Are the attributions here correct, or did Kevin primarily write the driver?

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
David Brownell Jan. 27, 2009, 3:06 a.m. UTC | #3
On Monday 26 January 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:16:15 -0800 David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> wrote:
> 
> > >From David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
> > Subject: RTC: rtc-dm355evm driver
> >     
> > Simple RTC driver for the MSP430 firmware on the DM355 EVM board.
> > Other than not supporting atomic reads/writes of all four bytes,
> > this is reasonable as a basic no-alarm RTC.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
> 
> Are the attributions here correct, or did Kevin primarily write the driver?

Attributions are correct.  Kevin's signoff comes from merging
it into the DaVinci tree.

(FWIW, looks to me like a lot of DaVinci stuff will finally be
hitting mainline in 2.6.30 ... more chips and drivers, including
stuff like EDMA, maybe even some of the video bits.)


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
diff mbox

Patch

--- a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
@@ -241,6 +241,12 @@  config RTC_DRV_M41T80_WDT
 	  If you say Y here you will get support for the
 	  watchdog timer in the ST M41T60 and M41T80 RTC chips series.
 
+config RTC_DRV_DM355EVM
+	tristate "TI DaVinci DM355 EVM RTC"
+	depends on MFD_DM355EVM_MSP
+	help
+	  Supports the RTC firmware in the MSP430 on the DM355 EVM.
+
 config RTC_DRV_TWL92330
 	boolean "TI TWL92330/Menelaus"
 	depends on MENELAUS
--- a/drivers/rtc/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/rtc/Makefile
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@  obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_AT91SAM9)	+= rtc-at
 obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_AU1XXX)	+= rtc-au1xxx.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_BFIN)	+= rtc-bfin.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_CMOS)	+= rtc-cmos.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DM355EVM)	+= rtc-dm355evm.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1216)	+= rtc-ds1216.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1286)	+= rtc-ds1286.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1302)	+= rtc-ds1302.o
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-dm355evm.c
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@ 
+/*
+ * rtc-dm355evm.c - access battery-backed counter in MSP430 firmware
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2008 by David Brownell
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
+ * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
+ * 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
+ */
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/rtc.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+
+#include <linux/i2c/dm355evm_msp.h>
+
+
+/*
+ * The MSP430 firmware on the DM355 EVM uses a watch crystal to feed
+ * a 1 Hz counter.  When a backup battery is supplied, that makes a
+ * reasonable RTC for applications where alarms and non-NTP drift
+ * compensation aren't important.
+ *
+ * The only real glitch is the inability to read or write all four
+ * counter bytes atomically:  the count may increment in the middle
+ * of an operation, causing trouble when the LSB rolls over.
+ *
+ * This driver was tested with firmware revision A4.
+ */
+union evm_time {
+	u8	bytes[4];
+	u32	value;
+};
+
+static int dm355evm_rtc_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
+{
+	union evm_time	time;
+	int		status;
+	int		tries = 0;
+
+	do {
+		/*
+		 * Read LSB(0) to MSB(3) bytes.  Defend against the counter
+		 * rolling over by re-reading until the value is stable,
+		 * and assuming the four reads take at most a few seconds.
+		 */
+		status = dm355evm_msp_read(DM355EVM_MSP_RTC_0);
+		if (status < 0)
+			return status;
+		if (tries && time.bytes[0] == status)
+			break;
+		time.bytes[0] = status;
+
+		status = dm355evm_msp_read(DM355EVM_MSP_RTC_1);
+		if (status < 0)
+			return status;
+		if (tries && time.bytes[1] == status)
+			break;
+		time.bytes[1] = status;
+
+		status = dm355evm_msp_read(DM355EVM_MSP_RTC_2);
+		if (status < 0)
+			return status;
+		if (tries && time.bytes[2] == status)
+			break;
+		time.bytes[2] = status;
+
+		status = dm355evm_msp_read(DM355EVM_MSP_RTC_3);
+		if (status < 0)
+			return status;
+		if (tries && time.bytes[3] == status)
+			break;
+		time.bytes[3] = status;
+
+	} while (++tries < 5);
+
+	dev_dbg(dev, "read timestamp %08x\n", time.value);
+
+	rtc_time_to_tm(le32_to_cpu(time.value), tm);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int dm355evm_rtc_set_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
+{
+	union evm_time	time;
+	unsigned long	value;
+	int		status;
+
+	rtc_tm_to_time(tm, &value);
+	time.value = cpu_to_le32(value);
+
+	dev_dbg(dev, "write timestamp %08x\n", time.value);
+
+	/*
+	 * REVISIT handle non-atomic writes ... maybe just retry until
+	 * byte[1] sticks (no rollover)?
+	 */
+	status = dm355evm_msp_write(time.bytes[0], DM355EVM_MSP_RTC_0);
+	if (status < 0)
+		return status;
+
+	status = dm355evm_msp_write(time.bytes[1], DM355EVM_MSP_RTC_1);
+	if (status < 0)
+		return status;
+
+	status = dm355evm_msp_write(time.bytes[2], DM355EVM_MSP_RTC_2);
+	if (status < 0)
+		return status;
+
+	status = dm355evm_msp_write(time.bytes[3], DM355EVM_MSP_RTC_3);
+	if (status < 0)
+		return status;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static struct rtc_class_ops dm355evm_rtc_ops = {
+	.read_time	= dm355evm_rtc_read_time,
+	.set_time	= dm355evm_rtc_set_time,
+};
+
+/*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
+
+static int __devinit dm355evm_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct rtc_device *rtc;
+
+	rtc = rtc_device_register(pdev->name,
+				  &pdev->dev, &dm355evm_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
+	if (IS_ERR(rtc)) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't register RTC device, err %ld\n",
+			PTR_ERR(rtc));
+		return PTR_ERR(rtc);
+	}
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rtc);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int __devexit dm355evm_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct rtc_device *rtc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+	rtc_device_unregister(rtc);
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * I2C is used to talk to the MSP430, but this platform device is
+ * exposed by an MFD driver that manages I2C communications.
+ */
+static struct platform_driver rtc_dm355evm_driver = {
+	.probe		= dm355evm_rtc_probe,
+	.remove		= __devexit_p(dm355evm_rtc_remove),
+	.driver		= {
+		.owner	= THIS_MODULE,
+		.name	= "rtc-dm355evm",
+	},
+};
+
+static int __init dm355evm_rtc_init(void)
+{
+	return platform_driver_register(&rtc_dm355evm_driver);
+}
+module_init(dm355evm_rtc_init);
+
+static void __exit dm355evm_rtc_exit(void)
+{
+	platform_driver_unregister(&rtc_dm355evm_driver);
+}
+module_exit(dm355evm_rtc_exit);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");