From patchwork Mon Sep 19 17:56:14 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Leandro Lupori X-Patchwork-Id: 1679627 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-ppc-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MWXnp0V1Dz1yp7 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 04:12:12 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:48686 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oaLFY-0007Ek-Fq for incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 14:12:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36982) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oaL0f-0003gE-4A; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 13:56:45 -0400 Received: from [200.168.210.66] (port=43379 helo=outlook.eldorado.org.br) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oaL0b-00060T-48; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 13:56:43 -0400 Received: from p9ibm ([10.10.71.235]) by outlook.eldorado.org.br over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(8.5.9600.16384); Mon, 19 Sep 2022 14:56:33 -0300 Received: from eldorado.org.br (unknown [10.10.70.45]) by p9ibm (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CFB980030B; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 14:56:33 -0300 (-03) From: Leandro Lupori To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org Cc: npiggin@gmail.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org, Leandro Lupori Subject: [PATCH v3] tcg/ppc: Optimize 26-bit jumps Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 14:56:14 -0300 Message-Id: <20220919175614.32879-1-leandro.lupori@eldorado.org.br> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Sep 2022 17:56:33.0821 (UTC) FILETIME=[27B7E4D0:01D8CC51] X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 200.168.210.66 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=200.168.210.66; envelope-from=leandro.lupori@eldorado.org.br; helo=outlook.eldorado.org.br X-Spam_score_int: -10 X-Spam_score: -1.1 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-ppc-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-ppc" PowerPC64 processors handle direct branches better than indirect ones, resulting in less stalled cycles and branch misses. However, PPC's tb_target_set_jmp_target() was only using direct branches for 16-bit jumps, while PowerPC64's unconditional branch instructions are able to handle displacements of up to 26 bits. To take advantage of this, now jumps whose displacements fit in between 17 and 26 bits are also converted to direct branches. Signed-off-by: Leandro Lupori --- v3: - make goto tb code 16-byte aligned - code cleanup v2: use stq to replace all instructions atomically tcg/ppc/tcg-target.c.inc | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) diff --git a/tcg/ppc/tcg-target.c.inc b/tcg/ppc/tcg-target.c.inc index 1cbd047ab3..0cde11c3de 100644 --- a/tcg/ppc/tcg-target.c.inc +++ b/tcg/ppc/tcg-target.c.inc @@ -1847,44 +1847,87 @@ static void tcg_out_mb(TCGContext *s, TCGArg a0) tcg_out32(s, insn); } -void tb_target_set_jmp_target(uintptr_t tc_ptr, uintptr_t jmp_rx, - uintptr_t jmp_rw, uintptr_t addr) +static inline uint64_t make_pair(tcg_insn_unit i1, tcg_insn_unit i2) { - if (TCG_TARGET_REG_BITS == 64) { - tcg_insn_unit i1, i2; - intptr_t tb_diff = addr - tc_ptr; - intptr_t br_diff = addr - (jmp_rx + 4); - uint64_t pair; - - /* This does not exercise the range of the branch, but we do - still need to be able to load the new value of TCG_REG_TB. - But this does still happen quite often. */ - if (tb_diff == (int16_t)tb_diff) { - i1 = ADDI | TAI(TCG_REG_TB, TCG_REG_TB, tb_diff); - i2 = B | (br_diff & 0x3fffffc); - } else { - intptr_t lo = (int16_t)tb_diff; - intptr_t hi = (int32_t)(tb_diff - lo); - assert(tb_diff == hi + lo); - i1 = ADDIS | TAI(TCG_REG_TB, TCG_REG_TB, hi >> 16); - i2 = ADDI | TAI(TCG_REG_TB, TCG_REG_TB, lo); - } -#if HOST_BIG_ENDIAN - pair = (uint64_t)i1 << 32 | i2; + if (HOST_BIG_ENDIAN) { + return (uint64_t)i1 << 32 | i2; + } + return (uint64_t)i2 << 32 | i1; +} + +static inline void ppc64_replace2(uintptr_t rx, uintptr_t rw, + tcg_insn_unit i0, tcg_insn_unit i1) +{ +#if TCG_TARGET_REG_BITS == 64 + qatomic_set((uint64_t *)rw, make_pair(i0, i1)); + flush_idcache_range(rx, rw, 8); #else - pair = (uint64_t)i2 << 32 | i1; + qemu_build_not_reached(); #endif +} - /* As per the enclosing if, this is ppc64. Avoid the _Static_assert - within qatomic_set that would fail to build a ppc32 host. */ - qatomic_set__nocheck((uint64_t *)jmp_rw, pair); - flush_idcache_range(jmp_rx, jmp_rw, 8); - } else { +static inline void ppc64_replace4(uintptr_t rx, uintptr_t rw, + tcg_insn_unit i0, tcg_insn_unit i1, tcg_insn_unit i2, tcg_insn_unit i3) +{ + uint64_t p[2]; + + p[!HOST_BIG_ENDIAN] = make_pair(i0, i1); + p[HOST_BIG_ENDIAN] = make_pair(i2, i3); + + asm("mr %%r6, %1\n\t" + "mr %%r7, %2\n\t" + "stq %%r6, %0" + : "=Q"(*(__int128 *)rw) : "r"(p[0]), "r"(p[1]) : "r6", "r7"); + flush_idcache_range(rx, rw, 16); +} + +void tb_target_set_jmp_target(uintptr_t tc_ptr, uintptr_t jmp_rx, + uintptr_t jmp_rw, uintptr_t addr) +{ + tcg_insn_unit i0, i1, i2, i3; + intptr_t tb_diff = addr - tc_ptr; + intptr_t br_diff = addr - (jmp_rx + 4); + intptr_t lo, hi; + + if (TCG_TARGET_REG_BITS == 32) { intptr_t diff = addr - jmp_rx; tcg_debug_assert(in_range_b(diff)); qatomic_set((uint32_t *)jmp_rw, B | (diff & 0x3fffffc)); flush_idcache_range(jmp_rx, jmp_rw, 4); + return; + } + + /* + * This does not exercise the range of the branch, but we do + * still need to be able to load the new value of TCG_REG_TB. + * But this does still happen quite often. + */ + if (tb_diff == (int16_t)tb_diff) { + i0 = ADDI | TAI(TCG_REG_TB, TCG_REG_TB, tb_diff); + i1 = B | (br_diff & 0x3fffffc); + ppc64_replace2(jmp_rx, jmp_rw, i0, i1); + return; + } + + lo = (int16_t)tb_diff; + hi = (int32_t)(tb_diff - lo); + assert(tb_diff == hi + lo); + i0 = ADDIS | TAI(TCG_REG_TB, TCG_REG_TB, hi >> 16); + i1 = ADDI | TAI(TCG_REG_TB, TCG_REG_TB, lo); + if (!have_isa_2_07) { + ppc64_replace2(jmp_rx, jmp_rw, i0, i1); + return; + } + + br_diff -= 4; + if (in_range_b(br_diff)) { + i2 = B | (br_diff & 0x3fffffc); + i3 = NOP; + } else { + i2 = MTSPR | RS(TCG_REG_TB) | CTR; + i3 = BCCTR | BO_ALWAYS; } + ppc64_replace4(jmp_rx, jmp_rw, i0, i1, i2, i3); } static void tcg_out_call_int(TCGContext *s, int lk, @@ -2574,8 +2617,8 @@ static void tcg_out_op(TCGContext *s, TCGOpcode opc, if (s->tb_jmp_insn_offset) { /* Direct jump. */ if (TCG_TARGET_REG_BITS == 64) { - /* Ensure the next insns are 8-byte aligned. */ - if ((uintptr_t)s->code_ptr & 7) { + /* Ensure the next insns are 16-byte aligned. */ + while ((uintptr_t)s->code_ptr & 15) { tcg_out32(s, NOP); } s->tb_jmp_insn_offset[args[0]] = tcg_current_code_size(s);