diff mbox series

migration/multifd: Fix clearing of mapped-ram zero pages

Message ID 20240321201242.6009-1-farosas@suse.de
State New
Headers show
Series migration/multifd: Fix clearing of mapped-ram zero pages | expand

Commit Message

Fabiano Rosas March 21, 2024, 8:12 p.m. UTC
When the zero page detection is done in the multifd threads, we need
to iterate the second part of the pages->offset array and clear the
file bitmap for each zero page. The piece of code we merged to do that
is wrong.

The reason this has passed all the tests is because the bitmap is
initialized with zeroes already, so clearing the bits only really has
an effect during live migration and when a data page goes from having
data to no data.

Fixes: 303e6f54f9 ("migration/multifd: Implement zero page transmission on the multifd thread.")
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
---
CI run: https://gitlab.com/farosas/qemu/-/pipelines/1222882269
---
 migration/multifd.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Peter Xu March 21, 2024, 8:39 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 05:12:42PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> When the zero page detection is done in the multifd threads, we need
> to iterate the second part of the pages->offset array and clear the
> file bitmap for each zero page. The piece of code we merged to do that
> is wrong.
> 
> The reason this has passed all the tests is because the bitmap is
> initialized with zeroes already, so clearing the bits only really has
> an effect during live migration and when a data page goes from having
> data to no data.
> 
> Fixes: 303e6f54f9 ("migration/multifd: Implement zero page transmission on the multifd thread.")
> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
> ---
> CI run: https://gitlab.com/farosas/qemu/-/pipelines/1222882269
> ---
>  migration/multifd.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/migration/multifd.c b/migration/multifd.c
> index d2f0238f70..2802afe79d 100644
> --- a/migration/multifd.c
> +++ b/migration/multifd.c
> @@ -111,7 +111,6 @@ void multifd_send_channel_created(void)
>  static void multifd_set_file_bitmap(MultiFDSendParams *p)
>  {
>      MultiFDPages_t *pages = p->pages;
> -    uint32_t zero_num = p->pages->num - p->pages->normal_num;
>  
>      assert(pages->block);
>  
> @@ -119,7 +118,7 @@ static void multifd_set_file_bitmap(MultiFDSendParams *p)
>          ramblock_set_file_bmap_atomic(pages->block, pages->offset[i], true);
>      }
>  
> -    for (int i = p->pages->num; i < zero_num; i++) {
> +    for (int i = p->pages->normal_num; i < p->pages->num; i++) {
>          ramblock_set_file_bmap_atomic(pages->block, pages->offset[i], false);
>      }
>  }

Hmm, a challenging one even if it reads obvious.. :)

queued for 9.0-rc1, thanks.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/migration/multifd.c b/migration/multifd.c
index d2f0238f70..2802afe79d 100644
--- a/migration/multifd.c
+++ b/migration/multifd.c
@@ -111,7 +111,6 @@  void multifd_send_channel_created(void)
 static void multifd_set_file_bitmap(MultiFDSendParams *p)
 {
     MultiFDPages_t *pages = p->pages;
-    uint32_t zero_num = p->pages->num - p->pages->normal_num;
 
     assert(pages->block);
 
@@ -119,7 +118,7 @@  static void multifd_set_file_bitmap(MultiFDSendParams *p)
         ramblock_set_file_bmap_atomic(pages->block, pages->offset[i], true);
     }
 
-    for (int i = p->pages->num; i < zero_num; i++) {
+    for (int i = p->pages->normal_num; i < p->pages->num; i++) {
         ramblock_set_file_bmap_atomic(pages->block, pages->offset[i], false);
     }
 }