| Message ID | 20230315001117.337128-2-iii@linux.ibm.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Fix EXECUTE of relative long instructions | expand |
On 15.03.23 01:11, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > The code uses the wrong base for relative addressing: it should use the > target instruction address and not the EXECUTE's address. > > Fix by storing the target instruction address in the new CPUS390XState > member and loading it from the code generated by gen_ri2(). > > Reported-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> > --- Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
On 3/14/23 17:11, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > The code uses the wrong base for relative addressing: it should use the > target instruction address and not the EXECUTE's address. > > Fix by storing the target instruction address in the new CPUS390XState > member and loading it from the code generated by gen_ri2(). > > Reported-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch<nsg@linux.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich<iii@linux.ibm.com> > --- > target/s390x/cpu.h | 1 + > target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c | 1 + > target/s390x/tcg/translate.c | 13 ++++++++++++- > 3 files chang Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> r~
diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h index 7d6d01325b2..8aaf8dd5a3b 100644 --- a/target/s390x/cpu.h +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ struct CPUArchState { uint64_t cc_vr; uint64_t ex_value; + uint64_t ex_target; uint64_t __excp_addr; uint64_t psa; diff --git a/target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c b/target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c index 6835c26dda4..00afae2b640 100644 --- a/target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c +++ b/target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c @@ -2530,6 +2530,7 @@ void HELPER(ex)(CPUS390XState *env, uint32_t ilen, uint64_t r1, uint64_t addr) that ex_value is non-zero, which flags that we are in a state that requires such execution. */ env->ex_value = insn | ilen; + env->ex_target = addr; } uint32_t HELPER(mvcos)(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t dest, uint64_t src, diff --git a/target/s390x/tcg/translate.c b/target/s390x/tcg/translate.c index 14c3896d529..e938d8538f8 100644 --- a/target/s390x/tcg/translate.c +++ b/target/s390x/tcg/translate.c @@ -5747,7 +5747,18 @@ static void in2_a2(DisasContext *s, DisasOps *o) static TCGv gen_ri2(DisasContext *s) { - return tcg_constant_i64(s->base.pc_next + (int64_t)get_field(s, i2) * 2); + int64_t delta = (int64_t)get_field(s, i2) * 2; + TCGv ri2; + + if (unlikely(s->ex_value)) { + ri2 = tcg_temp_new_i64(); + tcg_gen_ld_i64(ri2, cpu_env, offsetof(CPUS390XState, ex_target)); + tcg_gen_addi_i64(ri2, ri2, delta); + } else { + ri2 = tcg_constant_i64(s->base.pc_next + delta); + } + + return ri2; } static void in2_ri2(DisasContext *s, DisasOps *o)
The code uses the wrong base for relative addressing: it should use the target instruction address and not the EXECUTE's address. Fix by storing the target instruction address in the new CPUS390XState member and loading it from the code generated by gen_ri2(). Reported-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> --- target/s390x/cpu.h | 1 + target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c | 1 + target/s390x/tcg/translate.c | 13 ++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)