diff mbox series

docs/devel/reset.rst: Correct function names

Message ID 20221125140645.56490-1-akihiko.odaki@daynix.com
State New
Headers show
Series docs/devel/reset.rst: Correct function names | expand

Commit Message

Akihiko Odaki Nov. 25, 2022, 2:06 p.m. UTC
resettable_class_set_parent_phases() was mistakenly called
resettable_class_set_parent_reset_phases() in some places.

Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
---
 docs/devel/reset.rst | 17 ++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Comments

Philippe Mathieu-Daudé Nov. 25, 2022, 2:09 p.m. UTC | #1
On 25/11/22 15:06, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> resettable_class_set_parent_phases() was mistakenly called
> resettable_class_set_parent_reset_phases() in some places.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
> ---
>   docs/devel/reset.rst | 17 ++++++++---------
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Peter Maydell Nov. 25, 2022, 2:12 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 at 14:06, Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> wrote:
>
> resettable_class_set_parent_phases() was mistakenly called
> resettable_class_set_parent_reset_phases() in some places.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
> ---
>  docs/devel/reset.rst | 17 ++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Good catch; I think we renamed the function at some point
during code review of the resettable functionality, but
missed a few instances in the docs.

Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

thanks
-- PMM
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé Nov. 30, 2022, 10:24 a.m. UTC | #3
On 25/11/22 15:06, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> resettable_class_set_parent_phases() was mistakenly called
> resettable_class_set_parent_reset_phases() in some places.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
> ---
>   docs/devel/reset.rst | 17 ++++++++---------
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Akihiko Odaki Sept. 21, 2023, 7:33 a.m. UTC | #4
On 2022/11/25 23:06, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> resettable_class_set_parent_phases() was mistakenly called
> resettable_class_set_parent_reset_phases() in some places.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
> ---
>   docs/devel/reset.rst | 17 ++++++++---------
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/docs/devel/reset.rst b/docs/devel/reset.rst
> index 7cc6a6b314..38ed1790f7 100644
> --- a/docs/devel/reset.rst
> +++ b/docs/devel/reset.rst
> @@ -184,21 +184,20 @@ in reset.
>       {
>           MyDevClass *myclass = MYDEV_CLASS(class);
>           ResettableClass *rc = RESETTABLE_CLASS(class);
> -        resettable_class_set_parent_reset_phases(rc,
> -                                                 mydev_reset_enter,
> -                                                 mydev_reset_hold,
> -                                                 mydev_reset_exit,
> -                                                 &myclass->parent_phases);
> +        resettable_class_set_parent_phases(rc,
> +                                           mydev_reset_enter,
> +                                           mydev_reset_hold,
> +                                           mydev_reset_exit,
> +                                           &myclass->parent_phases);
>       }
>   
>   In the above example, we override all three phases. It is possible to override
>   only some of them by passing NULL instead of a function pointer to
> -``resettable_class_set_parent_reset_phases()``. For example, the following will
> +``resettable_class_set_parent_phases()``. For example, the following will
>   only override the *enter* phase and leave *hold* and *exit* untouched::
>   
> -    resettable_class_set_parent_reset_phases(rc, mydev_reset_enter,
> -                                             NULL, NULL,
> -                                             &myclass->parent_phases);
> +    resettable_class_set_parent_phases(rc, mydev_reset_enter, NULL, NULL,
> +                                       &myclass->parent_phases);
>   
>   This is equivalent to providing a trivial implementation of the hold and exit
>   phases which does nothing but call the parent class's implementation of the

Hi,

This patch seems to have been forgotten. Can anyone pull this?

Regards,
Akihiko Odaki
Michael Tokarev Sept. 21, 2023, 7:42 a.m. UTC | #5
21.09.2023 10:33, Akihiko Odaki:
..
> This patch seems to have been forgotten. Can anyone pull this?

Applied to my trivial-patches tree now.  Thank you!

/mjt
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/docs/devel/reset.rst b/docs/devel/reset.rst
index 7cc6a6b314..38ed1790f7 100644
--- a/docs/devel/reset.rst
+++ b/docs/devel/reset.rst
@@ -184,21 +184,20 @@  in reset.
     {
         MyDevClass *myclass = MYDEV_CLASS(class);
         ResettableClass *rc = RESETTABLE_CLASS(class);
-        resettable_class_set_parent_reset_phases(rc,
-                                                 mydev_reset_enter,
-                                                 mydev_reset_hold,
-                                                 mydev_reset_exit,
-                                                 &myclass->parent_phases);
+        resettable_class_set_parent_phases(rc,
+                                           mydev_reset_enter,
+                                           mydev_reset_hold,
+                                           mydev_reset_exit,
+                                           &myclass->parent_phases);
     }
 
 In the above example, we override all three phases. It is possible to override
 only some of them by passing NULL instead of a function pointer to
-``resettable_class_set_parent_reset_phases()``. For example, the following will
+``resettable_class_set_parent_phases()``. For example, the following will
 only override the *enter* phase and leave *hold* and *exit* untouched::
 
-    resettable_class_set_parent_reset_phases(rc, mydev_reset_enter,
-                                             NULL, NULL,
-                                             &myclass->parent_phases);
+    resettable_class_set_parent_phases(rc, mydev_reset_enter, NULL, NULL,
+                                       &myclass->parent_phases);
 
 This is equivalent to providing a trivial implementation of the hold and exit
 phases which does nothing but call the parent class's implementation of the