From patchwork Thu Feb 18 23:24:14 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Eduardo Habkost X-Patchwork-Id: 1441930 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Sa7tomMW; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DhW8b1mzFz9sBJ for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 10:27:43 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:48522 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCshx-0004xL-5a for incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 18:27:41 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59512) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCsf1-0002Ld-Pf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 18:24:41 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:59322) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCsez-00018d-AU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 18:24:39 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1613690675; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=WzcHn8IFaowWlLeeV2bO7vmuWqeQBs9RLapoyJ6fIdA=; b=Sa7tomMW6Bo5Qaw8MO9QqULXZShSPuNQXP5l1Y4hT2LtwW/+sHorRSA+ePmbr7fPE8prp8 KCnkhpfnq+OGpmmxxGX2FcXCgd3T5wBPsJQooWJS9E6A6l25IhIAZrAP43qZgWkGU16gu7 emZyaniy3mTKmhYjnp3JKFFbF7mNXFY= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-369-Ay60_yvJPKuUSXMB9Pp0Ag-1; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 18:24:19 -0500 X-MC-Unique: Ay60_yvJPKuUSXMB9Pp0Ag-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37B441005501; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 23:24:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-3-246.rdu2.redhat.com [10.22.3.246]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4FFC60BE5; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 23:24:17 +0000 (UTC) From: Eduardo Habkost To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell Subject: [PULL 2/3] device-crash-test: Remove problematic language Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 18:24:14 -0500 Message-Id: <20210218232415.1001078-3-ehabkost@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20210218232415.1001078-1-ehabkost@redhat.com> References: <20210218232415.1001078-1-ehabkost@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=ehabkost@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=ehabkost@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Thomas Huth , Eduardo Habkost , Richard Henderson , Paolo Bonzini , Igor Mammedov , John Snow Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Replace "whitelist" in the device-crash-test script with "rule list". I'm using "rule list" instead of "allow list" or "pass list" because the list is not used only for expected/allowed errors. It also contain rules specifying which errors shouldn't be ignored and/or should be fatal. Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost Reviewed-by: John Snow Acked-by: Thomas Huth Message-Id: <20210202191207.4103973-1-ehabkost@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost --- scripts/device-crash-test | 96 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/device-crash-test b/scripts/device-crash-test index 04118669ba7..ef1412ca590 100755 --- a/scripts/device-crash-test +++ b/scripts/device-crash-test @@ -41,18 +41,18 @@ logger = logging.getLogger('device-crash-test') dbg = logger.debug -# Purposes of the following whitelist: +# Purposes of the following rule list: # * Avoiding verbose log messages when we find known non-fatal # (exitcode=1) errors # * Avoiding fatal errors when we find known crashes # * Skipping machines/devices that are known not to work out of # the box, when running in --quick mode # -# Keeping the whitelist updated is desirable, but not required, +# Keeping the rule list updated is desirable, but not required, # because unexpected cases where QEMU exits with exitcode=1 will # just trigger a INFO message. -# Valid whitelist entry keys: +# Valid error rule keys: # * accel: regexp, full match only # * machine: regexp, full match only # * device: regexp, full match only @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ dbg = logger.debug # * expected: if True, QEMU is expected to always fail every time # when testing the corresponding test case # * loglevel: log level of log output when there's a match. -ERROR_WHITELIST = [ +ERROR_RULE_LIST = [ # Machines that won't work out of the box: # MACHINE | ERROR MESSAGE {'machine':'niagara', 'expected':True}, # Unable to load a firmware for -M niagara @@ -186,65 +186,65 @@ ERROR_WHITELIST = [ ] -def whitelistTestCaseMatch(wl, t): - """Check if a test case specification can match a whitelist entry +def errorRuleTestCaseMatch(rule, t): + """Check if a test case specification can match a error rule - This only checks if a whitelist entry is a candidate match + This only checks if a error rule is a candidate match for a given test case, it won't check if the test case - results/output match the entry. See whitelistResultMatch(). + results/output match the rule. See ruleListResultMatch(). """ - return (('machine' not in wl or + return (('machine' not in rule or 'machine' not in t or - re.match(wl['machine'] + '$', t['machine'])) and - ('accel' not in wl or + re.match(rule['machine'] + '$', t['machine'])) and + ('accel' not in rule or 'accel' not in t or - re.match(wl['accel'] + '$', t['accel'])) and - ('device' not in wl or + re.match(rule['accel'] + '$', t['accel'])) and + ('device' not in rule or 'device' not in t or - re.match(wl['device'] + '$', t['device']))) + re.match(rule['device'] + '$', t['device']))) -def whitelistCandidates(t): +def ruleListCandidates(t): """Generate the list of candidates that can match a test case""" - for i, wl in enumerate(ERROR_WHITELIST): - if whitelistTestCaseMatch(wl, t): - yield (i, wl) + for i, rule in enumerate(ERROR_RULE_LIST): + if errorRuleTestCaseMatch(rule, t): + yield (i, rule) def findExpectedResult(t): - """Check if there's an expected=True whitelist entry for a test case + """Check if there's an expected=True error rule for a test case - Returns (i, wl) tuple, where i is the index in - ERROR_WHITELIST and wl is the whitelist entry itself. + Returns (i, rule) tuple, where i is the index in + ERROR_RULE_LIST and rule is the error rule itself. """ - for i, wl in whitelistCandidates(t): - if wl.get('expected'): - return (i, wl) + for i, rule in ruleListCandidates(t): + if rule.get('expected'): + return (i, rule) -def whitelistResultMatch(wl, r): - """Check if test case results/output match a whitelist entry +def ruleListResultMatch(rule, r): + """Check if test case results/output match a error rule It is valid to call this function only if - whitelistTestCaseMatch() is True for the entry (e.g. on - entries returned by whitelistCandidates()) + errorRuleTestCaseMatch() is True for the rule (e.g. on + rules returned by ruleListCandidates()) """ - assert whitelistTestCaseMatch(wl, r['testcase']) - return ((wl.get('exitcode', 1) is None or - r['exitcode'] == wl.get('exitcode', 1)) and - ('log' not in wl or - re.search(wl['log'], r['log'], re.MULTILINE))) + assert errorRuleTestCaseMatch(rule, r['testcase']) + return ((rule.get('exitcode', 1) is None or + r['exitcode'] == rule.get('exitcode', 1)) and + ('log' not in rule or + re.search(rule['log'], r['log'], re.MULTILINE))) -def checkResultWhitelist(r): - """Look up whitelist entry for a given test case result +def checkResultRuleList(r): + """Look up error rule for a given test case result - Returns (i, wl) tuple, where i is the index in - ERROR_WHITELIST and wl is the whitelist entry itself. + Returns (i, rule) tuple, where i is the index in + ERROR_RULE_LIST and rule is the error rule itself. """ - for i, wl in whitelistCandidates(r['testcase']): - if whitelistResultMatch(wl, r): - return i, wl + for i, rule in ruleListCandidates(r['testcase']): + if ruleListResultMatch(rule, r): + return i, rule raise Exception("this should never happen") @@ -543,12 +543,12 @@ def main(): break if f: - i, wl = checkResultWhitelist(f) - dbg("testcase: %r, whitelist match: %r", t, wl) + i, rule = checkResultRuleList(f) + dbg("testcase: %r, rule list match: %r", t, rule) wl_stats.setdefault(i, []).append(f) - level = wl.get('loglevel', logging.DEBUG) + level = rule.get('loglevel', logging.DEBUG) logFailure(f, level) - if wl.get('fatal') or (args.strict and level >= logging.WARN): + if rule.get('fatal') or (args.strict and level >= logging.WARN): fatal_failures.append(f) else: dbg("success: %s", formatTestCase(t)) @@ -560,10 +560,10 @@ def main(): logger.info("Skipped %d test cases", skipped) if args.debug: - stats = sorted([(len(wl_stats.get(i, [])), wl) for i, wl in - enumerate(ERROR_WHITELIST)], key=lambda x: x[0]) - for count, wl in stats: - dbg("whitelist entry stats: %d: %r", count, wl) + stats = sorted([(len(wl_stats.get(i, [])), rule) for i, rule in + enumerate(ERROR_RULE_LIST)], key=lambda x: x[0]) + for count, rule in stats: + dbg("error rule stats: %d: %r", count, rule) if fatal_failures: for f in fatal_failures: