| Message ID | 20201020105938.23209-1-thuth@redhat.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | hw/arm/highbank: Silence warnings about missing fallthrough statements | expand |
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 at 11:59, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote: > > When compiling with -Werror=implicit-fallthrough, gcc complains about > missing fallthrough annotations in this file. Looking at the code, > the fallthrough is very likely intended here, so add some comments > to silence the compiler warnings. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> > --- > hw/arm/highbank.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) Applied to target-arm.next, thanks. -- PMM
diff --git a/hw/arm/highbank.c b/hw/arm/highbank.c index da0510d7ce..f71087860d 100644 --- a/hw/arm/highbank.c +++ b/hw/arm/highbank.c @@ -92,10 +92,12 @@ static void hb_reset_secondary(ARMCPU *cpu, const struct arm_boot_info *info) address_space_stl_notdirty(&address_space_memory, SMP_BOOT_REG + 0x30, 0, MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, NULL); + /* fallthrough */ case 3: address_space_stl_notdirty(&address_space_memory, SMP_BOOT_REG + 0x20, 0, MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, NULL); + /* fallthrough */ case 2: address_space_stl_notdirty(&address_space_memory, SMP_BOOT_REG + 0x10, 0,
When compiling with -Werror=implicit-fallthrough, gcc complains about missing fallthrough annotations in this file. Looking at the code, the fallthrough is very likely intended here, so add some comments to silence the compiler warnings. Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> --- hw/arm/highbank.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)