From patchwork Tue Nov 5 20:52:37 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Michael Roth X-Patchwork-Id: 1189997 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4772s866B1z9sNT for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 08:30:52 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:50358 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iS6Pa-0006A3-2o for incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 16:30:50 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59401) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iS5qZ-0002iK-Vm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 15:54:41 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iS5qY-0003A6-E6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 15:54:39 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:47290 helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iS5qY-00039d-9I; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 15:54:38 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xA5Ksbeu009168; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 15:54:37 -0500 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2w3dex64qy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Nov 2019 15:54:37 -0500 Received: from m0098419.ppops.net (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xA5Ksal3009125; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 15:54:36 -0500 Received: from ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com (ba.79.3fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.63.121.186]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2w3dex64q4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Nov 2019 15:54:36 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xA5KnuW3017656; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 20:53:15 GMT Received: from b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.23]) by ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2w11e7h8uf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Nov 2019 20:53:15 +0000 Received: from b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.107]) by b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id xA5KrFO551053052 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 5 Nov 2019 20:53:15 GMT Received: from b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A12124060; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 20:53:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2118124058; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 20:53:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (unknown [9.53.179.218]) by b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 20:53:14 +0000 (GMT) From: Michael Roth To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: [PATCH 49/55] COLO-compare: Fix incorrect `if` logic Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 14:52:37 -0600 Message-Id: <20191105205243.3766-50-mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20191105205243.3766-1-mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20191105205243.3766-1-mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-11-05_07:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=38 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=985 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1911050170 X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com id xA5Ksbeu009168 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 148.163.158.5 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Jason Wang , Fan Yang , qemu-stable@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" From: Fan Yang 'colo_mark_tcp_pkt' should return 'true' when packets are the same, and 'false' otherwise. However, it returns 'true' when 'colo_compare_packet_payload' returns non-zero while 'colo_compare_packet_payload' is just a 'memcmp'. The result is that COLO-compare reports inconsistent TCP packets when they are actually the same. Fixes: f449c9e549c ("colo: compare the packet based on the tcp sequence number") Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé Signed-off-by: Fan Yang Signed-off-by: Jason Wang (cherry picked from commit 1e907a32b77e5d418538453df5945242e43224fa) Signed-off-by: Michael Roth --- net/colo-compare.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c index 7489840bde..7ee17f2cf8 100644 --- a/net/colo-compare.c +++ b/net/colo-compare.c @@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ static bool colo_mark_tcp_pkt(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt, *mark = 0; if (ppkt->tcp_seq == spkt->tcp_seq && ppkt->seq_end == spkt->seq_end) { - if (colo_compare_packet_payload(ppkt, spkt, + if (!colo_compare_packet_payload(ppkt, spkt, ppkt->header_size, spkt->header_size, ppkt->payload_size)) { *mark = COLO_COMPARE_FREE_SECONDARY | COLO_COMPARE_FREE_PRIMARY; @@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ static bool colo_mark_tcp_pkt(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt, /* one part of secondary packet payload still need to be compared */ if (!after(ppkt->seq_end, spkt->seq_end)) { - if (colo_compare_packet_payload(ppkt, spkt, + if (!colo_compare_packet_payload(ppkt, spkt, ppkt->header_size + ppkt->offset, spkt->header_size + spkt->offset, ppkt->payload_size - ppkt->offset)) { @@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ static bool colo_mark_tcp_pkt(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt, /* primary packet is longer than secondary packet, compare * the same part and mark the primary packet offset */ - if (colo_compare_packet_payload(ppkt, spkt, + if (!colo_compare_packet_payload(ppkt, spkt, ppkt->header_size + ppkt->offset, spkt->header_size + spkt->offset, spkt->payload_size - spkt->offset)) {