| Message ID | 1634324580-27120-8-git-send-email-eric.devolder@oracle.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | acpi: Error Record Serialization Table, ERST, support for QEMU | expand |
On Fri, 15 Oct 2021, Eric DeVolder wrote: > This change exposes ACPI ERST support for x86 guests. > > Signed-off-by: Eric DeVolder <eric.devolder@oracle.com> > --- > hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 9 +++++++++ > hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c | 9 +++++++++ > include/hw/acpi/erst.h | 5 +++++ > 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c > index 81418b7..9c2f9d9 100644 > --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c > +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c > @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ > #include "sysemu/tpm.h" > #include "hw/acpi/tpm.h" > #include "hw/acpi/vmgenid.h" > +#include "hw/acpi/erst.h" > #include "sysemu/tpm_backend.h" > #include "hw/rtc/mc146818rtc_regs.h" > #include "migration/vmstate.h" > @@ -2499,6 +2500,7 @@ void acpi_build(AcpiBuildTables *tables, MachineState *machine) > GArray *tables_blob = tables->table_data; > AcpiSlicOem slic_oem = { .id = NULL, .table_id = NULL }; > Object *vmgenid_dev; > + Object *erst_dev; > char *oem_id; > char *oem_table_id; > > @@ -2560,6 +2562,13 @@ void acpi_build(AcpiBuildTables *tables, MachineState *machine) > ACPI_DEVICE_IF(x86ms->acpi_dev), x86ms->oem_id, > x86ms->oem_table_id); > > + erst_dev = find_erst_dev(); > + if (erst_dev) { > + acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob); > + build_erst(tables_blob, tables->linker, erst_dev, > + x86ms->oem_id, x86ms->oem_table_id); > + } > + This needs to be ifdef'd between CONFIG_ERST. > vmgenid_dev = find_vmgenid_dev(); > if (vmgenid_dev) { > acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob); > diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c b/hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c I do not think we need to include this for microvm machines. They are supposed to have minimal ACPUI support. So lets not bloat it unless there is a specific requirement to support ERST on microvms as well. > index 196d318..662c8ad 100644 > --- a/hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c > +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ > #include "hw/acpi/bios-linker-loader.h" > #include "hw/acpi/generic_event_device.h" > #include "hw/acpi/utils.h" > +#include "hw/acpi/erst.h" > #include "hw/i386/fw_cfg.h" > #include "hw/i386/microvm.h" > #include "hw/pci/pci.h" > @@ -158,6 +159,7 @@ static void acpi_build_microvm(AcpiBuildTables *tables, > X86MachineState *x86ms = X86_MACHINE(mms); > GArray *table_offsets; > GArray *tables_blob = tables->table_data; > + Object *erst_dev; > unsigned dsdt, xsdt; > AcpiFadtData pmfadt = { > /* ACPI 5.0: 4.1 Hardware-Reduced ACPI */ > @@ -207,6 +209,13 @@ static void acpi_build_microvm(AcpiBuildTables *tables, > ACPI_DEVICE_IF(x86ms->acpi_dev), x86ms->oem_id, > x86ms->oem_table_id); > > + erst_dev = find_erst_dev(); > + if (erst_dev) { > + acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob); > + build_erst(tables_blob, tables->linker, erst_dev, > + x86ms->oem_id, x86ms->oem_table_id); > + } > + > xsdt = tables_blob->len; > build_xsdt(tables_blob, tables->linker, table_offsets, x86ms->oem_id, > x86ms->oem_table_id); > diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/erst.h b/include/hw/acpi/erst.h > index 9d63717..b747fe7 100644 > --- a/include/hw/acpi/erst.h > +++ b/include/hw/acpi/erst.h > @@ -16,4 +16,9 @@ void build_erst(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, Object *erst_dev, > > #define TYPE_ACPI_ERST "acpi-erst" > > +/* returns NULL unless there is exactly one device */ > +static inline Object *find_erst_dev(void) > +{ > + return object_resolve_path_type("", TYPE_ACPI_ERST, NULL); > +} > #endif > -- > 1.8.3.1 > >
Ani, inline below. eric On 10/22/21 05:18, Ani Sinha wrote: > > > On Fri, 15 Oct 2021, Eric DeVolder wrote: > >> This change exposes ACPI ERST support for x86 guests. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric DeVolder <eric.devolder@oracle.com> >> --- >> hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 9 +++++++++ >> hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c | 9 +++++++++ >> include/hw/acpi/erst.h | 5 +++++ >> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c >> index 81418b7..9c2f9d9 100644 >> --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c >> +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c >> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ >> #include "sysemu/tpm.h" >> #include "hw/acpi/tpm.h" >> #include "hw/acpi/vmgenid.h" >> +#include "hw/acpi/erst.h" >> #include "sysemu/tpm_backend.h" >> #include "hw/rtc/mc146818rtc_regs.h" >> #include "migration/vmstate.h" >> @@ -2499,6 +2500,7 @@ void acpi_build(AcpiBuildTables *tables, MachineState *machine) >> GArray *tables_blob = tables->table_data; >> AcpiSlicOem slic_oem = { .id = NULL, .table_id = NULL }; >> Object *vmgenid_dev; >> + Object *erst_dev; >> char *oem_id; >> char *oem_table_id; >> >> @@ -2560,6 +2562,13 @@ void acpi_build(AcpiBuildTables *tables, MachineState *machine) >> ACPI_DEVICE_IF(x86ms->acpi_dev), x86ms->oem_id, >> x86ms->oem_table_id); >> >> + erst_dev = find_erst_dev(); >> + if (erst_dev) { >> + acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob); >> + build_erst(tables_blob, tables->linker, erst_dev, >> + x86ms->oem_id, x86ms->oem_table_id); >> + } >> + > > This needs to be ifdef'd between CONFIG_ERST. ok > > >> vmgenid_dev = find_vmgenid_dev(); >> if (vmgenid_dev) { >> acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob); >> diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c b/hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c > > I do not think we need to include this for microvm machines. They are > supposed to have minimal ACPUI support. So lets not bloat it unless there > is a specific requirement to support ERST on microvms as well. Would it be ok if I ifdef this on CONFIG_ERST also? > > >> index 196d318..662c8ad 100644 >> --- a/hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c >> +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c >> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ >> #include "hw/acpi/bios-linker-loader.h" >> #include "hw/acpi/generic_event_device.h" >> #include "hw/acpi/utils.h" >> +#include "hw/acpi/erst.h" >> #include "hw/i386/fw_cfg.h" >> #include "hw/i386/microvm.h" >> #include "hw/pci/pci.h" >> @@ -158,6 +159,7 @@ static void acpi_build_microvm(AcpiBuildTables *tables, >> X86MachineState *x86ms = X86_MACHINE(mms); >> GArray *table_offsets; >> GArray *tables_blob = tables->table_data; >> + Object *erst_dev; >> unsigned dsdt, xsdt; >> AcpiFadtData pmfadt = { >> /* ACPI 5.0: 4.1 Hardware-Reduced ACPI */ >> @@ -207,6 +209,13 @@ static void acpi_build_microvm(AcpiBuildTables *tables, >> ACPI_DEVICE_IF(x86ms->acpi_dev), x86ms->oem_id, >> x86ms->oem_table_id); >> >> + erst_dev = find_erst_dev(); >> + if (erst_dev) { >> + acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob); >> + build_erst(tables_blob, tables->linker, erst_dev, >> + x86ms->oem_id, x86ms->oem_table_id); >> + } >> + > > > >> xsdt = tables_blob->len; >> build_xsdt(tables_blob, tables->linker, table_offsets, x86ms->oem_id, >> x86ms->oem_table_id); >> diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/erst.h b/include/hw/acpi/erst.h >> index 9d63717..b747fe7 100644 >> --- a/include/hw/acpi/erst.h >> +++ b/include/hw/acpi/erst.h >> @@ -16,4 +16,9 @@ void build_erst(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, Object *erst_dev, >> >> #define TYPE_ACPI_ERST "acpi-erst" >> >> +/* returns NULL unless there is exactly one device */ >> +static inline Object *find_erst_dev(void) >> +{ >> + return object_resolve_path_type("", TYPE_ACPI_ERST, NULL); >> +} >> #endif >> -- >> 1.8.3.1 >> >>
On Fri, 22 Oct 2021, Eric DeVolder wrote: > Ani, inline below. > eric > > On 10/22/21 05:18, Ani Sinha wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 15 Oct 2021, Eric DeVolder wrote: > > > > > This change exposes ACPI ERST support for x86 guests. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Eric DeVolder <eric.devolder@oracle.com> > > > --- > > > hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 9 +++++++++ > > > hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c | 9 +++++++++ > > > include/hw/acpi/erst.h | 5 +++++ > > > 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c > > > index 81418b7..9c2f9d9 100644 > > > --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c > > > +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c > > > @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ > > > #include "sysemu/tpm.h" > > > #include "hw/acpi/tpm.h" > > > #include "hw/acpi/vmgenid.h" > > > +#include "hw/acpi/erst.h" > > > #include "sysemu/tpm_backend.h" > > > #include "hw/rtc/mc146818rtc_regs.h" > > > #include "migration/vmstate.h" > > > @@ -2499,6 +2500,7 @@ void acpi_build(AcpiBuildTables *tables, > > > MachineState *machine) > > > GArray *tables_blob = tables->table_data; > > > AcpiSlicOem slic_oem = { .id = NULL, .table_id = NULL }; > > > Object *vmgenid_dev; > > > + Object *erst_dev; > > > char *oem_id; > > > char *oem_table_id; > > > > > > @@ -2560,6 +2562,13 @@ void acpi_build(AcpiBuildTables *tables, > > > MachineState *machine) > > > ACPI_DEVICE_IF(x86ms->acpi_dev), x86ms->oem_id, > > > x86ms->oem_table_id); > > > > > > + erst_dev = find_erst_dev(); > > > + if (erst_dev) { > > > + acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob); > > > + build_erst(tables_blob, tables->linker, erst_dev, > > > + x86ms->oem_id, x86ms->oem_table_id); > > > + } > > > + > > > > This needs to be ifdef'd between CONFIG_ERST. > ok > > > > > > > > vmgenid_dev = find_vmgenid_dev(); > > > if (vmgenid_dev) { > > > acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob); > > > diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c b/hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c > > > > I do not think we need to include this for microvm machines. They are > > supposed to have minimal ACPUI support. So lets not bloat it unless there > > is a specific requirement to support ERST on microvms as well. > Would it be ok if I ifdef this on CONFIG_ERST also? I think we should not touch microvm machine unless you can justify why you need ERST support there. > > > > > > > > index 196d318..662c8ad 100644 > > > --- a/hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c > > > +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c > > > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ > > > #include "hw/acpi/bios-linker-loader.h" > > > #include "hw/acpi/generic_event_device.h" > > > #include "hw/acpi/utils.h" > > > +#include "hw/acpi/erst.h" > > > #include "hw/i386/fw_cfg.h" > > > #include "hw/i386/microvm.h" > > > #include "hw/pci/pci.h" > > > @@ -158,6 +159,7 @@ static void acpi_build_microvm(AcpiBuildTables > > > *tables, > > > X86MachineState *x86ms = X86_MACHINE(mms); > > > GArray *table_offsets; > > > GArray *tables_blob = tables->table_data; > > > + Object *erst_dev; > > > unsigned dsdt, xsdt; > > > AcpiFadtData pmfadt = { > > > /* ACPI 5.0: 4.1 Hardware-Reduced ACPI */ > > > @@ -207,6 +209,13 @@ static void acpi_build_microvm(AcpiBuildTables > > > *tables, > > > ACPI_DEVICE_IF(x86ms->acpi_dev), x86ms->oem_id, > > > x86ms->oem_table_id); > > > > > > + erst_dev = find_erst_dev(); > > > + if (erst_dev) { > > > + acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob); > > > + build_erst(tables_blob, tables->linker, erst_dev, > > > + x86ms->oem_id, x86ms->oem_table_id); > > > + } > > > + > > > > > > > > > xsdt = tables_blob->len; > > > build_xsdt(tables_blob, tables->linker, table_offsets, > > > x86ms->oem_id, > > > x86ms->oem_table_id); > > > diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/erst.h b/include/hw/acpi/erst.h > > > index 9d63717..b747fe7 100644 > > > --- a/include/hw/acpi/erst.h > > > +++ b/include/hw/acpi/erst.h > > > @@ -16,4 +16,9 @@ void build_erst(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, > > > Object *erst_dev, > > > > > > #define TYPE_ACPI_ERST "acpi-erst" > > > > > > +/* returns NULL unless there is exactly one device */ > > > +static inline Object *find_erst_dev(void) > > > +{ > > > + return object_resolve_path_type("", TYPE_ACPI_ERST, NULL); > > > +} > > > #endif > > > -- > > > 1.8.3.1 > > > > > > >
On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 07:52:21AM +0530, Ani Sinha wrote: > > > On Fri, 22 Oct 2021, Eric DeVolder wrote: > > > Ani, inline below. > > eric > > > > On 10/22/21 05:18, Ani Sinha wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 15 Oct 2021, Eric DeVolder wrote: > > > > > > > This change exposes ACPI ERST support for x86 guests. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Eric DeVolder <eric.devolder@oracle.com> > > > > --- > > > > hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 9 +++++++++ > > > > hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c | 9 +++++++++ > > > > include/hw/acpi/erst.h | 5 +++++ > > > > 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c > > > > index 81418b7..9c2f9d9 100644 > > > > --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c > > > > +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c > > > > @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ > > > > #include "sysemu/tpm.h" > > > > #include "hw/acpi/tpm.h" > > > > #include "hw/acpi/vmgenid.h" > > > > +#include "hw/acpi/erst.h" > > > > #include "sysemu/tpm_backend.h" > > > > #include "hw/rtc/mc146818rtc_regs.h" > > > > #include "migration/vmstate.h" > > > > @@ -2499,6 +2500,7 @@ void acpi_build(AcpiBuildTables *tables, > > > > MachineState *machine) > > > > GArray *tables_blob = tables->table_data; > > > > AcpiSlicOem slic_oem = { .id = NULL, .table_id = NULL }; > > > > Object *vmgenid_dev; > > > > + Object *erst_dev; > > > > char *oem_id; > > > > char *oem_table_id; > > > > > > > > @@ -2560,6 +2562,13 @@ void acpi_build(AcpiBuildTables *tables, > > > > MachineState *machine) > > > > ACPI_DEVICE_IF(x86ms->acpi_dev), x86ms->oem_id, > > > > x86ms->oem_table_id); > > > > > > > > + erst_dev = find_erst_dev(); > > > > + if (erst_dev) { > > > > + acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob); > > > > + build_erst(tables_blob, tables->linker, erst_dev, > > > > + x86ms->oem_id, x86ms->oem_table_id); > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > > > This needs to be ifdef'd between CONFIG_ERST. > > ok > > > > > > > > > > > > vmgenid_dev = find_vmgenid_dev(); > > > > if (vmgenid_dev) { > > > > acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob); > > > > diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c b/hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c > > > > > > I do not think we need to include this for microvm machines. They are > > > supposed to have minimal ACPUI support. So lets not bloat it unless there > > > is a specific requirement to support ERST on microvms as well. > > Would it be ok if I ifdef this on CONFIG_ERST also? > > I think we should not touch microvm machine unless you can justify why you > need ERST support there. OTOH why not? No idea... CC microvm maintainers and let them decide. > > > > > > > > > > > > index 196d318..662c8ad 100644 > > > > --- a/hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c > > > > +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c > > > > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ > > > > #include "hw/acpi/bios-linker-loader.h" > > > > #include "hw/acpi/generic_event_device.h" > > > > #include "hw/acpi/utils.h" > > > > +#include "hw/acpi/erst.h" > > > > #include "hw/i386/fw_cfg.h" > > > > #include "hw/i386/microvm.h" > > > > #include "hw/pci/pci.h" > > > > @@ -158,6 +159,7 @@ static void acpi_build_microvm(AcpiBuildTables > > > > *tables, > > > > X86MachineState *x86ms = X86_MACHINE(mms); > > > > GArray *table_offsets; > > > > GArray *tables_blob = tables->table_data; > > > > + Object *erst_dev; > > > > unsigned dsdt, xsdt; > > > > AcpiFadtData pmfadt = { > > > > /* ACPI 5.0: 4.1 Hardware-Reduced ACPI */ > > > > @@ -207,6 +209,13 @@ static void acpi_build_microvm(AcpiBuildTables > > > > *tables, > > > > ACPI_DEVICE_IF(x86ms->acpi_dev), x86ms->oem_id, > > > > x86ms->oem_table_id); > > > > > > > > + erst_dev = find_erst_dev(); > > > > + if (erst_dev) { > > > > + acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob); > > > > + build_erst(tables_blob, tables->linker, erst_dev, > > > > + x86ms->oem_id, x86ms->oem_table_id); > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > > > > > > > > > > xsdt = tables_blob->len; > > > > build_xsdt(tables_blob, tables->linker, table_offsets, > > > > x86ms->oem_id, > > > > x86ms->oem_table_id); > > > > diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/erst.h b/include/hw/acpi/erst.h > > > > index 9d63717..b747fe7 100644 > > > > --- a/include/hw/acpi/erst.h > > > > +++ b/include/hw/acpi/erst.h > > > > @@ -16,4 +16,9 @@ void build_erst(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, > > > > Object *erst_dev, > > > > > > > > #define TYPE_ACPI_ERST "acpi-erst" > > > > > > > > +/* returns NULL unless there is exactly one device */ > > > > +static inline Object *find_erst_dev(void) > > > > +{ > > > > + return object_resolve_path_type("", TYPE_ACPI_ERST, NULL); > > > > +} > > > > #endif > > > > -- > > > > 1.8.3.1 > > > > > > > > > >
On 10/23/21 4:14 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 07:52:21AM +0530, Ani Sinha wrote: >> >> On Fri, 22 Oct 2021, Eric DeVolder wrote: >> >>> Ani, inline below. >>> eric >>> >>> On 10/22/21 05:18, Ani Sinha wrote: >>>> >>>> On Fri, 15 Oct 2021, Eric DeVolder wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c b/hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c >>>> I do not think we need to include this for microvm machines. They are >>>> supposed to have minimal ACPUI support. So lets not bloat it unless there >>>> is a specific requirement to support ERST on microvms as well. >>> Would it be ok if I ifdef this on CONFIG_ERST also? >> I think we should not touch microvm machine unless you can justify why you >> need ERST support there. > OTOH why not? No idea... CC microvm maintainers and let them decide. I would argue that ERST support for microvm is in fact more useful than for "regular" VMs: those VMs can use EFI storage for pstore while microvms won't have that option. -boris
diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c index 81418b7..9c2f9d9 100644 --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ #include "sysemu/tpm.h" #include "hw/acpi/tpm.h" #include "hw/acpi/vmgenid.h" +#include "hw/acpi/erst.h" #include "sysemu/tpm_backend.h" #include "hw/rtc/mc146818rtc_regs.h" #include "migration/vmstate.h" @@ -2499,6 +2500,7 @@ void acpi_build(AcpiBuildTables *tables, MachineState *machine) GArray *tables_blob = tables->table_data; AcpiSlicOem slic_oem = { .id = NULL, .table_id = NULL }; Object *vmgenid_dev; + Object *erst_dev; char *oem_id; char *oem_table_id; @@ -2560,6 +2562,13 @@ void acpi_build(AcpiBuildTables *tables, MachineState *machine) ACPI_DEVICE_IF(x86ms->acpi_dev), x86ms->oem_id, x86ms->oem_table_id); + erst_dev = find_erst_dev(); + if (erst_dev) { + acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob); + build_erst(tables_blob, tables->linker, erst_dev, + x86ms->oem_id, x86ms->oem_table_id); + } + vmgenid_dev = find_vmgenid_dev(); if (vmgenid_dev) { acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob); diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c b/hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c index 196d318..662c8ad 100644 --- a/hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ #include "hw/acpi/bios-linker-loader.h" #include "hw/acpi/generic_event_device.h" #include "hw/acpi/utils.h" +#include "hw/acpi/erst.h" #include "hw/i386/fw_cfg.h" #include "hw/i386/microvm.h" #include "hw/pci/pci.h" @@ -158,6 +159,7 @@ static void acpi_build_microvm(AcpiBuildTables *tables, X86MachineState *x86ms = X86_MACHINE(mms); GArray *table_offsets; GArray *tables_blob = tables->table_data; + Object *erst_dev; unsigned dsdt, xsdt; AcpiFadtData pmfadt = { /* ACPI 5.0: 4.1 Hardware-Reduced ACPI */ @@ -207,6 +209,13 @@ static void acpi_build_microvm(AcpiBuildTables *tables, ACPI_DEVICE_IF(x86ms->acpi_dev), x86ms->oem_id, x86ms->oem_table_id); + erst_dev = find_erst_dev(); + if (erst_dev) { + acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob); + build_erst(tables_blob, tables->linker, erst_dev, + x86ms->oem_id, x86ms->oem_table_id); + } + xsdt = tables_blob->len; build_xsdt(tables_blob, tables->linker, table_offsets, x86ms->oem_id, x86ms->oem_table_id); diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/erst.h b/include/hw/acpi/erst.h index 9d63717..b747fe7 100644 --- a/include/hw/acpi/erst.h +++ b/include/hw/acpi/erst.h @@ -16,4 +16,9 @@ void build_erst(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, Object *erst_dev, #define TYPE_ACPI_ERST "acpi-erst" +/* returns NULL unless there is exactly one device */ +static inline Object *find_erst_dev(void) +{ + return object_resolve_path_type("", TYPE_ACPI_ERST, NULL); +} #endif
This change exposes ACPI ERST support for x86 guests. Signed-off-by: Eric DeVolder <eric.devolder@oracle.com> --- hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 9 +++++++++ hw/i386/acpi-microvm.c | 9 +++++++++ include/hw/acpi/erst.h | 5 +++++ 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+)