diff mbox series

[v4,13/28] riscv: hart: Add a "hartid-base" property to RISC-V hart array

Message ID 1566191521-7820-14-git-send-email-bmeng.cn@gmail.com
State Superseded
Headers show
Series riscv: sifive_u: Improve the emulation fidelity of sifive_u machine | expand

Commit Message

Bin Meng Aug. 19, 2019, 5:11 a.m. UTC
At present each hart's hartid in a RISC-V hart array is assigned
the same value of its index in the hart array. But for a system
that has multiple hart arrays, this is not the case any more.

Add a new "hartid-base" property so that hartid number can be
assigned based on the property value.

Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>

---

Changes in v4:
- new patch to add a "hartid-base" property to RISC-V hart array

Changes in v3: None
Changes in v2: None

 hw/riscv/riscv_hart.c         | 8 +++++---
 include/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.h | 1 +
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Alistair Francis Aug. 22, 2019, 10:40 p.m. UTC | #1
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 10:27 PM Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> At present each hart's hartid in a RISC-V hart array is assigned
> the same value of its index in the hart array. But for a system
> that has multiple hart arrays, this is not the case any more.
>
> Add a new "hartid-base" property so that hartid number can be
> assigned based on the property value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>

Why do we need this patch?

Alistair

>
> ---
>
> Changes in v4:
> - new patch to add a "hartid-base" property to RISC-V hart array
>
> Changes in v3: None
> Changes in v2: None
>
>  hw/riscv/riscv_hart.c         | 8 +++++---
>  include/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.h | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.c b/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.c
> index 9deef869..52ab86a 100644
> --- a/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.c
> +++ b/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>
>  static Property riscv_harts_props[] = {
>      DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("num-harts", RISCVHartArrayState, num_harts, 1),
> +    DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("hartid-base", RISCVHartArrayState, hartid_base, 0),
>      DEFINE_PROP_STRING("cpu-type", RISCVHartArrayState, cpu_type),
>      DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
>  };
> @@ -37,7 +38,7 @@ static void riscv_harts_cpu_reset(void *opaque)
>      cpu_reset(CPU(cpu));
>  }
>
> -static void riscv_hart_realize(RISCVHartArrayState *s, int idx,
> +static void riscv_hart_realize(RISCVHartArrayState *s, int idx, uint32_t hartid,
>                                 char *cpu_type, Error **errp)
>  {
>      Error *err = NULL;
> @@ -45,7 +46,7 @@ static void riscv_hart_realize(RISCVHartArrayState *s, int idx,
>      object_initialize_child(OBJECT(s), "harts[*]", &s->harts[idx],
>                              sizeof(RISCVCPU), cpu_type,
>                              &error_abort, NULL);
> -    s->harts[idx].env.mhartid = idx;
> +    s->harts[idx].env.mhartid = hartid;
>      qemu_register_reset(riscv_harts_cpu_reset, &s->harts[idx]);
>      object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(&s->harts[idx]), true,
>                               "realized", &err);
> @@ -58,12 +59,13 @@ static void riscv_hart_realize(RISCVHartArrayState *s, int idx,
>  static void riscv_harts_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>  {
>      RISCVHartArrayState *s = RISCV_HART_ARRAY(dev);
> +    uint32_t hartid = s->hartid_base;
>      int n;
>
>      s->harts = g_new0(RISCVCPU, s->num_harts);
>
>      for (n = 0; n < s->num_harts; n++) {
> -        riscv_hart_realize(s, n, s->cpu_type, errp);
> +        riscv_hart_realize(s, n, hartid + n, s->cpu_type, errp);
>      }
>  }
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.h b/include/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.h
> index 0671d88..1984e30 100644
> --- a/include/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.h
> +++ b/include/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.h
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ typedef struct RISCVHartArrayState {
>
>      /*< public >*/
>      uint32_t num_harts;
> +    uint32_t hartid_base;
>      char *cpu_type;
>      RISCVCPU *harts;
>  } RISCVHartArrayState;
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>
Bin Meng Aug. 23, 2019, 1:57 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Alistair,

On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 6:44 AM Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 10:27 PM Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > At present each hart's hartid in a RISC-V hart array is assigned
> > the same value of its index in the hart array. But for a system
> > that has multiple hart arrays, this is not the case any more.
> >
> > Add a new "hartid-base" property so that hartid number can be
> > assigned based on the property value.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
>
> Why do we need this patch?
>

Without this patch, we cannot create two clusters that represent 1 E51
(hartid 0) and 4 U54 (hart id 1-4). Current codes will create 1 E51
(hartid 0) and 4 U54 (hartid 0-3)

Regards,
Bin
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.c b/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.c
index 9deef869..52ab86a 100644
--- a/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.c
+++ b/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ 
 
 static Property riscv_harts_props[] = {
     DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("num-harts", RISCVHartArrayState, num_harts, 1),
+    DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("hartid-base", RISCVHartArrayState, hartid_base, 0),
     DEFINE_PROP_STRING("cpu-type", RISCVHartArrayState, cpu_type),
     DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
 };
@@ -37,7 +38,7 @@  static void riscv_harts_cpu_reset(void *opaque)
     cpu_reset(CPU(cpu));
 }
 
-static void riscv_hart_realize(RISCVHartArrayState *s, int idx,
+static void riscv_hart_realize(RISCVHartArrayState *s, int idx, uint32_t hartid,
                                char *cpu_type, Error **errp)
 {
     Error *err = NULL;
@@ -45,7 +46,7 @@  static void riscv_hart_realize(RISCVHartArrayState *s, int idx,
     object_initialize_child(OBJECT(s), "harts[*]", &s->harts[idx],
                             sizeof(RISCVCPU), cpu_type,
                             &error_abort, NULL);
-    s->harts[idx].env.mhartid = idx;
+    s->harts[idx].env.mhartid = hartid;
     qemu_register_reset(riscv_harts_cpu_reset, &s->harts[idx]);
     object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(&s->harts[idx]), true,
                              "realized", &err);
@@ -58,12 +59,13 @@  static void riscv_hart_realize(RISCVHartArrayState *s, int idx,
 static void riscv_harts_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
 {
     RISCVHartArrayState *s = RISCV_HART_ARRAY(dev);
+    uint32_t hartid = s->hartid_base;
     int n;
 
     s->harts = g_new0(RISCVCPU, s->num_harts);
 
     for (n = 0; n < s->num_harts; n++) {
-        riscv_hart_realize(s, n, s->cpu_type, errp);
+        riscv_hart_realize(s, n, hartid + n, s->cpu_type, errp);
     }
 }
 
diff --git a/include/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.h b/include/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.h
index 0671d88..1984e30 100644
--- a/include/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.h
+++ b/include/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.h
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@  typedef struct RISCVHartArrayState {
 
     /*< public >*/
     uint32_t num_harts;
+    uint32_t hartid_base;
     char *cpu_type;
     RISCVCPU *harts;
 } RISCVHartArrayState;