Message ID | 1547566866-129386-6-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | tests: acpi: add UEFI (ARM) testing support | expand |
On 1/15/19 4:40 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote: > that way it would be possible to test a DSDT pointed by > 64bit X_DSDT field in FADT. > > PS: > it will allow to enable testing arm/virt board, which sets > only newer X_DSDT field. > > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> > --- > tests/bios-tables-test.c | 8 +++++++- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tests/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/bios-tables-test.c > index c28c5c7..0f04a0a 100644 > --- a/tests/bios-tables-test.c > +++ b/tests/bios-tables-test.c > @@ -140,6 +140,8 @@ static void test_acpi_fadt_table(test_data *data) > AcpiSdtTable table = g_array_index(data->tables, typeof(table), 0); > uint8_t *fadt_aml = table.aml; > uint32_t fadt_len = table.aml_len; > + uint32_t val; > + int dsdt_offset = 40 /* DSDT */; > > g_assert(compare_signature(&table, "FACP")); > > @@ -148,8 +150,12 @@ static void test_acpi_fadt_table(test_data *data) > fadt_aml + 36 /* FIRMWARE_CTRL */, "FACS", false); > g_array_append_val(data->tables, table); > > + memcpy(&val, fadt_aml + dsdt_offset, 4); Maybe in case someone extend this test, add: val = le32_to_cpu(val); Regardless: Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> > + if (!val) { > + dsdt_offset = 140 /* X_DSDT */; > + } > acpi_fetch_table(data->qts, &table.aml, &table.aml_len, > - fadt_aml + 40 /* DSDT */, "DSDT", true); > + fadt_aml + dsdt_offset, "DSDT", true); > g_array_append_val(data->tables, table); > > memset(fadt_aml + 36, 0, 4); /* sanitize FIRMWARE_CTRL ptr */ >
On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:02:57 +0100 Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> wrote: > On 1/15/19 4:40 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > that way it would be possible to test a DSDT pointed by > > 64bit X_DSDT field in FADT. > > > > PS: > > it will allow to enable testing arm/virt board, which sets > > only newer X_DSDT field. > > > > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> > > --- > > tests/bios-tables-test.c | 8 +++++++- > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/tests/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/bios-tables-test.c > > index c28c5c7..0f04a0a 100644 > > --- a/tests/bios-tables-test.c > > +++ b/tests/bios-tables-test.c > > @@ -140,6 +140,8 @@ static void test_acpi_fadt_table(test_data *data) > > AcpiSdtTable table = g_array_index(data->tables, typeof(table), 0); > > uint8_t *fadt_aml = table.aml; > > uint32_t fadt_len = table.aml_len; > > + uint32_t val; > > + int dsdt_offset = 40 /* DSDT */; > > > > g_assert(compare_signature(&table, "FACP")); > > > > @@ -148,8 +150,12 @@ static void test_acpi_fadt_table(test_data *data) > > fadt_aml + 36 /* FIRMWARE_CTRL */, "FACS", false); > > g_array_append_val(data->tables, table); > > > > + memcpy(&val, fadt_aml + dsdt_offset, 4); > > Maybe in case someone extend this test, add: > > val = le32_to_cpu(val); I've skipped this conversion intentionally as we only care about 0 vs non 0. If we would care about concrete value then le32_to_cpu() would be must have. I can put le32_to_cpu() there if you prefer as it doesn't hurt and documents that value is in LE. > Regardless: > Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> > > > + if (!val) { > > + dsdt_offset = 140 /* X_DSDT */; > > + } > > acpi_fetch_table(data->qts, &table.aml, &table.aml_len, > > - fadt_aml + 40 /* DSDT */, "DSDT", true); > > + fadt_aml + dsdt_offset, "DSDT", true); > > g_array_append_val(data->tables, table); > > > > memset(fadt_aml + 36, 0, 4); /* sanitize FIRMWARE_CTRL ptr */ > > >
diff --git a/tests/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/bios-tables-test.c index c28c5c7..0f04a0a 100644 --- a/tests/bios-tables-test.c +++ b/tests/bios-tables-test.c @@ -140,6 +140,8 @@ static void test_acpi_fadt_table(test_data *data) AcpiSdtTable table = g_array_index(data->tables, typeof(table), 0); uint8_t *fadt_aml = table.aml; uint32_t fadt_len = table.aml_len; + uint32_t val; + int dsdt_offset = 40 /* DSDT */; g_assert(compare_signature(&table, "FACP")); @@ -148,8 +150,12 @@ static void test_acpi_fadt_table(test_data *data) fadt_aml + 36 /* FIRMWARE_CTRL */, "FACS", false); g_array_append_val(data->tables, table); + memcpy(&val, fadt_aml + dsdt_offset, 4); + if (!val) { + dsdt_offset = 140 /* X_DSDT */; + } acpi_fetch_table(data->qts, &table.aml, &table.aml_len, - fadt_aml + 40 /* DSDT */, "DSDT", true); + fadt_aml + dsdt_offset, "DSDT", true); g_array_append_val(data->tables, table); memset(fadt_aml + 36, 0, 4); /* sanitize FIRMWARE_CTRL ptr */
that way it would be possible to test a DSDT pointed by 64bit X_DSDT field in FADT. PS: it will allow to enable testing arm/virt board, which sets only newer X_DSDT field. Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> --- tests/bios-tables-test.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)